Occupational Therapy students’ Concepts of Learning: Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Associations With Deep, Strategic, and Surface Study Approaches

References

• Aboregela, A. M., Sonpol, H. M. A., Metwally, A. S., El-Ashkar, A. M., Hashish, A. A., Mohammed, O. A., Elnahriry, T. A., Senbel, A., & Alghamdi, M. (2023). Medical students’ perception and academic performance after team-based and seminar-based learning in human anatomy. Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences, 18(1), 65–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtumed.2022.08.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asikainen, H., & Gijbels, D. (2017). Do students develop towards more deep approaches to learning during studies? A systematic review on the development of students’ deep and surface approaches to learning in higher education. Educational Psychology Review, 29(2), 205–234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-017-9406-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson, K., & Steward, B. (1997). A longitudinal study of occupational therapy new practitioners in their first years of professional practice: Preliminary findings. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 60(8), 338–342. https://doi.org/10.1177/030802269706000802
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, J. (1993). What do inventories of students’ learning processes really measure? A theoretical review and clarification. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 63 (Pt 1)(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1993.tb01038.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Biggs, J., Kember, D., & Leung, D. Y. P. (2001). The revised two-factor study process questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71(Pt 1), 133–149. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709901158433
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Björklund, A., & Svensson, T. (2006). A longitudinal study on the transformation of 15 occupational therapist students’ paradigms into occupational therapists’ paradigms. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 53(2), 87–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1630.2006.00545.x
   Google Scholar
• Bonsaksen, T. (2018). Deep, surface, or both? A study of occupational therapy students’ learning concepts. Occupational Therapy International, 2018, 3439815. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3439815
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bonsaksen, T., & Breen-Franklin, A. (2020). An evaluation of the factor structure and internal consistency of the ‘Conceptions of Learning’ and ‘Preferences for Teaching’ measures in American occupational therapy students. Journal of Occupational Therapy Education, 4(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.26681/jote.2020.040104
   Google Scholar
• Bonsaksen, T., & Breen-Franklin, A. (2023). Intrinsic relationships between learning conceptions, preferences for teaching and approaches to studying among occupational therapy students in the United States. Occupational Therapy in Health Care, 37(2), 197–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380577.2022.2025512
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonsaksen, T., Brown, T., Lim, H. B., & Fong, K. (2017). Approaches to studying predict academic performance in undergraduate occupational therapy students: A cross-cultural study. BMC Medical Education, 17(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-017-0914-3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bonsaksen, T., Magne, T. A., Stigen, L., Gramstad, A., Åsli, L., Mørk, G., Johnson, S. G., & Carstensen, T. (2021). Associations between occupational therapy students’ academic performance and their study approaches and perceptions of the learning environment. BMC Medical Education, 21(1), 496. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02940-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonsaksen, T., Småstuen, M. C., Thørrisen, M. M., Fong, K., Lim, H. B., & Brown, T. (2019). Factor analysis of the approaches and study skills inventory for students in a cross-cultural undergraduate occupational therapy student sample. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 66(1), 33–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1630.12504
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonsaksen, T., & Thørrisen, M. M. (2017). Psychometric properties of two interrelated measures: ‘conceptions of learning’ and ‘preferences for different types of courses and teaching. Ergoterapeuten, 60(4), 32–45.
   Google Scholar
• Breen-Franklin, A., & Bonsaksen, T. (2021). Associations between study approaches and exam grades among occupational therapy students in the United States. Irish Journal of Occupational Therapy, 49(1), 36–40. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOT-09-2020-0013
   Google Scholar
• Briggs, S. R., & Cheek, J. M. (1986). The role of factor analysis in the development and evaluation of personality scales. Journal of Personality, 54(1), 106–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1986.tb00391.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, T., Fong, K. N. K., Bonsaksen, T., Lan, T. H., Murdolo, Y., Gonzalez, P. C., & Beng, L. H. (2017). Approaches to learning among occupational therapy undergraduate students: A cross-cultural study. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 24(4), 299–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/11038128.2016.1229811
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, T., & Murdolo, Y. (2016). Approaches to study across four year-levels of undergraduate occupational therapy students: Similar or different? British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 79(12), 752–761. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308022616662482
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carstensen, T., Ødegaard, N. B., & Bonsaksen, T. (2018). Approaches to studying: Associations with learning conceptions and preferences for teaching. Cogent Education, 5(1)Article, 1480909. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2018.1480909
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman, J., Watson, J., & Adams, J. (2006). Exploring changes in occupational therapy students’ approaches to learning during pre-registration education. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 69(10), 457–463. https://doi.org/10.1177/03080226060691004
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.112.1.155
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DaLomba, E., Gramstad, A., Johnson, S. G., Carstensen, T., Stigen, L., Mørk, G., Magne, T. A., & Bonsaksen, T. (2021). Predictors of students’ participation in a learning environment survey with annual follow-ups. PloS One, 16(6), e0253773. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253773
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DaLomba, E., Stigen, L., Johnson, S. G., Mørk, G., Gramstad, A., Magne, T. A., Carstensen, T., Åsli, L. A., & Bonsaksen, T. (2020). Psychometric properties and associations between subscales of a study approach measure. Nursing & Health Sciences, 22(4), 941–948. https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12750
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diseth, Å. (2001). Validation of Norwegian version of the approaches and study skills inventory for students (ASSIST): Application of structural equation modelling. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 45(4), 381–394. https://doi.org/10.1080/0031380120096789
   Google Scholar
• Diseth, Å., & Martinsen, Ø. (2003). Approaches to learning, cognitive style, and motives as predictors of academic achievement. Educational Psychology, 23(2), 195–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410303225
   Google Scholar
• Eichler, J. R., & Keptner, K. M. (2023). Defining occupational therapy practice for students in higher education: A census from practitioners. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/03080226231168008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eklund-Myrskog, G. (1998). Students’ conceptions of learning in different educational contexts. Higher Education, 35(3), 299–316. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003145613005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entwistle, N. (2001). Styles of learning and approaches to studying in higher education. Kybernetes, 30(5/6), 593–603. https://doi.org/10.1108/03684920110391823
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entwistle, N. (2007). Research into student learning and university teaching. In N. Entwistle & P. Tomlinson (Eds.), British Journal of Educational Psychology, Monograph Series II: Psychological Aspects of Education - Current Trends, Number 4. (pp. 1–18). British Psychological Society.
   Google Scholar
• Entwistle, N. (2018). Student learning and academic understanding: A research perspective with implications for teaching. Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Entwistle, N., McCune, V., & Tait, H. (2013). Approaches and Study Skills Inventory for Students (ASSIST): Report of the development and use of inventories. University of Edinburgh.
   Google Scholar
• Entwistle, N. J., & Peterson, E. R. (2004). Conceptions of learning and knowledge in higher education: Relationships with study behaviour and influences of learning environments. International Journal of Educational Research, 41(6), 407–428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2005.08.009
   Google Scholar
• Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using SPSS. (4 ed.). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Goss, H. (2022). Student learning outcomes assessment in higher education and in academic libraries: A review of the literature. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 48(2), 102485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2021.102485
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gow, L., & Kember, D. (1990). Does higher education promote independent learning? Higher Education, 19(3), 307–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00133895
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gramstad, A., Åsli, L. A., Johnson, S. G., Magne, T. A., Carstensen, T., Mørk, G., Stigen, L., & Bonsaksen, T. (2020). Approaches to studying: A cross-sectional comparison of occupational therapy students in six education programs in Norway. The Open Journal of Occupational Therapy, 8(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.15453/2168-6408.1683
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hattie, J., & Anderman, E. M. (2013). International guide to student achievement. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hayat, A. A., Shateri, K., Amini, M., & Shokrpour, N. (2020). Relationships between academic self-efficacy, learning-related emotions, and metacognitive learning strategies with academic performance in medical students: A structural equation model. BMC Medical Education, 20(1), 76. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-01995-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrmann, K. J., Bager-Elsborg, A., & McCune, V. (2017). Investigating the relationships between approaches to learning, learner identities and academic achievement in higher education. Higher Education, 74(3), 385–400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-9999-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodgetts, S., Hollis, V., Triska, O., Dennis, S., Madill, H., & Taylor, E. (2007). Occupational therapy students’ and graduates’ satisfaction with professional education and preparedness for practice. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy. Revue Canadienne D’ergotherapie, 74(3), 148–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/000841740707400303
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Honaker, J., & King, G. (2010). What to do about missing values in time-series cross-section data. American Journal of Political Science, 54(2), 561–581. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00447.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooper, B. (2010). On arriving at the destination of the centennial vision: Navigational landmarks to guide occupational therapy education. Occupational Therapy in Health Care, 24(1), 97–106. https://doi.org/10.3109/07380570903329636
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hooper, B., Krishnagiri, S., Price, P., Taff, S. D., & Bilics, A. (2018). Curriculum-level strategies that US occupational therapy programs use to address occupation: A qualitative study. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 72(1), 7201205040p7201205041–7201205040p7201205010. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2018.024190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooper, B., Molineux, M., & Wood, W. (2020). The subject-centered integrative learning model: A new model for teaching occupational therapy’s distinct value. Journal of Occupational Therapy Education, 4(2), 1. https://doi.org/10.26681/jote.2020.040201
   Google Scholar
• Howie, P., & Bagnall, R. (2013). A critique of the deep and surface approaches to learning model. Teaching in Higher Education, 18(4), 389–400. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2012.733689
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IBM Corporation (2019). SPSS for Windows, version 26. IBM Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• İlçin, N., Tomruk, M., Yeşilyaprak, S. S., Karadibak, D., & Savcı, S. (2018). The relationship between learning styles and academic performance in Turkish physiotherapy students. BMC Medical Education, 18(1), 291. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1400-2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jones, K. B., Schell, B. A. B., Neville, M., & Pickens, N. D. (2023). Novice occupational therapy practitioners’ use of occupation in practice: A scoping review. Occupational Therapy in Health Care, 37(2), 210–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380577.2022.2025513
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanashiro, P., Iizuka, E. S., Sousa, C., & Dias, S. E. F. (2020). Sustainability in management education: A Biggs’ 3P model application. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 21(4), 671–684. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-05-2019-0176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kember, D. (1996). The intention to both memorise and understand: Another approach to learning? Higher Education, 31(3), 341–354. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00128436
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kember, D., Wong, A., & Leung, D. Y. P. (1999). Reconsidering the dimensions of approaches to learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 69(3), 323–343. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709999157752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korman, A. K. (2012). Self-enhancement and self-protection: Toward a theory of work motivation. In Erez, M., Kleinbeck, U., & Thierry, H. (Eds.) Work motivation in the context of a globalizing economy. (pp. 127–136). Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lebo, M. J., & Weber, C. (2015). An effective approach to the repeated cross-sectional design. American Journal of Political Science, 59(1), 242–258. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liew, S.-C., Sidhu, J., & Barua, A. (2015). The relationship between learning performances (styles and approaches) and learning outcomes among pre-clinical undergraduate medical students. BMC Medical Education, 15(1), 44. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-015-0327-0
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mørk, G., Gramstad, A., Åsli, L. A., Stigen, L., Johnson, S. G., Magne, T. A., Carstensen, T., Småstuen, M. C., & Bonsaksen, T. (2024). Approaches to studying: Changes during a three-year undergraduate study program. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 68(3), 389–401. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2022.2148274
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mørk, G., Magne, T. A., Carstensen, T., Stigen, L., Åsli, L. A., Gramstad, A., Johnson, S. G., & Bonsaksen, T. (2020). Associations between learning environment variables and students’ approaches to studying: A cross-sectional study. BMC Medical Education, 20(1), 120. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02033-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mørk, G., Stigen, L., Gramstad, A., Magne, T. A., Carstensen, T., & Bonsaksen, T. (2023). Stable and unstable associations between learning environment factors and study approaches: Two consecutive cross-sectional analyses of Norwegian occupational therapy students. Learning Environments Research, 26(2), 539–554. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-022-09445-7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mygland, J. S., Mørk, G., Stigen, L., Gramstad, A., Magne, T. A., & Bonsaksen, T. (2023). Stable or unstable associations between learning environment factors, study approaches and exam grades: Cross-sectional analyses across two consecutive program years. Journal of Occupational Therapy Education, 7(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.26681/jote.2023.070112
