1,762
Views
25
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Facets of Website Content

&

REFERENCES

  • Abdinnour-Helm, S. F., Chaparro, B. S., & Farmer, S. M. (2005). Using the End-User Computing satisfaction (EUCS) instrument to measure satisfaction with a Web Site. Decision Sciences, 36(2), 341–364.
  • Agarwal, R., & Venkatesh, V. (2002). Assessing a firm’s web presence: A heuristic evaluation procedure for the measurement of usability. Information Systems Research, 13(2), 168–186.
  • Ahn, T., Ryu, S., & Han, I. (2007). The impact of Web quality and playfulness on user acceptance of online retailing. Information and Management, 44(3), 263–275.
  • Aladwani, A. M. (2002). The development of two tools for measuring the easiness and usefulness of transactional Web sites. European Journal of Information Systems, 11(3), 223–234.
  • Aladwani, A. M., & Palvia, P. C. (2002). Developing and validating an instrument for measuring user-perceived web quality. Information and Management, 39(6), 467–476.
  • Appelman, A., & Sundar, S. S. (2016). Measuring message credibility: Construction and validation of an exclusive scale. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 93(1), 59–79.
  • Aranyi, G., & van Schaik, P. (2016). Testing a model of user-experience with news websites. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(7), 1555–1575.
  • Bao, S., Xue, G., Wu, X., Yu, Y., Fei, B., & Su, Z. (2007). Optimizing web search using social annotations. Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on World Wide Web - WWW ’07, 501–510.
  • Baumgartner, H., & Homburg, C. (1996). Applications of structural equation modeling in marketing and consumer research: A review. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 13(2), 139–161.
  • Bölte, J., Hösker, T., Hirschfeld, G., & Thielsch, M. T. (2017). Electrophysiological correlates of aesthetic processing of webpages: A comparison of experts and laypersons. PeerJ, 5, e3440.
  • Braddy, P. W., Meade, A. W., Michael, J. J., & Fleenor, J. W. (2009). Internet recruiting: Effects of website content features on viewers’ perceptions of organizational culture. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 17(1), 19–34.
  • Brin, S., Motwani, R., Page, L., & Winograd, T. (1998). What can you do with a web in your pocket? IEEE Data Engineering Bulletin, 21(2), 37–47.
  • Burges, C., Shaked, T., Renshaw, E., Lazier, A., Deeds, M., Hamilton, N., & Hullender, G. (2005, August). Learning to rank using gradient descent. Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on Machine learning, (pp. 89–96). ACM.
  • Cai, D., Yu, S., Wen, J.-R., & Ma, W.-Y. (2003). Extracting content structure for web pages based on visual representation. Proceedings of the 5th Asia-Pacific Web Conference on Web Technologies and Applications, 406–417.
  • Cao, M., Zhang, Q., & Seydel, J. (2005). B2C e-commerce web site quality: An empirical examination. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 105(5), 645–661.
  • Caro, A., Calero, C., Caballero, I., & Piattini, M. (2008). A proposal for a set of attributes relevant for Web portal data quality. Software Quality Journal, 16(4), 513–542.
  • Casaló, L. V., Flavián, C., & Guinalíu, M. (2007). The role of security, privacy, usability and reputation in the development of online banking. Online Information Review, 31(5), 583–603.
  • Chakraborty, G., Srivastava, P., & Warren, D. L. (2005). Understanding corporate B2B web sites’ effectiveness from North American and European perspective. Industrial Marketing Management, 34(5), 420–429.
  • Choi, S. M., & Rifon, N. J. (2002). Antecedents and consequences of Web advertising credibility: A study of consumer response to banner ads. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 3(1), 12–24.
  • Chung, C. J., Nam, Y., & Stefanone, M. A. (2012). Exploring online news credibility: The relative influence of traditional and technological factors. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17(2), 171–186.
  • Clarke, C. L. A., Kolla, M., Cormack, G. V., Vechtomova, O., Ashkan, A., Büttcher, S., & MacKinnon, I. (2008). Novelty and diversity in information retrieval evaluation. Proceedings of the 31st Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, 659–666.
  • Cober, R. T., Brown, D. A., Levy, P. E., Cober, A. B., & Keeping, L. M. (2003). Organizational web sites: Web site content and style as determinants of organizational attraction. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 11(2/3), 158–169.
  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. Hillsdale, USA: Erlbaum.
  • Coiro, J. (2011). Predicting reading comprehension on the internet. Journal of Literacy Research, 43(4), 352–392.
  • Coleman, E. B. (1962). Improving comprehensibility by shortening sentences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 46(2), 131.
  • Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. W. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Education, 10(7), 1–9.
  • Dames, H., Hirschfeld, G., Sackmann, T., & Thielsch, M. T. (under review). Browsing vs. Searching - Exploring the influence of consumers’ goal directedness on website evaluation.
  • De Marsico, M., & Levialdi, S. (2004). Evaluating web sites: Exploiting user’s expectations. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 60(3), 381–416.
  • De Wulf, K., Schillewaert, N., Muylle, S., & Rangarajan, D. (2006). The role of pleasure in web site success. Information & Management, 43(4), 434–446.
  • DeLone, W. H., & McLean., E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9–30.
  • Dinet, J., Chevalier, A., & Tricot, A. (2012). Information search activity: An overview. Revue Europeene De Psychologie Appliquee, 62(2), 49–62.
  • Douneva, M., Jaron, R., & Thielsch, M. T. (2016). Effects of different website designs on first impressions, aesthetic judgments, and memory performance after short presentation. Interacting with Computers, 28(4), 552–567.
  • Dumais, S., & Chen, H. (2000). Hierarchical classification of Web content. Proceedings of the 23rd Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval - SIGIR ’00, 256–263.
  • Elling, S., Lentz, L., & de Jong, M. (2007). Website evaluation questionnaire: Development of a research-based tool for evaluating informational websites. Electronic Government: 6th International Conference, (EGOV 2007), 4656/2007, 293–304.
  • Eysenbach, G., & Köhler, C. (2002). How do consumers search for and appraise health information on the World Wide Web? Qualitative study using focus groups, usability tests, and in-depth interviews. British Medical Journal, 324(7337), 573–577.
  • Fillmore, L. (1995). Internet publishing: How we must think. Journal of Electronic Publishing, 1(1&2).
  • Flanagin, A. J., & Metzger, M. J. (2000). Perceptions of Internet information credibility. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 77(3), 515–540.
  • Flavián, C., Guinalíu, M., & Gurrea, R. (2006). The role played by perceived usability, satisfaction and consumer trust on website loyalty. Information & Management, 43(1), 1–14.
  • Fletcher, R. (2006). The impact of culture on web site content, design, and structure: An international and a multicultural perspective. Journal of Communication Management, 10(3), 259–273.
  • Fogg, B. J., Kameda, T., Boyd, J., Marshall, J., Sethi, R., Sockol, M., & Trowbridge, T. (2002). Stanford-makovsky web credibility study 2002: Investigating what makes web sites credible today (Tech. Rep.). Stanford University, USA: Stanford Persuasive Technology Lab and Makovsky & Company.
  • Fogg, B. J., Marshall, J., Laraki, O., Osipovich, A., Varma, C., Fang, N., … Treinen, M. (2001). What makes Web sites credible? A report on a large quantitative study. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, (pp. 61–68). ACM.
  • Fogg, B. J., & Tseng, H. (1999). The elements of computer credibility. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (pp. 80–87). ACM.
  • Geißler, H., Donath, T., & Jaron, R. (2003). Von der Schwierigkeit Websites benutzerfreundlich zu gestalten. [The difficulty to design usable websites]. Planung & Analyse, 30(2), 42–49.
  • Hasan, L., & Abuelrub, E. (2011). Assessing the quality of web sites. Applied Computing and Informatics, 9(1), 11–29.
  • Hausman, A. V., & Siekpe, J. S. (2009). The effect of web interface features on consumer online purchase intentions. Journal of Business Research, 62(1), 5–13.
  • Hayes, A. F. (2005, November). A computational tool for survey shortening applicable to composite attitude, opinion, and personality measurement scales. Paper presented at the meeting of the Midwestern Association for Public Opinion Research. Chicago, IL.
  • Hirschfeld, G., & Thielsch, M. T. (2015). Establishing meaningful cut points for online user ratings. Ergonomics, 58(2), 310–320.
  • Hirschfeld, G., von Brachel, R., & Thielsch, M. T. (2014). Selecting items for Big Five questionnaires: At what sample size do factor loadings stabilize? Journal of Research in Personality, 53, 54–63.
  • Hong, S. Y., & Kim, J. (2004). Architectural criteria for website evaluation - conceptual framework and empirical validation. Behaviour & Information Technology, 23(5), 337–357.
  • Hong, T. (2006). Contributing factors to the use of health-related websites. Journal of Health Communication, 11(2), 149–165.
  • Hsieh, T. L., Lo, H. H., Hu, H. H., & Chang, C. C. (2015). The effect of information design on cognitive processing of website navigation. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 25(5), 548–558.
  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55.
  • Huizingh, E. (2000). The content and design of web sites: An empirical study. Information & Management, 37, 123–134.
  • ISO. (1998). ISO 9241: Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals, VDTS—Part 11: Guidance on usability. Geneva, Swiss Confederation: International Organization for Standardisation.
  • ISO. (2006). ISO 9241: Ergonomics of human-system interaction – part 151: Guidance on World Wide Web interfaces. Geneva, Swiss Confederation: International Organization for Standardisation.
  • Johnson, T. J., & Kaye, B. K. (2002). Webelievability: A path model examining how convenience and reliance predict online credibility. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 79(3), 619–642.
  • Kalyanaraman, S., & Sundar, S. (2006). The psychological appeal of personalized content in web portals: Does customization affect attitudes and behavior? Journal of Communication, 56(1), 110–132.
  • Kang, Y., & Kim, Y. (2006). Do visitors’ interest level and perceived quantity of web page content matter in shaping the attitude toward a web site? Decision Support Systems, 42(2), 1187–1202.
  • Karreman, J., van der Geest, T., & Buursink, E. (2007). Accessible website content guidelines for users with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 20, 510–518.
  • Kim, H., & Niehm, L. S. (2009). The impact of website quality on information quality, value, and loyalty intentions in apparel retailing. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 23(3), 221–233.
  • Kim, S. Y., & Lim, Y. J. (2001). Consumers ’ perceived importance of and satisfaction with internet shopping. Electronic Markets, 11(3), 148–154.
  • Kincl, T., & Štrach, P. (2012). Measuring website quality: Asymmetric effect of user satisfaction. Behaviour & Information Technology, 31(7), 647–657.
  • Kleinberg, J. M. (1999). Authoritative sources in a hyperlinked environment. Journal of the ACM (JACM), 46(5), 604–632.
  • Koch, W., & Frees, B. (2016). Dynamische Entwicklung bei mobiler Internetnutzung sowie Audios und Videos [Dynamic development of mobile Internet use plus audio and video]. Media Perspektiven, 9/2016, 418–437.
  • Kohli, S., Kaur, S., & Singh, G. (2012). A website content analysis approach based on keyword similarity analysis. Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology (WI-IAT), 2012 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conferences On, 1, 254–257.
  • Krauss, K. (2003, January). Testing an e-government website quality questionnaire: A pilot study. Paper presented at the 5th Annual Conference on World Wide Web Applications (WWW2003). Durban, South Africa.
  • Kreiner, D. S., Schnakenberg, S. D., Green, A. G., Costello, M. J., & McClin, A. F. (2002). Effects of spelling errors on the perception of writers. The Journal of General Psychology, 129(1), 5–17.
  • Lavie, T., & Tractinsky, N. (2004). Assessing dimensions of perceived visual aesthetics of web sites. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 60(3), 269–298.
  • Lee, Y. W., Strong, D. M., Kahn, B. K., & Wang, R. Y. (2002). AIMQ: A methodology for information quality assessment. Information and Management, 40(2), 133–146.
  • Lehto, T., & Oinas-Kukkonen, H. (2011). Persuasive features in web-based alcohol and smoking interventions: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 13(3).
  • Lin, H.-F. (2007). The impact of website quality dimensions on customer satisfaction in the B2C E-commerce context. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 18(4), 363–378.
  • Liu, C., & Arnett, K. P. (2000). Exploring the factors associated with Web site success in the context of electronic commerce. Information & Management, 38(1), 23–33.
  • Liu, C., White, R. W., & Dumais, S. (2010). Understanding web browsing behaviors through Weibull analysis of dwell time. Proceeding of the 33rd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval - SIGIR ’10, 379–386.
  • Loiacono, E., Watson, R., & Goodhue, D. (2007). WebQual: An instrument for consumer evaluation of web sites. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 11(3), 51–87.
  • Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Journal, 20(3), 709–734.
  • McKinney, V., Yoon, K., & Zahedi, F. (2002). The measurement of Web-customer satisfaction: An expectation and disconfirmation approach. Information Systems Research, 13(3), 296–315.
