Faculty Perceptions of Administrator Influence on Academic Quality in For-Profit Vocational Higher Education

References

• Akonkwa, D. B. M. (2009). Is market orientation a relevant strategy for higher education institutions? Context analysis and research agenda. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 1(3), 311–333. doi:10.1108/17566690911004230
   Google Scholar
• Barusch, A., Gringeri, C., & George, M. (2011). Rigor in qualitative social work research: A review of strategies used in published articles. Social Work Research, 35(1), 11–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belue, R., Carmack, C., Myers, K. R., Weinreb-Welch, L., & Lengerich, E. J. (2012). Systems thinking tools as applied to community-based participatory research: A case study. Health Education & Behavior, 39(6), 745–751. doi:10.1177/1090198111430708
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Checkland, P. (1981/1984). Systems thinking, systems practice. Chichester, England: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, J., Friday-Stroud, S., & Ashley, C. (2010, summer). A systems approach to creating and sustaining an assessment culture. International Journal of Education Research, 5(2), 152–167.
   Google Scholar
• Cooley, A. H., & Cooley, A. (2009). From diploma mills to for-profit colleges and universities: Business opportunities, regulatory challenges, and consumer responsibility in higher education. Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal, 18, 505–526.
   Google Scholar
• Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dawidowicz, P. (2012). The person on the street's understanding of systems thinking. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 29, 2–13. doi:10.1002/sres.1094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dechant, K., & Dechant, L. (2010). Using systems theory to conceptualize the implementation of undergraduate online education in a university setting. Organization Management Journal, 7, 291–300. doi:10.1057/omj.2010.38
   Google Scholar
• Doloi, H. K. (2011). Understanding stakeholders' perspective of cost estimation in project management. International Journal of Project Management, 29, 622–636. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2010.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duderstadt, J. J. (2009, October/December). Aligning American higher education with a twenty-first-century public agenda: Examining the national purposes of American higher education: A leadership approach to policy reform. Higher Education in Europe, 24(3/4), 347–366. doi:10.1080/03797720903355612
   Google Scholar
• Ewell, P. (2010, July). Twenty years of quality assurance in higher education: What's happened and what's different? Quality in Higher Education, 16(2), 173–175. doi:10.1080/13538322.2010.485728
   Google Scholar
• García-Aracil, A., & Palomares-Montero, D. (2010). Examining benchmark indicator systems for the evaluation of higher education institutions. Higher Education, 60, 217–234. doi:10.1007/s10734-009-9296-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guida, A. J., Jr., & Figuli, D. (2012, winter). Higher education's Gainful Employment and 90/10 rules: Unintended “scarlet letters” for minority, low-income, and other at-risk students. The University of Chicago Law Review, 79(1), 131–158. doi:10.2307/41552898
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardman, J., & Paucar-Caceres, A. (2011). A soft systems methodology (SSM) based framework for evaluating managed learning environments. Systemic Practice Action Research, 24, 165–185. doi:10.1007/s11213-010-9182-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, L., & Green, D. (1993). Defining quality. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 19(1), 9–26. doi:10.1080/0260293930180102
   Google Scholar
• He, H., & Li, Y. (2011, February). Key service drivers for high-tech service brand equity: The mediating role of overall service quality and perceived value. Journal of Marketing Management, 27(1/2), 77–99. doi:10.1080/0267257X.2010.495276
   Google Scholar
• Heller, D. E. (2011). The impact of gainful employment regulations. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 43(4), 58–64. doi:10.1080/00091383.2011.607074
   Google Scholar
• Houston, D. (2008). Rethinking quality and improvement in higher education. Quality Assurance in Education, 16(1), 61–79. doi:10.1080/13538320802507463
   Google Scholar
• Huang, P., & Dai, C. (2010). The impacts of emotional contagion and emotional labor perception on employees' service performance. International Journal of Electronic Business Management, 8(1), 68–79.
   Google Scholar
• Kamenetz, A. (2015, June 8). The forces behind the decline of for-profit colleges. Retrieved from http://www.npr.org/sections/ed/2015/06/08/412024783/the-forces-behind-the-decline-of-for-profit-colleges
   Google Scholar
• Liao, H., Toya, K., Lepak, D. P., & Hong, Y. (2009). Do they see eye to eye? Management and employee perspectives of high-performance work systems and influence processes on service quality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(2), 371–391. doi:10.1037/a0013504
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, O. L. (2011). Measuring value-added in higher education: Conditions and caveats—results from using the Measure of Academic Proficiency and Progress (MAPP). Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 36(1), 81–94. doi:10.1080/02602930903197917
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maguad, B. A. (2011, summer). Deming's “profound knowledge”: Implications for higher education. Education, 131(4), 768–774.