   Google Scholar
• Pan, X. (2021). Repeated cross-sectional design. In D. Gu & M. E. Dupre (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Gerontology and Population Aging. (pp. 4246–4250). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22009-9_578
   Google Scholar
• Parpala, A., Mattsson, M., Herrmann, K. J., Bager-Elsborg, A., & Hailikari, T. (2022). Detecting the variability in student learning in different disciplines—a person-oriented approach. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 66(6), 1020–1037. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2021.1958256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponterotto, J. G., & Ruckdeschel, D. (2007). An overview of coefficient alpha and a reliability matrix for estimating adequacy of internal consistency coefficients with psychological research measures. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 105(3), 997–1014. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.105.3.997-1014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Postareff, L., Mattsson, M., & Parpala, A. (2018). The effect of perceptions of the teaching-learning environment on the variation in approaches to learning – between-student differences and within-student variation. Learning and Individual Differences, 68, 96–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2018.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pucillo, E. M., & Perez, G. (2023). Metacognition and self-regulation influence academic performance in occupational and physical therapy students. Journal of Occupational Therapy Education, 7(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.26681/jote.2023.070104
   Google Scholar
• Ramsden, P. (1983). Institutional variations in British students’ approaches to learning and experiences of teaching. Higher Education, 12(6), 691–705. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00132425
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, J. T. E., Gamborg, G., & Hammerberg, G. (2005). Perceived academic quality and approaches to studying at Danish schools of occupational therapy. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 12(3), 110–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/11038120510030898
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sadlo, G., & Richardson, J. T. E. (2003). Approaches to studying and perceptions of the academic environment in students following problem-based and subject-based curricula. Higher Education Research & Development, 22(3), 253–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/0729436032000145130
   Google Scholar
• Schober, P., & Vetter, T. R. (2018). Repeated measures designs and analysis of longitudinal data: If at first you do not succeed-try, try again. Anesthesia and Analgesia, 127(2), 569–575. https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0000000000003511
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streiner, D. L. (2003). Starting at the beginning: An introduction to coefficient alpha and internal consistency. Journal of Personality Assessment, 80(1), 99–103. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327752JPA8001_18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tait, H., Entwistle, N., & McCune, V. (1998). ASSIST: A reconceptualisation of the approaches to studying inventory. In C. Rust (Ed.), Improving student learning: Improving students as learners. (pp. 262–271). Oxford Center for Staff and Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Trigwell, K., Ashwin, P., & Millan, E. S. (2013). Evoked prior learning experience and approach to learning as predictors of academic achievement. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(Pt 3), 363–378. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.2012.02066.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turesson, C., & Lindh Falk, A. (2023). Learning occupational therapy practice using standardised patients in a practical examination – experiences of students and teachers. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 30(4), 425–434. https://doi.org/10.1080/11038128.2021.1974549
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Ginkel, J. R., Linting, M., Rippe, R. C. A., & van der Voort, A. (2020). Rebutting existing misconceptions about multiple imputation as a method for handling missing data. Journal of Personality Assessment, 102(3), 297–308. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2018.1530680
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermunt, J. D., & Vermetten, Y. J. (2004). Patterns in student learning: Relationships between learning strategies, conceptions of learning, and learning orientations. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 359–384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-004-0005-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrugt, A., & Oort, F. J. (2008). Metacognition, achievement goals, study strategies and academic achievement: Pathways to achievement. Metacognition and Learning, 3(2), 123–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-008-9022-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, P. J. (2011). First year medical students’ approaches to study and their outcomes in a gross anatomy course. Clinical Anatomy , 24(1), 120–127. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.21071
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, J., Chapman, J., Adams, J., & Nila, U. H. (2006). Occupational therapy students’ approaches to learning: Considering the impact of culture. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 69(12), 548–555. https://doi.org/10.1177/030802260606901203
   Google Scholar
• Weinstein, C. E., & Underwood, V. L. (2014). Learning strategies: The how of learning. In Thinking and learning skills. (pp. 241–258). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, L.-Z., Birtch, T. A., Chiang, F. F., & Zhang, H. (2018). Perceptions of negative workplace gossip: A self-consistency theory framework. Journal of Management, 44(5), 1873–1898. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316632057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeegers, P. (2001). Approaches to learning in science: A longitudinal study. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71(Pt 1), 115–132. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709901158424
   PubMedGoogle Scholar