Exploring Validity, Reliability, and Factor Analysis of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology in an Italian Population: A Cross-Sectional Study

References

• Baumgartner, H., & Homburg, C. (1996). Applications of structural equation modeling in marketing and consumer research: A review. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 13(2), 139–161. doi: 10.1016/0167-8116(95)00038-0
   Google Scholar
• Berardi, A., De Santis, R., Tofani, M., Márquez, M. A., Santilli, V., Rushton, P. W., … Galeoto, G. (2018). The Wheelchair use confidence scale: Italian translation, adaptation, and validation of the short form. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 13, 575–580. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2017.1357053
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Carvalho, K. E. C., Júnior, G., Bolívar, M., & Sá, K. N. (2014). Translation and validation of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST 2.0) into Portuguese. Revistabrasileira de Reumatologia, 54(4), 260–267. doi: 10.1016/j.rbr.2014.04.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, S. C., & Chan, A. P. (2006). The validity and applicability of the Chinese version of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology for people with spinal cord injury. Assistive Technology, 18(1), 25–33. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2006.10131904
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. W. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 10(7), 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Cronbach, L. J. (1989). Construct validation after thirty years. Intelligence: Measurement, theory, and public policy (Vol. 3, pp. 147–171), Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Demers, L. (2000). Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with assistive Technology QUEST 2.0 - An outcome measure for assistive technology devices. Webster, NY: Institute for Matching Person and Technology. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2000.10132015
   Google Scholar
• Demers, L., Weiss-Lambrou, R., & Ska, B. (1996). Development of the Quebec user evaluation of satisfaction with assistive technology (QUEST). Assistive Technology, 8(1), 3–13. doi: 10.1080/10400435.1996.10132268
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Demers, L., Weiss-Lambrou, R., & Ska, B. (2000). Item analysis of the Quebec user evaluation of satisfaction with assistive technology (QUEST). Assistive Technology, 12(2), 96–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demers, L., Weiss-Lambrou, R., & Ska, B. (2002). The Quebec user evaluation of satisfaction with assistive technology (QUEST 2.0): An overview and recent progress. Technology and Disability, 14(3), 101–105.
   Google Scholar
• Demers, L., Wessels, R. D., Weiss‐Lambrou, R., Ska, B., & De Witte, L. P. (1999). An international content validation of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with assistive Technology (QUEST). Occupational Therapy International, 6(3), 159–175. doi: 10.1002/oti.95
   Google Scholar
• Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychologicalmethods, 4(3), 272.
   Google Scholar
• Federici, S., & Borsci, S. (2011). The use and non-use of assistive technology in Italy: Preliminary data. G. J. Gelderblom, M. Soede, L. Adriaens, & K. Miesenberger (Eds.), Everyday Technology for Independence and Care (pp. 979–986). (Assistive Technology Research Series; Vol. 29). doi: 10.3233/978-1-60750-814-4-979
   Google Scholar
• Federici, S., & Borsci, S. (2016). Providing assistive technology in Italy: The perceived delivery process quality as affecting abandonment. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 11(1), 22–31. doi: 10.3109/17483107.2014.930191
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federici, S., & Corradi, F. (2015). ATUFS 1.1. Italianversion. Follow-up sull’uso della Tecnologia Assistiva per la Mobilità (a 24 mesi). Accessed on December 19, 2017, Retrieved from doi: 10.13140/RG.2.1.4014.0963
   Google Scholar
• Federici, S., De Luca, E., & Corradi, F. (2015). ATUFS 1.1. Italianversion. Followup sull’uso della Tecnologia Assistiva per ICT (a 12 e 24 mesi). Accessed on December 19, 2017, Retrieved from doi: 10.13140/RG.2.1.1261.5840
   Google Scholar
• Federici, S., Meloni, F., & Borsci, S. (2013). Assistive Technology Use and Satisfaction Questionnaire (ATUS Q) for telephone interview. Accessed on December 19, 2017, Retrieved from www.researchgate.net/publication/280942287_Assistive_Technology_Use_and_Satisfaction_Questionnaire_(ATUSQ)_for_Telephone_Interview
   Google Scholar
• Federici, S., Meloni, F., & Borsci, S. (2016). The abandonment of assistive technology in Italy: A survey of users of the national health service. European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitative Medicine, 52, 516–526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galeoto, G., Berardi, A., De Santis, R., Di Valentini, L., Beccasio, R., Marquez, M. A., … Tofani, M. (2018). Validation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Van Lieshout test in an Italian population with cervical spinal cord injury: A psychometric study. Spinal Cord Series and Cases, 4(1), 49.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Galeoto, G., Colalelli, F., Massai, P., Berardi, A., Tofani, M., Pierantozzi, M., … Fabbrini, G. (2018). Quality of life in Parkinson’s disease: Italian validation of the Parkinson’s Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39-IT). Neurological Sciences, 1–7. doi: 10.1007/s10072-018-3524-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galeoto, G., De Santis, R., Marcolini, A., Cinelli, A., & Cecchi, R. (2016). Il consenso informato in Terapia Occupazionale: proposta di una modulistica. Giornale Italiano di Medicina Del Lavoro ed Ergonomia, 38(2), 107–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galeoto, G., Mollica, R., Astorino, O., & Cecchi, R. (2015). Informed consent in physiotherapy: proposal of a form. Giornale Italiano di Medicina Del Lavoro ed Ergonomia, 37(4), 245–254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galeoto, G., Sansoni, J., Scuccimarri, M., Bruni, V., De Santis, R., Colucci, M., … Tofani, M. (2018). A psychometric properties evaluation of the Italian version of the geriatric depression scale. Depression Research and Treatment, 2018, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Gatignon, H. (2010). Confirmatory factor analysis. In Statistical analysis of management data (pp. 59–122). New York, NY: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-1270-1_4
   Google Scholar
• Gjersing, L., Caplehorn, J. R., & Clausen, T. (2010). Cross-cultural adaptation of research instruments: Language, setting, time and statistical considerations. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 10, 13.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, S. S., & Evans, J. (2005). Considering response efficiency as a strategy to prevent assistive technology abandonment. Journal of Special Education Technology, 20(3), 45–50.
   Google Scholar
• Koumpouros, Y., Karavasili, A., Papageorgiou, E., & Siavelis, P. (2016). Validation of the Greek version of the device subscale of the Quebec user evaluation of satisfaction with assistive technology 2.0 (QUEST 2.0). Assistive Technology, 28(3), 152–158. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2015.1131758
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laake, P., Benestad, H. B., & Olsen, B. R. (Eds.). (2007). Research methodology in the medical and biological sciences. London, UK: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mao, H.-F., Chen, W.-Y., Yao, G., Huang, S.-L., Lin, C.-C., & Huang, W.-N. W. (2010). Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST 2.0): The development of the Taiwanese version. Clinical Rehabilitation, 24(5), 412–421. doi: 10.1177/0269215509347438
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massai, P., Colalelli, F., Sansoni, J., Valente, D., Tofani, M., Fabbrini, G., … Galeoto, G. (2018). Reliability and validity of the geriatric depression scale in Italian subjects with Parkinson’s disease. Parkinson’s Disease, 2018, 6. doi: 10.1155/2018/7347859
   Google Scholar
• Mokkink, L. B., Prinsen, C. A., Bouter, L. M., de Vet, H. C., & Terwee, C. B. (2016). The COnsensus-based standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) and how to select an outcome measurement instrument. Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy, 20(2), 105–113. Accessed on December 19, 2017, doi: 10.1590/bjpt-rbf.2014.0143
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Portale Siva (n.d.). http://portale.siva.it/it-IT/databases/libraries/detail/id-95
   Google Scholar
• Tofani, M., Candeloro, C., Sabbadini, M., Lucibello, L., Figura, M., Fabbrini, G., … Castelli, E. (2018). The psychosocial impact of assistive device scale: Italian validation in a cohort of nonambulant people with neuromotor disorders. Assistive Technology, 1–6. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2018.1469553
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wessels, R. D., & Witte, L. D. (2003). Reliability and validity of the Dutch version of QUEST 2.0 with users of various types of assistive devices. Disability and Rehabilitation, 25(6), 267–272. doi: 10.1080/0963828021000031197
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wild, D., Grove, A., Martin, M., Eremenco, S., McElroy, S., Verjee-Lorenz, A., … ISPOR Task Force for Translation and Cultural Adaptation. (2005). Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for patient‐reported outcomes (PRO) measures: Report of the ISPOR Task Force for Translation and Cultural Adaptation. Value in Health, 8(2), 94–104. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.04054.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar