Microbial interactions during sugar cane must fermentation for bioethanol production: does quorum sensing play a role?

References

• Carere CR, Sparling R, Cicek N, et al. Third generation biofuels via direct cellulose fermentation. Int J Mol Sci. 2008;9:1342–1360.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajee O, Fabian KQS, Shen LJ, et al. Potential and technological advancement of biofuels. Int J Adv Sci Tech Res. 2014;4:12–29.
   Google Scholar
• Sims REH, Mabee W, Saddler JN, et al. An overview of second generation biofuel technologies. Bioresour Technol. 2010;101:1570–1580.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RFA. Global Ethanol Production [Internet]. Renewable fuels association: alternative fuels data center; 2015. Available from: http://www.afdc.energy.gov/data/10331
   Google Scholar
• RFA. World fuel ethanol production [Internet]. Renewable Fuels Association; Alternative Fuels Data Center; 2014. Available from: http://www.ethanolrfa.org/resources/industry/statistics/world/
   Google Scholar
• UNICA. Produção brasileira de álcool anidro e hidratado. Unicadata. União da Indústria de cana-de-açúcar; 2016. Available from: http://www.unicadata.com.br
   Google Scholar
• Amorim HV, Leão RM. Fermentação Alcoólica: Ciência e Tecnologia. Industriais F-ST, editor. Piracicaba (BR): Fermentec; 2005. p. 448.
   Google Scholar
• Andrietta GS, Steckelberg C, Andrietta R. Bioetanol: Brasil, 30 anos na vanguarda. Construindo a História Dos Prod Nat. 2006;7:1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Basso LC, De Amorim HV, De Oliveira AJ, et al. Yeast selection for fuel ethanol production in Brazil. FEMS Yeast Res. 2008;8:1155–1163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vianna CR, Silva CLC, Neves MJ, et al. Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains from traditional fermentations of Brazilian cachaça: Trehalose metabolism, heat and ethanol resistance. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek, Int J Gen Mol Microbiol. 2008;93:205–217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Freitas LC, Kaneko S. Ethanol demand under the flex-fuel technology regime in Brazil. Energy Econ. 2011;33:1146–1154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrietta MGS, Andrietta SR, Steckelberg C, et al. Bioethanol: Brazil, 30 years of Proalcool. Int Sugar J. 2007;109:195–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basso L, Basso T, Rocha S. Ethanol production in Brazil: the industrial process and its impact on yeast fermentation. In: Bernardes MAS, editor. Biofuel production recent development prospects. Vol. 1530. Rijeka (Croatia): InTech; 2011. p. 85–100.
   Google Scholar
• Della-Bianca BE, Basso TO, Stambuk BU, et al. What do we know about the yeast strains from the Brazilian fuel ethanol industry? Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2013;97:979–991.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liberal ATS, Basílio ACM, Resende AM, et al. Identification of Dekkera bruxellensis as a major contaminant yeast in continuous fuel ethanol fermentation. J Appl Microbiol. 2007;102:538–547.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filho EA, da S, de Melo HF, Antunes DF, et al. Isolation by genetic and physiological characteristics of a fuel-ethanol fermentative Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain with potential for genetic manipulation. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2005;32:481–486.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basílio ACM, de Araújo PRL, de Morais JOF, et al. Detection and identification of wild yeast contaminants of the industrial fuel ethanol fermentation process. Curr Microbiol. 2008;56:322–326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucena BT. Genetic diversity of lactic bacteria present in alcohol fuel distilleries in the states of Paraiba and Pernambuco [thesis]. Federal University of Pernambuco; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Skinner KA, Leathers TD. Bacterial contaminants of fuel ethanol production. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2004;31:401–408.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lacerda ICA, Gomes FCO, Borelli BM, et al. Identification of the bacterial community responsible for traditional fermentation during sour cassava starch, cachaça and minas cheese production using cultureindependent 16s rrna gene sequence analysis. Braz J Microbiol. 2011;42:650–657.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallo CR. Determinação da microbiota bacteriana de mosto e de dornas de fermentação alcoólica (Determination of the bacterial microbiota of must and alcoholic fermentation vats) [thesis]. State University of Campinas; 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Makanjuola DB, Tymon A, Springham DG. Some effects of lactic acid bacteria on laboratory-scale yeast fermentations. Enzyme Microb Technol. 1992;14:350–357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narendranath NV. Bacterial contamination and control in ethanol production. In: Ingledew WM, Kelsall DR, Austin GD, Kluhspies C, editors. The alcohol textbook. 4th ed. Nottingham (UK): Nottingham University Press; 2003. p. 287–298.
