751
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Occupational Therapy students’ Concepts of Learning: Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Associations With Deep, Strategic, and Surface Study Approaches

, , , , , & show all
Received 14 Jan 2024, Accepted 26 Feb 2024, Published online: 12 Mar 2024

References

  • Aboregela, A. M., Sonpol, H. M. A., Metwally, A. S., El-Ashkar, A. M., Hashish, A. A., Mohammed, O. A., Elnahriry, T. A., Senbel, A., & Alghamdi, M. (2023). Medical students’ perception and academic performance after team-based and seminar-based learning in human anatomy. Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences, 18(1), 65–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtumed.2022.08.005
  • Asikainen, H., & Gijbels, D. (2017). Do students develop towards more deep approaches to learning during studies? A systematic review on the development of students’ deep and surface approaches to learning in higher education. Educational Psychology Review, 29(2), 205–234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-017-9406-6
  • Atkinson, K., & Steward, B. (1997). A longitudinal study of occupational therapy new practitioners in their first years of professional practice: Preliminary findings. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 60(8), 338–342. https://doi.org/10.1177/030802269706000802
  • Biggs, J. (1993). What do inventories of students’ learning processes really measure? A theoretical review and clarification. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 63 (Pt 1)(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1993.tb01038.x
  • Biggs, J., Kember, D., & Leung, D. Y. P. (2001). The revised two-factor study process questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71(Pt 1), 133–149. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709901158433
  • Björklund, A., & Svensson, T. (2006). A longitudinal study on the transformation of 15 occupational therapist students’ paradigms into occupational therapists’ paradigms. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 53(2), 87–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1630.2006.00545.x
  • Bonsaksen, T. (2018). Deep, surface, or both? A study of occupational therapy students’ learning concepts. Occupational Therapy International, 2018, 3439815. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3439815
  • Bonsaksen, T., & Breen-Franklin, A. (2020). An evaluation of the factor structure and internal consistency of the ‘Conceptions of Learning’ and ‘Preferences for Teaching’ measures in American occupational therapy students. Journal of Occupational Therapy Education, 4(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.26681/jote.2020.040104
  • Bonsaksen, T., & Breen-Franklin, A. (2023). Intrinsic relationships between learning conceptions, preferences for teaching and approaches to studying among occupational therapy students in the United States. Occupational Therapy in Health Care, 37(2), 197–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380577.2022.2025512
  • Bonsaksen, T., Brown, T., Lim, H. B., & Fong, K. (2017). Approaches to studying predict academic performance in undergraduate occupational therapy students: A cross-cultural study. BMC Medical Education, 17(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-017-0914-3
  • Bonsaksen, T., Magne, T. A., Stigen, L., Gramstad, A., Åsli, L., Mørk, G., Johnson, S. G., & Carstensen, T. (2021). Associations between occupational therapy students’ academic performance and their study approaches and perceptions of the learning environment. BMC Medical Education, 21(1), 496. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02940-0
  • Bonsaksen, T., Småstuen, M. C., Thørrisen, M. M., Fong, K., Lim, H. B., & Brown, T. (2019). Factor analysis of the approaches and study skills inventory for students in a cross-cultural undergraduate occupational therapy student sample. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 66(1), 33–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1630.12504
  • Bonsaksen, T., & Thørrisen, M. M. (2017). Psychometric properties of two interrelated measures: ‘conceptions of learning’ and ‘preferences for different types of courses and teaching. Ergoterapeuten, 60(4), 32–45.
  • Breen-Franklin, A., & Bonsaksen, T. (2021). Associations between study approaches and exam grades among occupational therapy students in the United States. Irish Journal of Occupational Therapy, 49(1), 36–40. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOT-09-2020-0013
  • Briggs, S. R., & Cheek, J. M. (1986). The role of factor analysis in the development and evaluation of personality scales. Journal of Personality, 54(1), 106–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1986.tb00391.x
  • Brown, T., Fong, K. N. K., Bonsaksen, T., Lan, T. H., Murdolo, Y., Gonzalez, P. C., & Beng, L. H. (2017). Approaches to learning among occupational therapy undergraduate students: A cross-cultural study. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 24(4), 299–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/11038128.2016.1229811
  • Brown, T., & Murdolo, Y. (2016). Approaches to study across four year-levels of undergraduate occupational therapy students: Similar or different? British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 79(12), 752–761. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308022616662482
  • Carstensen, T., Ødegaard, N. B., & Bonsaksen, T. (2018). Approaches to studying: Associations with learning conceptions and preferences for teaching. Cogent Education, 5(1)Article, 1480909. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2018.1480909
  • Chapman, J., Watson, J., & Adams, J. (2006). Exploring changes in occupational therapy students’ approaches to learning during pre-registration education. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 69(10), 457–463. https://doi.org/10.1177/03080226060691004
  • Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.112.1.155
  • DaLomba, E., Gramstad, A., Johnson, S. G., Carstensen, T., Stigen, L., Mørk, G., Magne, T. A., & Bonsaksen, T. (2021). Predictors of students’ participation in a learning environment survey with annual follow-ups. PloS One, 16(6), e0253773. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253773
  • DaLomba, E., Stigen, L., Johnson, S. G., Mørk, G., Gramstad, A., Magne, T. A., Carstensen, T., Åsli, L. A., & Bonsaksen, T. (2020). Psychometric properties and associations between subscales of a study approach measure. Nursing & Health Sciences, 22(4), 941–948. https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12750
  • Diseth, Å. (2001). Validation of Norwegian version of the approaches and study skills inventory for students (ASSIST): Application of structural equation modelling. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 45(4), 381–394. https://doi.org/10.1080/0031380120096789
  • Diseth, Å., & Martinsen, Ø. (2003). Approaches to learning, cognitive style, and motives as predictors of academic achievement. Educational Psychology, 23(2), 195–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410303225
  • Eichler, J. R., & Keptner, K. M. (2023). Defining occupational therapy practice for students in higher education: A census from practitioners. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/03080226231168008
  • Eklund-Myrskog, G. (1998). Students’ conceptions of learning in different educational contexts. Higher Education, 35(3), 299–316. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003145613005
  • Entwistle, N. (2001). Styles of learning and approaches to studying in higher education. Kybernetes, 30(5/6), 593–603. https://doi.org/10.1108/03684920110391823
  • Entwistle, N. (2007). Research into student learning and university teaching. In N. Entwistle & P. Tomlinson (Eds.), British Journal of Educational Psychology, Monograph Series II: Psychological Aspects of Education - Current Trends, Number 4. (pp. 1–18). British Psychological Society.
  • Entwistle, N. (2018). Student learning and academic understanding: A research perspective with implications for teaching. Elsevier.
  • Entwistle, N., McCune, V., & Tait, H. (2013). Approaches and Study Skills Inventory for Students (ASSIST): Report of the development and use of inventories. University of Edinburgh.
  • Entwistle, N. J., & Peterson, E. R. (2004). Conceptions of learning and knowledge in higher education: Relationships with study behaviour and influences of learning environments. International Journal of Educational Research, 41(6), 407–428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2005.08.009
  • Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using SPSS. (4 ed.). Sage Publications.
  • Goss, H. (2022). Student learning outcomes assessment in higher education and in academic libraries: A review of the literature. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 48(2), 102485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2021.102485
  • Gow, L., & Kember, D. (1990). Does higher education promote independent learning? Higher Education, 19(3), 307–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00133895
  • Gramstad, A., Åsli, L. A., Johnson, S. G., Magne, T. A., Carstensen, T., Mørk, G., Stigen, L., & Bonsaksen, T. (2020). Approaches to studying: A cross-sectional comparison of occupational therapy students in six education programs in Norway. The Open Journal of Occupational Therapy, 8(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.15453/2168-6408.1683
  • Hattie, J., & Anderman, E. M. (2013). International guide to student achievement. Routledge.
