Loss Aversion and Preferences in Interaction

References

• Abeler, J., Falk, A., Goette, L., & Huffman, D. (2011). Reference points and effort provision. The American Economic Review, 101(2), 470–492. doi:10.1257/aer.101.2.470
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arrow, K. J. (1958). Utilities, attitudes, choices: A review note. Econometrica, 26(1), 1–23. doi:10.2307/1907381
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banovic, N., Grossman, T., & Fitzmaurice, G. (2013). The effect of time-based cost of error in target-directed pointing tasks. Proceedings of the CHI 2013 Conference on Human Factors in Computer Systems (pp. 1373–1382), New York, NY: ACM. doi: 10.1145/2466110.2466181
   Google Scholar
• Barberis, N. C. (2013). Thirty years of prospect theory in economics: A review and assessment. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 27(1), 173–195. doi:10.1257/jep.27.1.173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., & Vohs, K. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5(4), 323–370. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.5.4.323
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Bassat, T., Meyer, J., & Tractinsky, N. (2006). Economic and subjective measures of the perceived value of aesthetics and usability. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 13(2), 210–234. doi:10/c767md
   Google Scholar
• Bergman, O., Tucker, S., Beyth-Marom, R., Cutrell, E., & Whittaker, S. (2009). It’s not that important: Demoting personal information of low subjective importance using grayarea. Proceedings of the CHI 2009 Conference on Human Factors in Computer Systems (pp. 269–278), New York, NY: ACM. doi: 10.1145/1518701.1518745
   Google Scholar
• Bernoulli, D. (1954). Exposition of a new theory on the measurement of risk (L. Sommer, Trans.). Econometrica, 22(1), 23–36. (Reprinted from Commentarii academiae scientiarum imperialis Petropolitanae, 1738, 5, 175–192). doi: 10.2307/1909829
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bessière, K., Newhagen, J. E., Robinson, J. P., & Shneiderman, B. (2006). A model for computer frustration: The role of instrumental and dispositional factors on incident, session, and post-session frustration and mood. Computers in Human Behavior, 22(6), 941–961. doi:10/fxb5pv
   Google Scholar
• Bhavnani, S. K., & John, B. E. (2000). The strategic use of complex computer systems. Human-Computer Interaction, 15(2–3), 107–137. doi:10/d3j27j
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bordalo, P., Gennaioli, N., & Shleifer, A. (2013). Salience and consumer choice. Journal of Political Economy, 121(5), 803–843. doi:10.1086/673885
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camerer, C. F. (1995). Individual decision making. In J. H. Kagel & A. E. Roth (Eds.), The handbook of experimental economics (pp. 587–703). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Camerer, C. F. (1998). Bounded rationality in individual decision making. Experimental Economics, 1(2), 163–183. doi:10.1023/A:1009944326196
   Google Scholar
• Camerer, C. F. (2004). Prospect theory in the wild: Evidence from the field. In C. F. Camerer, G. Loewenstein, & M. Rabin (Eds.), Advances in behavioral economics (pp. 148–161). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Card, S. K., Moran, T. P., & Newell, A. (1980a). Computer text-editing: An information-processing analysis of a routine cognitive skill. Cognitive Psychology, 12(1), 32–74. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(80)90003-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Card, S. K., Moran, T. P., & Newell, A. (1980b, July). The keystroke-level model for user performance time with interactive systems. Communications of the ACM, 23(7), 396–410. doi:10.1145/358886.358895
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Card, S. K., Moran, T. P., & Newell, A. (1983). The psychology of human-computer interaction. London, England: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Ceaparu, I., Lazar, J., Bessiere, K., Robinson, J., & Shneiderman, B. (2004). Determining causes and severity of end-user frustration. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 17(3), 333–356. doi:10/bj2rqn
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choe, E. K., Jung, J., Lee, B., & Fisher, K. (2013). Nudging people away from privacy-invasive mobile apps through visual framing. In P. Kotzé, G. Marsden, G. Lindgaard, J. Wesson, & M. Winckler (Eds.), Human-computer interaction – INTERACT 2013 (Vol. 8119, pp. 74–91). Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-40477-1_5
   Google Scholar
• Chou, P.-H., Chou, R. K., & Ko, K.-C. (2009). Prospect theory and the risk-return paradox: Some recent evidence. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 33(3), 193–208. doi:10.1007/s11156-009-0109-z
   Google Scholar
• Cockburn, A., Quinn, P., & Gutwin, C. (2015). Examining the peak-end effects of subjective experience. Proceedings of the CHI 2015 Conference on Human Factors in Computer Systems (pp. 357–366), New York, NY: ACM. doi: 10.1145/2702123.2702139
   Google Scholar
• Cockburn, A., Quinn, P., & Gutwin, C. (2017). The effects of interaction sequencing on user experience and preference. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 108, 89–104. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2017.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cramer, J. S. (2003). Logit models from economics and other fields. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511615412
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, V. P., & Meng, J. (2011). New York City cab drivers’ labor supply revisited: Reference-dependent preferences with rational-expectations targets for hours and income. The American Economic Review, 101(5), 1912–1932. doi:10.1257/aer.101.5.1912
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn, O. J. (1964). Multiple comparisons using rank sums. Technometrics, 6(3), 241–253. doi:10.2307/1266041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, W. (1954). The theory of decision making. Psychological Bulletin, 51(4), 380–417. doi:10/crnw6p
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, W. (1961). Behavioral decision theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 12(1), 473–498. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.12.020161.002353
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fehr-Duda, H., & Epper, T. (2012). Probability and risk: Foundations and economic implications of probability-dependent risk preferences. Annual Review of Economics, 4(1), 567–593. doi:10/bhp7
   Google Scholar
• Fishburn, P. C. (1979). On the nature of expected utility. In M. Allais & O. Hagen (Eds.), Expected utility and the Allais paradox (pp. 243–257). London, England: D. Reidel.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, M., & Savage, L. J. (1948). The utility analysis of choices involving risk. Journal of Political Economy, 56(4), 279–304. doi:10.1086/256692
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frøkjær, E., Hertzum, M., & Hornbæk, K. (2000). Measuring usability: Are effectiveness, efficiency, and satisfaction really correlated? Proceedings of the CHI 2000 Conference on Human Factors in Computer Systems (pp. 345–352), New York, NY: ACM. doi: 10.1145/332040.332455
   Google Scholar
• Fu, W.-T., & Gray, W. D. (2004). Resolving the paradox of the active user: Stable suboptimal performance in interactive tasks. Cognitive Science, 28(6), 901–935. doi:10.1016/j.cogsci.2004.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furnell, S. (2005). Why users cannot use security. Computers & Security, 24(4), 274–279. doi:10.1016/j.cose.2005.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelman, A., & Stern, H. (2006). The difference between “significant” and “not significant” is not itself statistically significant. The American Statistician, 60(4), 328–331. doi:10.1198/000313006X152649
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, W. D., Sims, C. R., Fu, W.-T., & Schoelles, M. J. (2006). The soft constraints hypothesis: A rational analysis approach to resource allocation for interactive behavior. Psychological Review, 113(3), 461–482. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.113.3.461
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross, R., & Acquisti, A. (2005). Information revelation and privacy in online social networks. Proceedings of the 2005 ACM workshop on privacy in the electronic society (pp. 71–80), New York, NY: ACM. doi: 10/cqhxwg
   Google Scholar
• Gutwin, C., Rooke, C., Cockburn, A., Mandryk, R. L., & Lafreniere, B. (2016). Peak-end effects on player experience in casual games. Proceedings of the CHI 2016 Conference on Human Factors in Computer Systems (pp. 5608–5619), New York, NY: ACM. doi: 10.1145/2858036.2858419
   Google Scholar
• Hartmann, J., Sutcliffe, A., & De Angeli, A. (2008). Towards a theory of user judgment of aesthetics and user interface quality. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 15(4), 15:1–15:30. doi:10/b57cf9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassenzahl, M. (2004). The interplay of beauty, goodness, and usability in interactive products. Human-Computer Interaction, 19(4), 319–349. doi:10.1207/s15327051hci1904_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassenzahl, M., & Monk, A. (2010). The inference of perceived usability from beauty. Human-Computer Interaction, 25(3), 235–260. doi:10/cxcs4n
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heath, C., Larrick, R. P., & Wu, G. (1999). Goals as reference points. Cognitive Psychology, 38(1), 79–109. doi:10.1006/cogp.1998.0708
