Producing Printability: Articulation Work and Alignment in 3D Printing

REFERENCES

• Abraham, J., & Reddy, M. C. (2013). Re-coordinating activities: An investigation of articulation work in patient transfers. Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Computer supported cooperative work, (pp. 67–78). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Acher, M., Baudry, B., Barais, O., & Jézéquel, J.-M. (2014). Customization and 3D printing: A challenging playground for software product lines. Proceedings of the 18th International Software Product Line Conference. (Vol. 1, pp. 142–146). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Adamson, G. (2007). Thinking through craft (Vol. 159). Oxford: Berg. Copublished with the Victoria & Albert Museum, London.
   Google Scholar
• Adamson, G. (2013). The invention of craft. London, UK: Bloomsbury Academic/V&A Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Alfoldy, S. (Ed.). (2007). NeoCraft: Modernity and the crafts. Halifax: Press of the Nova Scotia College of Art and Design.
   Google Scholar
• Ames, M. G. (2013). From MIT to paraguay: A critical historical and ethnographic analysis of one laptop per child. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University.
   Google Scholar
• Ames, M. G. (2015). Charismatic Technology. In Proceedings of the fifth decennial Aarhus Conference on Critical Alternatives (pp. 109–120). Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Amrute, S. (2016). Encoding race, encoding class: Indian IT workers in Berlin. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, C. (2014). Makers: The new industrial revolution. New York: Crown Business.
   Google Scholar
• Asad, M., Fox, S., & Le Dantec, C. A. (2014). Speculative activist technologies. Proceedings of the iConference 2014, Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Avle, S., & Lindtner, S. (2016). Design(Ing) “Here” and “There”: Tech entrepreneurs, global markets, and reflexivity in design processes. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (pp. 2233–2245). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Avle, S., Lindtner, S., & Williams, K. (2017). How methods make designers. Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (pp. 472–483). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Bardram, J. E., & Hansen, T. R. (2010). Why the plan doesn’t hold: A study of situated planning, articulation and coordination work in a surgical ward. Proceedings of the 2010 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, (pp. 331–340). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Baudisch, P., & Mueller, S. (2016). Personal fabrication: State of the art and future research. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (pp. 936–939). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Beyer, D., Gurevich, S., Mueller, S., Chen, H.-T., & Baudisch, P. (2015). Platener: Low-fidelity fabrication of 3D objects by substituting 3D print with laser-cut plates. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (pp. 1799–1806). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Buechley, L., & Perner-Wilson, H. (2012). Crafting technology: Reimagining the processes, materials, and cultures of electronics. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 19(3), 21. doi:10.1145/2362364.2362369
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buehler, E., Easley, W., McDonald, S., Comrie, N., & Hurst, A. (2015). Inclusion and education: 3D printing for integrated classrooms. Proceedings of the 17th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers & Accessibility, (pp. 281–290). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cheatle, A., & Jackson, S. J. (2015). Digital entanglements: Craft, computation and collaboration in fine art furniture production. Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, (pp. 958–968). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, X., Anthony, Kim, J., Mankoff, J., Grossman, T., Coros, S., & Hudson, S. E. (2016). Reprise: A design tool for specifying, generating, and customizing 3D printable adaptations on everyday objects. Proceedings of the 29th Annual Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, (pp. 29–39). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, X. A., Coros, S., & Hudson, S. E. (2018). Medley: A library of embeddables to explore rich material properties for 3D printed objects. Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (pp. 162). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Crabtree, A., O’Neill, J., Tolmie, P., Castellani, S., Colombino, T., & Grasso, A. (2006). The practical indispensability of articulation work to immediate and remote help-giving. Proceedings of the 2006 Conference on Computer supported cooperative work, (pp. 219–228). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Devendorf, L., De Kosnik, A., Mattingly, K., & Ryokai, K. (2016). Probing the potential of post-anthropocentric 3d printing. Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, (pp. 170–181). ACM. doi: 10.1177/1753193416651574.
   Google Scholar
• Devendorf, L., & Ryokai, K. (2015). Being the machine: Reconfiguring agency and control in hybrid fabrication. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (pp. 2477–2486). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Dew, K. N., & Rosner, D. K. (2018). Lessons from the woodshop: Cultivating design with living materials. Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (pp. 585). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Dew, K. N., Shorey, S., & Rosner, D. K. (2018). Making within limits: Towards salvage fabrication. Proceedings of the 2018 Workshop on Computing within Limits (pp. 7). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (1995). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, S., Ulgado, R. R., & Rosner, D. (2015). Hacking culture, not devices: Access and recognition in feminist hackerspaces. Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, (pp. 56–68). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Fujimura, J. H. (1987). Constructing do-able’ problems in cancer research: Articulating alignment. Social Studies of Science, 17(2), 257–293. doi:10.1177/030631287017002003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, W., Zhang, Y., Nazzetta, D. C., Ramani, K., & Cipra, R. J. (2015). RevoMaker: Enabling multi-directional and Functionally-embedded 3D printing using a rotational cuboidal platform. Proceedings of the 28th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software & Technology (pp. 437–446). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Gasser, L. (1986). The integration of computing and routine work. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), 4(3), 205–225. doi:10.1145/214427.214429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gershenfeld, N. (2008). Fab: The coming revolution on your desktop – From personal computers to personal fabrication. Cambridge, MA: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gerson, E. M., & Star, S. L. (1986). Analyzing due process in the workplace. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), 4(3), 257–270. doi:10.1145/214427.214431
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, D., & Kirk, D. (2018). Open design, inclusivity and the intersections of making. In Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference, (pp. 173–186). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Green, D. P., Fuchsberger, V., Kirk, D., Taylor, N., Chatting, D., Meissner, J. L., … Reiter, A. (2017). Open design at the intersection of making and manufacturing. Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (pp. 542–549). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Grinter, R. E. (1996). Supporting articulation work using software configuration management systems. Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 5(4), 447–465. doi:10.1007/BF00136714
   Google Scholar
• Grudin, J., & Barbano, D. M. (1988). Why CSCW applications fail: Problems in the design and evaluation of organizational interfaces. Proceedings of the 1988 ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative work (pp. 85–93). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Harrod, T. (2007). Chapter 13 – Otherwise unobtainable: The applied arts and the politics and poetics of digital technology. In S. Alfoldy (Ed.), NeoCraft: Modernity and the crafts (pp. 225–239). Halifax: Press of the Nova Scotia College of Art and Design.
   Google Scholar
• Hofmann, M., Hann, G., Hudson, S. E., & Mankoff, J. (2018). Greater than the sum of its parts: Expressing and reusing design intent in 3D models. Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 301(1–301), 12.
   Google Scholar
• Hudson, N., Alcock, C., & Chilana, P. K. (2016). Understanding newcomers to 3D printing: Motivations, workflows, and barriers of casual makers. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (pp. 384–396). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Hui, J. S., & Gerber, E. M. (2017). Developing makerspaces as sites of entrepreneurship. Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, (pp. 2023–2038). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Ion, A., Frohnhofen, J., Wall, L., Kovacs, R., Alistar, M., Lindsay, J., … Baudisch, P. (2016). Metamaterial Mechanisms. Proceedings of the 29th Annual Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, (pp. 529–539). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Irani, L. C., & Silberman, M. S. (2016). Stories we tell about labor: Turkopticon and the trouble with “Design.” Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 4573–4586). San Jose, CA: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, S. J., Ribes, D., Buyuktur, A., & Bowker, G. C. (2011). Collaborative rhythm: Temporal dissonance and alignment in collaborative scientific work. Proceedings of the ACM 2011 conference on Computer supported cooperative work, (pp. 245–254). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Johri, A. (2016). Demo or die: Narrative construction as articulation work for promoting early stage digital innovations. Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Supporting Group Work, (pp. 315–324). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Khoshnevis, B. (2004). Automated construction by contour crafting—Related robotics and information technologies. Automation in Construction, 13(1), 5–19. doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2003.08.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khot, R. A. (2014). Exploring material representations of physical activity (pp. 177–180). DIS Companion '14: Proceedings of the 2014 companion publication on Designing Interactive Systems. Vancouver, BC: ACM Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kwon, B.-R., & Lee, J. (2017). What makes a maker: The motivation for the maker movement in ICT. Information Technology for Development, 23(2), 318–335.
   Google Scholar
• Lindtner, S., Hertz, G. D., & Dourish, P. (2014). Emerging sites of HCI innovation: Hackerspaces, hardware startups & incubators. Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on Human factors in computing systems, (pp. 439–448). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Lipson, H., & Kurman, M. (2013). Fabricated: The new world of 3D printing. Indianapolis, IN: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Ludwig, T., Boden, A., & Pipek, V. (2017). 3D printers as sociable technologies: Taking appropriation infrastructures to the internet of things. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human-Interaction, 24, 2, 17(1–17), 28.
   Google Scholar
• Ludwig, T., Stickel, O., Boden, A., & Pipek, V. (2014). Towards sociable technologies: An empirical study on designing appropriation infrastructures for 3D printing. Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Designing Interactive Systems, (pp. 835–844). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• McCullough, M. (1998). Abstracting craft: The practiced digital hand. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• McNally, B., Norooz, L., Shorter, A., & Golub, E. (2017). Toward understanding children’s perspectives on using 3D printing technologies in their everyday lives. Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Interaction Design and Children, (pp. 298–303). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Mellis, D. A., & Buechley, L. (2012). Case studies in the personal fabrication of electronic products. Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference, (pp. 268–277). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Mentis, H. M. (2017). Collocated use of imaging systems in coordinated surgical practice. Proceedings of the ACM Human-Computer-Interaction 1, CSCW, 78(1–78), 17.
   Google Scholar
• Mentis, H. M., Reddy, M., & Rosson, M. B. (2010). Invisible emotion: Information and interaction in an emergency room. Proceedings of the 2010 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, (pp. 311–320). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Mizrahi, M., Golan, A., Mizrahi, A. B., Gruber, R., Lachnise, A. Z., & Zoran, A. (2016). Digital gastronomy: Methods & recipes for hybrid cooking. Proceedings of the 29th Annual Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, (pp. 541–552). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Mueller, S., Im, S., Gurevich, S., Teibrich, A., Pfisterer, L., Guimbretière, F., & Baudisch, P. (2014a). WirePrint: 3D printed previews for fast prototyping. Proceedings of the 27th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, (pp. 273–280). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Mueller, S., Mohr, T., Guenther, K., Frohnhofen, J., & Baudisch, P. (2014b). faBrickation: Fast 3D printing of functional objects by integrating construction kit building blocks. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (pp. 3827–3834). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, L. U. (2016). Infrastructural action in Vietnam: Inverting the techno-politics of hacking in the global South. New Media & Society, 18(4), 637–652. doi:10.1177/1461444816629475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oropallo, W., & Piegl, L. A. (2016). Ten challenges in 3D printing. Engineering with Computers, 32(1), 135–148. doi:10.1007/s00366-015-0407-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oxman, N., Ortiz, C., Gramazio, F., & Kohler, M. (2015). Material ecology. Computer-Aided Design, 60(1–2), 2015. doi:10.1016/j.cad.2014.05.009
   Google Scholar
• Papoutsi, C., & Brown, I. (2015). Privacy as articulation work in HIV health services. Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, (pp. 339–348). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Peek, N., & Moyer, I. (2017). Popfab: A case for portable digital fabrication. Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction, (pp. 325–329). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Peng, H., Briggs, J., Wang, C.-Y., Guo, K., Kider, J., Mueller, S., … Guimbretière, F. (2018). RoMA: Interactive fabrication with augmented reality and a robotic 3D printer. Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 579(1–579), 12.
   Google Scholar
• Peng, H., Guimbretière, F., McCann, J., & Hudson, S. (2016b). A 3d printer for interactive electromagnetic devices. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, (pp. 553–562). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Peng, H., Wu, R., Marschner, S., & Guimbretière, F. (2016a). On-the-fly print: Incremental printing while modelling. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (pp. 887–896). San Jose, CA: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Pereira, T., Rusinkiewicz, S., & Matusik, W. (2014). Computational light routing: 3D printed optical fibers for sensing and display. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 33(3), 24:1–24:13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham, M.-H. T. (2015). Asians wear clothes on the Internet: Race, gender, and the work of personal style blogging. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pipek, V., & Wulf, V. (2009). Infrastructuring: Toward an integrated perspective on the design and use of information technology. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 10(5), 447. doi:10.17705/1jais.00195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pye, D. (1968). The nature and art of workmanship (Vol. 4). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rolland, B., Paine, D., & Lee, C. P. (2014). Work practices in coordinating center enabled networks (CCENs). Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Supporting Group Work, (pp. 194–203). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Rosner, D. K. (2018). Critical fabulations: Reworking the methods and margins of design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosner, D. K., Ikemiya, M., & Regan, T. (2015). Resisting alignment: Code and clay. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction, (pp. 181–188). Palo Alto, CA: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Roumen, T. J., Müller, W., & Baudisch, P. (2018). Grafter: Remixing 3D-printed machines. Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (pp. 63). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Savage, V., Follmer, S., Li, J., & Hartmann, B. (2015). Makers’ marks: Physical markup for designing and fabricating functional objects. Proceedings of the 28th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software & Technology, (pp. 103–108). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Sawyer, S., & Tapia, A. (2006). Always articulating: Theorizing on mobile and wireless technologies. The Information Society, 22(5), 311–323. doi:10.1080/01972240600904258
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, K., & Bannon, L. (1992). Taking CSCW seriously. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 1(1–2), 7–40. doi:10.1007/BF00752449
   Google Scholar
• Schön, S., Ebner, M., & Kumar, S. (2014). The maker movement. Implications of new digital gadgets, fabrication tools and spaces for creative learning and teaching. eLearning papers special edition 2014. Transforming Education through Innovation and Technology, 39, 86–100.
   Google Scholar
• Shewbridge, R., Hurst, A., & Kane, S. K. (2014). Everyday making: Identifying future uses for 3D printing in the home. Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (pp. 815–824), Vancouver.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A. G., Hielscher, S., Dickel, S., Soderberg, J., & Van Oost, E. (2013). Grassroots digital fabrication and makerspaces: Reconfiguring, relocating and recalibrating innovation? University of Sussex, SPRU Working Paper SWPS. 2.
   Google Scholar
• Star, S. L., & Strauss, A. (1999). Layers of silence, arenas of voice: The ecology of visible and invisible work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 8(1–2), 9–30. doi:10.1023/A:1008651105359
   Google Scholar
• Star, S. L. (Ed.). (1995). Chapter 2 – The politics of formal representations: Wizards, gurus, and organizational complexity. In Ecologies of Knowledge: Work and Politics in Science and Technology (pp. 88–118). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Steinhardt, S. B., & Jackson, S. J. (2014). Reconciling rhythms: Plans and temporal alignment in collaborative scientific work. Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing, (pp. 134–145). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A. (1988). The articulation of project work: An organizational process. The Sociological Quarterly, 29(2), 163–178. doi:10.1111/j.1533-8525.1988.tb01249.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suchman, L. (1996). Supporting articulation work. Computerization and Controversy: Value Conflicts and Social Choices, 2, 407–423.
   Google Scholar
• Suchman, L. (2007). Human-machine reconfigurations: Plans and situated actions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sydow, S. L., Tholander, J., & Jonsson, M. (2017). It’s a bomb! – material literacy and narratives of making. Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (pp. 121–132). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Tanenbaum, J. G., Williams, A. M., Desjardins, A., & Tanenbaum, K. (2013). Democratizing technology: Pleasure, utility and expressiveness in DIY and maker practice. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (pp. 2603–2612). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Teibrich, A., Mueller, S., Guimbretière, F., Kovacs, R., Neubert, S., & Baudisch, P. (2015). Patching physical objects. Proceedings of the 28th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software & Technology, (pp. 83–91). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Thayer, A. (2013). Understanding university students’ use of tools and artifacts in support of collaborative project work. Seattle, WA: University of Washington.
   Google Scholar
• Thoresen, K. (1997). Workflow meets work practice. Accounting, Management and Information Technologies, 7(1), 21–36. doi:10.1016/S0959-8022(97)00002-7
   Google Scholar
• Vidimce, K., Kaspar, A., Wang, Y., & Matusik, W. (2016). Foundry: Hierarchical material design for multi-material fabrication. Proceedings of the 29th Annual Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, (pp. 563–574). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, S., & Noe, R. A. (2010). Knowledge sharing: A review and directions for future research. Human Resource Management Review, 20(2), 115–131. doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2009.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, T., & Kaye, J. J. (2011). Inventive leisure practices: Understanding hacking communities as sites of sharing and innovation. In CHI ‘11 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems (pp. 263–272). Vancouver, BC: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Wiggers, N. G. (2016). 15 We claim the bowl in the name of craft. Contemporary Clay and Museum Culture, 154. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, A., & Nadeau, B. (2014). Manufacturing for makers: From prototype to product. Interactions, 21(6), 64–67. doi:10.1145/2685354
   Google Scholar
• Willis, K. D. D., Lin, J., Mitani, J., & Igarashi, T. (2010). Spatial sketch: Bridging between movement & fabrication. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction, (pp. 5–12). Cambridge, MA: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Yoshida, H., Igarashi, T., Obuchi, Y., Takami, Y., Sato, J., Araki, M., … Igarashi, S. (2015). Architecture-scale human-assisted additive manufacturing. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), 34(4), 88. doi:10.1145/2766951
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zoran, A. (2015). Hybrid craft: Showcase of physical and digital integration of design and craft skills. In ACM SIGGRAPH art gallery (pp. 384–398). Los Angeles, CA: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Zoran, A., & Buechley, L. (2013). Hybrid reassemblage: An exploration of craft, digital fabrication and artifact uniqueness. Leonardo, 46(1), 4–10. doi:10.1162/LEON_a_00477
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar