Physical Programming for Blind and Low Vision Children at Scale

References

• Bach, S., Kessler, I., & Heron, P. 2004. Support roles and changing jobs boundaries in the public services: The case of teaching assistants in British primary schools. Proceedings of the 22nd Annual International Labour Press Conference, Amsterdam, 5–7.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, C. M., Milne, L. R., & Ladner, R. E. 2015. Structjumper: Atool to help blind programmers navigate and understand the structure of code. Proceedings of the 2015 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Seoul, Republic of Korea, 3043–52.
   Google Scholar
• Bouck, E. C. (2016). A national snapshot of assistive technology for students with disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 31(2), 4–13. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643416633330
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. doi:https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, K., & Resnick, M. 2012. New frameworks for studying and assessing the development of computational thinking. Proceedings of the 2012 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Vancouver, Canada, 25.
   Google Scholar
• Brule, E., Bailly, G., Brock, A., Valentin, F., Denis, G., & Jouffrais, C. 2016. MapSense: Multi-sensory interactive maps for children living with visual impairments. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, San Jose, CA, 445–57.
   Google Scholar
• Burg, B., Kuhn, A., & Parnin, C. 2013. 1st International Workshop on Live Programming (LIVE 2013). Proceeding of the 2013 ICSE International Conference on Software Engineering, San Francisco, CA, 1529–30.
   Google Scholar
• Burgstahler, S. E., & Ladner, R. E. (2007). Increasing the Participation of People with Disabilities in Computing Fields. Computer, 40(5), 94–97. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2007.175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, S., Pérez, L. C., & Rainey, D. (2010). K–12 Computational Learning. Communications of the ACM, 53(11), 27–29. doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/1839676.1839686
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cullen, C., & Metatla, O. 2018. Multisensory storytelling: A co-design study with children with mixed visual abilities. Proceedings of the 2018 IDC Conference on Interaction Design and Children, Trondheim, Norway, 557–62.
   Google Scholar
• DeLyser, L., Ann, B. M., & Finkel, K. 2016. Introducing student assessments with evidence of validity for NYC’s CS4All. Proceedings of the 2016 WiPSCE Workshop in Primary and Secondary Computing Education, Münster, Germany, 17–26.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education. 2013. Computing Programmes of Study : Key Stages 1 and 2 National Curriculum in England.” http://www.computingatschool.org.uk/data/uploads/primary_national_curriculum_-_computing.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Duncan, C., Bell, T., & Tanimoto, S. 2014. Should Your 8-year-old learn coding? Proceedings of the 2014 WiPSCE Workshop on Primary and Secondary Computing Education, Berlin, Germany, 60–69.
   Google Scholar
• Eccles, J., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational Beliefs, Values, and Goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 109–132. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giordano, D., Maiorana, F., Csizmadia, A. P., Marsden, S., Riedesel, C., Mishra, S., & Lina, V. 2015. New horizons in the assessment of computer science at school and beyond: Leveraging on the viva platform. Proceedings of the 2015 ITiCSE on Working Group Reports, Vilnius, Lithuania, 117–47.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, C. (2009). A Qualitatively Different Experience: Mainstreaming Pupils with a Visual Impairment in Northern Ireland. Euro. J. Special Needs Education, 24(2), 169–182. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/08856250902793644
   Google Scholar
• Grover, S., Cooper, S., & Pea, R. 2014. Assessing computational learning in K-12. Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Innovation & Technology in Computer Science Education, Berlin, Germany, 57–62.
   Google Scholar
• Hadwen-Bennett, A., Sentance, S., & Morrison, C. (2018). Making Programming Accessible to Learners with Visual Impairments: A Literature Review. International Journal of Computer Science Education in Schools, 2, 2. doi:https://doi.org/10.21585/ijcses.v2i2
   Google Scholar
• Horn, M. S., & Robert, J. K. J. 2007a. Designing tangible programming languages for classroom use. In Proceedings of the 2007 TEI Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction (pp. 159–162). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Horn, M. S., & Robert, J. K. J. 2007b. Tangible programming in the classroom with tern. In Proceedings of the 2007 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts, 1965–1970. New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Horn, M. S., Solovey, E. T., Jordan Crouser, R., & Jacob, R. J. K. 2009. Comparing the use of tangible and graphical programming languages for informal science education. Proceedings of the 2009 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Boston, MA, 32: 975.
   Google Scholar
• Horn, M. S., Solovey, E. T., Robert, J. K., & Jacob. 2008. Tangible programming and informal science learning. Proceedings of the 2008 IDC Conference on Interaction Design and Children, Chicago, IL, 194.
   Google Scholar
• Israel, M., Wherfel, Q. M., Pearson, J., Shehab, S., & Tapia, T. (2015). Empowering K–12 Students with Disabilities to Learn Computational Thinking and Computer Programming. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 48(1), 45–53. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059915594790
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kallia, M. (2017). Assessment in Computer Science Courses: A Literature Review. https://royalsociety.org/~/media/policy/projects/
   Google Scholar
• Kane, S. K., Koushik, V., & Muehlbradt, A. 2018. “Bonk: Accessible programming for accessible audio games. Proceedings of the 2018 IDC Conference on Interaction Design and Children, Trondheim, Norway, 132–42.
   Google Scholar
• Kasanen, K., Raty, H., & Eklund, A.-L. (2009). Elementary School Pupils’ Evaluations of the Malleability of Their Academic Abilities. Educational Research, 51(1), 27–38. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00131880802704699
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lechelt, Z., Rogers, Y., Marquardt, N., & Shum, V. 2016. ConnectUs: Anew toolkit for teaching about the internet of things. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts, San Jose, CA, 3711–14.
   Google Scholar
• Lechelt, Z., Rogers, Y., Yuill, N., Nagl, L., Ragone, G., & Marquardt, N. 2018. Inclusive computing in special needs classrooms: Designing for All. Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Montreal, QC, 517.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, I., Martin, F., Denner, J., Coulter, B., Allan, W., Erickson, J., … Werner, L. (2011). Computational Thinking for Youth in Practice. ACM Inroads, 2(1), 32. doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/1929887
   Google Scholar
• Lister, R., Adams, E. S., Fitzgerald, S., Fone, W., Hamer, J., Lindholm, M., … Simon, B.(2004). A Multi-National Study of Reading and Tracing Skills in Novice Programmers. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 36(4), 119–150. ACM. doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/1041624.1041673
   Google Scholar
• Ludi, S., Ellis, L., & Jordan, S. 2014. An accessible robotics programming environment for visually impaired users. Proceedings of the 2014 ASSETS International Conference on Computers & Accessibility, Rochester, NY, 237–38.
   Google Scholar
• Maloney, J., Resnick, M., Rusk, N., Silverman, B., & Eastmond, E. (2010). The Scratch Programming Language and Environment. Transactions of Computing Education, 10(4), 15. 16:1–16. doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/1868358.1868363
   Google Scholar
• Martinez, C., Gomez, M. J., & Benotti, L. 2015. AComparison of preschool and elementary school children learning computer science concepts through amultilanguage robot Programming Platform. Proceedings of the 2015 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, Vilnius, Lithuania, 159–64.
   Google Scholar
• Metatla, O., & Cullen, C. 2018. Bursting the assistance bubble”: Designing inclusive technology with children with mixed visual abilities. Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Montreal, QC, 346.
   Google Scholar
• Metatla, O., Serrano, M., Jouffrais, C., Thieme, A., Kane, S., Branham, S., … Bennett, C. L. 2018. Inclusive education technologies: Emerging opportunities for people with visual impairments.” Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Montreal, QC, W13.
   Google Scholar
• Metatla, O., Thieme, A., Brulé, E., Bennett, C., Serrano, M., & Jouffrais, C. (2018). Toward Classroom Experiences Inclusive of Students with Disabilities. Interactions, 26(1), 40–45. doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/3301428
   Google Scholar
• Milne, L. R., & Ladner, R. E. 2018. Blocks4All: Overcoming accessibility barriers to blocks Programming for Children with Visual Impairments.” Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Montreal, QC, 69.
   Google Scholar
• Moon, N. W., Todd, R. L., Morton, D. L., & Ivey, E. 2012. “Accommodating Students with Disabilities in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM): Findings from Research and practice for middle grades through university education.” http://www.catea.gatech.edu/scitrain/accommodating.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison, C., Villar, N., Thieme, A., Ashktorab, Z., Taysom, E., Salandin, O., … Zhang, H. (2018). Torino: A tangible programming language inclusive of children with visual disabilities. Human Computer Interaction. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2018.1512413
   Google Scholar
• Peyton-Jones, S., Humphreys, S., & Mitchell, B. 2013. “Computing at School in the UK : From Guerrilla to Gorilla.” https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/publication/computing-at-school-in-the-uk-from-guerrilla-to-gorilla/.
   Google Scholar
• RNIB. 2016. “Children and young people england RNIB evidence-based review.” https://www.rnib.org.uk/sites/default/files/Eviden
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, Y., Shum, V., Marquardt, N., Lechelt, S., Johnson, R., Baker, H., & Davies, M. (2017). From the BBC micro to micro: Bit and beyond: A british innovation. Interactions, 24(2), 74–77. doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/3055204
   Google Scholar
• Román-González, M., Pérez-González, J.-C., & Carmen, J.-F. (2017). Which cognitive abilities underlie computational thinking? criterion validity of the computational thinking test. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 678–691. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.08.047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sentance, S., & Csizmadia, A. (2017). Computing in the curriculum: Challenges and strategies from a teacher’s perspective. Education and Information Technologies, 22(2), 469–495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sentance, S., & Waite, J. (2018). Computing in the Classroom: Tales from the Chalkface. It-Information Technology, 60(2), 103–112. doi:https://doi.org/10.1515/itit-2017-0014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sentance, S., Waite, J., Yeomans, L., & Emily, M. 2017. Teaching with physical computing devices: The BBC Micro: Bit initiative. Proceedings of the 2017 WiPSCE Workshop on Primary and Secondary Computing Education, Nijmegen, Netherlands, 87–96.
   Google Scholar
• Sorva, J. (2013). Notional machines and introductory programming education. ACM Transactions of Computing Education, 13, 2. doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/2483710.2483713
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stefik, A. M., Hundhausen, C., & Smith, D. 2011. On the design of an educational infrastructure for the blind and visually impaired in computer science. Proceedings of the 2011 CSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, Dallas, TX, 571.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, A., Elkin, M., & Bers, M. U. 2015. KIBO robot demo: Engaging young children in programming and engineering. Proceedings of the 2015 IDC International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, Boston, MA, 418–421.
   Google Scholar
• Tanimoto, S. (1990). VIVA: A Visual Language for Image Processing. J. Vis. Languages Computing, 1(2), 127–139.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, N., Cheverst, K., Wright, P., & Patrick Olivier. 2013. Leaving the Wild: Lessons from community technology handovers. Proceedings of the 2013 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Paris, France.
   Google Scholar
• Thieme, A., Morrison, C., Villar, N., Grayson, M., & Lindley, S. 2017. Enabling collaboration in learning computer programing inclusive of children with vision impairments.” Proceedings of the 2017 DIS Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, Edinburgh, UK, 739–752.
   Google Scholar
• UK Parliment. 1981. “The 1981 Education Act.” http://www.legislation.gov.uk/Ukpga/1981/60/Enacted.
   Google Scholar
• Utting, I., Cooper, S., Kölling, M., Maloney, J., & Resnick, M. (2010). Alice, greenfoot, and scratch – A discussion. Transactions of Computing Education, 10(4), 17, 1–17:11 doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/1868358.1868364.
   Google Scholar
• Verbeek, P.-P. (2015). Beyond interaction: A short introduction to mediation theory. Interactions, 22(3), 26–31. doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/2751314
   Google Scholar
• Virnes, M., Sutinen, E., & Eija, K.-L. 2008. How children’s individual needs challenge the design of educational robotics. Proceedings of the 2008 ICD International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, Chicago, IL, 274–281.
   Google Scholar
• Waite, J., Curzon, P., Marsh, W., Sentance, S., & Hawden-Bennett, A. (2018). Abstraction in action: K-5 teachers’ uses of levels of abstraction, particularly the design level, in teaching programming. International Journal Of Computer Science Education In Schools, 2(4), 14–40.
   Google Scholar
• Wing, M. (2009). On technology and cultural change. SIGSOFT Softw. Eng. Notes, 34(2), 4. doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/1507195
   Google Scholar
• Wyeth, P. (2008). How young children learn to program with sensor, action, and logic blocks. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 17(4), 517–550. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10508400802395069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaman, B., Abeele, V. V., Markopoulos, P., & Marshall, P. (2012). The evolving field of tangible interaction for children: The challenge of empirical validation. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 16(4), 367–378. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-011-0409-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, L., Parker, A. T., Smith, D. W., & Griffin-Shirley, N. (2011). Assistive technology for students with visual impairments: Challenges and needs in teachers’ preparation programs and practice. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 105(4), 197–210. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X1110500402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuckerman, O., Grotzer, T., & Leahy, K. 2006. Flow blocks as aconceptual bridge between understanding the structure and behavior of acomplex causal system. Proceedings of the 2006 International Conference on Learning Sciences, 880–86. International Society of the Learning Sciences, Bloomington, IN.
   Google Scholar