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heidhues, P., & Kőszegi, B. (2008). Competition and price variation when consumers are loss averse. The American Economic Review, 98(4), 1245–1268. doi:10.1257/aer.98.4.1245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herweg, F., Müller, D., & Weinschenk, P. (2010). Binary payment schemes: Moral hazard and loss aversion. The American Economic Review, 100(5), 2451–2477. doi:10.1257/aer.100.5.2451
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Highhouse, S., & Johnson, M. A. (1996). Gain/loss asymmetry and riskless choice: Loss aversion in choices among job finalists. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 68(3), 225–233. doi:10/c56zzq
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho, T. H. (2006). Modeling the psychology of consumer and firm behavior with behavioral economics. Journal of Marketing Research, 43(3), 307–331. doi:10.1509/jmkr.43.3.307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornbæk, K. (2006). Current practice in measuring usability: Challenges to usability studies and research. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64(2), 79–102. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornbæk, K., & Law, E. L.-C. (2007). Meta-analysis of correlations among usability measures. Proceedings of the CHI 2007 Conference on Human Factors in Computer Systems (pp. 617–626), New York, NY: ACM. doi: 10.1145/1240624.1240722
   Google Scholar
• Howes, A., Lewis, R. L., & Vera, A. (2009). Rational adaptation under task and processing constraints: Implications for testing theories of cognition and action. Psychological Review, 116(4), 717–751. doi:10.1037/a0017187
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huygens, C. (1714). De ratiociniis in ludo aleæ [The value of all chances in games of fortune] (W. Browne, Trans.). London, England: S. Keimer. (Original work published 1657).
   Google Scholar
• Jameson, A., Berendt, B., Gabrielli, S., Cena, F., Gena, C., Vernero, F., & Reinecke, K. (2014). Choice architecture for human-computer interaction. Foundations and Trends in Human-Computer Interaction, 7(1–2), 1–235. doi:10.1561/1100000028
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., Fredrickson, B. L., Schreiber, C. A., & Redelmeier, D. A. (1993). When more pain is preferred to less: Adding a better end. Psychological Science, 4(6), 401–405. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1993.tb00589.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–292. doi:10.2307/1914185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (Eds.). (2000). Choices, values, and frames. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kalnikaite, V., Rogers, Y., Bird, J., Villar, N., Bachour, K., Payne, S., … Kreitmayer, S. (2011). How to nudge in situ: Designing lambent devices to deliver salient information in supermarkets. Proceedings of the 13th international conference on ubiquitous computing (pp. 11–20), New York, NY: ACM. doi: 10.1145/2030112.2030115
   Google Scholar
• Keren, G. B., & Raaijmakers, J. G. W. (1988). On between-subjects versus within-subjects comparisons in testing utility theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 41(2), 233–247. doi:10/b2nkrd
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y.-H., Jeon, J. H., Choe, E. K., Lee, B., Kim, K., & Seo, J. (2016). TimeAware: Leveraging framing effects to enhance personal productivity. Proceedings of the CHI 2016 Conference on Human Factors in Computer Systems, New York, NY: ACM. doi: 10.1145/2858036.2858428
   Google Scholar
• Kissel, G. V. (1995). The effect of computer experience on subjective and objective software usability measures. Conference companion on human factors in computing systems (pp. 284–285), New York, NY: ACM. doi: 10.1145/223355.223676
   Google Scholar
• Knetsch, J. L. (1992). Preferences and nonreversibility of indifference curves. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 17(1), 131–139. doi:10.1016/0167-2681(92)90082-M
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kőszegi, B., & Rabin, M. (2006). A model of reference-dependent preferences. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121(4), 1133–1165. doi:10/cqgpmq
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kőszegi, B., & Rabin, M. (2007). Reference-dependent risk attitudes. The American Economic Review, 97(4), 1047–1073. doi:10/djbb7t
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kőszegi, B., & Rabin, M. (2009). Reference-dependent consumption plans. The American Economic Review, 99(3), 909–936. doi:10.1257/aer.99.3.909
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kusev, P., Van Schaik, P., Ayton, P., Dent, J., & Chater, N. (2009). Exaggerated risk: Prospect theory and probability weighting in risky choice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35(6), 1487–1505. doi:10.1037/a0017039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwatinetz, A., Leblond, A., Peters, G. C., & Hirsch, S. M. (1998). U.S. Patent No. 5,832,528. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
   Google Scholar
• Lane, D. M., Napier, H. A., Peres, S. C., & Sándor, A. (2005). Hidden costs of graphical user interfaces: Failure to make the transition from menus and icon toolbars to keyboard shortcuts. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 18(2), 133–144. doi:10/bqxz2b
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larrick, R. P., & Boles, T. L. (1995). Avoiding regret in decisions with feedback: A negotiation example. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 63(1), 87–97. doi:10.1006/obhd.1995.1064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavie, T., & Tractinsky, N. (2004). Assessing dimensions of perceived visual aesthetics of web sites. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 60(3), 269–298. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2003.09.002
   Google Scholar
• Lazar, J., Jones, A., Hackley, M., & Shneiderman, B. (2006). Severity and impact of computer user frustration: A comparison of student and workplace users. Interacting with Computers, 18(2), 187–207. doi:10/ck4rqb
   Google Scholar
• Levin, I. P., Schneider, S. L., & Gaeth, G. J. (1998). All frames are not created equal: A typology and critical analysis of framing effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 76(2), 149–188. doi:10/bzntst
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louviere, J. J. (1991). Experimental choice analysis: Introduction and overview. Journal of Business Research, 23(4), 291–297. doi:10/c27xhw
   Google Scholar
• Machina, M. J. (1987). Choice under uncertainty: Problems solved and unsolved. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1(1), 121–154. doi:10/bhqf
   Google Scholar
• Mackay, W. E. (1990). Patterns of sharing customizable software. Proceedings of the 1990 ACM conference on computer-supported cooperative work (pp. 209–221), New York, NY: ACM. doi: 10.1145/99332.99356
   Google Scholar
• Mackay, W. E. (1991). Triggers and barriers to customizing software. Proceedings of the CHI 1991 Conference on Human Factors in Computer Systems (pp. 153–160), New York, NY: ACM. doi: 10.1145/108844.108867
   Google Scholar
• MacKenzie, I. S., & Soukoreff, R. W. (2003). Phrase sets for evaluating text entry techniques. In CHI ‘03 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems (pp. 754–755). New York, NY: ACM. doi:10/fttfp5
   Google Scholar
• Markowitz, H. (1952). The utility of wealth. Journal of Political Economy, 60(2), 151–158. doi:10.1086/257177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer, J. (2005). Prospect theory and political science. Annual Review of Political Science, 8(1), 1–21. doi:10/d5wfcq
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, J., & Levy, J. (1994). Measuring usability: Preference vs. performance. Communications of the ACM, 37(4), 66–75. doi:10/bt8736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieuwenhuis, S., Forstmann, B. U., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2011). Erroneous analyses of interactions in neuroscience: A problem of significance. Nature Neuroscience, 14(9), 1105–1107. doi:10.1038/nn.2886
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oppenheimer, D. M., & Kelso, E. (2015). Information processing as a paradigm for decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 66(1), 277–294. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015148
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Page, S. R., Johnsgard, T. J., Albert, U., & Allen, C. D. (1996). User customization of a word processor. Proceedings of the CHI 1996 Conference on Human Factors in Computer Systems (pp. 340–346), New York, NY: ACM. doi: 10.1145/238386.238541
   Google Scholar
• Peeters, G., & Czapinski, J. (1990). Positive-negative asymmetry in evaluations: The distinction between affective and informational negativity effects. European Review of Social Psychology, 1(1), 33–60. doi:10/b8jxpn
   Google Scholar
• Pitz, G. F., & Sachs, N. J. (1984). Judgment and decision: Theory and application. Annual Review of Psychology, 35(1), 139–164. doi:10/ctxm3d
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinn, P. (2016). Economic behaviour and psychological biases in human–Computer interaction (Doctoral dissertation, University of Canterbury). Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10092/12187
   Google Scholar
• Quinn, P., & Cockburn, A. (2016). When bad feels good: Assistance failures and interface preferences. Proceedings of the CHI 2016 Conference on Human Factors in computer Systems (pp. 4005–4010), New York, NY: ACM. doi: 10/bhqq
   Google Scholar
• Quinn, P., & Zhai, S. (2016). A cost–benefit study of text entry suggestion interaction. Proceedings of the CHI 2016 Conference on Human Factors in Computer Systems (pp. 83–88), New York, NY: ACM. doi: 10/bhqr
   Google Scholar
• Rabin, M. (1998). Psychology and economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 36(1), 11–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rozin, P., & Royzman, E. B. (2001). Negativity bias, negativity dominance, and contagion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5(4), 296–320. doi:10.1207/S15327957PSPR0504_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuelson, W., & Zeckhauser, R. (1988). Status quo bias in decision making. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1(1), 7–59. doi:10.1007/BF00055564
   Google Scholar
• Shafir, E. (1993). Choosing versus rejecting: Why some options are both better and worse than others. Memory & Cognition, 21(4), 546–556. doi:10.3758/BF03197186
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shafir, E., & Tversky, A. (1995). Decision making. In E. E. Smith & D. N. Osherson (Eds.), An invitation to cognitive science: Thinking (Vol. 3, 2nd ed., pp. 77–100). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. (1957). A behavioral model of rational choice. In Models of man: Social and rational (pp. 241–260). Boston, MA: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. (1959). Theories of decision-making in economics and behavioral science. The American Economic Review, 49(3), 253–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B., & Lichtenstein, S. (1977). Behavioral decision theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 28, 1–39. doi:10/cc25w7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sprenger, C. (2010). An endowment effect for risk: Experimental tests of stochastic reference points (Tech. Rep.). University of California San Diego.
   Google Scholar
• Starmer, C. (1999). Cycling with rules of thumb: An experimental test for a new form of non-transitive behaviour. Theory and Decision, 46(2), 139–157. doi:10.1023/A:1004930205037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thaler, R. H. (1980). Toward a positive theory of consumer choice. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 1(1), 39–60. doi:10.1016/0167-2681(80)90051-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thielsch, M. T., Engel, R., & Hirschfeld, G. (2015). Expected usability is not a valid indicator of experienced usability. PeerJ Computer Science, 1, e19. doi:10.7717/peerj-cs.19
   Google Scholar
• Todd, P. M., Rogers, Y., & Payne, S. J. (2011). Nudging the trolley in the supermarket: How to deliver the right information to shoppers. International Journal of Mobile Human Computer Interaction, 3(2), 20–34. doi:10.4018/jmhci.2011040102
   Google Scholar
• Toomim, M., Kriplean, T., Pörtner, C., & Landay, J. (2011). Utility of human-computer interactions: Toward a science of preference measurement. Proceedings of the CHI 2011 Conference on Human Factors in Computer Systems (pp. 2275–2284), New York, NY: ACM. doi: 10/c87fzn
   Google Scholar
• Tractinsky, N., Katz, A. S., & Ikar, D. (2000). What is beautiful is usable. Interacting with Computers, 13(2), 127–145. doi:10.1016/S0953-5438(00)00031-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turland, J., Coventry, L., Jeske, D., Briggs, P., & Van Moorsel, A. (2015). Nudging towards security: Developing an application for wireless network selection for Android phones. Proceedings of the 2015 British HCI conference (pp. 193–201), New York, NY: ACM. doi: 10.1145/2783446.2783588
   Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211(4481), 453–458. doi:10.1126/science.7455683
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1986). Rational choice and the framing of decisions. The Journal of Business, 59(S4), S251–S278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1947). Theory of games and economic behavior (2nd ed., Germany). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., Leon, P. G., Acquisti, A., Cranor, L. F., Forget, A., & Sadeh, N. (2014). A field trial of privacy nudges for Facebook. In Proceedings of the CHI 2014 Conference on Human Factors in Computer Systems (pp. 2367–2376), New York, NY: ACM. doi: 10.1145/2556288.2557413
   Google Scholar
• Wason, P. C. (1968). Reasoning about a rule. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Physiology, 20(3), 273–281. doi:10.1080/14640746808400161
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, E. U., & Johnson, E. J. (2009). Mindful judgment and decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 60(1), 53–85. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163633
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, M., & Camerer, C. F. (1998). The disposition effect in securities trading: An experimental analysis. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 33(2), 167–184. doi:10.1016/S0167-2681(97)00089-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, G., Heath, C., & Larrick, R. (2008). A prospect theory model of goal behavior. Unpublished manuscript.
   Google Scholar