Can Computer-Assisted Instruction Strengthen Equitable Student Achievement: Evaluation of a District-Wide Reading Intervention

References

• Abadie, A. (2005). Semiparametric difference-in-differences estimators. The Review of Economic Studies, 72(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/0034-6527.00321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Athey, S., & Imbens, G. W. (2022). Design-based analysis in difference-in-differences settings with staggered adoption. Journal of Econometrics, 226(1), 62–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2020.10.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beechler, S., & Williams, S. (2012). Computer assisted instruction and elementary ESL students in sight word recognition. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(4), 85–91.
   Google Scholar
• Boulay B., Goodson B., Frye M., Blocklin M., & Price C. 2015). Summary of Research Generated by Striving Readers on the Effectiveness of Interventions for Struggling Adolescent Readers. (Report No. NCEE 2016-4001). National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance.
   Google Scholar
• Callaway, B., & Sant’Anna, P. H. C. (2021). Difference-in-differences with multiple time periods. Journal of Econometrics, 225(2), 200–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2020.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassady, J. C., Smith, L. L., & Thomas, C. L. (2018). Supporting emergent literacy for English language learners with computer-assisted instruction. Journal of Research in Reading, 41(2), 350–369. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cervetti, G. N. (2020). The nature and development of reading for understanding In Pearson, P. D., Palincsar, A. S., Biancarosa, G., & Berman, A. I. (Eds.), Reaping the Rewards of the Reading for Understanding Initiative(pp.41–66). National Academy of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, M.-T., Lin, Y.-W., & She, H.-C. (2015). Learning through playing virtual age: Exploring the interactions among student concept learning, gaming performance, in-game behaviors, and the use of in-game characters. Computers & Education, 86, 18–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.03.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu, Y. D, (2018). The simple view of reading across development: Prediction of grade 3 reading comprehension from prekindergarten skills. Remedial and Special Education, 39(5), 289–303. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932518762055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietrichson, J., Bøg, M., Filges, T., & Klint Jørgensen, A. M. (2017). Academic interventions for elementary and middle school students with low socioeconomic status: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 87(2), 243–282. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316687036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietrichson, J., Filges, T., Seerup, J. K., Klokker, R. H., Viinholt, B. C. A., Bøg, M., & Eiberg, M. (2020). Targeted school-based interventions for improving reading and mathematics for students with, or at risk of, academic difficulties in Grades 7–12: A systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 17(2), e1152. https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1081
   Google Scholar
• Dimitrov D., Jurich S., Frye M., Lammert J., Sayko S., & Taylor L. 2012). Year One Evaluation Report/Impact Study: Illinois Striving Readers. RMC Research Corporation. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED600855.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ehri, L. C. (2005). Learning to read words: Theory, findings, and issues. Scientific Studies of Reading, 9(2), 167–188. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr0902_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flynn, L. J., Zheng, X., & Swanson, H. L. (2012). Instructing struggling older readers: A selective meta-analysis of intervention research. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 27(1), 21–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5826.2011.00347.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fogarty, M., Clemens, N., Simmons, D., Anderson, L., Davis, J., Smith, A., Wang, H., Kwok, O., Simmons, L. E., & Oslund, E. (2017). Impact of a technology-mediated reading intervention on adolescents’ reading comprehension. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 10(2), 326–353. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2016.1227412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gersten, R., Haymond, K., Newman-Gonchar, R., Dimino, J., & Jayanthi, M. (2020). Meta-analysis of the impact of reading interventions for students in the primary grades. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 13(2), 401–427. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2019.1689591
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman-Bacon, A. (2021). Difference-in-differences with variation in treatment timing. Journal of Econometrics, 225(2), 254–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2021.03.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. E. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7(1), 6–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325860070010
   Google Scholar
• Grabe, W., & Stoller, F. L. (2019). Teaching and Researching Reading (3rd ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S., Silva, M., & Restrepo, M. A. (2022). Reading intervention research with emergent bilingual students: A meta-analysis. Reading and Writing, 36(9), 2433–2464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-022-10399-8
   Google Scholar
• Grant, G. V. C. (2022). A Causal-Comparative Study of the Supplemental Lexia Core5 Reading Computer-Assisted Instruction Program Intervention for Improving the Reading Achievement of Elementary School Students with Disabilities [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Northcentral University.
   Google Scholar
• Heckman, J. J., Ichimura, H., & Todd, P. E. (1997). Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator: Evidence from evaluating a job training programme. The Review of Economic Studies, 64(4), 605–654. Volume Issue October Pages https://doi.org/10.2307/2971733
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heckman, J. J., Ichimura, H., Smith, J. A., & Todd, P. E. (1998). Characterizing selection bias using experimental data. https://doi.org/10.3386/w6699
   Google Scholar
• Hurwitz, L. B., & Macaruso, P. (2021). Supporting struggling middle school readers: Impact of the Lexia® PowerUp Literacy® program. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 77, 101329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2021.101329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurwitz, L. B., Macaruso, P., Thang, S., & Studwell, J. (2022). Bolstering middle school students’ component reading skills: An evaluation of the Lexia® PowerUp Literacy® Blended Learning Program. Computers in the Schools, 39(1), 80–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2022.2037298
   Google Scholar
• International Dyslexia Association (2019). Structured literacy: An introductory guide. https://app.box.com/s/mvuvhel6qaj8tghvu1nl75i0ndnlp0yz
   Google Scholar
• International Dyslexia Association (2020). Structured Literacy: Effective instruction for children with Dyslexia and related reading difficulties. https://app.box.com/s/noj70cwd28vnvevb85xy1mm2yr29h7g9
   Google Scholar
• Keengwe, J., & Hussein, F. (2014). Using computer-assisted instruction to enhance achievement of English language learners. Education and Information Technologies, 19(2), 295–306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-012-9214-z
   Google Scholar
• Kilpatrick, D. (2015). Essentials of assessing, preventing and overcoming Reading difficulties. John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Kraft, M. A. (2023). The effect-size benchmark that matters most: Education interventions often fail. Educational Researcher, 52(3), 183–187. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X231155154
   Google Scholar
• Kraft, M., Edwards, D., & Cannata, M. (2022, November 17). Taking High-Dosage Tutoring to Scale: Program Implementation, Causal Effects, and Lessons Learned [Paper presentation]. Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management (APPAM) Fall Research Conference, Washington D.C. https://appam.confex.com/appam/2022/meetingapp.cgi/Paper/45795
   Google Scholar
• Language and Reading Research Consortium. (2015). Learning to read: Should we keep things simple? Reading Research Quarterly, 50(2), 151–169. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.99
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loadman W. E., Moore R. J., Ren W., Zhu J., Zhao J., & Lomax R. 2011). Striving Readers Year 5 Project Evaluation Report: Ohio An Addendum to the Year 4 Report. Ohio State University.
   Google Scholar
• Macaruso, P., Hook, P. E., & McCabe, R. (2006). The efficacy of computer-based supplementary phonics programs for advancing reading skills in at-risk elementary students. Journal of Research in Reading, 29(2), 162–172. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2006.00282.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macaruso, P., & Rodman, A. (2009). Benefits of computer-assisted instruction for struggling readers in middle school. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 24(1), 103–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856250802596774
   Google Scholar
• Macaruso, P., & Rodman, A. (2011). Benefits of computer-assisted instruction to support reading acquisition in English language learners. Bilingual Research Journal, 34(3), 301–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/15235882.2011.622829
   Google Scholar
• Major, L., Francis, G. A., & Tsapali, M. (2021). The effectiveness of technology-supported personalised learning in low- and middle-income countries: A meta-analysis. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(5), 1935–1964. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMurray, S. (2013). An evaluation of the use of Lexia reading software with children in Year 3, Northern Ireland (6-to 7-year olds). Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 13(1), 15–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-3802.2012.01238.x
   Google Scholar
• Messer, D., & Nash, G. (2018). An evaluation of the effectiveness of a computer-assisted reading intervention. Journal of Research in Reading, 41(1), 140–158. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12107
   Google Scholar
• Metsala, J. L., & Kalindi, S. C. (2022). The effects of a computer-based early reading program on the literacy skills of kindergarten students. Computers in the Schools, 39(4), 373–393. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2022.2127344
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muralidharan, K., Singh, A., & Ganimian, A. J. (2019). Disrupting education? Experimental evidence on technology-aided instruction in India. American Economic Review, 109(4), 1426–1460. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20171112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagy, W., & Townsend, D. (2012). Words as tools: Learning academic vocabulary as language acquisition. Reading Research Quarterly, 47(1), 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1002/RRQ.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD). (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (NIH Publication No. 00-4769). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Newton, J. M., Ferris, D. R., Goh, C. C. M., Grabe, W., Stoller, F. L., & Vandergrift, L. (2018). Teaching English to second language learners in academic contexts: Reading, writing, listening, and speaking (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315626949
   Google Scholar
• Nickow A., Oreopoulos P., & Quan V. 2020. The Impressive Effects of Tutoring on PreK-12 Learning: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Experimental Evidence. (Working Paper No. 27476). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w27476
   Google Scholar
• Richards-Tutor, C., Baker, D. L., Gersten, R., Baker, S. K., & Smith, J. M. (2016). The Effectiveness of Reading Interventions for English Learners: A Research Synthesis. Exceptional Children, 82(2), 144–169. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402915585483
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, C. D., Kraft, M. A., Loeb, S., & Schueler, B. E. (2021). Accelerating Student Learning with High-Dosage Tutoring. EdResearch for Recovery Design Principles SeriesEdResearch for Recovery Project.
   Google Scholar
• Sant’Anna, P. H., & Zhao, J. (2020). Doubly robust difference-in-differences estimators. Journal of Econometrics, 219(1), 101–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2020.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scarborough, H. S. (2001). Connecting early language and literacy to later reading (dis)abilities: Evidence, theory, and practice In S. Neuman, & D. Dickinson (Eds.), Handbook for research in early literacy (pp. 97–110) Guilford Publications Incorporated.
   Google Scholar
• Schenck, A., Jurich, S., Frye, M., Lammert, J., & Sayko, S. (2012). Evaluation Report/Impact Study: Virginia Striving Readers Intervention Initiative (VSRII). RMC Research Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Schleppegrell, M. J. (2012). Academic language in teaching and learning: Introduction to the special issue. The Elementary School Journal, 112(3), 409–418. https://doi.org/10.1086/663297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seamer, J. (2022). Reading Success in the Early Primary Years: A Teacher’s Guide to Implementing Systematic Instruction. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Smartt, S., & Glaser, D. (2023). Next steps in literacy instruction: Connecting assessments to effective interventions. Brookes Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Sprague, K., Zaller, C., Kite, A., & Hussar, K. (2012). Springfield-Chicopee School Districts Striving Readers (SR) Program. Final Report Years 1-5: Evaluation of Implementation and Impact. Education Alliance at Brown University.
   Google Scholar
• Stæhr, L. S. (2008). Vocabulary size and the skills of listening, reading and writing. Language Learning Journal, 36(2), 139–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571730802389975
   Google Scholar
• Swanlund A., Dahlke K., Tucker N., Kleidon B., Kregor J., Davidson-Gibbs D., & Hallberg K. 2012). Striving Readers: Impact Study and Project Evaluation Report–Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction (with Milwaukee Public Schools). American Institutes for Research.
   Google Scholar
• Vaden-Kiernan M., Caverly S., Bell N., Sullivan K., Fong C., Atwood E., Borman G., Park S. J., & Jones D. H. 2012). Louisiana Striving Readers: Final Evaluation Report. SEDL. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED595145
   Google Scholar
• von Hippel, P. (2024). Multiply by 37 (or divide by 0.027): A surprisingly accurate rule of thumb for converting effect sizes from standard deviations to percentile points. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 01623737241239677. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737241239677
   Google Scholar