Low-Code and No-Code in Secondary Education—Empowering Teachers to Embed Citizen Development in Schools

References

• Al-Maroof, R. S., Salloum, S. A., Hassanien, A. E., & Shaalan, K. (2023). Fear from COVID-19 and technology adoption: The impact of Google Meet during Coronavirus pandemic. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(3), 1293–1308. doi:10.1080/10494820.2020.1830121
   Google Scholar
• Beranic, T., Rek, P., & Hericko, M. (2020). Adoption and usability of low-code/no-code development tools. In Central European Conference on Information and Intelligent Systems (pp. 97–103). Varaždin, Croatia: Faculty of Organization and Informatics.
   Google Scholar
• Blau, I., Shamir-Inbal, T., & Avdiel, O. (2020). How does the pedagogical design of a technology-enhanced collaborative academic course promote digital literacies, self-regulation, and perceived learning of students? The Internet and Higher Education, 45, 100722. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2019.100722
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, K., & Resnick, M. (2012, April 13–17). New frameworks for studying and assessing the development of computational thinking. In Proceedings of the 2012 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Vancouver, BC, Canada (pp. 1–25). AERA. http://scratched.gse.harvard.edu/ct/files/AERA2012.pdf
   Google Scholar
• British Educational Research Association (BERA). (2018). Ethical guidelines for educational research (4th ed.). BERA. https://www.bera.ac.uk/publication/ethical-guidelines-for-educational-research-2018
   Google Scholar
• Bryman, A. (2012). Social research methods (4th ed.). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, N., & Conboy, K. (2020). Normalising the “new normal”: Changing tech-driven work practices under pandemic time pressure. International Journal of Information Management, 55, 102186. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102186
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll, N., Móráin L. Ó., Garrett D., & Jamnadass, A. (2021). The importance of citizen development for digital transformation. Cutter Business Technology Journal, 34(3), 5–9. https://www.cutter.com/article/importance-citizen-development-digital-transformation
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, N., & Maher, M. (2023). How shell fueled digital transformation by establishing DIY software development. MIS Quarterly Executive, 22(2), 99–127. https://aisel.aisnet.org/misqe/vol22/iss2/3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chai, C. S., & Lim, C. P. (2011). The Internet and teacher education: Traversing between the digitized world and schools. The Internet and Higher Education, 14(1), 3–9. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, C. H., Liao, C. H., Chen, Y. C., & Lee, C. F. (2011). The integration of synchronous communication technology into service learning for pre-service teachers’ online tutoring of middle school students. The Internet and Higher Education, 14(1), 27–33. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Research methods in education (7th ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Connolly, C., Byrne, J. R., & Oldham, E. (2022). The trajectory of computer science education policy in Ireland: A document analysis narrative. European Journal of Education, 57(3), 512–529. doi:10.1111/ejed.12507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connolly, C., & Kirwan, C. (2023). Capacity for, access to, and participation in computer science education in Ireland. University of Galway. doi:10.13025/bccm-2c38
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Denning, P. J., Tedre, M., & Yongpradit, P. (2017). Misconceptions about computer science. Communications of the ACM, 60(3), 31–33. doi:10.1145/3041047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of Education and Skills (2016, November). STEM Education in the Irish school system. https://www.gov.ie/en/policy-information/4d40d5-stem-education-policy/#report-stem-education-in-the-irish-school-system
   Google Scholar
• Deuze, M. (2006). Participation, remediation, bricolage: Considering principal components of a digital culture. The Information Society, 22(2), 63–75. doi:10.1080/01972240600567170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobrigkeit, F., de Paula, D., & Carroll, N. (2020). InnoDev workshop: A one day introduction to combining design thinking, lean startup and agile software development. In 2020 IEEE 32nd Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training (CSEE&T) (pp. 1–10). IEEE. doi:10.1109/CSEET49119.2020.9206184
   Google Scholar
• Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Addressing first-and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(4), 47–61. doi:10.1007/BF02299597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ertmer, P., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Sadik, O., Sendurur, E., & Sendurur, P. (2012). Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: A critical relationship. Computers & Education, 59(2), 423–435. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ertmer, P. A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., & Tondeur, J. (2015). Teachers’ beliefs and uses of technology to support 21st-century teaching and learning. In H. Fives & M. G. Gill (Eds.), International handbook of research on teacher beliefs (pp. 403–418). Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203108437
   Google Scholar
• European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (CEDEFOP) (2009). The shift to learning outcomes: Policies and practices in Europe. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. https://www.cedefop.europa.eu/en/publications/3054#group-details https://www.cedefop.europa.eu/en/publications/3054
   Google Scholar
• Francom, G. M. (2016). Barriers to technology use in large and small school districts. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 15, 577–591. doi:10.28945/3596
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galvis, H. A. (2012). Understanding beliefs, teachers’ beliefs and their impact on the use of computer technology. Profile Issues in Teachers Professional Development, 14(2), 95–112. http://www.scielo.org.co/pdf/prf/v14n2/v14n2a07.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Goodfellow, R. (2011). Literacy, literacies, and the digital in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 16(1), 131–144. doi:10.1080/13562517.2011.544125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvard Catalyst (n.d.). Mixed methods research. Community Engagement Program. https://catalyst.harvard.edu/community-engagement/mmr/
   Google Scholar
• Hemerling, J., Kilmann, J., Danoesastro, M., Stutts, L., & Ahern, C. (2018). It’s not a digital transformation without a digital culture. Boston Consulting Group. https://www.bcg.com/publications/2018/not-digital-transformation-without-digital-culture
   Google Scholar
• Hesse-Biber, S., & Burke Johnson, R. (Eds.). (2015). The Oxford handbook of multimethod and mixed methods research inquiry. Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199933624.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Hew, K. F., & Brush, T. (2007). Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: Current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(3), 223–252. doi:10.1007/s11423-006-9022-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu, Y.-C., Irie, N. R., & Ching, Y.-H. (2019). Computational Thinking Educational Policy Initiatives (CTEPI) across the globe. TechTrends, 63(3), 260–270. doi:10.1007/s11528-019-00384-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, C., Kim, M. K., Lee, C., Spector, J. M., & DeMeester, K. (2013). Teacher beliefs and technology integration. Teaching and Teacher Education, 29, 76–85. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2012.08.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, T., & Wadmany, R. (2006). Teachers’ beliefs and practices in technology-based classrooms: A developmental view. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 39(2), 157–181. doi:10.1080/15391523.2006.10782478
   Google Scholar
• Lim, C. P., & Khine, M. S. (2006). Managing teachers’ barriers to ICT integration in Singapore schools. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 14(1), 97–125.
   Google Scholar
• National Council for Curriculum and Assessment (NCCA) (2015a). Junior cycle business studies. https://curriculumonline.ie/Junior-Cycle/Junior-Cycle-Subjects/Business-Studies/
   Google Scholar
• National Council for Curriculum and Assessment (NCCA) (2015b). Junior cycle science. https://curriculumonline.ie/Junior-Cycle/Junior-Cycle-Subjects/Science/
   Google Scholar
• National Council for Curriculum and Assessment (NCCA) (2019, September). Learning outcomes. https://ncca.ie/media/4107/learning-outcomes-booklet_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• O’Neal, L. J., Gibson, P., & Cotten, S. R. (2017). Elementary school teachers’ beliefs about the role of technology in 21st-century teaching and learning. Computers in the Schools, 34(3), 192–206. doi:10.1080/07380569.2017.1347443
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priestley, M. (2016). A perspective on learning outcomes in curriculum and assessment. https://ncca.ie/media/2015/a-perspective-on-learning-outcomes-in-curriculum-and-assessment.pdfhttps://ncca.ie/media/2015/a-perspective-on-learning-outcomes-in-curriculum-and-assessment.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Project Management Institute (PMI) (2021). PMI & Tech2025 July 2021 Citizen developer Survey. https://www.projectmanagement.com/presentations/720143/PMI-Tech2025-July-2021-Citizen-Developer-Survey
   Google Scholar
• Project Management Institute (PMI) (2022). PMI Citizen developer Foundation Course. https://www.pmi.org/shop/p-/elearning/pmi-citizen-developer-foundation-course/el001
   Google Scholar
• Resnick, M. (2013, May). Learn to code, code to learn. EdSurge. https://www.edsurge.com/news/2013-05-08-learn-to-code-code-to-learn
   Google Scholar
• Salmon, G. (2019). May the fourth be with you: Creating education 4.0. Journal of Learning for Development, 6(2), 95–115. doi:10.56059/jl4d.v6i2.352
   Google Scholar
• Scanlon, D., & Connolly, C. (2021). Teacher agency and learner agency in teaching and learning a new school subject, Leaving Certificate Computer Science, in Ireland: Considerations for teacher education. Computers & Education, 174(4), 104291. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104291
   Google Scholar
• Schrum, L., Burbank, M. D., & Capps, R. (2007). Preparing future teachers for diverse schools in an online learning community: Perceptions and practice. The Internet and Higher Education, 10(3), 204–211. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2007.06.002
   Google Scholar
• Selwyn, N. (2006a). Digital division or digital decision? A study of non-users and low-users of computers. Poetics, 34(4–5), 273–292. doi:10.1016/j.poetic.2006.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selwyn, N. (2006b). Exploring the ‘digital disconnect’ between net‐savvy students and their schools. Learning, Media and Technology, 31(1), 5–17. doi:10.1080/17439880500515416
   Google Scholar
• Selwyn, N. (2015). Data entry: Towards the critical study of digital data and education. Learning, Media and Technology, 40(1), 64–82. doi:10.1080/17439884.2014.921628
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selwyn, N. (2019). What is digital sociology? John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Snoeyink, R., & Ertmer, P. A. (2001). Thrust into technology: How veteran teachers respond. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 30(1), 85–111. doi:10.2190/YDL7-XH09-RLJ6-MTP1
   Google Scholar
• Teaching Council (2022). Céim: Standards for initial teacher education. https://www.teachingcouncil.ie/en/news-events/latest-news/ceim-standards-for-initial-teacher-education.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Thacker, D., Beradi, V., Kaur, V., & Blundell, G. (2021). Business students as citizen developers: Assessing technological self-conception and readiness. Information Systems Education Journal, 5(19), 15–30. https://isedj.org/2021-19/n5/ISEDJv19n5p15.pdf
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) (2020). Education in a post-COVID-19 world: Nine ideas for public action. International Commission on the Futures of Education. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000373717/PDF/373717eng.pdf.multi
   Google Scholar
• UC Berkeley (n.d). Course evaluations question bank. Berkley Center for Teaching & Learning. https://teaching.berkeley.edu/course-evaluations-question-bank
   Google Scholar
• University Of Wisconsin–Madison (n.d). Best practices and sample questions for course evaluation surveys. Student Learning Assessment. https://assessment.provost.wisc.edu/best-practices-and-sample-questions-for-course-evaluation-surveys/
   Google Scholar
• Winter, E., Costello, A., O’Brien, M., & Hickey, G. (2021). Teachers’ use of technology and the impact of Covid-19. Irish Educational Studies, 40(2), 235–246. doi:10.1080/03323315.2021.1916559
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuiker, S. J., & Ang, D. (2011). Virtual environments and the ongoing work of becoming a Singapore teacher. The Internet and Higher Education, 14(1), 34–43. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.05.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar