Flipping an Algebra Classroom: Analyzing, Modeling, and Solving Systems of Linear Equations

REFERENCES

• Bentler, P.M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentler, P.M., & Bonnett, D.G. (1980). Multivariate analysis with latent variables: Causal modeling. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 419–456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. Washington DC: International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE).
   Google Scholar
• Bollen, K.A. (1986). Sample size and Bentler and Bonett's nonnormed fit index. Psychometrika, 51, 375–377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brophy, J. (1999). Teaching (Educational Practices Series—1). Geneva, Switzerland: International Bureau of Education. Retrieved from http://www.ibe.unesco.org/publications/educationalpracticesseriespdf/prac01e.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bulmer, M.G. (1979). Principles of statistics. Mineola, NY: Dover.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, B.M. (2012). Structural equation modeling with Mplus: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Confrey, J., Nguyen, K.H., Lee, K., Panorkou, N., Corley, A.K., & Maloney, A.P. (2012). Turn-on common core math: Learning trajectories for the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics. Retrieved from http://www.turnonccmath.net/
   Google Scholar
• Confrey, J., Nguyen, K.H., & Maloney, A.P. (2011). Hexagon map of learning trajectories for the K–8 Common Core Mathematics Standards. Retrieved from http://www.turnonccmath.net/p = map
   Google Scholar
• Council of State School Officers (CSSO). (2010). Common core state standards for mathematics: Understanding mathematics. Washington, DC: National Governor's Association. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/Math
   Google Scholar
• Cramer, D. (1997). Basic statistics for social research: Step-by-step calculations and computer techniques using Minitab. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Edmodo. (2014). Welcome to Edmodo. Retrieved from https://www.edmodo.com
   Google Scholar
• Fasse, B., & Kolodner, J. (2000). Evaluating classroom practices using qualitative research methods: Defining and refining the process. In B. Fishman & S. O'Connor-Divelbiss (Eds.), Fourth international conference of the learning sciences (pp. 193–198). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Gelman, A., Carlin, J.B., Stern, H.S., Rubin, D.B. (2004). Bayesian data analysis (2nd ed.). Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
   Google Scholar
• Gerbing, D.W., & Anderson, J.C. (1993). Monte Carlo evaluations of goodness of fit indices. In K.A. Bollen & J.S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 40–65). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Glass, G.V., & Hopkins, L.D. (1996). Statistical methods in education and psychology (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, B., & Miller, K. (2013). Research says evidence on flipped classrooms is still coming in. Technology-Rich Learning, 70, 78–80.
   Google Scholar
• Hiebert, J., & Grouws, D.A. (2007). The effects of classroom mathematics teaching on students' learning. In F.K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 371–404). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Hiebert, J., Stigler, J.W., Jacobs, J.K., Givvin, K.B., Garnier, H., Smith, M., & Gallimore, R. (2005). Mathematics teaching in the United States today (and tomorrow): Results from the TIMSS 1999 video study. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 27, 111–132. doi: 10.3102/01623737027002111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P.M. (1995). Evaluating model fit. In R. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 76–99). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, L.W., & Renner, J.D. (2012). Effect of the flipped classroom model on a secondary computer applications course: Student and teacher perceptions, questions, and student achievement (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Louisville, Louisville, KY. Retrieved from http://theflippedclassroom.files.wordpress.com/2012/04/johnson-renner-2012.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kidron, Y., & Lindsay, J. (2015). Stated briefly: What does the research say about increased learning time and student outcomes? (REL 2015-061). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Appalachia.
   Google Scholar
• Kieran, C. (1989). The early learning of algebra: A structural perspective. In S. Wagner & C. Kieran (Eds.), Research issues in the learning and teaching of algebra (pp. 33–56). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Kieran, C. (1992). The learning and teaching of school algebra. In D.A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 390–419). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Kieran, C. (2007). Learning and teaching of algebra at the middle school through college levels: Building meaning for symbols and their manipulation. In F.K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 707–762). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (Eds.). (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. Washington DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kwan, R. (2000). Tapping into children's curiosity. In J.H. Minstrell & E.H. van Zee (Eds.), Inquiring into inquiry learning and teaching in science (pp. 148–150). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
   Google Scholar
• Lage, M.J., Platt, G.J., & Treglia, M. (2000). Inverting the classroom: A gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment. Journal of Economic Education, 31, 30–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B.2001 Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Little, R.J. A. (1987). A test of missing completely at random for multivariate data with missing values. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83, 1198–1202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H.W., Hau, K.-T., & Grayson, D. (2005). Goodness of fit in structural equation models. In A. Maydeu-Olivares & J.J. McArdle (Eds.), Contemporary psychometrics (pp. 275–341). Mahweh, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Rakes, C.R., Valentine, J., McGatha, M.C., & Ronau, R.N. (2010). Methods of instructional improvement in algebra: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 80, 372–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ronau, R.N., Rakes, C.R., Niess, M.L., Bush, S.B., Driskell, S., & Pugalee, D. (2015). The quality of mathematics education technology literature. Journal of Multidisciplinary Evaluation, 11, 12–36.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, D.B. (1987). Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Saunders, J.M. (2014). The flipped classroom: Its effect on student academic achievement and critical thinking skills in high school mathematics (UMI 3645482). Dissertation Abstracts International-A, 76(03), 128.
   Google Scholar
• Shadish, W.R., Cook, T.D., & Campbell, D.T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Skemp, R.R. (2006). Relational understanding and instrumental understanding. Mathematics Teaching, 77, 20–26. Reprinted in Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 12, 88–95. (Original work published 1976)
   Google Scholar
• Slavin, R.E., & Karweit, N.L. (1982). Student teams and mastery learning: A factorial experiment in urban math nine classes. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University, Center for Social Organization of Schools.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, J.P. (2012). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (5th ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stigler, J.W., & Hiebert, J. (1997). Understanding and improving classroom mathematics instructions: An overview of the TIMSS video study. Phi Delta Kappan, 79, 14–21. Retrieved from http://research.acer.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article = 1000&context = research_conference_1997#page = 60
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strayer, J. (2007). The effects of the classroom flip on the learning environment: A comparison of learning activity in a traditional classroom and a flip classroom that used an intelligent tutoring system (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH. Retrieved from http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num = osu1189523914
   Google Scholar
• Tucker, B. (2012). The flipped classroom: Online instruction at home frees class time for learning. Education Next, 12, 82–83. Retrieved from http://educationnext.org/the-flipped-classroom/
   Google Scholar
• Vogel, C. (2008). Algebra: Changing the equation. District Administration, 44, 34–40.
   Google Scholar
• What Works Clearinghouse. (2014). Procedures and standards handbook. Version 3.0. Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/DocumentSum.aspx?sid = 19
   Google Scholar