Using Performance Measures to Predict Early Childhood Reading Outcomes: An Exploratory Longitudinal Analysis

References

• Al Otaiba, S., Connor, C. M., Folsom, J. S., Greulich, L., Meadows, J., & Li, Z. (2011). Assessment data-informed guidance to individualize kindergarten reading instruction: findings from a cluster-randomized control field trial. The Elementary School Journal, 111(4), 535–560. doi:10.1086/659031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archer, E., Scherman, V., & Howie, S. (2013). Approaches to effective data use: Does one size fit all? In K. Schildkamp, M. K. Lai, & L. Earl (Eds.), Data-based decision making in education (pp. 91–112). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bast, J., & Reitsma, P. (1997). Mathew effects in reading: A comparison of latent growth curve models and simplex models with structured means. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 32(2), 135–167. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr3202_3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588–606. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biesanz, J. C. (2012). Autoregressive longitudinal models. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of structural equation modeling (pp. 459–471). The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Billington, C. (2016). How digital technology can support early language and literacy outcomes in early years settings: A review of the literature. National Literacy Trust.
   Google Scholar
• Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sage Focus Editions, 154, 136–136.
   Google Scholar
• Brueck, J., Lenhart, L. A., & Roskos, K. A. (2019). Digital reading programs: Definitions, analytic tools and practice examples. In J. E. Kim & B. Hassinger-Das (Eds.), Reading in the digital age: Young children’s experiences with e-books (pp. 135–156). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Callaghan, M. N., & Reich, S. M. (2018). Are educational preschool apps designed to teach? An analysis of the app market. Learning, Media and Technology, 43(3), 280–293. doi:10.1080/17439884.2018.1498355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, A. C. K., & Slavin, R. E. (2013). The effectiveness of educational technology applications for enhancing mathematics achievement in K-12 classrooms: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 9, 88–113. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2013.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, B., & Svanaes, S. (2014). An updated literature review on the use of tablets in education. Tablets for Schools, Family Kids & Youth.
   Google Scholar
• Connolly, T. M., Boyle, E. A., MacArthur, E., Hainey, T., & Boyle, J. M. (2012). A systematic literature review of empirical evidence on computer games and serious games. Computers & Education, 59(2), 661–686. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Core Team, R. (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Datnow, A., & Hubbard, L. (2016). Teacher capacity for and beliefs about data-driven decision making: A literature review of international research. Journal of Educational Change, 17(1), 7–28. doi:10.1007/s10833-015-9264-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson, K., Antonenko, P., Lane, H. B., & Zhu, J. (2019). Assistive technologies to support students with dyslexia. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 51(3), 226–239. doi:10.1177/0040059918794027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dotterer, A. M., & Lowe, K. (2011). Classroom context, school engagement, and academic achievement in early adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 40(12), 1649–1660. doi:10.1007/s10964-011-9647-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downey, C., & Kelly, A. (2013). Professional attitudes to the use of data in England. In K. Schildkamp, M. K. Lai, & L. Earl (Eds.), Data-based decision making in education (pp. 69–89). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, D. M. (2007). Peabody picture vocabulary test (4th ed.). NCS Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Enders, C. K., & Bandalos, D. L. (2001). The relative performance of Full Information Maximum Likelihood estimation for missing data in structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 8(3), 430–457. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0803_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filderman, M. J., Toste, J. R., Didion, L. A., Peng, P., & Clemens, N. H. (2018). Data-based decision making in reading interventions: A synthesis and meta-analysis of the effects for struggling readers. The Journal of Special Education, 52(3), 174–187. doi:10.1177/0022466918790001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. S. (2006). Introduction to response to intervention: What, why, and how valid is it? Reading Research Quarterly, 41(1), 93–99. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4151803 doi:10.1598/RRQ.41.1.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Good, R. H., Kaminski, R. A., & Cummings, K. (2011). DIBELS next. Cambium Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Good, R. H., Kaminski, R. A., Dewey, E. N., Wallin, J., Powell-Smith, K. A., & Latimer, R. (2019). Acadience Reading K-6 Technical Manual. (p. 143). acadiencelearning.org
