An adaptive optimization method toward batch-wise variable set point of outlet moisture content for the tobacco drying process

References

• Trojosky, M. Rotary Drums for Efficient Drying and Cooling. Dry. Technol. 2019, 37, 632–651. DOI: 10.1080/07373937.2018.1552597.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bi, S.; Zhang, B.; Mu, L.; Ding, X.; Wang, J. Optimization of Tobacco Drying Process Control Based on Reinforcement Learning. Dry. Technol. 2020, 38, 1291–1299. DOI: 10.1080/07373937.2019.1633662.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mu, L.; Bi, S.; Yu, S.; Liu, X.; Ding, X. An Intelligent Moisture Prediction Method for Tobacco Drying Process Using a Multi-Hierarchical Convolutional Neural Network. Dry. Technol. 2022, 40, 1791–1803. DOI: 10.1080/07373937.2021.1876722.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, M.; Wu, K.; Zhou, Y.; Wang, Z.; Qiao, J.; Wang, Y.; Fan, X.; Nong, Y.; Zi, W. Prediction of Cooling Moisture Content after Cut Tobacco Drying Process Based on a Particle Swarm Optimization-Extreme Learning Machine Algorithm. MBE. 2021, 18, 2496–2507. DOI: 10.3934/mbe.2021127.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, T.; Cai, C.; Gao, Y.; Li, M.; Lou, Y.; Kong, B. Adaptive Online Learning for System Identification and in-Advance Optimization under Long Feedback Delay and Concept Drift in Cigarette Production. Dry. Technol. 2022, 40, 3340–3356. DOI: 10.1080/07373937.2022.2029476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvarez-López, I.; Llanes-Santiago, O.; Verdegay, J. L. Drying Process of Tobacco Leaves by Using a Fuzzy Controller. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 2005, 150, 493–506. DOI: 10.1016/j.fss.2004.07.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosseinpour, S.; Martynenko, A. Application of Fuzzy Logic in Drying: A Review. Dry. Technol. 2022, 40, 797–826. DOI: 10.1080/07373937.2020.1846192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosseinpour, S.; Martynenko, A. An Adaptive Fuzzy Logic Controller for Intelligent Drying. Dry. Technol. 2023, 41, 1110–1132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bottari, A.; Braccia, L. Optimal Control Structure Selection Based on Economics for Continuous Cross-Flow Grain Dryer. Dry. Technol. 2023, 1–15. DOI: 10.1080/07373937.2023.2167829.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, F.; Peng, H.; Ruan, W.; Wang, D.; Liu, M.; Gu, Y.; Li, L. Cubic-RBF-ARX Modeling and Model-Based Optimal Setting Control in Head and Tail Stages of Cut Tobacco Drying Process. Neural Comput. Appl. 2018, 30, 1039–1053. DOI: 10.1007/s00521-016-2735-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, A.; Ren, Z.; Fan, Z.; Feng, X. Dead Band Zone Model Predictive Control of Cut Tobacco Drying Process. IEEE Access. 2020, 8, 157781–157792. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3020469.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, A.; Ren, Z.; Fan, Z.; Feng, X. Two-Layered Model Predictive Control Strategy of the Cut Tobacco Drying Process. IEEE Access. 2020, 8, 155697–155709. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3018476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pang, S.; Jia, J.; Ding, X.; Yu, S.; Liu, Y. Intelligent Control in the Application of a Rotary Dryer for Reduction in the over-Drying of Cut Tobacco. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 8205. DOI: 10.3390/app11178205.
   Google Scholar
• Amini, G.; Salehi, F.; Rasouli, M. Drying Kinetics of Basil Seed Mucilage in an Infrared Dryer: Application of GA-ANN and ANFIS for the Prediction of Drying Time and Moisture Ratio. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2021, 45, e15258. DOI: 10.1111/jfpp.15258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taheri, S.; Brodie, G.; Gupta, D. Optimised ANN and SVR Models for Online Prediction of Moisture Content and Temperature of Lentil Seeds in a Microwave Fluidised Bed Dryer. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2021, 182, 106003. DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2021.106003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, H.; Huang, M.; Zhu, Q.; Zhang, M. Developing C-LSTM Model for Evaluating Moisture Content of Carrot Slices during Drying. Dry. Technol. 2022, 40, 2964–2974. DOI: 10.1080/07373937.2021.1983822.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, J.; Chen, C. Quality Prediction Model Based on Variable-Learning-Rate Neural Networks in Tobacco Redrying Process. In Proceedings of the 2016 5th International Conference on Measurement, Instrumentation and Automation (ICMIA 2016), 2016. DOI: 10.2991/icmia-16.2016.139.
   Google Scholar
• Yuan, C.; Ding, X.; Hou, R. Prediction Method for Moisture Content in Dried Cut Tobacco Based on Combination Model of WNN and ARX. Presented at the 2018 14th International Conference on Natural Computation, Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery (ICNC-FSKD), 2018; pp 155–160. DOI: 10.1109/FSKD.2018.8687157.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, S.; Bi, S.; Ding, X.; Zhang, G. Multichannel Convolutional Neural Network Based Soft Sensing Approach for Measuring Moisture Content in Tobacco Drying Process. In Frontier Computing; Hung, J.C., Yen, N.Y., Chang, J.W., Eds.; Springer Nature Singapore: Singapore, 2022; pp 130–142
   Google Scholar
• Sutskever, I.; Vinyals, O.; Le, Q. V. Sequence to Sequence Learning with Neural Networks. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems; Ghahramani, Z., Welling, M., Cortes, C., Lawrence, N., Weinberger, K., Eds.; Curran Associates, Inc.: United States, 2014; Vol. 27.
   Google Scholar
• He, Y.; Li, B.; Pu, Y.; Jin, W.; Zhou, X.; Jin, C. Uncertainty-Aware Data-Driven Tobacco Loosening and Conditioning Process Moisture Prediction and Control Optimization. Presented at the 2021 IEEE 10th Data Driven Control and Learning Systems Conference (DDCLS), 2021; pp 600–607. DOI: 10.1109/DDCLS52934.2021.9455522.
   Google Scholar
• Li, Z.; Feng, Z.; Zhao, L.; Chen, J.; Gao, Y.; Sun, S.; Ma, Y. Construction and Application of the Prediction Model of Outlet Moisture in the Loosening and Conditioning Process. In International Conference on Electronic Information Engineering, Big Data, and Computer Technology (EIBDCT 2022); Zhong, G., Ed.; SPIE, 2022; Vol. 12256, p 122562Y. DOI: 10.1117/12.2635392.
   Google Scholar
• Ma, Y.; Yuan, R.; He, B.; Jiang, H.; Liu, Z.; Huang, Y.; Tang, J.; Luo, J.; Zhou, B.; Qian, J.; et al. Temperature Variation and Distribution in Tobacco Casing Cylinder Based on Infrared Thermal Imaging Detection; Springer Singapore: Singapore, 2018; pp 389–408
   Google Scholar
• Hochreiter, S.; Schmidhuber, J. Long Short-Term Memory. Neural Comput. 1997, 9, 1735–1780. DOI: 10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilse, M.; Tomczak, J.; Welling, M. Attention-Based Deep Multiple Instance Learning. In Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Machine Learning, 10–15 Jul.; Dy, J., Krause, A., Eds.; PMLR, 2018; Vol. 80, pp 2127–2136.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, J. H. Stochastic Gradient Boosting. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 2002, 38, 367–378. DOI: 10.1016/S0167-9473(01)00065-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cejnek, M.; Vrba, J. Online Centered NLMS Algorithm for Concept Drift Compensation. NNW. 2021, 31, 329–341. DOI: 10.14311/NNW.2021.31.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engel, Y.; Mannor, S.; Meir, R. The Kernel Recursive Least-Squares Algorithm. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 2004, 52, 2275–2285. DOI: 10.1109/TSP.2004.830985.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandic, D. A Generalized Normalized Gradient Descent Algorithm. IEEE Signal Process. Lett. 2004, 11, 115–118. DOI: 10.1109/LSP.2003.821649.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, C.; Jiang, M. Robust Adaptive Filter with Lncosh Cost. Signal Process. 2020, 168, 107348. DOI: 10.1016/j.sigpro.2019.107348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar