Publication Cover
Computers in the Schools
Interdisciplinary Journal of Practice, Theory, and Applied Research
Volume 34, 2017 - Issue 4
735
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Tracking Professional Development of Novice Teachers when Integrating Technology in Teaching Mathematics

, &

References

  • Abboud-Blanchard, M., & Lagrange, J. B. (2006). Uses of ICT by preservice mathematics teachers: Towards a professional instrumentation? International Journal of Technology in Mathematics Education, 13(4), 183–190.
  • Abramovich, S. (2013). Computers in mathematics education: An introduction. Computers in the Schools, 30(1–2), 4–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2013.765305
  • Budinski, N., & Takači, D. (2013). Using computers and context in the modeling-based teaching of logarithms. Computers in the Schools, 30(1–2), 30–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2013.764275
  • Calder, N. (2011). Affordances of digital technologies. In N. Calder (Ed.), Processing mathematics through digital technologies: The primary years (pp. 31–38). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
  • Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L., & Tsai, C. C. (2010). Facilitating preservice teachers' development of technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge (TPACK). Educational Technology & Society, 13(4), 63–73.
  • Chen, F. H., Looi, C. K., & Chen, W. (2009). Integrating technology in the classroom: A visual conceptualization of teachers' knowledge, goals and beliefs. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25(5), 470–488. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2009.00323.x
  • Deaney, R., & Hennessy, S. (2011). A case study of using multiple resources to teach straight line graphs. In A. Oldknow & C. Knights (Eds), Mathematics education with digital technology 101–108). London, England: Continuum International Publishing Group.
  • Demetriadis, S., Barbas, A., Molohides, A., Palaigeorgiou, G., Psillos, D., Vlahavas, I., & Pombortsis, A. (2003). Cultures in negotiation: Teachers' acceptance/resistance attitudes considering the infusion of technology into schools. Computers & Education, 41(1), 19–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1315(03)00012-5
  • Drijvers, P. (2000). Students encountering obstacles using a CAS. International Journal of Computers for Mathematic al Learning, 5(3), 189–209. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009825629417
  • Drijvers, P., Kieran, C., Mariotti, M. A., Ainley, J., Andresen, M., Chan, Y. C., … Meagher, M. (2010). Integrating technology into mathematics education: Theoretical perspectives. In C. Hoyles & J. B. Lagrange (Eds.), Digital technologies and mathematics teaching and learning: Rethinking the terrain (Vol. 13, pp. 89–132). Boston, MA: Springer.
  • Engen, B. K., & Ogrim, L. (2009). Integrating ICT without throwing the baby out with the bathwater. In T. Bastiaens, J. Dron, & C. Xin (Eds.), Proceedings of E-Learn 2009– World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (pp. 2555–2561). Vancouver, Canada: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/32845/
  • Ertmer, P. A. (2005). Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 25–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504683
  • Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2010.10782551
  • Fuglestad, A. B., Healy, L., Kynigos, C., & Monaghan, J. (2010). Working with teachers: Context and culture. In C. Hoyles & J. B. Lagrange (Eds.), Digital technologies and mathematics teaching and learning: Rethinking the terrain (Vol. 13, pp. 293–310). Boston, MA: Springer.
  • Goos, M. (2005). A sociocultural analysis of the development of preservice and beginning teachers' pedagogical identities as rs of technology. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 8(1), 35–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-005-0457-0
  • Goos, M., Soury-Lavergne, S., Assude, T., Brown, J., Kong, C. M., Glover, D., … Sinclair, M. (2010). Teachers and teaching: Theoretical perspectives and issues concerning classroom implementation. In C. Hoyles & J-B. Lagrange (Eds.), Digital technologies and mathematics teaching and learning: Rethinking the terrain (Vol.13, pp. 311–332). Boston, MA: Springer.
  • Goos, M. (2012). Digital technologies in the Australian curriculum: Mathematics—a lost opportunity? In B. Atweh, M. Goos, R. Jorgensen, & D. Siemon (Eds.), Engaging the Australian national curriculum: Mathematics: Perspectives from the field (pp. 135–152). New South Wales, AU: Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia. Retrieved from http://www.merga.net.au/sites/default/files/editor/books/1/Chapter%207%20Goos.pdf
  • Gurevich, I., & Gorev, D. (2012). Examining the impact of an integrative method of using technology on students' achievement and efficiency of computer use and on pedagogical procedure in geometry. The International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education, 19(3), 95–104.
  • Gurevich, I., & Gorev, D. (2015). The challenge for mathematics teachers-educators: Leading students toward teaching in a technological environment. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Technology in Mathematics Teaching (ICTMT 12) (pp.395–402), Portugal. http://hdl.handle.net/10400.1/6081
  • Gurevich, I., & Barchilon Ben-Av, M. (2017). The impact of technology on the curriculum of the course “Plane Transformations in geometry”: S self-study. Manuscript submitted for publication to Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Technology in Mathematics Teaching (ICTMT 13), Lyon, France.
  • Hall, J., & Chamblee, G. (2013). Teaching algebra and geometry with GeoGebra: Preparing preservice teachers for middle grades/secondary mathematics classrooms. Computers in the Schools, 30(1–2), 12–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2013.764276
  • Hammond, M., Fragkouli, E., Suandi, I., Crosson, S., Ingram, J., Johnston‐Wilder, P., & Wray, D. (2009). What happens as student teachers who made very good of ICT during pre‐ service training enter their first year of teaching? Teacher Development, 13(2), 93–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530903043939
  • Harris, J., & Hofer, M. (2009). Instructional planning activity types as vehicles for curriculum- based TPACK development. In C. D. Maddux (Ed.), Research highlights in technology and teacher education (pp. 99–108) Chesapeake, VA: Society for Information Technology in Teacher Education (SITE).
  • Healy, L., & Soares de Carvalho, C. C. S. (2014). Evidence-based, theoretically informed design as a means to investigate and transform proof practices in school mathematics. Teaching Mathematics and its Applications, 33(3), 150–165. https://doi.org/10.1093/teamat/hru017
  • Hershkowitz, R., Dreyfus, T., Ben-Zvi, D., Friedlander, A., Hadas, N., Resnick, T., … Schwarz, B. B. (2002). Mathematics curriculum development for computerized environments: A designer–researcher–teacher–learner activity. In L. D. English (Ed.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (pp. 657–694). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Hollebrands, K. F. (2007). The role of a dynamic software program for geometry in the strategies high school mathematics students employ. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38(2), 164–192.
  • Jung, I., & Latchem, C. (2011). A model for e-education: Extended teaching spaces and extended learning spaces. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(1), 6–18. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00987.xhttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00987.x
  • Kleiner, B., Thomas, N., & Lewis, L. (2007). Educational technology in teacher education programs for initial licensure. Statistical analysis report ( NCES 2008- 040). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
  • Kosma, R. B. ((2003).Ed.). Technology, innovation, and educational change: A global perspective. Eugene, OR: International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE).
  • Lagrange, J. B., Argitue, M., Laborde, C., & Trouche, L. (2003). Technology and mathematics education: A multidimensional overview of recent research and innovation. In A. J. Bishop, M. A. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & F. K. S. Leung (Eds.). Second international handbook of mathematics education (Vol.10, pp. 237–271). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
  • Marton, F. (1986). Phenomenography–a research approach to investigating different understandings of reality. Journal of Thought, 21(3), 28–49.
  • Ministry of Education. (2015). The guide for the computerized school (2015-2019). Ministry of Education, Department of Telecommunication Technology and Information Systems, Department of Technology Management (Hebrew). Retrieved from http://sites.education.gov.il/cloud/home/tikshuv/Documents/mdrich_ashalem_tikshuv.pdf
  • Miodr, D., Nachmias, R., Tubin, D., & Forkosh-Baruch, A. (2003). Analysis schema for the study of domains and levels of pedagogical innovation in schools using ICT. Education and Information Technologies, 8(1), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023922207476
  • Mittal, A. K., & Chawla, N. (2013). Pedagogy of mathematics: Role of technology in teaching learning mathematics. Journal of Indian Research 1(1), 105–110.
  • Monaghan, J. (2001). Teachers' classroom interactions in ICT-based mathematics lessons. In M. V. D. Heuvel (Ed.), Proceedings of the 25th International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol.3, pp. 239–257).
  • Mwalongo, A. (2012). Teachers' perceptions about ICTs for teaching, professional development, administration and personal use. International Journal of Education and Development Using ICT, 7(3), 36–49.
  • Naftaliev, E., & Yerushalmy, M. (2013). Guiding explorations: Design principles and functions of interactive diagrams. Computers in the Schools, 30(1–2), 61–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2013.769084
  • Niess, M. L. (2005). Preparing teachers to teach science and mathematics with technology: Developing a technology pedagogical content knowledge. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(5), 509–523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2005.03.006
  • Noss, R., & Hoyles, C. (1996). Windows on mathematical meanings: Learning cultures and computers. In A. J. Bishop (Ed.), Mathematics education library (Vol. 17, pp.5–11). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
  • Nuggent, G., Soh, L., & Samal, A. (2006). Design, development, and validation of learning objects. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 34(3), 271–281. https://doi.org/10.2190/9BF6-1KBL-Y3CX-6QXG
  • Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Brush, T. A., Strycker, J., Gronseth, S., Roman, T., Abaci, S., & Plucker, J. (2012). Preparation versus practice: How do teacher education programs and practicing teachers align in their use of technology to support teaching and learning? Computers & Education, 59(2), 399–411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.01.014
  • Ozgun-Koca, S. A., Meagher, M., & Edwards, M. T. (2010). Preservice teachers' emerging TPACK in a technology-rich methods class. Mathematics Educator, 19(2), 10–20.
  • Pamuk, S. (2012). Understanding preservice teachers' technology through TPACK framework. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28(5), 425–439. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00447.x
  • Perrotta, C. (2013). Do school-level factors influence the educational benefits of digital technology? A critical analysis of teachers' perceptions. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(2), 314–327. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01304.x
  • Pierce, R., & Ball, L. (2009). Perceptions that may affect teachers' intention to use technology in secondary mathematics classes. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 71(3), 299–317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-008-9177-6
  • Pitard, V. (2011). Emerging technologies for learning and teaching. In A. Oldknow & C. Knights (Eds.), Mathematics education with digital technology (pp.111–117). London, England: Continuum International Publishing Group.
  • Rasmussen, C., & Nemirovsky, R. (2003). Becoming friends with acceleration: The role of tools and bodily activity in mathematical learning. In N. A. Pateman & B. J. Zilliox (Eds.), Proceedings of the 27th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol.1, pp. 127–135). Cape Town, South Africa: PME.
  • Ruthven, K., & Lavicza, Z. (2011). Didactical conceptualization of dynamic mathematical approaches: Example analysis from the InnoMathEd program. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 6(2), 89–110.
  • Sang, G., Valcke, M., van Braak, J., & Tondeur, J. (2010). Student teachers' thinking processes and ICT integration: Predictors of prospective teaching behaviors with educational technology. Computers & Education, 54(1), 103–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.07.010
  • Seidel, J. V., & Kelle, U. (1995). Different functions of coding in the analysis of textual data. In U. Kelle, G. Prein, & K. Bird (Eds.), Computer-aided qualitative data analysis: Theory, methods, and practice (pp. 52–61). London, England: Sage.
  • So, H. J., & Kim, B. (2009). Learning about problem based learning: Student teachers integrating technology, pedagogy and content knowledge. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(1), 101–116. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1183
  • Tabach, M., Hershkowitz, R., & Dreyfus, T. (2013). Learning beginning algebra in a computer- intensive environment. ZDM The International Journal of Mathematics Education, 45(3), 377–391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-012-0458-2
  • Tondeur, J., Aesaert, K., Pynoo, B., Braak, J., Fraeyman, N., & Erstad, O. (2017). Developing a validated instrument to measure preservice teachers' ICT competencies: Meeting the demands of the 21st century. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(2), 462–472. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12380
  • Torner, G., Rolka, K., Rosken, B., & Sriraman, B. (2010). Understanding a teacher's actions in the classroom by applying Schoenfeld's theory teaching-in-context: Reflecting on goals and beliefs. In B. Sriraman & L. English ( Series Eds.), Theories of mathematics education: Seeking new frontiers: Vol. 4. Advances in mathematics education (pp. 401–420). New York, NY: Springer.
  • Yerushalmy, M. (2009). Technology-based algebra learning, epistemological discontinuities and curricular implications. In B. B. Schwarz, T. Dreyfus, & R. Hershkowitz (Eds.), Transformation of knowledge through classroom interaction (pp. 56–64). London, England: Routledge.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.