   Google Scholar
• Malterud, K. (2012). Systematic text condensation: A strategy for qualitative analysis. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 40, 795–805. doi:10.1177/1403494812465030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martensen, A., & Grønholdt, L. (2009). Quality in higher education: Linking graduates' competencies and employers' needs. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 1(1), 67–77. doi:10.1108/17566690910945877
   Google Scholar
• Mella, P. (2009). Description, definition, denomination, and explanation: The bases of the knowledge process. The International Journal of Learning, 16(4), 483–494.
   Google Scholar
• Millora, M. L. (2010). Market values in higher education: A review of the for-profit sector. Interactions: UCLA Journal of Education and Information Studies, 6(2), 1–20. Retrieved from https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2q5856m8
   Google Scholar
• Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Natale, S. M., & Doran, C. (2012). Marketization of education: An ethical dilemma. Journal of Business Ethics, 105, 187–196. doi:10.1007/s10551-011-0958-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). (2015, May). The condition of education: Student loan volume and default rates. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator_cug.asp
   Google Scholar
• Paucar-Caceres, A., & Pagano, R. (2011). Measuring the performance of a research strategic plan system using the soft systems methodology's three “Es” and the viable system models' indices of achievement. Systemic Practice Action Research, 22, 445–462. doi:10.1007/s11213-009-9140-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarrico, C. S., Rosa, M. J., Teixeira, P. N., & Cardoso, M. F. (2010). Assessing quality and evaluating performance in higher education: Worlds apart or complementary views? Minerva, 48, 35–54. doi:10.1007/s11024-010-9142-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shanahan, P., & Gerber, R. (2004). Quality in university student administration: Stakeholder conceptions. Quality Assurance in Education, 12(4), 166–174. doi:10.1108/09684880410561578
   Google Scholar
• Simmons, O. S. (2013). For-profits and the market paradox. Wake Forest Law Review, 48(2), 333–360. Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2282868
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, A. N. (2010). “Your results may vary”: Protecting students and taxpayers through tighter regulation of proprietary school representations. Administrative Law Review, 62(3), 729–782.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tierney, W. G., & Lechuga, V. M. (2010). The social significance of academic freedom. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 10(2), 118–133. doi:10.1177/1532708609354316
   Google Scholar
• Toppo, G. (2015, June 8). Obama administration to forgive loans for many Corinthian Colleges students. Retrieved from http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2015/06/08/corinthian-colleges-loan-debt/28706813/
   Google Scholar
• Tsinidou, M., Gerogiannis, V., & Fitsilis, P. (2010). Evaluation of the factors that determine quality in higher education: An empirical study. Quality Assurance in Education, 18(3), 227–244. doi:10.1108/09684881011058669
   Google Scholar
• United States Department of Education. (2011, June 13). Program integrity: Gainful employment—debt measures. Federal Register, 76(113), 34386–34539. Retrieved from http://ifap.ed.gov/fregisters/FR061311GEDebtMeasures.html
   Google Scholar
• United States Department of Education. (2015, July 1). Fact sheet: Obama administration increases accountability for low-performing for-profit institutions. Retrieved from http://www.ed.gov/news/press-releases/fact-sheet-obama-administration-increases-accountability-low-performing-profit-institutions
   Google Scholar
• United States Government Accountability Office (GAO). (2010, August 3). For-profit colleges: Undercover testing finds colleges encouraged fraud and engaged in deceptive and questionable marketing practices [Testimony of GAO before the U.S. Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions]. Retrieved from http://www.gao.gov/htext/d10948t.html
   Google Scholar
• United States Government Accountability Office (GAO). (2011, December). Postsecondary education: Student outcomes vary at for-profit, nonprofit, and public schools. Retrieved from http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-12-143
   Google Scholar
• Van der Lei, T. E., Enserink, B., Thissen, W. A. H., & Bekebrede, G. (2011). How to use a systems diagram to analyse and structure complex problems for policy issue papers. Journal of Operational Research Society, 62(7), 1391–1402. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/20868979
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Manen, M. (1990). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wittnebel, L. (2012). Predator or proprietor? Challengers to the liberal education throne. The Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 60(2), 58–65. doi:10.1080/07377363.2012.687295
   Google Scholar