  • Metzger, M. (2007). Making sense of credibility on the Web: Models for evaluating online information and recommendations for future research. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(13), 2078–2091.
  • Metzger, M. J., & Flanagin, A. J. (2013). Credibility and trust of information in online environments: The use of cognitive heuristics. Journal of Pragmatics, 59, 210–220.
  • Moshagen, M., & Thielsch, M. T. (2010). Facets of visual aesthetics. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 68(10), 689–709.
  • Moshagen, M., & Thielsch, M. T. (2013). A short version of the visual aesthetics of websites inventory. Behaviour & Information Technology, 32(12), 1305–1311.
  • Moustakis, V., Tsironis, L., & Litos, C. (2006). A model of web site quality assessment. The Quality Management Journal, 13(2), 22–37.
  • Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York, USA: McGraw-Hill.
  • Ozok, A. A., & Salvendy, G. (2001). How consistent is your web design? Behaviour & Information Technology, 20(6), 433–447.
  • Palmer, J. W. (2002). Web site usability, design, and performance metrics. Information Systems Research, 13(2), 151–167.
  • Park, Y. A., & Gretzel, U. (2007). Success factors for destination marketing web sites: A qualitative meta-analysis. Journal of Travel Research, 46(1), 46–63.
  • Parker, M., Moleshe, V., De La Harpe, R., & Wills, G. (2006). An evaluation of Information quality frameworks for the World Wide Web. In Proceedings of the 8th Annual Conference on WWW Applications. Bloemfontein, Free State Province, South Africa. Retrieved from http://eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/12908/
  • Rahimnia, F., & Hassanzadeh, J. F. (2013). The impact of website content dimension and e-trust on e-marketing effectiveness: The case of Iranian commercial saffron corporations. Information and Management, 50(5), 240–247.
  • Rains, S. A., & Karmikel, C. D. (2009). Health information-seeking and perceptions of website credibility: Examining Web-use orientation, message characteristics, and structural features of websites. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(2), 544–553.
  • Ranganathan, C., & Ganapathy, S. (2002). Key dimensions of business-to-consumer web sites. Information & Management, 39(6), 457–465.
  • Robbins, S. S., & Stylianou, A. C. (2003). Global corporate web sites: An empirical investigation of content and design. Information & Management, 40(3), 205–212.
  • Robertson, S., & Zaragoza, H. (2009). The probabilistic relevance framework: BM25 and beyond. Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval, 3(4), 333–389.
  • Robins, D., & Holmes, J. (2008). Aesthetics and credibility in web site design. Information Processing & Management, 44(1), 386–399.
  • Rosen, D. E., & Purinton, E. (2004). Website design: Viewing the web as a cognitive landscape. Journal of Business Research, 57(7), 787–794.
  • Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1996). Measurement error in psychological research: Lessons from 26 research scenarios. Psychological Methods, 1(2), 199.
  • Seckler, M., Heinz, S., Forde, S., Tuch, A. N., & Opwis, K. (2015). Trust and distrust on the web: User experiences and website characteristics. Computers in Human Behavior, 45, 39–50.
  • Selden, S., & Orenstein, J. (2011). Government E-Recruiting Web Sites: The influence of e-recruitment content and usability on recruiting and hiring outcomes in US state governments. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 19(1), 31–40.
  • Serrano-Guerrero, J., Olivas, J. A., Romero, F. P., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2015). Sentiment analysis: A review and comparative analysis of web services. Information Sciences, 311, 18–38.
  • Shukla, A., Sharma, N. K., & Swami, S. (2010). Website characteristics, user characteristics and purchase intention: Mediating role of website satisfaction. International Journal of Internet Marketing and Advertising, 6(2), 142.
  • Sillence, E., Briggs, P., Harris, P. R., & Fishwick, L. (2007). How do patients evaluate and make use of online health information? Social Science & Medicine, 64(9), 1853–1862.
  • Smith, A. G. (1997). Testing the surf: Criteria for evaluating Internet information resources. Public Access-Computer Systems Review, 8(3), 5–23.
  • Smith, A. G. (2001). Applying evaluation criteria to New Zealand government websites. International Journal of Information Management, 21(2), 137–149.
  • Spector, P. E. (1992). Summated rating scale construction: An introduction (No. 82). Newbury Park, CA, USA: Sage.
  • Spyridakis, J. H. (2000). Guidelines for authoring comprehensible Web pages and evaluating their success. Technical Communication, 47(3), 359–382.
  • Sundar, S. S. (2008). The MAIN model: A heuristic approach to understanding technology effects on credibility. Digital Media, Youth, and Credibility, 73–100.
  • Sutherland, L. A., Wildemuth, B., Campbell, M. K., & Haines, P. S. (2005). Unraveling the web: An evaluation of the content quality, usability, and readability of nutrition web sites. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 37(6), 300–305.
  • Thielsch, M. T. (2008). Ästhetik von Websites [Aesthetics of websites]. Münster, Germany: MV Wissenschaft.
  • Thielsch, M. T., Blotenberg, I., & Jaron, R. (2014). User evaluation of websites: From first impression to recommendation. Interacting with Computers, 26(1), 89–102.
  • Thielsch, M. T., Engel, R., & Hirschfeld, G. (2015). Expected usability is not a valid indicator of experienced usability. PeerJ Computer Science, 1, e19.
  • Thielsch, M. T., & Hirschfeld, G. (2012). Spatial frequencies in aesthetic website evaluations–Explaining how ultra-rapid evaluations are formed. Ergonomics, 55(7), 731–742.
  • Thielsch, M. T., & Thielsch, C. (2018). Depressive symptoms and web user experience. PeerJ. 6:e4439. doi:10.7717/peerj.4439
  • Thielsch, M. T., Träumer, L., & Pytlik, L. (2012). E-Recruiting and fairness – The applicant’s point of view. Information Technology and Management, 13(2), 59–67.
  • Thielsch, M. T., & Wirth, M. (2017). Web-based annual reports at first contact: Corporate image and aesthetics. Technical Communication, 64(4), 282–296.
  • Thongpapanl, N., & Ashraf, A. R. (2011). Enhance online performance through website content and personalization. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 52(1), 3–13.
  • Tjur, T. (2009). Coefficients of determination in logistic regression models—a new proposal: The coefficient of discrimination. American Statistician, 63(4), 366–372.
  • Tsakonas, G., & Papatheodorou, C. (2006). Analysing and evaluating usefulness and usability in electronic information services. Journal of Information Science, 32(5), 400–419.
  • Tuch, A. N., Presslaber, E. E., Stöcklin, M., Opwis, K., & Bargas-Avila, J. A. (2012). The role of visual complexity and prototypicality regarding first impression of websites: Working towards understanding aesthetic judgments. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 70(11), 794–811.
  • Verhagen, T., Boter, J., & Adelaar, T. (2010). The effect of product type on consumer preferences for website content elements: An empirical study. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 16(1), 139–170.
  • von Brachel, R., Hötzel, K., Hirschfeld, G., Rieger, E., Schmidt, U., Kosfelder, J., … Vocks, S. (2014). Internet-based motivation program for women with eating disorders: Eating disorder pathology and depressive mood predict dropout. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 16(3), e92.
  • Wang, R. Y., Lee, Y., Pipino, L., & Strong, D. (1998). Managing your information as a product. Sloan Management Review, 39(4), 95–106.
  • Wang, R. Y., & Strong, D. M. (1996). Beyond accuracy: What data quality means to data consumers. Source Journal of Management Information Systems, 12(4), 5–33.
  • Warnick, B. (2004). Online ethos: Source credibility in an “authorless” environment. American Behavioral Scientist, 48(2), 256–265.
  • Wathen, C. N., & Burkell, J. (2002). Believe it or not: Factors influencing credibility on the Web. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(2), 134–144.
  • West, S. G., Finch, J. F., & Curran, P. J. (1995). Structural equation models with nonnormal variables: Problems and remedies. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 56–75). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Winter, S., & Krämer, N. C. (2012). Selecting science information in web 2.0: how source cues, message sidedness, and need for cognition influence users’ exposure to blog posts. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 18(1), 80–96.
  • Yang, Z. L., Cai, S. H., Zhou, Z., & Zhou, N. (2005). Development and validation of an instrument to measure user perceived service quality of information presenting Web portals. Information & Management, 42(4), 575–589.
  • Zhang, X., Keeling, K. B., & Pavur, R. J. (2000). Information quality of commercial web site home pages: An explorative analysis. In Proceedings of the 21st anniversary international conference on information systems (pp. 164–175). Atlanta: Association for Information Systems.
  • Zhao, W., Massey, B., Murphy, J., & Fang, L. (2003). Cultural dimensions of website design and content. Prometheus, 21(1), 74–84.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.