   Google Scholar
• Bayrock DP, Ingledew WM. Inhibition of yeast by lactic acid bacteria in continuous culture: nutrient depletion and/or acid toxicity? J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2004;31:362–368.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tosin C, Andrietta SR, Andrietta M. d GS. Population dynamics of yeasts inhabiting bioethanol production with cell recycling. J Inst Brew. 2015;121:343–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayrock D, Ingledew WM. Changes in steady state on introduction of a Lactobacillus contaminant to a continuous culture ethanol fermentation. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2001;27:39–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paramithiotis S, Gioulatos S, Tsakalidou E, et al. Interactions between Saccharomyces cerevisiae and lactic acid bacteria in sourdough. Process Biochem. 2006;41:2429–2433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckner M, Ivey ML, Phister TG. Microbial contamination of fuel ethanol fermentations. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2011;53:387–394.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sue T, Obolonkin V, Griffiths H, et al. An exometabolomics approach to monitoring microbial contamination in microalgal fermentation processes by using metabolic footprint analysis. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011;77:7605–7610.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albergaria H, Arneborg N. Dominance of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in alcoholic fermentation processes: role of physiological fitness and microbial interactions. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2016;100:2035–2046.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branco P, Francisco D, Chambon C, et al. Identification of novel GAPDH-derived antimicrobial peptides secreted by Saccharomyces cerevisiae and involved in wine microbial interactions. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2014;98:843–853.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemsawasd V, Branco P, Almeida MG, et al. Cell-to-cell contact and antimicrobial peptides play a combined role in the death of Lachanchea thermotolerans during mixed-culture alcoholic fermentation with Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2015;362:1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branco P, Viana T, Albergaria H, et al. Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) produced by Saccharomyces cerevisiae induce alterations in the intracellular pH, membrane permeability and culturability of Hanseniaspora guilliermondii cells. Int J Food Microbiol. 2015;205:112–118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narendranath NV, Hynes SH, Thomas KC, et al. Effects of lactobacilli on yeast-catalyzed ethanol fermentations. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1997;63:4158–4163:
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorta C, Oliva-Neto P, De-Abreu-Neto MS, et al. Synergism among lactic acid, sulfite, pH and ethanol in alcoholic fermentation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae (PE-2 and M-26). World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2006;22:177–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuipers OP, De Ruyter PGGA Kleerebezem M, et al. Quorum sensing-controlled gene expression in lactic acid bacteria. J Biotechnol. 1998;64:15–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller MB, Bassler BL. Quorum sensing in bacteria. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2001;55:165–199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa VM. Perfil de metabólitos excretados por Lactobacillus isolados de processos industriais de produção de etanol, com ênfase nos isômeros óticos D(−) e L(+) do ácido lático (Metabolics profile excrected by Lactobacillus isolated from industrial ethanol production process concearning D(-) and L(+) Lactic Acid optical isomers) [thesis]. ESALQ-University of São Paulo; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Di Cagno R, De Angelis M, Calasso M, et al. Proteomics of the bacterial cross-talk by quorum sensing. J Proteomics. 2011;74:19–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winzer K, Hardie KR, Williams P. Bacterial cell-to-cell communication: sorry, can't talk now - gone to lunch! Curr Opin Microbiol. 2002;5:216–222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bassler BL, Losick R. Bacterially speaking. Cell. 2006;125:237–246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camilli A, Bassler BL. Bacterial small-molecule signaling pathways. Science. 2006;311:1113–1116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams P, Winzer K, Chan WC, et al. Look who's talking: communication and quorum sensing in the bacterial world. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2007;362:1119–1134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albuquerque P, Casadevall A. Quorum sensing in fungi-a review. Med Mycol. 2012;50:337–345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zupan J, Avbelj M, Butinar B, et al. Monitoring of quorum-sensing molecules during minifermentation studies in wine yeast. J Agric Food Chem. 2013;61:2496–2505.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleet G. Yeast interactions and wine flavour. Int J Food Microbiol. 2003;86:11–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivey M, Massel M, Phister TG. Microbial interactions in food fermentations. Annu Rev Food Sci Technol. 2013;4:141–162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruth L. Bio or bust? The economic and ecological cost of biofuels. EMBO Rep. 2008;9:130–133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dias MODS Maciel Filho R, Mantelatto PE, et al. Sugarcane processing for ethanol and sugar in Brazil. Environ Dev. 2015;1:17.
   Google Scholar
• Brexó RP, Sant’Ana AS. Impact and significance of microbial contamination during fermentation for bioethanol production. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2017;73:423–434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borzani W, Schmidell W, Lima U, de A, et al. Biotecnologia Industrial: Processos Fermentativos e Enzimáticos. São Paulo (BR): Blucher; 2001. p. 593.
   Google Scholar
• Facciotti MCR. Fermentação Contínua. In: Schmidell W, Lima UA, Aquarone E, Borzani W, editors. Biotecnologia Industrial II: Engenharia Bioquímica. São Paulo: Edgar Blücher; 2001. p. 223–46.
   Google Scholar
• de Souza Liberal AT, da Silva Filho EA, de Morais JOF, et al. Contaminant yeast detection in industrial ethanol fermentation must by rDNA-PCR. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2005;40:19–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ngang JJE, Letourneau F, Villa P. Alcoholic fermentation of beet molasses: effects of lactic acid on yeast fermentation parameters. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 1989;31:125–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallo CR, Canhos VP. Efeitos do tratamento ácido no fermento sobre a microbiota bacteriana da fermentação alcoólica. stab. 1991;29:35–37.
   Google Scholar
• Alcarde VE. Avaliação de parametros que afetam a floculação de leveduras e bacterias isoladas de processos industriais de fermentação alcoolica (Evaluation of parameters affecting yeasts and bacteria flocculation isolated from industrial alcohol fermentation process) [thesis]. State University of Campinas; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Camolez MA, Mutton MJR. Influência de microrganismos contaminantes sobre o processo fermentativo. stab. 2005;23:6–9.
   Google Scholar
• Muthaiyan A, Limayem A, Ricke SC. Antimicrobial strategies for limiting bacterial contaminants in fuel bioethanol fermentations. Prog Energy Combust Sci. 2011;37:351–370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worley-Morse TO, Deshusses MA, Gunsch CK. Reduction of invasive bacteria in ethanol fermentations using bacteriophages. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2015;112:1544–1553.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roach DR, Khatibi P. a, Bischoff KM, et al. Bacteriophage-encoded lytic enzymes control growth of contaminating Lactobacillus found in fuel ethanol fermentations. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2013;6:20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rich JO, Leathers TD, Bischoff KM, et al. Biofilm formation and ethanol inhibition by bacterial contaminants of biofuel fermentation. Bioresour Technol. 2015;196:347–354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuqua WC, Winans SC, Greenberg EP. Quorum sensing in bacteria: the LuxR-LuxI family of cell density-responsive transcriptional regulators. J Bacteriol. 1994;176:269–275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hense BA, Kuttler C, Müller J, et al. Does efficiency sensing unify diffusion and quorum sensing? Nat Rev Microbiol. 2007;5:230–239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlson P, Lüscher M. Pheromones’: a new term for a class of biologically active substances. Nature. 1959;183:55–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Even-Tov E, Omer Bendori S, Valastyan J, et al. Social evolution selects for redundancy in bacterial quorum sensing. PLoS Biol. 2016;14:e1002386.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bassler BL. Small talk. Cell-to-cell communication in bacteria. Cell. 2002;109:421–424.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waters CM, Bassler BL. Quorum sensing: cell-to-cell communication in bacteria. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2005;21:319–346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skandamis PN, Nychas G-JE. Quorum sensing in the context of food microbiology. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012;78:5473–5482.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henke JM, Bassler BL. Bacterial social engagements. Trends Cell Biol. 2004;14:648–656.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taga ME, Bassler BL. Chemical communication among bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2003;100(Suppl):14549–14554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lade H, Paul D, Kweon JH. N-Acyl homoserine lactone-mediated quorum sensing with special reference to use of quorum quenching bacteria in membrane biofouling control. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyon GJ, Novick RP. Peptide signaling in Staphylococcus aureus and other Gram-positive bacteria. Peptides. 2004;25:1389–1403.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyon GJ, Muir TW. Chemical signaling among bacteria and its inhibition. Chem Biol. 2003;10:1007–1021.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smith D, Wang J-H, Swatton JE, et al. Variations on a theme: diverse N-acyl homoserine lactone-mediated quorum sensing mechanisms in gram-negative bacteria. Sci Prog. 2006;89:167–211.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Antunes LCM, Ferreira RBR. Intercellular communication in bacteria. Crit Rev Microbiol. 2009;35:69–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reading NC, Torres AG, Kendall MM, et al. A novel two-component signaling system that activates transcription of an enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli effector involved in remodeling of host actin. J Bacteriol. 2007;189:2468–2476.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogan DA. Talking to themselves: autoregulation and quorum sensing in fungi. Eukaryot Cell. 2006;5:613–619.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sprague GF, Winans SC. Eukaryotes learn how to count: quorum sensing by yeast. Genes Dev. 2006;20:1045–1049.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rumjanek NG, Fonseca MCC da, Xavier GR. Quorum sensing em sistemas agricolas: Comportamento multicelular em procarioto via comunicação intercelular. Rev Biotecnol Cienc e Desenvolv. 2004;33:35–50.
   Google Scholar
• Flavier AB, Ganova-Raeva LM, Schell MA, et al. Hierarchical autoinduction in Ralstonia solanacearum: control of acyl-homoserine lactone production by a novel autoregulatory system responsive to 3-hydroxypalmitic acid methyl ester. J Bacteriol. 1997;179:7089–7097.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diggle SP, Matthijs S, Wright VJ, et al. The Pseudomonas aeruginosa 4-Quinolone signal molecules HHQ and PQS play multifunctional roles in quorum sensing and iron entrapment. Chem Biol. 2007;14:87–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sturme MHJ, Kleerebezem M, Nakayama J, et al. Cell to cell communication by autoinducing peptides in gram-positive bacteria. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2002;81:233–243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bassler BL. How bacteria talk to each other: regulation of gene expression by quorum sensing. Curr Opin Microbiol. 1999;2:582–587.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wuster A, Babu MM. Transcriptional control of the quorum sensing response in yeast. Mol BioSyst. 2009;6:134–141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gori K, Knudsen PB, Nielsen KF, et al. Alcohol-based quorum sensing plays a role in adhesion and sliding motility of the yeast Debaryomyces hansenii. FEMS Yeast Res. 2011;11:643–652.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monnet V, Juillard V, Gardan R. Peptide conversations in Gram-positive bacteria. Crit Rev Microbiol. 2014;42:339–351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reading NC, Sperandio V. Quorum sensing: the many languages of bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2006;254:1–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Withers H, Swift S, Williams P. Quorum sensing as an integral component of gene regulatory networks in Gram-negative bacteria. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2001;4:186–193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long T, Tu KC, Wang Y, et al. Quantifying the integration of quorum-sensing signals with single-cell resolution. PLoS Biol. 2009;7:e1000068.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornby JM, Jensen EC, Lisec AD, et al. Quorum sensing in the dimorphic fungus Candida albicans is mediated by farnesol. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001;67:2982–2992.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller L, Surette MG. Communication in bacteria: an ecological and evolutionary perspective. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2006;4:249–258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivey M. Transcriptome analysis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae under bacterial contamination and lactic acid stress during ethanolic fermentation [Thesis]. New York State University; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Redfield RJ. Is quorum sensing a side effect of diffusion sensing? Trends Microbiol. 2002;10:365–370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber M, Buceta J. Dynamics of the quorum sensing switch: stochastic and non-stationary effects. BMC Syst Biol. 2013;7:6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalia VC. Quorum sensing inhibitors: an overview. Biotechnol Adv. 2013;31:224–245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du Y, Li T, Wan Y, et al. Signal molecule-dependent quorum-sensing and quorum-quenching enzymes in bacteria. Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr. 2014;24:117–132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fetzner S. Quorum quenching enzymes. J Biotechnol. 2015;201:2–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bassler BL, Miller MB. Quorum sensing. The prokaryotes. Heidelberg: Springer; 2013. p. 495–509.
   Google Scholar
• Williams TCC, Averesch NJHJH, Winter G, et al. Quorum-sensing linked RNA interference for dynamic metabolic pathway control in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Metab Eng. 2015;29:124–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tocheva EI, Ortega DR, Jensen GJ. Sporulation, bacterial cell envelopes and the origin of life. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2016;14:535–542.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shirtliff ME, Peters BM, Jabra-Rizk MA. Cross-kingdom interactions: Candida albicans and bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2009;299:1–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alem MAS, Oteef MDY, Flowers TH, et al. Production of tyrosol by Candida albicans biofilms and its role in quorum sensing and biofilm development. Eukaryot Cell. 2006;5:1770–1779.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lingappa BT, Prasad M, Lingappa Y, et al. Phenethyl alcohol and tryptophol: autoantibiotics produced by the fungus Candida albicans. Science. 1969;163:192–194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madhani HD. Quorum sensing in fungi: Q&A. PLoS Pathog. 2011;7:10–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen H, Fink GR. Feedback control of morphogenesis in fungi by aromatic alcohols. Genes Dev. 2006;20:1150–1161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cottier F, Mühlschlegel FA. Communication in fungi. Int J Microbiol. 2012;2012:1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Eddy AA. Flocculation characteristics of yeasts: iii. General role of flocculating agents and special characteristics of a yeast flocculated by alcohol. J Inst Brew. 1955;61:318–320.
   Google Scholar
• Gilliland RB. The flocculation characteristics of brewing yeasts during fermentation. Proceedings of the European Brewery Convention; Brighton, England; 1951. p. 35–58.
   Google Scholar
• Hazelwood LA, Daran J-M, van Maris AJA, et al. The Ehrlich pathway for fusel alcohol production: a century of research on Saccharomyces cerevisiae metabolism. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008;74:2259–2266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mas A, Guillamon JM, Torija MJ, et al. Bioactive compounds derived from the yeast metabolism of aromatic amino acids during alcoholic fermentation. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patil AG, Koolwal SM, Butala HD. Fusel oil: Composition, removal and potential utilization. Int Sugar J. 2009;104:51–58.
   Google Scholar
• Dickinson JR. Filament formation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae-a review. Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2008;53:3–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machida K, Tanaka T, Fujita K, et al. Farnesol-induced generation of reactive oxygen species via indirect inhibition of the mitochondrial electron transport chain in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Bacteriol. 1998;180:4460–4465.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machida K, Tanaka T, Yano Y, et al. Farnesol-induced growth inhibition in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by a cell cycle mechanism. Microbiology. 1999;145:293–299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenz MC, Cutler NS, Heitman J. Characterization of alcohol-induced filamentous growth in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Biol Cell. 2000;11:183–199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceccato-Antonini SR, Sudbery PE. Filamentous growth in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Braz J Microbiol. 2004;35:173–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidari R, Caridi A, Howell KS. Wild Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains display biofilm-like morphology in contact with polyphenols from grapes and wine. Int J Food Microbiol. 2014;189:146–152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogan DA. Quorum sensing: alcohols in a social situation. Curr Biol. 2006;16:R457–R458.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aggarwal C, Federle MJ. Peptide pheromones and their protein receptors: cellular signaling in Gram-positive bacteria. In: Molecular Life Sciences. New York: Springer; 2014. p. 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Kleerebezem M, Quadri LE, Kuipers OP, et al. Quorum sensing by peptide pheromones and two-component signal-transduction systems in Gram-positive bacteria. Mol Microbiol. 1997;24:895–904.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Cagno R, De Angelis M, Calasso M, et al. Quorum sensing in sourdough Lactobacillus plantarum DC400: induction of plantaricin A (PlnA) under co-cultivation with other lactic acid bacteria and effect of PlnA on bacterial and Caco-2 cells. Proteomics. 2010;10:2175–2190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sturme MHJ, Nakayama J, Molenaar D, et al. An agr-like two-component regulatory system in Lactobacillus plantarum is involved in production of a novel cyclic peptide and regulation of adherence. J Bacteriol. 2005;187:5224–5235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turgay K, Hahn J, Burghoorn J, et al. Competence in Bacillus subtilis is controlled by regulated proteolysis of a transcription factor. EMBO J. 1998;17:6730–6738.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazazzera BA, Grossman AD. The ins and outs of peptide signaling. Trends Microbiol. 1998;6:288–294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner-Nemec KA, Nichols NN, Leathers TD. Biofilm formation by bacterial contaminants of fuel ethanol production. Biotechnol Lett. 2007;29:379–383.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bischoff KM, Liu S, Leathers TD, et al. Modeling bacterial contamination of fuel ethanol fermentation. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2009;103:117–122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leathers TD, Bischoff KM, Rich JO, et al. Inhibitors of biofilm formation by biofuel fermentation contaminants. Bioresour Technol. 2014;169:45–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costerton JW, Stewart PS, Greenberg EP. Bacterial biofilms: a common cause of persistent infections. Science. 1999;284:1318–1322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campana FB. Monitoramento temporal e espacial de contaminações bacterianas na produção de bioetanol: caracterização molecular por T-RFLP e detecção quantitativa por qPCR de comunidades formadoras de biofilmes (Temporal and spatial monitoring of bacterial contaminatio [thesis]. ESALQ-University of São Paulo-USP; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Kjelleberg S, Molin S. Is there a role for quorum sensing signals in bacterial biofilms? Curr Opin Microbiol. 2002;5:254–258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kubota H, Senda S, Nomura N, et al. Biofilm formation by lactic acid bacteria and resistance to environmental stress. J Biosci Bioeng. 2008;106:381–386.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y-H, Tian X. Quorum sensing and bacterial social interactions in biofilms. Sensors (Basel). 2012;12:2519–2538.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neto PO. Influência da contaminação por bactérias láticas na fermentação alcoólica por batelada-alimentada (Influence of contamination by lactic acid bacteria in the alcohol fermentation of the fed-batch process) [thesis]. State University of Campinas-UNICAMP; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Sturme MHJ, Francke C, Siezen RJ, et al. Making sense of quorum sensing in lactobacilli: a special focus on Lactobacillus plantarum WCFS1. Microbiology (Reading, Engl). 2007;153:3939–3947.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnusson J, Schnürer J. Lactobacillus coryniformis subsp. coryniformis strain Si3 produces a broad-spectrum proteinaceous antifungal compound. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001;67:1–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turovskiy Y, Kashtanov D, Paskhover B, Chikindas ML. Quorum sensing: fact, fiction, and everything in between. Adv Appl Microbiol. 2007;62:191–234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eijsink VGH, Axelsson L, Diep DB, et al. Production of class II bacteriocins by lactic acid bacteria; an example of biological warfare and communication. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2002;81:639–654.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willey JM. Donk WAVD. Lantibiotics: peptides of diverse structure and function. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2007;61:477–501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vuyst L, De, Leroy F. Bacteriocins from lactic acid bacteria: production, purification, and food applications. J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol. 2007;13:194–199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camu N, De Winter T, Verbrugghe K, et al. Dynamics and biodiversity of populations of lactic acid bacteria and acetic acid bacteria involved in spontaneous heap fermentation of cocoa beans in Ghana. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007;73:1809–1824.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krivorotova T, Cirkovas A, Maciulyte S, et al. Nisin-loaded pectin nanoparticles for food preservation. Food Hydrocoll. 2016;54:49–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zacharof MP, Lovitt RW. Bacteriocins produced by lactic acid bacteria a review article. APCBEE Procedia. 2012;2:50–56.
   Google Scholar
• Cotter PD, Ross RP, Hill C. Bacteriocins - a viable alternative to antibiotics? Nat Rev Microbiol. 2012;11:95–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balciunas EM, Castillo Martinez FA, Todorov SD, et al. Novel biotechnological applications of bacteriocins: a review. Food Control. 2013;32:134–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng J, Zhang L, Gu Z-H, et al. The role of nisin in fuel ethanol production with Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2012;55:128–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar