The Usability Construct: A Concern for Both Theory and Practice

REFERENCES

• Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (2005). The influence of attitudes on behavior. The Handbook of Attitudes, 173(221), 31.
   Google Scholar
• Albarracin, D., & Shavitt, S. (2018). Attitudes and attitude change. Annual Review of Psychology, 69, 299–327. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011911
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumer, H. (1954). What is wrong with social theory? American Sociological Review, 19(1), 3–10. doi:10.2307/2088165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, K. A. (1996). Usability engineering turns 10. Interactions, 3(1), 58–75. doi:10.1145/223500.223513
   Google Scholar
• Cartwright, N. D., & Bradburn, N. (2011). A theory of measurement: The importance of common metrics for advancing social science theory and research. Proceedings of the 2011 National Research Council Committee on common metrics. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cockton, G. (2013). Usability evaluation. In M. Soegaard & R. F. Dam (Eds.), The encyclopedia of human-computer interaction (2nd ed.). Aarhus, Denmark: The Interaction Design. Foundation. Retrieved from http://www.interaction-design.org/encyclopedia/usability_evaluation.html
   Google Scholar
• Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. doi:10.1037/h0040957
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammersley, M. (1989). The problem of the concept: Herbert Blumer on the relationship between concepts and data. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 18(2), 133–159. doi:10.1177/089124189018002002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hertzum, M. (2010). Images of usability. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 26(6), 567–600. doi:10.1080/10447311003781300
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hertzum, M., & Clemmensen, T. (2012). How do usability professionals construe usability? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 70(1), 26–42. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2011.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hertzum, M., Clemmensen, T., Hornbæk, K., Kumar, J., Shi, Q., & Yammiyavar, P. (2011). Personal usability constructs: How people construe usability across nationalities and stakeholder groups. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 27(8), 729–761.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornbæk, K. (2006). Current practice in measuring usability: Challenges to usability studies and research. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64(2), 79–102. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurosu, M., & Kashimura, K. (1995). Apparent usability vs. inherent usability: Experimental analysis on the determinants of the apparent usability. CHI '95 Conference companion on Human factors in computing systems (pp. 292–293). Denver, Colorado, USA — May 07 - 11. ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Lavie, T., & Tractinsky, N. (2004). Assessing dimensions of perceived visual aesthetics of web sites. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 60(3), 269–298. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2003.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law, E. L. C., Roto, V., Hassenzahl, M., Vermeeren, A. P., & Kort, J. (2009). Understanding, scoping and defining user experience: A survey approach. Proceedings of the CHI 2009 conference on human factors in computer systems. Boston, MA, USA. New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Law, E. L. C., van Schaik, P., & Roto, V. (2014). Attitudes towards user experience (UX) measurement. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 72(6), 526–541. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2013.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, J. R. (2018). Editorial: Is the report of the death of the construct of usability an exaggeration? Journal of Usability Studies, 14(1), 1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., Goncalves, J., Ferreira, D., Xiao, B., Hosio, S., & Kostakos, V. (2014, April). CHI 1994-2013: Mapping two decades of intellectual progress through co-word analysis. Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (pp. 3553–3562). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., Li, H., Goncalves, J., Kostakos, V., & Xiao, B. (2016). Fragmentation or cohesion? Visualizing the process and consequences of information system diversity, 1993–2012. European Journal of Information Systems, 25(6), 509–533. doi:10.1057/ejis.2016.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGrath, J. E. (1981). Dilemmatics: The study of research choices and dilemmas. American Behavioral Scientist, 25(2), 179–210. doi:10.1177/000276428102500205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molich, R. (2018). Are usability evaluations reproducible? Interactions. 25(6), 82–85.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, Y. (2012). HCI theory: Classical, modern, and contemporary. Morgan & Claypool. Retrieved from www.morganclaypool.com
   Google Scholar
• Roto, V., Law, E., Vermeeren, A., & Hoonhout, J. (eds.). (2011). User experience white paper: Result from dagstuhl seminar on demarcating user experience, September 15–18, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Shackel, B. (1991). Usability – Context, framework, definition, design and evaluation. In B. Shackel & S. J. Richardson (Eds.), Human factors for informatics usability (pp. 21–31). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shackel, B. (1997). Human-computer interaction—Whence and whither? Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48(11), 970–986. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199711)48:11<970::AID-ASI2>3.0.CO;2-Z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, S., & Ernst, E. (2008). Trick or treatment: The undeniable facts about alternative medicine. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Tractinsky, N. (1997). Aesthetics and apparent usability: Empirically assessing cultural and methodological issues. Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, Atlanta, Georgia, USA (pp. 115–122). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Tractinsky, N., Katz, A. S., & Ikar, D. (2000). What is beautiful is usable. Interacting with Computers, 13(2), 127–145. doi:10.1016/S0953-5438(00)00031-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weick, K. E. (1979). The social psychology of organizing (Topics in social psychology series). Columbus, OH: McGraw-Hill Humanities.
   Google Scholar