   Google Scholar
• Gunn, C., & McDonald, J. (2018). Promoting learning analytics for tertiary teachers: 246A New Zealand case study. In J. M. Lodge, J. Cooney Horvath, & L. Corrin (Eds.), Learning analytics in the classroom (pp. 247–266). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Haydon, T., MacSuga-Gage, A. S., Simonsen, B., & Hawkins, R. (2012). Opportunities to respond: A key component of effective instruction. Beyond Behavior, 22(1), 23–31. doi:10.1177/107429561202200105
   Google Scholar
• Headsprout. (2019). Get students started with Headsprout. https://www.headsprout.com/main/ViewPage/name/get-students-reading/
   Google Scholar
• Henrie, C. R., Halverson, L. R., & Graham, C. R. (2015). Measuring student engagement in technology-mediated learning: A review. Computers & Education, 90, 36–53. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2015.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, D., Ameenuddin, N., Chassiakos, Y. L. R., Cross, C., Hutchinson, J., Levine, A., Boyd, R., Mendelson, R., Moreno, M., & Swanson, W. S. (2016a). Media and young minds. Pediatrics, 138(5), e20162591. doi:10.1542/peds.2016-2591
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, D., Ameenuddin, N., Chassiakos, Y. L. R., Cross, C., Radesky, J., Hutchinson, J., Levine, A., Boyd, R., Mendelson, R., Moreno, M., & Swanson, W. S.. (2016b). Media use in school-aged children and adolescents. Pediatrics, 138(5), e20162592. doi:10.1542/peds.2016-2592
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huggins-Manley, A. C., Beal, C. R., D’Mello, S. K., Leite, W. L., Cetin-Berber, D. D., Kim, D., & McNamara, D. S. (2019). A commentary on construct validity when using operational virtual learning environment data in effectiveness studies. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 12(4), 750–759. doi:10.1080/19345747.2019.1639869
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Israelson, M. H. (2015). The App Map. The Reading Teacher, 69(3), 339–349. doi:10.1002/trtr.1414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorgensen, T. D., Pornprasertmanit, S., Schoemann, A. M., Rosseel, Y. (2020). semTools: Useful tools for structural equation modeling (0.5-3) [Computer software]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=semTools
   Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (2014). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kucirkova, N., Messer, D., Sheehy, K., & Fernández Panadero, C. (2014). Children’s engagement with educational iPad apps: Insights from a Spanish classroom. Computers & Education, 71, 175–184. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Layng, T. V. J., Twyman, J. S., & Stikeleather, G. (2003). Headsprout Early ReadingTM: Reliably teaching children to read. Behavioral Technology Today, 3, 7–20.
   Google Scholar
• Learning A-Z. (2017). Headsprout [Web application]. https://www.headsprout.com/?_ga=2.90539608.350284248.1648742644-248264696.1648742644
   Google Scholar
• Leite, W. L., Cetin‐Berber, D. D., Huggins‐Manley, A. C., Collier, Z. K., & Beal, C. R. (2019). The relationship between Algebra Nation usage and high-stakes test performance for struggling students. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 35(5), 569–581. doi:10.1111/jcal.12360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little, T. D. (2013). Longitudinal structural equation modeling. Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• MacSuga-Gage, A. S., & Simonsen, B. (2015). Examining the effects of teacher-directed opportunities to respond on student outcomes: A systematic review of the literature. Education and Treatment of Children, 38(2), 211–239. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44683954 doi:10.1353/etc.2015.0009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manset-Williamson, G., Dunn, M., Hinshaw, R., & Nelson, J. M. (2008). The impact of self-questioning strategy use on the text-reader assisted comprehension of students with reading disabilities. International Journal of Special Education, 23(1), 123–135.
   Google Scholar
• McIntosh, K., & Goodman, S. (2016). Integrated multi-tiered systems of support: Blending RTI and PBIS. Guilford Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Muis, K. R., Ranellucci, J., Trevors, G., & Duffy, M. C. (2015). The effects of technology-mediated immediate feedback on kindergarten students’ attitudes, emotions, engagement and learning outcomes during literacy skills development. Learning and Instruction, 38, 1–13. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musti-Rao, S., Lo, Y., & Plati, E. (2015). Using an iPad® app to improve sight word reading fluency for at-risk first graders. Remedial and Special Education, 36(3), 154–166. doi:10.1177/0741932514541485
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics. (2019). The condition of education 2018. (NCES 2018-144). Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Neumann, M. M. (2018). Using tablets and apps to enhance emergent literacy skills in young children. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 42, 239–246. doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2017.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neumann, M. M., & Neumann, D. L. (2017). The use of touch-screen tablets at home and pre-school to foster emergent literacy. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 17(2), 203–220. doi:10.1177/1468798415619773
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connor, R. (2000). Increasing the intensity of intervention in kindergarten and first grade. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 15(1), 43–54. doi:10.1207/SLDRP1501_5
   Google Scholar
• Revelle, W. (2020). psych: Procedures for Psychological, Psychometric, and Personality Research (2.0.7) [Computer software]. Northwestern University. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psych
   Google Scholar
• Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. doi:10.18637/jss.v048.i02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaffhauser, D. (2011). Swimming with data: With an ocean of data available to a district, how much does it really need to make informed decisions about student achievement? Not that much, it turns out, but districts likely can’t do it without some help. The Journal (Technological Horizons in Education), 38(8), 32.
   Google Scholar
• Simonsen, B., Fairbanks, S., Briesch, A., Myers, D., & Sugai, G. (2008). Evidence-based practices in classroom management: Considerations for research to practice. Education and Treatment of Children, 31, 351–380. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42899983
   Google Scholar
• Sutherland, K. S., & Wehby, J. H. (2001). Exploring the relationship between increased opportunities to respond to academic requests and the academic and behavioral outcomes of students with EBD: A review. Remedial and Special Education, 22(2), 113–121. doi:10.1177/074193250102200205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarar, J. M., Meisinger, E. B., & Dickens, R. H. (2015). Test Review: Test of word reading efficiency–Second Edition (TOWRE-2) (by Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., & Rashotte, C. A.). SAGE Publications Sage CA.
   Google Scholar
• Torgesen, J. K. (1998). Catch them before they fall: Identification and assessment to prevent reading failure in young children. American Educator, 22, 32–41.
   Google Scholar
• Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (2012). Test of word reading efficiency—Second Edition. Pro-ed.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, M.-T., & Holcombe, R. (2010). Adolescents’ perceptions of school environment, engagement, and academic achievement in middle school. American Educational Research Journal, 47(3), 633–662. doi:10.3102/0002831209361209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wanzek, J., Stevens, E. A., Williams, K. J., Scammacca, N., Vaughn, S., & Sargent, K. (2018). Current evidence on the effects of intensive early reading interventions. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 51(6), 612–624. doi:10.1177/0022219418775110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wanzek, J., Vaughn, S., Scammacca, N., Gatlin, B., Walker, M. A., & Capin, P. (2016). Meta-analyses of the effects of tier 2 type reading interventions in grades K-3. Educational Psychology Review, 28(3), 551–576. doi:10.1007/s10648-015-9321-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wesson, C. L., King, R. P., & Deno, S. L. (1984). Direct and frequent measurement of student performance: If it’s good for us, why don’t we do it? Learning Disability Quarterly, 7(1), 45–48. doi:10.2307/1510260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitney, T., Cooper, J. T., & Lingo, A. S. (2015). Providing student opportunities to respond in reading and mathematics: A look across grade levels. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 59(1), 14–21. doi:10.1080/1045988X.2014.919138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wigfield, A., Guthrie, J. T., Perencevich, K. C., Taboada, A., Klauda, S. L., McRae, A., & Barbosa, P. (2008). Role of reading engagement in mediating effects of reading comprehension instruction on reading outcomes. Psychology in the Schools, 45(5), 432–445. doi:10.1002/pits.20307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiig, E. H., Secord, W. A., & Semel, E. (2013). Clinical evaluation of language fundamentals: CELF-5. Pearson.
   Google Scholar