  • Hayat, A. A., Shateri, K., Amini, M., & Shokrpour, N. (2020). Relationships between academic self-efficacy, learning-related emotions, and metacognitive learning strategies with academic performance in medical students: A structural equation model. BMC Medical Education, 20(1), 76. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-01995-9
  • Herrmann, K. J., Bager-Elsborg, A., & McCune, V. (2017). Investigating the relationships between approaches to learning, learner identities and academic achievement in higher education. Higher Education, 74(3), 385–400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-9999-6
  • Hodgetts, S., Hollis, V., Triska, O., Dennis, S., Madill, H., & Taylor, E. (2007). Occupational therapy students’ and graduates’ satisfaction with professional education and preparedness for practice. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy. Revue Canadienne D’ergotherapie, 74(3), 148–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/000841740707400303
  • Honaker, J., & King, G. (2010). What to do about missing values in time-series cross-section data. American Journal of Political Science, 54(2), 561–581. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00447.x
  • Hooper, B. (2010). On arriving at the destination of the centennial vision: Navigational landmarks to guide occupational therapy education. Occupational Therapy in Health Care, 24(1), 97–106. https://doi.org/10.3109/07380570903329636
  • Hooper, B., Krishnagiri, S., Price, P., Taff, S. D., & Bilics, A. (2018). Curriculum-level strategies that US occupational therapy programs use to address occupation: A qualitative study. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 72(1), 7201205040p7201205041–7201205040p7201205010. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2018.024190
  • Hooper, B., Molineux, M., & Wood, W. (2020). The subject-centered integrative learning model: A new model for teaching occupational therapy’s distinct value. Journal of Occupational Therapy Education, 4(2), 1. https://doi.org/10.26681/jote.2020.040201
  • Howie, P., & Bagnall, R. (2013). A critique of the deep and surface approaches to learning model. Teaching in Higher Education, 18(4), 389–400. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2012.733689
  • IBM Corporation (2019). SPSS for Windows, version 26. IBM Corporation.
  • İlçin, N., Tomruk, M., Yeşilyaprak, S. S., Karadibak, D., & Savcı, S. (2018). The relationship between learning styles and academic performance in Turkish physiotherapy students. BMC Medical Education, 18(1), 291. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1400-2
  • Jones, K. B., Schell, B. A. B., Neville, M., & Pickens, N. D. (2023). Novice occupational therapy practitioners’ use of occupation in practice: A scoping review. Occupational Therapy in Health Care, 37(2), 210–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380577.2022.2025513
  • Kanashiro, P., Iizuka, E. S., Sousa, C., & Dias, S. E. F. (2020). Sustainability in management education: A Biggs’ 3P model application. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 21(4), 671–684. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-05-2019-0176
  • Kember, D. (1996). The intention to both memorise and understand: Another approach to learning? Higher Education, 31(3), 341–354. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00128436
  • Kember, D., Wong, A., & Leung, D. Y. P. (1999). Reconsidering the dimensions of approaches to learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 69(3), 323–343. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709999157752
  • Korman, A. K. (2012). Self-enhancement and self-protection: Toward a theory of work motivation. In Erez, M., Kleinbeck, U., & Thierry, H. (Eds.) Work motivation in the context of a globalizing economy. (pp. 127–136). Psychology Press.
  • Lebo, M. J., & Weber, C. (2015). An effective approach to the repeated cross-sectional design. American Journal of Political Science, 59(1), 242–258. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12095
  • Liew, S.-C., Sidhu, J., & Barua, A. (2015). The relationship between learning performances (styles and approaches) and learning outcomes among pre-clinical undergraduate medical students. BMC Medical Education, 15(1), 44. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-015-0327-0
  • Mørk, G., Gramstad, A., Åsli, L. A., Stigen, L., Johnson, S. G., Magne, T. A., Carstensen, T., Småstuen, M. C., & Bonsaksen, T. (2024). Approaches to studying: Changes during a three-year undergraduate study program. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 68(3), 389–401. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2022.2148274
  • Mørk, G., Magne, T. A., Carstensen, T., Stigen, L., Åsli, L. A., Gramstad, A., Johnson, S. G., & Bonsaksen, T. (2020). Associations between learning environment variables and students’ approaches to studying: A cross-sectional study. BMC Medical Education, 20(1), 120. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02033-4
  • Mørk, G., Stigen, L., Gramstad, A., Magne, T. A., Carstensen, T., & Bonsaksen, T. (2023). Stable and unstable associations between learning environment factors and study approaches: Two consecutive cross-sectional analyses of Norwegian occupational therapy students. Learning Environments Research, 26(2), 539–554. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-022-09445-7
  • Mygland, J. S., Mørk, G., Stigen, L., Gramstad, A., Magne, T. A., & Bonsaksen, T. (2023). Stable or unstable associations between learning environment factors, study approaches and exam grades: Cross-sectional analyses across two consecutive program years. Journal of Occupational Therapy Education, 7(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.26681/jote.2023.070112
  • Pan, X. (2021). Repeated cross-sectional design. In D. Gu & M. E. Dupre (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Gerontology and Population Aging. (pp. 4246–4250). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22009-9_578
  • Parpala, A., Mattsson, M., Herrmann, K. J., Bager-Elsborg, A., & Hailikari, T. (2022). Detecting the variability in student learning in different disciplines—a person-oriented approach. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 66(6), 1020–1037. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2021.1958256
  • Ponterotto, J. G., & Ruckdeschel, D. (2007). An overview of coefficient alpha and a reliability matrix for estimating adequacy of internal consistency coefficients with psychological research measures. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 105(3), 997–1014. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.105.3.997-1014
  • Postareff, L., Mattsson, M., & Parpala, A. (2018). The effect of perceptions of the teaching-learning environment on the variation in approaches to learning – between-student differences and within-student variation. Learning and Individual Differences, 68, 96–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2018.10.006
  • Pucillo, E. M., & Perez, G. (2023). Metacognition and self-regulation influence academic performance in occupational and physical therapy students. Journal of Occupational Therapy Education, 7(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.26681/jote.2023.070104
  • Ramsden, P. (1983). Institutional variations in British students’ approaches to learning and experiences of teaching. Higher Education, 12(6), 691–705. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00132425
  • Richardson, J. T. E., Gamborg, G., & Hammerberg, G. (2005). Perceived academic quality and approaches to studying at Danish schools of occupational therapy. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 12(3), 110–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/11038120510030898
  • Sadlo, G., & Richardson, J. T. E. (2003). Approaches to studying and perceptions of the academic environment in students following problem-based and subject-based curricula. Higher Education Research & Development, 22(3), 253–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/0729436032000145130
  • Schober, P., & Vetter, T. R. (2018). Repeated measures designs and analysis of longitudinal data: If at first you do not succeed-try, try again. Anesthesia and Analgesia, 127(2), 569–575. https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0000000000003511
  • Streiner, D. L. (2003). Starting at the beginning: An introduction to coefficient alpha and internal consistency. Journal of Personality Assessment, 80(1), 99–103. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327752JPA8001_18
  • Tait, H., Entwistle, N., & McCune, V. (1998). ASSIST: A reconceptualisation of the approaches to studying inventory. In C. Rust (Ed.), Improving student learning: Improving students as learners. (pp. 262–271). Oxford Center for Staff and Learning.
  • Trigwell, K., Ashwin, P., & Millan, E. S. (2013). Evoked prior learning experience and approach to learning as predictors of academic achievement. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(Pt 3), 363–378. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.2012.02066.x
  • Turesson, C., & Lindh Falk, A. (2023). Learning occupational therapy practice using standardised patients in a practical examination – experiences of students and teachers. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 30(4), 425–434. https://doi.org/10.1080/11038128.2021.1974549
  • van Ginkel, J. R., Linting, M., Rippe, R. C. A., & van der Voort, A. (2020). Rebutting existing misconceptions about multiple imputation as a method for handling missing data. Journal of Personality Assessment, 102(3), 297–308. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2018.1530680
  • Vermunt, J. D., & Vermetten, Y. J. (2004). Patterns in student learning: Relationships between learning strategies, conceptions of learning, and learning orientations. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 359–384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-004-0005-y
  • Vrugt, A., & Oort, F. J. (2008). Metacognition, achievement goals, study strategies and academic achievement: Pathways to achievement. Metacognition and Learning, 3(2), 123–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-008-9022-4
  • Ward, P. J. (2011). First year medical students’ approaches to study and their outcomes in a gross anatomy course. Clinical Anatomy , 24(1), 120–127. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.21071
  • Watson, J., Chapman, J., Adams, J., & Nila, U. H. (2006). Occupational therapy students’ approaches to learning: Considering the impact of culture. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 69(12), 548–555. https://doi.org/10.1177/030802260606901203
  • Weinstein, C. E., & Underwood, V. L. (2014). Learning strategies: The how of learning. In Thinking and learning skills. (pp. 241–258). Routledge.
  • Wu, L.-Z., Birtch, T. A., Chiang, F. F., & Zhang, H. (2018). Perceptions of negative workplace gossip: A self-consistency theory framework. Journal of Management, 44(5), 1873–1898. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316632057
  • Zeegers, P. (2001). Approaches to learning in science: A longitudinal study. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71(Pt 1), 115–132. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709901158424