Teachers' Cloud-Based Learning Designs: The Development of a Guiding Rubric Using the TPACK Framework

References

• Bennett, S., Agostinho, S., Lockyer, L., Kosta, L., Jones, J., Koper, R., & Harper, B. (2007, December). Learning designs: Bridging the gap between theory and practice. Paper presented at the 2007 Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education (ASCILITE) Conference: Providing choices for learners and learning. Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.
   Google Scholar
• Berggren, A., Burgos, D., Fontana, J. M., Hinkelman, D., Hung, V., Hursh, A., & Tielemans, G. (2005). Practical and pedagogical issues for teacher adoption of IMS learning design standards in Moodle LMS. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2, 1–24. Retrieved from http://jime.open.ac.uk/articles/10.5334/2005-2/
   Google Scholar
• Britten, J. S., & Cassady, J. C. (2005). The technology integration assessment instrument: Understanding planned use of technology by classroom teachers. Computers in the Schools, 22(3), 49–61. doi:10.1300/J025v22n03_05
   Google Scholar
• Bughin, J., Chui, M., & Manyika, J. (2010). Clouds, big data, and smart assets: Ten tech-enabled business trends to watch. McKinsey Quarterly, pp. 1–14. Retrieved from http://www.mckinsey.com/insights/high_tech_telecoms_Internet/clouds_big_data_and_smart_assets_ten_tech-enabled_business_trends_to_watch
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, C., Al-Harthi, A., & Karimi, A. (2015, December). Teachers' cloud-based content creation in light of the TPACK framework: Implications for teacher education. Paper presented at the 2015 ASCILITE conference: Globally Connected, Digitally Enabled, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Colman, A. M. (2015). Content validity. In A dictionary of psychology. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Retrieved from http://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780199657681.001.0001/acref-9780199657681-e-1835
   Google Scholar
• Conole, G. (2010, June). Learning design - Making practice explicit. Paper presented at the ConnectEd 2010: Second International Conference on Design Education, Sydney, Australia. Retrieved from http://cloudworks.ac.uk/cloud/view/4001
   Google Scholar
• Conole, G., Dyke, M., Oliver, M., & Seale, J. (2004). Mapping pedagogy and tools for effective learning design. Computers & Education, 43, 17–33. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2003.12.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalziel, J. (2008). Learning design: Sharing pedagogical know-how. In T. Iiyoshi & M. S. V. Kumar (Eds.), Opening up education: The collective advancement of education through open technology, open content, and open knowledge (pp. 375–387). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dholakia, U., King, J., & Baraniuk, R. (2006). What makes an open education program sustainable? The case of connexions. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/3/6/36781781.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Erl, T., Puttini, R., & Mahmood, Z. (2013). Cloud computing: Concepts, technology, & architecture. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. Retrieved from http://servicetechbooks.com/pdf/cloud_sample_chapter_1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fernandez, A., Peralta, D., Herrera, F., & Benítez, J. M. (2012, January). An overview of e-learning in cloud computing. In L. Uden, E. S. Corchado Rodriguez, J. F. De Paz Santana, & F. De la Prieta (Eds.), Workshop on Learning Technology for Education in Cloud (LTEC'12) (pp. 35–46). Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany: Springer Verlag. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-30859-8_4
   Google Scholar
• Garzotto, F., & Retalis, S. (2009). A critical perspective on designing patterns for e-learning. In L. Lockyer, S. Bennett, S. Agostinho, & B. Harper (Eds.), Handbook of research on learning design and learning objects: Issues, applications and technologies (pp. 113–143). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• George, D., & Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Goodyear, P. (2005). Educational design and networked learning: Patterns, pattern languages and design practice. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 21(1), 82–101. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14742/ajet.v21i1.1344
   Google Scholar
• Graham, C. R., Burgoyne, N., Cantrell, P., Smith, L., St. Clair, L., & Harris, R. (2009). TPACK development in science teaching: Measuring the TPACK confidence of inservice science teachers. TechTrends: For Leaders in Education & Training, 53(5), 70–79. doi:10.1007/s11528-009-0328-0
   Google Scholar
• Haladyna, T. M., & Rodriguez, M. C. (2013). Developing and validating test items. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, J., Grandgenett, N., & Hofer, M. (2010). Testing a TPACK-based technology integration assessment rubric. In D. Gibson & B. Dodge (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference 2010 (pp. 3833–3840). Chesapeake, VA: American Association of Computing Education (AACE).
   Google Scholar
• Hartas, D. (2015). Quantitative research as a method of inquiry in education. In D. Hartas (Ed.), Educational research and inquiry: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (pp. 65–81). London, UK: Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hartmann, S. B., Braae, L. Q. N., Pedersen, S., & Khalid, M. S. (2016). The potentials of using cloud computing in schools: A systematic literature review. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 16(1), 190–202. Retrieved from http://www.tojet.net/volumes/v16i1.pdf#page=201
   Google Scholar
• Hofer, M., & Grandgenett, N. (2012). TPACK development in teacher education: A longitudinal study of preservice teachers in a secondary M.A.Ed. program. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 45(1), 83–106. doi:10.1080/15391523.2012.10782598
   Google Scholar
• IMS Global Learning Consortium. (2003). IMS learning design best practice and implementation guide. Retrieved from http://www.imsglobal.org/learningdesign/ldv1p0/imsld_bestv1p0.html
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, G. (2015). Research methods for public administrators (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Estrada, V., & Freeman, A. (2014). NMC Horizon Report: 2014 K-12 Edition. Austin, TX: The New Media Consortium. Retrieved from http://www.nmc.org/publication/nmc-horizon-report-2014-k-12-edition/
   Google Scholar
• Koehler, M. J. (2012). TPACK explained – The seven components of TPACK. Retrieved from http://matt-koehler.com/tpack2/tpack-explained/
   Google Scholar
• Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2005). What happens when teachers design educational technology? The development of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32(2), 131–152.
   Google Scholar
• Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2008). Introducing TPCK. In AACTE Committee on Innovation and Technology (Ed.), Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK) for educators (pp. 3–29). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2011). TPACK – Technological pedagogical and content knowledge. Retrieved from www.tpck.org/
   Google Scholar
• Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., Kereluik, K., Shin, T. S., & Graham, C. R. (2014). The technological pedagogical content knowledge framework. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. J. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (4th ed., pp. 101–111). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Koh, J. H. L. (2013). A rubric for assessing teachers' lesson activities with respect to TPACK for meaningful learning with ICT. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(6), 887–900.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koh, J. H. L., Chai, C. S., & Tay, L. Y. (2014). TPACK-in-action: Unpacking the contextual influences of teachers' construction of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Computers & Education, 78, 20–29. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.04.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159–174. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2529310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Learning design: The learning design construct. (2003). Retrieved from http://www.learningdesigns.uow.edu.au/project/learn_design.htm
   Google Scholar
• Lodico, M. G., Spaulding, D. T., & Voegtle, K. H. (2010). Methods in educational research: From theory to practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education. (2013). Malaysia education blueprint 2013–2025, Malaysia: Ministry of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver, R. (1999). Exploring strategies for on-line teaching and learning. Distance Education, 20(2), 240–254. doi:10.1080/0158791990200205
   Google Scholar
• Powell, C. (2003). The Delphi technique: Myths and realities. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 41(4), 376–382. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02537.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1175860
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the New Reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stemler, S., & Tsai, J. (2008). Best practices in interrater reliability: Three common approaches. In J. Osborne (Ed.), Best practices in quantitative methods (pp. 29–50). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, C. (2011). How Khan Academy is changing the rules of education. Wired Magazine, p. 126. Retrieved from http://resources.rosettastone.com/CDN/us/pdfs/K-12/Wired_KhanAcademy.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wang, W. Y. C., Rashid, A., & Chuang, H. (2011). Toward the trend of cloud computing. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 12(4), 238–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar