Measuring Perceived Attributes of the Interactive Whiteboard for the Mathematics Class

References

• Agarwal, R., & Prasad, J. (1997). The role of innovation characteristics and perceived voluntariness in the acceptance of information technologies. Decision Sciences, 28(3), 557–582. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1997.tb01322.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barclay, D., Higgins, C., & Thompson, R. (1995). The Partial Least Squares (PLS) approach to causal modeling: Personal computer adoption and use as an illustration. Technology Studies, 2(2), 285–309. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/313137896313137896
   Google Scholar
• Bayar, F. B., & Kurt, U. (2021). Effects of mobile learning science course on students’ academic achievement and their opinions about the course. Science Education International, 32(3), 254–263. doi:https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v32.i3.9
   Google Scholar
• Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238–246. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen, J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bryant, F. B., & Yarnold, P. R. (1995). Principal-components analysis and exploratory andconfirmatory factor analysis. In L. G. Grimm & P. R. Yarnold (Eds.), Reading and understanding multivariate statistics (pp. 99–136). American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Dobrovolná, A. (2015). Using interactive board and communication in teaching English at lower-secondary stage of elementary school. Practice and Theory in Systems of Education, 10(1), 16–22. doi:https://doi.org/10.1515/ptse-2015-0002
   Google Scholar
• Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 48, 39–50. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fornell, C., Tellis, G. J., & Zinkhan, G. M. (1982). Validity assessment: A structural equations approach using partial least squares. AMA Educator’s Proceedings, 405–409.
   Google Scholar
• Glover, D., Miller, D., Averis, D., & Door, V. (2005). The interactive whiteboard: A literature survey. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 14(2), 155–170. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14759390500200199
   Google Scholar
• Glover, D., Miller, D., Averis, D., & Door, V. (2007). The evolution of an effective pedagogy for teachers using the interactive whiteboard in mathematics and modern languages: An empirical analysis from the secondary sector. Learning, Media and Technology, 32(1), 5–20. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17439880601141146
   Google Scholar
• Gregorcic, B., Etkina, E., & Planinsic, G. (2018). A new way of using the interactive whiteboard in a high school physics classroom: A case study. Research in Science Education, 48(2), 465–489. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9576-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greiffenhagen, C. (2004). Interactive whiteboards in mathematics education: Possibilities and dangers. In H. Fujita. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Ninth International Congress on Mathematical Education. Kluwer (Springer).
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Balin, B. j., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis. Maxwell Macmillan International Editions.
   Google Scholar
• Heemskerk, I., Kuiper, E., & Meijer, J. (2014). Interactive whiteboard and virtual learning environment combined: Effects on mathematics education. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 30(5), 465–478. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendawi, M., & Nosair, M. R. (2020). The efficiency of using the Interactive Smartboard in social studies to increase students’ achievement and tendency toward the subject matter in the state of Qatar. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 19(3), 1–19. doi:https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.19.3.1
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, S., Beauchamp, G., & Miller, D. (2007). Reviewing the literature on interactive whiteboards. Learning, Media and Technology, 32(3), 213–225. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17439880701511040
   Google Scholar
• Kent, P. (2006). Using interactive whiteboards to enhance mathematics teaching. Australian Primary Mathematics Classroom: Journal of the Australian Association of Mathematics Teachers, 11(2), 23–26. https://search.informit.org/doi/abs/10.3316/informit.171454322540987
   Google Scholar
• Mathews-Aydinli, J., & Elaziz, F. (2010). Turkish students’ and teachers’ attitudes toward the use of interactive whiteboards in EFL classrooms. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 23(3), 235–252. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221003776781
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milfont, T. L., & Fischer, R. (2010). Testing measurement invariance across groups: Applications in cross-cultural research. International Journal of Psychological Research, 3(1), 111–145. doi:https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.857
   Google Scholar
• Miller, D., Glover, D., & Averis, D. (2005). Developing pedagogic skills for the use of the interactive whiteboard in mathematics. British Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Nevitt, J., & Hancock, G. R. (2001). Performance of bootstrapping approaches to model test statistics and parameter standard error estimation in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 8(3), 353–377. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1207/S15328007SEM0803_2 doi:https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0803_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, Y., & Chen, J. V. (2007). Acceptance and adoption of the innovative use of smartphone. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 107(9), 1349–1365. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/02635570710834009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roach, G. (2009). Consumer perceptions of mobile phone marketing: A direct marketing innovation. Direct Marketing: An International Journal, 3(2), 124–138. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/17505930910964786
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations. 4th ed. The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sad, S. (2015). An attitude scale for smart board use in education: Validity and reliability studies. Computers & Education, 58, 900–907. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.017
   Google Scholar
• Smith, H. J., Higgins, S., Wall, K., & Miller, J. (2005). Interactive whiteboards: Boon or bandwagon? A critical review of the literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(2), 91–101. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2005.00117.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somekh, B., Haldane, M., Jones, K., Lewin, C., Stephen Steadman, S., Scrimshaw, P., Sing, S., Bird, K., Cummings, J., Downing, B., Stuart, T. H., Jarvis, J., Mavers, D., & Woodrow, D. (2007). Evaluation report of the Primary Schools Whiteboard Expansion Project (SWEEP). Centre for ICT, Pedagogy and Learning, Education & Social Research Institute, Manchester Metropolitan University.
   Google Scholar
• Steiger, J. H. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25(2), 173–180. doi:https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr2502_4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Tataroglu, B., & Erduran, A. (2010). The development of attitude scale towards interactive whiteboard in mathematics course. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 1(3), 233–250. doi:https://doi.org/10.17762/turcomat.v1i3.16
   Google Scholar
• Tosuntaş, Ş., Karadağ, E., & Orhan, S. (2015). The factors affecting acceptance and use of interactive whiteboard within the scope of FATIH project: A structural equation model based on the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. Computers & Education, 81, 169–178. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.10.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turel, Y. K. (2011). An interactive whiteboard student survey. Development, validity and reliability. Computers & Education, 57, 2441–2450. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, K.-T., Teo, T., & Goh, P.-S.-C. (2014). Development of the interactive whiteboard Acceptance Scale (IWBAS): An initial study. Educational Technology & Society, 17(4), 268–277. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.17.4.268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, R., & Ashfield, J. (2008). The use of the interactive whiteboard for creative teaching and learning in literacy and mathematics: A case study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(1), 84–96. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00703.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar