Professional Development Strategies and Recommendations for High School Teachers to Teach Computer Science Online

References

• Alozie, N., & Knudsen, J. (2020). Middle school teachers’ perspectives and experiences on developing formative assessments during professional development on a computer science curriculum [Paper presentation]. Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, April). In (pp. 1077–1083). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing teaching presence in a computer conference environment. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(2), 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A., & Hall, P. (2018). Albert bandura and social learning theory. In Learning Theories for Early Years Practice (63–65). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Beyer, H., & Holtzblatt, K. (1999). Contextual design. Interactions, 6(1), 32–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/291224.291229
   Google Scholar
• Bilandzic, M., & Venable, J. (2011). Towards participatory action design research: Adapting action research and design science research methods for urban informatics. Journal of Community Informatics, 7(3), 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• CoI Framework. (2022). Community of inquiry framework. https://coi.athabascau.ca/coi-model/
   Google Scholar
• Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. (3rd ed.). Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452230153
   Google Scholar
• College Board. (2019). AP computer science principles | AP Central – The College Board. AP Central. https://apcentral.collegeboard.org/courses/ap-computer-science-principles
   Google Scholar
• Cutts, Q., Robertson, J., Donaldson, P., & O’Donnell, L. (2017). An evaluation of a professional learning network for computer science teachers. Computer Science Education, 27(1), 30–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2017.1315958
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Fasso, W. (2010). Facilitated networking and group formation in an online community of practice. Australian Educational Computing, 25(1), 25–33.
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 7–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08923640109527071
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R. (2009). Communities of inquiry in online learning: Social, teaching and cognitive presence. In C. Howard (Eds.), Encyclopedia of distance and online learning (2nd ed., pp. 352–355). IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Gao, J., Pang, B., Lumetta, S. S. (2016, July). Automated feedback framework for introductory programming courses. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (pp. 53–58).
   Google Scholar
• Goode, J., Peterson, K., Malyn-Smith, J., & Chapman, G. (2020). Online professional development for high school computer science teachers: Features that support an equity-based professional learning community. Computing in Science & Engineering, 22(5), 51–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2020.2989622
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Google. (2017). Google Jamboard. https://jamboard.google.com/
   Google Scholar
• Gray, J., Haynie, K., Trees, F., Astrachan, O., Uche, C., Cooney, S., Kick, R. (2019). February). Infusing cooperative learning into AP computer science principles courses to promote engagement and diversity. In Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 1190–1196). http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3287324.3287421
   Google Scholar
• Gray, C. M., Stolterman, E., Siegel, M. A. (2014, June). Reprioritizing the relationship between HCI research and practice: bubble-up and trickle-down effects. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (pp. 725–734).
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, S. (2016). The use of participatory action research within education–benefits to stakeholders. World Journal of Education, 6(3), 48–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.5430/wje.v6n3p48
   Google Scholar
• Lay, C. D., Allman, B., Cutri, R. M., & Kimmons, R. (2020). Examining a decade of research in online teacher professional development. Frontiers in Education, 5, 167. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.573129
   Google Scholar
• Lucero, A. (2015). Using affinity diagrams to evaluate interactive prototypes [Paper presentation]. In IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, September), (pp. 231–248). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ludvigsen, S., & Mørch, A. (2010). Computer-supported collaborative learning: Basic concepts, multiple perspectives, and emerging trends. The International Encyclopedia of Education, 5, 290–296.
   Google Scholar
• Macbeth, S. (2019). Participatory action research | participatory methods. Participatorymethods.org. https://www.participatorymethods.org/glossary/participatory-action-research
   Google Scholar
• Martin, F., Ritzhaupt, A., Kumar, S., & Budhrani, K. (2019). Award-winning faculty online teaching practices: Course design, assessment and evaluation, and facilitation. The Internet and Higher Education, 42, 34–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2019.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, F., Shanley, N., Ahlgrim-Delzell, L., Hite, N., Perez-Quinones, M., Pugalee, D. (2021). December). High school teachers teaching programming online: instructional strategies used and challenges faced. Proceedings of the RPP for CS Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Martinez, M. C., Gomez, M. J., Moresi, M., Benotti, L. (2016, July). Lessons learned on computer science teachers professional development. In Proceedings of the 2016 Acm Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (pp. 77–82). http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2899415.2899460
   Google Scholar
• Menekse, M. (2015). Computer science teacher professional development in the United States: A review of studies published between 2004 and 2014. Computer Science Education, 25(4), 325–350. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2015.1111645
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neumann, M., Linzmayer, R. (2021). March). Capturing student feedback and emotions in large computing courses: A sentiment analysis approach. In Proceedings of the 52nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 541–547). http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3408877.3432403
   Google Scholar
• Ni, L., Bausch, G., & Benjamin, R. (2021). Computer science teacher professional development and professional learning communities: A review of the research literature. Computer Science Education, 1–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2021.1993666
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ni, L., Guzdial, M. (2012). Who am I?: Understanding high school computer science teachers’ professional identity. In Proceedings of the 43rd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 499–504). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Piotrowska, X., Alekseeva, T. (2020, February). Scaffolding for CLIL in computer science courses: Data-driven learning approach. In Ceur Workshop Proceedings. Proceedings of the XV International Conference (NESinMIS-2020), (pp. 87–99).
   Google Scholar
• Prestridge, S., & Tondeur, J. (2015). Exploring elements that support teachers engagement in online professional development. Education Sciences, 5(3), 199–219. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/educsci5030199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qian, Y., Hambrusch, S., Yadav, A., & Gretter, S. (2018). Who needs what: Recommendations for designing effective online professional development for computer science teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 50(2), 164–181. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2018.1433565
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saldaña, J. (2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D. A. (2017). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Scupin, R. (1997). The KJ method: A technique for analyzing data derived from Japanese ethnology. Human Organization, 56(2), 233–237. http://dx.doi.org/10.17730/humo.56.2.x335923511444655
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spencer, R. (2015). How to apply social learning theory for effective E-learning. https://trainingindustry.com/blog/e-learning/how-to-apply-social-learning-theory-for-effective-e-learning/
   Google Scholar
• The University of North Carolina at Charlotte. (2021). About us. North Carolina Virtual. https://ncvps.org/about-us/
   Google Scholar
• Voghoei, S., Tonekaboni, N. H., Yazdansepas, D., Soleymani, S., Farahani, A., & Arabnia, H. R. (2020). Personalized feedback emails: A case study on online introductory ­computer science courses [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Southeast Conference, April), (pp. 18–25).
   Google Scholar
• Yadav, A., Gretter, S., Hambrusch, S., & Sands, P. (2016). Expanding computer science education in schools: Understanding teacher experiences and challenges. Computer Science Education, 26(4), 235–254. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2016.1257418
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, N., Nguyen, H., Fischer, C., Richardson, D., & Warschauer, M. (2020). High school teachers’ self-efficacy in teaching computer science. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 20(3), 1–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3410631
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar