Exploration of a Blended Learning Approach to Reading Instruction for Low SES Students in Early Elementary Grades

REFERENCES

• Cassady, J. C. & Smith, L. L.2004 The impact of a reading-focused integrated learning system on phonological awareness in kindergarten. Journal of Literacy Research35947–964
   Google Scholar
• Cassady, J.C., & Smith, L.L. (2005). The impact of a structured integrated learning system on first grade students’ reading gains. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 21, 361–376.
   Google Scholar
• Chambers, B., Slavin, R.E., Madden, N.A., Abrami, P.C., Tucker, B.J., Cheung, A., & Gifford, R. (2008). Technology infusion in Success for All: Reading outcomes for first graders. The Elementary School Journal, 109(1), 2–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, A.C. K., & Slavin, R.E. (2013). Effects of educational technology applications on reading outcomes for struggling readers: A best-evidence synthesis. Reading Research Quarterly, 48(3), 277–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Graaff, S., Bosman, A.M. T, Hasselman, F., & Verhoeven, L. (2009). Benefits of systematic phonics instruction. Scientific Studies of Reading, 13(4), 318–333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foorman, B. R., Breier, J. I., & Fletcher, J. M.2003 Interventions aimed at improving reading success: An evidence-based approach. Developmental neuropsychology242–3613--639
   Google Scholar
• Foorman, B. R., & Torgesen, J.2001 Critical elements of classroom and small-group instruction promote reading success in all children. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice164203--212
   Google Scholar
• Grantmakers in Education. (2011). Investing in our next generation: A funder's guide to addressing the educational opportunities and challenges facing English language learners. New York, NY: Foundation for Child Development.
   Google Scholar
• Hecht, S.A., & Close, L. (2002). Emergent literacy skills and training time uniquely predict variability in responses to phonemic awareness training in disadvantaged kindergartners. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 82, 93–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, E. P., Perry, J., & Shamir, H. (2010). Variability in reading ability gains as a function of computer-assisted instruction method of presentation. Computers & Education, 55, 209–217.
   Google Scholar
• Lonigan, C.J., Driscoll, K., Phillips, B.M., Cantor, B.G., Anthony, J.L., & Goldstein, H. (2003). A computer-assisted instruction phonological sensitivity program for preschool children at-risk for reading problems. Journal of Early Intervention, 25, 248–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacArthur, C.A., Ferretti, R.P., Okolo, C.M., & Cavalier, A.R. (2001). Technology applications for students with literacy problems: A critical review. The Elementary School Journal, 101, 273–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macaruso, P. & Rodman, A. (2011a). Efficacy of computer-assisted instruction for the development of early literacy skills in young children. Reading Psychology, 32(2), 172–196.
   Google Scholar
• Macaruso, P. & Rodman, A. (2011b). Benefits of computer-assisted instruction to support reading acquisition in English language learners. Bilingual Research Journal, 34(3), 301–315.
   Google Scholar
• Macaruso, P., Hook, P.E., & McCabe, R. (2006). The efficacy of computer-based supplementary phonics programs for advancing reading skills in at-risk elementary students. Journal of Research in Reading, 29, 162–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macaruso, P., & Walker, A. (2008). The efficacy of computer-assisted instruction for advancing literacy skills in kindergarten children. Reading Psychology, 29, 266–287.
   Google Scholar
• Mioduser, D., Tur-Kaspa, H., & Leitner, I. (2000). The learning value of computer-based instruction of early reading skills. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 16, 54–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, M.J., & Fox, B.J. (2001). The effects of computer software for developing phonological awareness in low-progress readers. Reading Research and Instruction, 40, 315–332.
   Google Scholar
• Mohr, K.A. J., & Mohr, E.S. (2007). Engaging English language learners in classroom interactions using the Response Protocol. The Reading Teacher, 60, 440–450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics. (2011). The Nation's Report Card: Reading 2011 (NCES 2012-457). Washington, DC: Author, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common Core State Standards for English language arts and literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects. Washington, DC: Authors.
   Google Scholar
• National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (NIH Publication No. 00–4754). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Ness, M., Couperus, J., & Willey, M. (2013). A comparison study of the effectiveness of the Lexia Reading programme. Kairaraniga, 14(1), 17–24.
   Google Scholar
• Pappamihiel, N.E. (2002). English as a second language students and English language anxiety: Issues in the mainstream classroom. Research in the Teaching of English, 36, 327–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paterson, W.A., Henry, J.J., O’Quin, K., Ceprano, M.A., & Blue, E.V. (2003) Investigating the effectiveness of an integrated learning system on early emergent readers. Reading Research Quarterly, 38, 172–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, R.M., & Deci, E.L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saine, N.L., Lerkkanen, M.-K., Ahonen, T., Tolvanen, A., & Lyytinen, H. (2011). Computer-assisted remedial reading intervention for school beginners at risk for reading disability. Child Development, 82(3), 1013–1028.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savage, R., Abrami, P.C., Piquette, N., Wood, E., Deleveaux, G., Sanghera-Sidhu, S., & Burgos, G. (2013). A (Pan-Canadian) cluster randomized control effectiveness trial of the ABRACADABRA Web-based literacy program. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(2), 310–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scammaca, N., Vaughn, S., Roberts, G., Wanzek, J., & Torgesen, J. K.2007 Extensive reading interventions in grades K– 3: From research to practice. Portsmouth, NH: RMC Research Corporation, Center on Instruction
   Google Scholar
• Segers, E., & Verhoeven, L. (2005). Long-term effects of computer training of phonological awareness in kindergarten. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21, 17–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shelley-Tremblay, J., & Eyer, J. (2009). Effect of the reading plus program on reading skills in second graders. Journal of Behavioral Optometry, 20, 59–66.
   Google Scholar
• Staker, H., & Horn, M. (2012). Classifying K–12 blended learning. Mountain View, CA: Innosight Institute, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Torgesen, J.K., Rashotte, C.A., & Alexander, A. (2001). Principles of fluency instruction in reading: Relationships with established empirical outcomes. In M. Wolf (Ed.), Dyslexia, fluency, and the brain (pp. 333–355). Timonium, MD: York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Torgesen, J.K., Wagner, R.K., Rashotte, C.A., Herron, J., & Lindamood, P. (2010). Computer-assisted instruction to prevent early reading difficulties in students at risk for dyslexia: Outcomes from two instructional approaches. Annals of Dyslexia, 60, 40–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toste, J.R., Compton, D.L., Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L.S., Gilbert, J.K., Cho, E., Barquero, L.A., & Bouton, B.D. (2014). Understanding unresponsiveness to Tier 2 reading intervention: Exploring the classification and profiles of adequate and inadequate responders in first grade. Learning Disability Quarterly, 37(4), 192–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Daal, V.H. P., & Reitsma, P. (2000). Computer-assisted learning to read and spell: Results from two pilot studies. Journal of Research in Reading, 23, 181–193.
   Google Scholar
• Vaughn, S., Denton, C. A., & Fletcher, J. M.2010 Why intensive interventions are necessary for students with severe reading difficulties. Psychology in the Schools47432--444
   Google Scholar
• Wild, M. (2009). Using computer-aided instruction to support the systematic practice of phonological skills in beginning readers. Journal of Research in Reading, 32(4), 413–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, K.T. (2001). Group Reading Assessment and Diagnostic Evaluation, Levels P and K. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Services.
   Google Scholar
• Wright Group. (n.d.). About LEAD21: Literacy, equity, acceleration, and differentiation in the 21st century classroom. Retrieved from http://edc425uri.wikispaces.com/file/view/LEAD21+Program+Overview.pdf
   Google Scholar