341
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Open Source, Open Vision: The MakerPro Network and the Broadening of Participation in Setting Taiwan’s IT Vision Agenda

References

  • Ames, M. G., Bardzell, J., Bardzell, S., Lindtner, S., Mellis, D. A., & Rosner, D. K. (2014). Making cultures: Empowerment, participation, and democracy-or not? In CHI’14 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1087–1092). New York, NY: ACM.
  • Australian Council of Learned Academies (ACOLA). (2013). STEM: Country comparisons. Australian Council of Learned Academies. Retrieved July 10, 2018, from https://acola.org.au/wp/PDF/SAF02Consultants/SAF02_STEM_%20FINAL.pdf
  • Avle, S., Lindtner, S., & Williams, K. (2017). How methods make designers. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 472–483), Denver, CO. New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1142/S0218810417500526
  • Bardzell, J., & Bardzell, S. (2014). A great and troubling beauty: Cognitive speculation and ubiquitous computing. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 18(4), 779–794. doi:10.1007/s00779-013-0677-8
  • Bardzell, J., Bardzell, S., Lin, C., Lindtner, S., & Toombs, A. (2017). HCI’s making agendas. Foundations and Trends® in Human–Computer Interaction, 11(3), 126–200. doi:10.1561/1100000066
  • Bardzell, S. (2018). Utopias of participation: Feminism, design, and the futures. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 25(1), Article 6. doi:10.1145/3127359
  • Bardzell, S., Bardzell, J., & Ng, S. (2017). Supporting cultures of making: Technology, policy, visions, and myths. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 6523–6535), Denver, CO. New York, NY: ACM.
  • Bardzell, S., Rosner, D. K., & Bardzell, J. (2012). Crafting quality in design: Integrity, creativity, and public sensibility. In Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference (pp. 11–20), Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK. New York, NY: ACM.
  • Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739–768. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2012.670661
  • Björgvinsson, E., Ehn, P., & Hillgren, P. A. (2010). Participatory design and democratizing innovation. In Proceedings of the 11th Biennial Participatory Design Conference (pp. 41–50), Sydney, Australia. New York, NY: ACM.
  • Bjørn, P., & Boulus-Rødje, N. (2018). Infrastructural inaccessibility: Tech entrepreneurs in occupied palestine. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 25(5), article 26. doi:10.1145/3219777
  • Blackwell, A. F. (2015). Interacting with an inferred world: The challenge of machine learning for humane computer interaction. In Proceedings of The Fifth Decennial Aarhus Conference on Critical Alternatives (pp. 169–180). Aarhus, Denmark: Aarhus University Press.
  • Chung, O. (2011). Envisioning a creative future. Taiwan Review. Retrieved April 4, 2018, from https://taiwantoday.tw/news.php?unit=8,8,29,32,32,45&post=13900
  • Collins, J. C., & Porras, J. I. (1991). Organizational vision and visionary organizations. California Management Review, 34(1), 30–52. doi:10.2307/41166682
  • Culén, A. L., & Følstad, A. (2014, October). Innovation in HCI: What can we learn from design thinking? In Proceedings of the 8th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Fun, Fast, Foundational (pp. 849–852), Helsinki, Finland. New York, NY: ACM.
  • Devendorf, L., & Ryokai, K. (2015). Being the machine: Reconfiguring Agency and control in hybrid fabrication. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2477–2486), Seoul, Republic of Korea. New York, NY: ACM.
  • FocusEconomics. 2017. Retrieved from www.focus-economics.com/countries/taiwan
  • Freeman, G., Bardzell, J., & Bardzell, S. (2017). Aspirational design and messy democracy: Partisanship, policy, and hope in an Asian city. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW 2017) (pp. 404–416). New York: ACM. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.04.009
  • Freeman, G., Bardzell, S., & Bardzell, J. (2018). Bottom-up imaginaries: The cultural-technical practice of inventing regional advantage through IT R&D. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’18) (paper 325, pp. 1–11). New York: ACM.
  • Fuchsberger, V., Lindtner, S., Murer, M., & Tscheligi, M. (2015a). Rethinking technology innovation: Factories, fabrication & design research. Center for Human-Computer Interaction, University of Salzburg. Retrieved from https://hci.sbg.ac.at/sites/ffdr/
  • Fuchsberger, V., Murer, M., Tscheligi, M., Lindtner, S., Bardzell, S., Bardzell, J., … Bjorn, P. (2016). Fabrication & HCI: Hobbyist making, industrial production, and beyond. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 3550–3557), San Jose, CA. New York, NY: ACM.
  • Fuchsberger, V., Murer, M., Tscheligi, M., Lindtner, S., Reiter, A., Bardzell, S.,& Bjørn, P. (2015b). The future of making: Where industrial and personal fabrication meet. Aarhus Series on Human Centered Computing, 1(1), 1–4. doi:10.7146/aahcc.v1i1.21394
  • Gao, Y. (2013). Report on Taiwan: STEM (Science, technology, engineering and mathematics). Australian Council of Learned Academies. Retrieved July 10, 2018, from https://acola.org.au/wp/PDF/SAF02Consultants/Consultant%20Report%20-%20Taiwan.pdf
  • Green, D. P., Fuchsberger, V., Kirk, D., Taylor, N., Chatting, D., Meissner, J. L., … Reiter, A. (2017). Open design at the intersection of making and manufacturing. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 542–549), Denver, CA. New York, NY: ACM.
  • Grudin, J. (2017). From tool to partner: The evolution of human-computer interaction. Synthesis lectures on human-centered interaction. San Rafael, CA: Morgan & Claypool.
  • Haines, J. K. (2014). Emerging innovation: The global expansion of seed accelerators. In Proceedings of The 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing Companion (pp. 57–60), Baltimore, MD. New York, NY: ACM.
  • Irani, L. (2015). Hackathons and the making of entrepreneurial citizenship. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 40(5), 799–824. doi:10.1177/0162243915578486
  • Jasanoff, S., & Kim, S. H. (Eds.). (2015). Dreamscapes of modernity: Sociotechnical imaginaries and the fabrication of power. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Kantabutra, S., & Avery, G. C. (2010). The power of vision: Statements that resonate. Journal of Business Strategy, 31(1), 37–45. doi:10.1108/02756661011012769
  • Lindtner, S. (2015). Hacking with Chinese characteristics: The promises of the maker movement against China’s manufacturing culture. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 40(5), 854–879. doi:10.1177/0162243915590861
  • Lindtner, S., & Avle, S. (2017). Tinkering with Governance: Technopolitics and the economization of citizenship. Proceedings of the ACM on Human Computer Interaction, 1. doi:10.1145/3134705
  • Lindtner, S., Bardzell, S., & Bardzell, J. (2016). Reconstituting the utopian vision of making: HCI after technosolutionism. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’16) (pp. 1390–1402), San Jose, CA. New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1002/btpr.2340
  • Lindtner, S., Greenspan, A., & Li, D. (2015). Designed in Shenzhen: Shanzhai manufacturing and maker entrepreneurs. In Proceedings of The Fifth Decennial Aarhus Conference on Critical Alternatives (pp. 85–96). Aarhus, Denmark: Aarhus University Press. doi:10.4070/kcj.2015.45.1.85
  • Lindtner, S., Hertz, G. D., & Dourish, P. (2014). Emerging sites of HCI innovation: Hackerspaces, hardware startups & incubators. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 439–448), Toronto, ON. New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.4097/kjae.2014.66.6.439
  • Lipton, M. (1996). Demystifying the development of an organizational vision. Sloan Management Review, 37(4), 83–92.
  • Nguyen, L. U. (2017). Ethnic platforms and the failure of techno-futurity. Journal of Asian American Studies, 20(1), 51–68. doi:10.1353/jaas.2017.0004
  • Oulasvirta, A., & Hornbæk, K. (2016, May). Hci research as problem-solving. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 4956–4967), San Jose, CA. New York, NY: ACM.
  • Reeves, S. (2012). Envisioning ubiquitous computing. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1573–1582)Austin, TX. New York, NY: ACM.
  • Segal, H. P. (1985). Technological utopianism in American culture. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
  • The sociotechnical imaginaries project (2007). Harvard University. Retrieved October 23, 2018, from http://sts.hks.harvard.edu/research/platforms/imaginaries/
  • Tanenbaum, J. G., Williams, A. M., Desjardins, A., & Tanenbaum, K. (2013, April). Democratizing technology: Pleasure, utility and expressiveness in DIY and maker practice. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2603–2612), Paris, France. New York, NY: ACM.
  • Taylor, N., Hurley, U., & Connolly, P. (2016). Making community: The wider role of makerspaces in public life. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1415–1425), San Jose, CA. New York, NY: ACM.
  • Turner, F. (2008). From counterculture to cyberculture: Stewart brand, the whole earth network, and the rise of digital utopianism. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Vines, J., Clarke, R., Leong, T., McCarthy, J., Iversen, O. S., Wright, P., & Olivier, P. (2012, May). Invited SIG-participation and HCI: Why involve people in design? In CHI’12 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1217–1220), Austin, TX. New York, NY: ACM.
  • Weiser, M. (1991). The computer for the 21st century. Scientific American, 265(3), 94–104. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0991-94

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.