Extended Social Cognitive Model Explains Pre-Service Teachers’ Technology Integration Intentions with Cross-Cultural Validity

References

• Anderson, S. E., Groulx, J. G., & Maninger, R. M. (2011). Relationships among preservice teachers’ technology-related abilities, beliefs, and intentions to use technology in their future classrooms. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 45(3), 321–338. doi:10.2190/EC.45.3.d
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, S. E., & Maninger, R. M. (2007). Preservice teachers’ abilities, beliefs, and intentions regarding technology integration. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 37(2), 151–172. doi:10.2190/H1M8-562W-18J1-634P
   Google Scholar
• Backfisch, I., Lachner, A., Stürmer, K., & Scheiter, K. (2021). Variability of teachers’ technology integration in the classroom: A matter of utility!. Computers & Education, 166, 104159–104159. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Baylor, A. L., & Ritchie, D. (2002). What factors facilitate teacher skill, teacher morale, and perceived student learning in technology-using classrooms? Computers & Education, 39(4), 395–414. doi:10.1016/S0360-1315(02)00075-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolick, C. M., Berson, M. J., Friedman, A. M., & Porfeli, E. J. (2007). Diffusion of technology innovation in the preservice social studies experience: Results of a national survey. Theory & Research in Social Education, 35(2), 174–195. doi:10.1080/00933104.2007.10473332
   Google Scholar
• Bowman, M. A., Vongkulluksn, V. W., Jiang, Z., & Xie, K. (2022). Teachers’ exposure to professional development and the quality of their instructional technology use: The mediating role of teachers’ value and ability beliefs. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 54(2), 188–204. doi:10.1080/15391523.2020.1830895
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collis, B. (1999). Designing for differences: Cultural issues in the design of WWW‐based course‐support sites. British Journal of Educational Technology, 30(3), 201–215. doi:10.1111/1467-8535.00110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Compeau, D., & Higgins, C. (1995). Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly, 19, 189–211. doi:10.2307/249688
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO five-factor (NEO-FFI) inventory professional manual. PAR.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. doi:10.2307/249008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dede, C. (2010). Comparing frameworks for 21st century skills. In J. Bellance, & R. Brandt (Eds.), 21st century skills: Rethinking how students learn (Vol. 20, pp. 51–76). Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dooley, K. E. (1999). Towards a holistic model for the diffusion of educational technologies: An integrative review of educational innovation studies. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 2(4), 35–45. https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/jeductechsoci.2.4.35.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Addressing first-and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(4), 47–61. doi:10.1007/BF02299597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ertmer, P. A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Sadik, O., Sendurur, E., & Sendurur, P. (2012). Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: A critical relationship. Computers & Education, 59(2), 423–435. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foulger, T. S., Burke, D., Kim Williams, M., Waker, M. L., Hansen, R., & Slykhuis, D. A. (2013). Innovators in teacher education: Diffusing mobile technologies in teacher preparation curriculum. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 30(1), 21–29. doi:10.1080/21532974.2013.10784722
   Google Scholar
• Fullan, M. G. (1993). The professional teacher: Why teachers must become change agents. Educational Leadership, 50(6), 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, D., & Mallery, P. (2010). SPSS for Windows step by step. A simple study guide and reference (10th ed.). Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hogan, R. T. (1991). Personality and personality measurement. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 2, 2nd ed., pp. 873–919). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
   Google Scholar
• Joo, Y. J., Park, S., & Lim, E. (2018). Factors influencing preservice teachers’ intention to use technology: TPACK, teacher self-efficacy, and technology acceptance model. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 21(3), 48–59. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26458506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keengwe, J., Onchwari, G., & Wachira, P. (2008). Computer technology integration and student learning: Barriers and promise. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17(6), 560–565. doi:10.1007/s10956-008-9123-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kopcha, T. J., Neumann, K. L., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A., & Pitman, E. (2020). Process over product: The next evolution of our quest for technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(2), 729–749. doi:10.1007/s11423-020-09735-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, C. (2015). Modeling teachers’ influence on learners’ self-directed use of technology for language learning outside the classroom. Computers & Education, 82, 74–83. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45(1), 79–122. doi:10.1006/jvbe.1994.1027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luan, W. S., & Teo, T. (2009). Investigating the technology acceptance among student teachers in Malaysia: An application of the technology acceptance model (TAM). Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 18(2), 261–272. doi:10.3860/taper.v18i2.1327
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcinkiewicz, H. R. (1993). Computers and teachers: Factors influencing computer use in the classroom. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 26(2), 220–237. doi:10.1080/08886504.1993.10782088
   Google Scholar
• Niederhauser, D. S., & Lindstrom, D. L. (2018). Instructional technology integration models and frameworks: Diffusion, competencies, attitudes, and dispositions. In J. Voogt, G. Knezek, R. Christensen, & K.-W. Lai (Eds.), Second handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 335–355). Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-71054-9_23
   Google Scholar
• Nistor, N., Göğüş, A., & Lerche, T. (2013). Educational technology acceptance across national and professional cultures: A European study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 61(4), 733–749. doi:10.1007/s11423-013-9292-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Office of Educational Technology. (2017). Reimagining the role of technology in higher education: 2017 National Education Technology Plan Update. US Department of Education. https://tech.ed.gov/files/2017/01/NETP17.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A., Kimmons, R. (2020). The K-12 educational technology handbook. EdTech Books. https://edtechbooks.org/k12handbook
   Google Scholar
• Perkmen, S., Toy, S., Caracuel, A., & Shelley, M. (2018). Cross-cultural search for Big Five: Development of a scale to compare personality traits of pre-service elementary school teachers in Turkey and Spain. Asia Pacific Education Review, 19(4), 459–468. doi:10.1007/s12564-018-9549-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petko, D., Prasse, D., & Cantieni, A. (2018). The interplay of school readiness and teacher readiness for educational technology integration: A structural equation model. Computers in the Schools, 35(1), 1–18. doi:10.1080/07380569.2018.1428007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pittalis, M. (2021). Extending the technology acceptance model to evaluate teachers’ intention to use dynamic geometry software in geometry teaching. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 52(9), 1385–1404. doi:10.1080/0020739X.2020.1766139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranellucci, J., Rosenberg, J. M., & Poitras, E. G. (2020). Exploring pre‐service teachers’ use of technology: The technology acceptance model and expectancy–value theory. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36(6), 810–824. doi:10.1111/jcal.12459
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahin, I. (2008). From the social-cognitive career theory perspective: A college of education faculty model for explaining their intention to use educational technology. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 38(1), 51–66. doi:10.2190/EC.38.1.c
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saleem, H., Beaudry, A., & Croteau, A.-M. (2011). Antecedents of computer self-efficacy: A study of the role of personality traits and gender. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(5), 1922–1936. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2011.04.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salomon, G., & Almog, T. (1998). Educational psychology and technology: A matter of reciprocal relations. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 100(2), 222–241. doi:10.1177/016146819810000201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schunk, D. H. (2001). Learning theories: An educational perspective (3rd ed.). Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2020). Motivation and social cognitive theory. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 60, 101832. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101832
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semiz, K., & Ince, M. L. (2012). Pre-service physical education teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge, technology integration self-efficacy and instructional technology outcome expectations. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(7), 1248–1265. doi:10.14742/ajet.800
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, H., & Zhang, P. (2006). The role of moderating factors in user technology acceptance. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64(2), 53–78. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.04.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teo, T. (2009). Examining the relationship between student teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs and their intended uses of technology for teaching: A structural equation modelling approach. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 8(4), 7–15. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ859493
   Google Scholar
• Teo, T. (2010a). Examining the influence of subjective norm and facilitating conditions on the intention to use technology among pre-service teachers: A structural equation modeling of an extended technology acceptance model. Asia Pacific Education Review, 11(2), 253–262. doi:10.1007/s12564-009-9066-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teo, T. (2010b). A path analysis of pre-service teachers’ attitudes to computer use: Applying and extending the technology acceptance model in an educational context. Interactive Learning Environments, 18(1), 65–79. doi:10.1080/10494820802231327
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teo, T., Lee, C. B., Chai, C. S., & Wong, S. L. (2009). Assessing the intention to use technology among pre-service teachers in Singapore and Malaysia: A multigroup invariance analysis of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Computers & Education, 53(3), 1000–1009. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.05.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teo, T., Luan, W. S., & Sing, C. C. (2008). A cross-cultural examination of the intention to use technology between Singaporean and Malaysian pre-service teachers: An ­application of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 11(4), 265–280. https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/jeductechsoci.11.4.265.pdf
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teo, T., & Noyes, J. (2011). An assessment of the influence of perceived enjoyment and attitude on the intention to use technology among pre-service teachers: A structural equation modeling approach. Computers & Education, 57(2), 1645–1653. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teo, T., & Noyes, J. (2014). Explaining the intention to use technology among pre-service teachers: A multi-group analysis of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. Interactive Learning Environments, 22(1), 51–66. doi:10.1080/10494820.2011.641674
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teo, T., & Van Schalk, P. (2009). Understanding technology acceptance in pre-service teachers: A structural-equation modeling approach. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 18(1), 47–66. doi:10.3860/taper.v18i1.1035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vannatta, R. A., & Nancy, F. (2004). Teacher dispositions as predictors of classroom technology use. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(3), 253–271. doi:10.1080/15391523.2004.10782415
   Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. doi:10.2307/30036540
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., & Zhang, X. (2010). Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology: US vs. Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 13(1), 5–27. doi:10.1080/1097198X.2010.10856507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vongkulluksn, V. W., Xie, K., & Bowman, M. A. (2018). The role of value on teachers’ internalization of external barriers and externalization of personal beliefs for classroom technology integration. Computers & Education, 118, 70–81. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2017.11.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wigfield, A. (1994). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation: A developmental perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 6(1), 49–78. doi:10.1007/BF02209024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wigfield, A., & Koenka, A. C. (2020). Where do we go from here in academic motivation theory and research? Some reflections and recommendations for future work. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101872. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101872
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar