Bioreactor-based advances in plant tissue and cell culture: challenges and prospects

References

• Denchev PD, Kuklin AI, Scragg AH. Somatic embryo production in bioreactors. J Biotechnol. 1992;26:99–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giri C, Shyamkumar B, Anjaneyulu C. Progress in tissue culture, genetic transformation and applications of biotechnology to trees: an overview. Trees. 2004;18:115–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guan Y, Li S-G, Fan X-F, et al. Application of somatic embryogenesis in woody plants. Front Plant Sci. 2016;7:938.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uchendu EE, Shukla MR, Reed BM, et al. Improvement of ginseng by in vitro culture: challenges and opportunities. Compr Biotechnol. 2011;4:317–329.
   Google Scholar
• Takayama S, Misawa M. Mass propagation of Begonia hiemalis plantlet by shake culture. Plant. Cell Physiol. 1981;22:461–467.
   Google Scholar
• Hvoslef-Eide AK, Olsen OAS, Lyngved R. Bioreactor design for propagation of somatic embryos. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult. 2005;81:265–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takayama S, Akita M. Bioengineering aspects of bioreactor application in plant propagation. In: Dutta S, Ibaraki Y, editors. Plan Tissue Culture Engineering. Dordrecht: Springer; 2006, p. 83–100.
   Google Scholar
• Furusaki S, Takeda T. Bioreactors for plant cell culture. Ref Mod Life Sci. 2017; doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-809633-8.09076-2
   Google Scholar
• Palomares LA, Ramírez OT. Bioreactor scale-up. In: Flickinger MC, editor. Encyclopedia of industrial biotechnology: Bioprocess, bioseparation, and cell technology. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2009 doi: 10.1002/9780470054581.eib143
   Google Scholar
• Kong L, Holtz CT, Nairn CJ, et al. Application of airlift bioreactors to accelerate genetic transformation in American chestnut. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult. 2014;117:39–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuklin AI, Denchev PD, Atanassov AI, et al. Alfalfa embryo production in airlift vessels via direct somatic embryogenesis. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult. 1994;38:19–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teng W-L, Liu Y-J, Tsai Y-C, et al. Somatic embryogenesis of carrot in bioreactor culture systems. Hortic Sci. 1994;29:1349–1352.
   Google Scholar
• Tapia E, Sequeida A, Castro A, et al. Development of grapevine somatic embryogenesis using an airlift bioreactor as an efficient tool in the generation of transgenic plants. J Biotechnol. 2009;139:95–101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiménez JA, Alonso-Blázquez N, López-Vela D, et al. Influence of culture vessel characteristics and agitation rate on gaseous exchange, hydrodynamic stress, and growth of embryogenic cork oak (Quercus suber L.) cultures. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant. 2011;47:578–588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AL-Mashhadani MKH, Wilkinson SJ, Zimmerman WB. Airlift bioreactor for biological applications with microbubble mediated transport processes. Chemic Eng Sci. 2015;137:243–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georgiev MI, Weber J. Bioreactors for plant cells: hardware configuration and internal environment optimization as tools for wider commercialization. Biotechnol Lett. 2014;36:1359–1367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georgiev MI, Eibl R, Zhong JJ. Hosting the plant cells in vitro: recent trends in bioreactors. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2013;97:3787–3800.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun X, Linden JC. Shear stress effects on plant cell suspension cultures in a rotating wall vessel bioreactor. J Indust Microbiol Biotechnol. 1999;22:44–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sánchez Pérez JA, Rodríguez Porcel EM, Casas López JL, et al. Shear rate in stirred tank and bubble column bioreactors. Chemic Eng J. 2006;124:1–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Del Carmen OSM, Morales-López E, Durán-Páramo E, et al. Shear rate and microturbulence effects on the synthesis of proteases by Jacaratia mexicana cells cultured in a bubble column, airlift, and stirred tank bioreactors. Biotechnol Bioproc E. 2013;18:808–818.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhong JJ. Bioreactor engineering. In Murray M-Y, editors. Compr Biotechnol. Vol 2, 2nd edn. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2011. p. 165–177.
   Google Scholar
• Georgiev MI, Ludwig-Mueller J, Weber J, et al. Bioactive metabolites production and stress-related hormones in devil’s claw cell suspension cultures grown in bioreactors. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011;89:1683–1691.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moorhouse SD, Wilson G, Hennerty MJ, et al. A plant cell bioreactor with medium-perfusion for control of somatic embryogenesis in liquid cell suspensions. Plant Growth Regul. 1996;20:53–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirro R, Voll K. Which impeller is right for your cell line? BioProcess Int. 2009;7:52–57.
   Google Scholar
• Issa HM. Oxygen mass transfer in an aerated stirred tank with double impellers: A generalized correlation including spacing impact. Int J Chemic Eng. 2016; 2016:1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Alok S, Immanuel G. Effect of different impellers and baffles on aerobic stirred tank fermenter using computational fluid dynamics. J Bioprocess Biotechnol. 2014;4:1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Archambault J, Williams RD, Lavoie L, et al. Production of somatic embryos in a helical ribbon impeller bioreactor. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1994;44:930–943.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamen AA, Chavarie C, André G, et al. Design parameters and performance of a surface baffled helical ribbon impeller for the culture of shear sensitive cells. Chem Eng Sci. 1992;47:2375–2380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jolicoeur M, Chavarie C, Carreau PJ, et al. Development of a helical-ribbon impeller bioreactor for high-density plant cell suspension culture. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1992;39:511–521.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mellor LF, Baker TL, Brown RJ, et al. Optimal 3-D culture of primary articular chondrocytes for use in the rotating wall vessel bioreactor. Aviat Space Environ Med. 2014;85:798–804.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chang HN, Furusaki S. Membrane bioreactors: present and prospects. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol. 1991;44:27–64.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wolff C, Beutel S, Scheper T. Tubular membrane bioreactors for biotechnological processes. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2013;97:929–937.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang T-K, McDonald KA. Molecular farming using bioreactor-based plant cell suspension cultures for recombinant protein production. In: Wang A, Ma S, editors. Molecular Farming in Plants: Recent Advances and Future Prospects. The Netherlands: Springer; 2012. p. 37–67.
   Google Scholar
• Ochoa-Villarreal M, Howat S, Hong S-M, et al. Plant cell culture strategies for the production of natural products. BMB Rep. 2016;49:149–158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorvari S, Mäkeläinen R, Ahanen K, et al. Membranes to reduce adherence of somatic embryos to the cell lift impeller of a bioreactor. In: Hvoslef-Eide AK, Preil W, editors. Liquid Culture Systems for in vitro Plant Propagation. The Netherlands: Springer; 2008, p. 117–125.
   Google Scholar
• Yang RYK, Bayraktar O, Pu HT. Plant-cell bioreactors with simultaneous electropermeabilization and electrophoresis. J Biotechnol. 2003;100:13–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luttman R, Florek P, Preil W. Silicone-tubing aerated bioreactors for somatic embryo production. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult. 1994;39:157–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eibl R, Eibl D. Design of bioreactors suitable for plant cell and tissue cultures. Phytochem Rev. 2008;7:593–598.
   Google Scholar
• Frahm B, Brod H, Langer U. Improving bioreactor cultivation conditions for sensitive cell lines by dynamic membrane aeration. Cytotechnol. 2009;59:17–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziv M. Silicon effects on growth acclimatization and stress tolerance of bioreactor cultured Ornithogalum dubium plants. Acta Hortic. 2010;865:29–36.
   Google Scholar
• Sivanesan I, Park SW. The role of silicon in plant tissue culture. Front Plant Sci. 2014;5:571.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman WB, Zandi M, Hemaka Bandulasena HC, et al. Design of an airlift loop bioreactor and pilot scales studies with fluidic oscillator induced microbubbles for growth of a microalgae Dunaliella salina. Appl Energy. 2011;88:3357–3369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li X, Li P, Zu L, et al. Gas-liquid mass transfer characteristics with microbubble aeration – I. Standard stirred tank. Chem Eng Technol. 2016;39:945–952.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han Y, Liu Y, Jiang H, et al. Large scale preparation of microbubbles by multi-channel ceramic membranes: Hydrodynamics and mass transfer characteristics. Can J Chemic Eng. 2017;95:2176–2185. doi: 10.1002/cjce.22825
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei P, Zhang K, Gao W, et al. CFD modeling of hydrodynamic characteristics of slug bubble flow in a flat sheet membrane bioreactor. J Membr Sci. 2013;445:15–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terrier B, Courtois D, Henault N, et al. Two new disposable bioreactors for plant cell culture: the wave and undertow bioreactor and the slug bubble bioreactor. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2007;96:914–923.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gòdia F, Solà C. Fluidized-Bed Bioreactors. Biotechnol Prog. 1995;11:479–497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gharelo RS, Oliaei ED, Bandehagh A, et al. Production of therapeutic proteins through plant tissue and cell culture. J BioSci Biotechnol. 2016;5:93–104.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews G. Fluidized-bed bioreactors. Biotechnol Genet Eng Rev. 1988;6:151–178.
   Google Scholar
• Nagai N, Kuroiwa I, Kanda T, et al. Improvement of a fixed bed bioreactor for plant cell culture. J Ferment Bioeng. 1994;77:212–214.
   Google Scholar
• Eibl R, Kaiser S, Lombriser R, et al. Disposable bioreactors: the current state-of-the-art and recommended applications in biotechnology. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010;86:41–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valdiani A, Talei D, Lattoo SK, et al. Genoproteomics-assisted improvement of Andrographis paniculata: toward a promising molecular and conventional breeding platform for autogamous plants affecting pharmaceutical industry. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2017;37:803–816.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallejos JR, Uplekar S, da Silva JF, et al. A case study in converting disposable process scouting devices into disposable bioreactors as a future bioprocessing tool. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2012;109:2790–2797.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eibl R, Eibl D. Design and use of the wave bioreactor for plant cell culture. In: Gupta SD, Ibaraki Y, editors. Plant Tissue Culture Engineering. Dordrecht: Springer; 1st edn. 2008. p. 223–229.
   Google Scholar
• Klöckner W, Diederichs S, Büchs J. Orbitally shaken single-use bioreactors. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol. 2014;138:45–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raven N, Schillberg S, Rasche S. Plant cell-based recombinant antibody manufacturing with a 200 L orbitally shaken disposable bioreactor. Methods Mol Biol. 2016;1385:161–172.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wilson PDG, Hilton MG, Robins RJ, et al. Fermentation studies of transformed root cultures. International Conference on Bioreactors and Biotransformations. London: Elsevier; 1987, p. 38–51.
   Google Scholar
• Weathers P, Liu C, Towler M, et al. Mist reactors: principles, comparison of various systems, and case studies. Electron J Integr Biosci. 2008;3:29–37.
   Google Scholar
• Srivastava S, Srivastava AK. In vitro azadirachtin production by hairy root cultivation of Azadirachta indica in nutrient mist bioreactor. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2012;166:365–378.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonetti G, Tocci N, Valletta A, et al. In vitro antifungal activity of extracts obtained from Hypericum perforatum adventitious roots cultured in a mist bioreactor against planktonic cells and biofilm of Malassezia furfur. Nat Prod Res. 2016;30:544–550.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tscheschke B, Dreimann J, von der Ruhr JW, et al. Evaluation of a new mist-chamber bioreactor for biotechnological applications. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2015;112:1155–1164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang GR, Qi NM. Influence of mist intervals and aeration rate on growth and second metabolite production of Pseudostellaria heterophylla adventitious roots in a siphon-mist bioreactor. Biotechnol Bioproc Eng. 2010;15:1059–1064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patyna A, Witczak S. Overview of photobioreactors for the production of biodiesel. Chemik. 2016;70:634–643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulumba N, Farag IH. Tubular photobioreactor for microalgae biodiesel production. Int J Eng Sci Technol. 2012;4:703–709.
   Google Scholar
• Silva AG, Carter R, Merss FLM, et al. Life cycle assessment of biomass production in microalgae compact photobioreactors. GCB Bioenergy. 2015;7:184–194.
   Google Scholar
• Böhme C, Schröder M-B, Jung-Heiliger H, et al. Plant cell suspension culture in a bench-scale with a newly designed membrane stirrer for bubble-free aeration. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 1997;48:149–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho CH, Her JM, Duan KJ. Investigation the optimum culture variable for taxol production from Taxus mairei cells by perfusion cultivation. In: Proceedings of the 1999 CIChE Annual Meeting and Conferences of Chemical Engineering Technology (Taiwan); 1999. p. 213–216.
   Google Scholar
• Ho C-W, Jian W-T, Lai H-C. Plant regeneration via somatic embryogenesis from suspension cell cultures of Lilium × formolongi Hort. using a bioreactor system. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant.. 2006;42:240–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brena B, González-Pombo P, Batista-Viera F. Immobilization of enzymes: a literature survey. Methods Mol Biol. 2013;1051:15–31.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Xu J, Ge X, Dolan MC. Towards high-yield production of pharmaceutical proteins with plant cell suspension cultures. Biotechnol Adv. 2011;29:278–299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archambault J, Volesky B, Kurz WGW. Surface immobilization of plant cells. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1989;33:293–299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler PT, Kurz WGW, Paiva NL, et al. Bioreactors for surface-immobilized cells. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult. 1995;42:81–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentebibel S, Moyano E, Palazón J, et al. Effects of immobilization by entrapment in alginate and scale-up on paclitaxel and baccatin III production in cell suspension cultures of Taxus baccata. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2005;89:647–655.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao SR, Ravishankar GA. Plant cell cultures: Chemical factories of secondary metabolites. Biotechnol Adv. 2002;20:101–153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodeutsch T, James EA, Lee JM. The effect of immobilization on recombinant protein production in plant cell culture. Plant Cell Rep. 2001;20:562–566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asada M, Shuler ML. Stimulation of ajmalicine production and excretion from Catharanthus roseus: effects of adsorption in situ, elicitors and alginate immobilization. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 1989;30:475–481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris RE, Mason EB. Two machines for in vitro propagation of plants in liquid media. Can J Plant Sci. 1983;63:311–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etienne H, Berthouly M. Temporary immersion systems in plant micropropagation. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult. 2002;69:215–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steward FC, Caplin S, Millar FK. Investigations on growth and metabolism of plant cells. I. New techniques for the investigation of metabolism, nutrition and growth in undifferentiated cells. Ann Bot. 1952;16:57–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teisson C, Alvard D, Lartaud M, et al. Temporary immersion for plant tissue culture. In: Plant Biotechnology and In vitro Biology in the 21st Century, Proceedings of the IXth International Congress of Plant Tissue and Cell Culture, Section H: Novel micropropagation methods. Jerusalem 1999, p. 629–632.
   Google Scholar
• Latawa J, Shukla MR, Saxena PK. An efficient temporary immersion system for micropropagation of hybrid hazelnut. Botany. 2016;94:1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Hui AV, Bhatt A, Sreeramanan S, et al. Establishment of a shoot proliferation protocol for banana (ABB group) cv. ‘Pisang Awak’ via temporary immersion system. J Plant Nut. 2013;36:529–538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez M, Bueno MA, Escalona M, et al. Temporary immersion systems (RITA®) for the improvement of cork oak somatic embryogenic culture proliferation and somatic embryo production. Trees. 2013;27:1277–1284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Florez SL, Curtis MS, Shaw SE, et al. A temporary immersion plant propagation bioreactor with decoupled gas and liquid flows for enhanced control of gas phase. Biotechnol Progress. 2016;32:337–345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jimenez E, Perez N, Feria M, et al. Improved Production of potato microtubers using a temporary immersion system. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult. 1999;59:19–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jova MC, Kosky RG, Perez M, et al. Production of Yam microtubers using a temporary immersion system. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult. 2005;83:103–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georgiev V, Schumann A, Pavlov A, et al. Temporary immersion systems in plant biotechnology. Eng Life Sci. 2014;14:607–621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welander M, Persson J, Asp H, et al. Evaluation of a new vessel system based on temporary immersion system for micropropagation. Sci Hortic. 2014;179:227–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landey RB, Cenci A, Georget F, et al. High genetic and epigenetic stability in Coffea arabica plants derived from embryogenic suspensions and secondary embryogenesis as revealed by AFLP, MSAP and the phenotypic variation rate. PLoS One. 2013;8:e56372.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallón R, Covelo P, Vieitez AM. Improving secondary embryogenesis in Quercus robur: Application of temporary immersion for mass propagation. Trees Struct Funct. 2012;26:731–741.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hua HW, Huang TD, Huang HS. Micropropagation of self-rooting juvenile clones by secondary somatic embryogenesis in Hevea brasiliensis. Plant Breed. 2010;129:202–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goel MK, Kukreja AK, Bisht NS. In vitro manipulations in St. John’s wort (Hypericum perforatum L.) for incessant and scale up micropropagation using adventitious roots in liquid medium and assessment of clonal fidelity using RAPD analysis. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult. 2009;96:1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez-Estrada M, Caamal-Velázquez JH, Salinas-Ruíz J, et al. Assessment of somaclonal variation during sugarcane micropropagation in temporary immersion bioreactors by intersimple sequence repeat (ISSR) markers. In Vitro Celldevbiol-Plant. 2017;53:553–560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishna H, Alizadeh M, Singh D, et al. Somaclonal variations and their applications in horticultural crops improvement. 3 Biotech. 2016;6:54.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Slazak B, Sliwinska E, Saługa M, et al. Micropropagation of Viola uliginosa (Violaceae) for endangered species conservation and for somaclonal variation-enhanced cyclotide biosynthesis. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult. 2015;120:179–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gómez D, Hernández L, Valle B, et al. Temporary immersion bioreactors (TIB) provide a versatile, cost-effective and reproducible in vitro analysis of the response of pineapple shoots to salinity and drought. Acta Physiol Plant. 2017;39:277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao J, Li ZT, Cui J, et al. Efficient somatic embryogenesis and Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of pothos (Epipremnum aureum) ‘Jade’. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult. 2013;114:237–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pathi KM, Tula S, Tuteja N. High frequency regeneration via direct somatic embryogenesis and efficient Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation of tobacco. Plant Signal Behav. 2013;8:e24354.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nyaboga EN, Njiru JM, Tripathi L. Factors influencing somatic embryogenesis, regeneration, and Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) cultivar TME14. Front Plant Sci. 2015;6:411.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smertenko A, Bozhkov PV. Somatic embryogenesis: life and death processes during apical–basal patterning. J Exp Bot. 2014;65:1343–1360.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quainoo AK, Dwomon IB. The effect of abscisic acid in the conversion of cocoa somatic embryos into plantlets. Front Sci. 2012;2:6–10.102.
   Google Scholar
• Viaene T, Landberg K, Thelander M, et al. Directional auxin transport mechanisms in early diverging land plants. Curr Biol. 2014;24:2786–2791.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campos NA, Panis B, Carpentier SC. Somatic embryogenesis in coffee: The evolution of biotechnology and the integration of omics technologies offer great opportunities. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:1460.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghoshdastidar AJ, Tong AZ. Treatment of 2,4-D, mecoprop, and dicamba using membrane bioreactor technology. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2013;20:5188–5197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laere E, Ling APK, Wong YP, et al. Plant-based vaccines: Production and challenges. J Bot. 2016;2016:1.
   Google Scholar
• Ganapathy M. Plants as bioreactors- A review. Adv Tech Biol Med. 2016;4:1000161.
   Google Scholar
• Yan N, Fan C, Chen Y, et al. The potential for microalgae as bioreactors to produce pharmaceuticals. Int J Mol Sci. 2016;17:E962.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirschl S, Ralser C, Asam C, et al. Expression and characterization of functional recombinant Bet v 1.0101 in the chloroplast of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2017;173:44–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stiles AR, Liu CZ. Hairy root culture: bioreactor design and process intensification. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol. 2013;134:91–114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra BN, Ranjan R. Growth of hairy-root cultures in various bioreactors for the production of secondary metabolites. Biotechnol Appl Biochem. 2008;49:1–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaremicz Z, Luczkiewicz M, Kokotkiewicz A, et al. Production of tropane alkaloids in Hyoscyamus niger (black henbane) hairy roots grown in bubble-column and spray bioreactors. Biotechnol Lett. 2014;36:843–853.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao Q, Xiang T, Meng S, et al. Genetic stability analysis of exogenous gene in long-term cultured cucumber hairy roots. Acta Hort Sin. 2012;39:1589–1598.
   Google Scholar
• Mankin SL, Hill DS, Olhoft PM, et al. Disarming and sequencing of Agrobacterium rhizogenes strain K599 (NCPPB2659) plasmid pRi2659. In Vitro Cell Dev. Biol. Plant. 2007;43:521–535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerszberg A, Hnatuszko-Konka K, Kowalczyk T, et al. Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) in the service of biotechnology. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult. 2015;120:881–902.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du S, Xiang T, Song Y, et al. Transgenic hairy roots of Tetrastigma hemsleyanum: induction, propagation, genetic characteristics and medicinal components. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult. 2015;122:373–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiao TI, Ellis MH, Dolferus R, et al. Overexpression of alcohol dehydrogenase or pyruvate decarboxylase improves growth of hairy roots at reduced oxygen concentrations. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2002;77:455–461.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gantait S, Kundu S, Ali N, et al. Synthetic seed production of medicinal plants: a review on influence of explants, encapsulation agent and matrix. Acta Physiol Plant. 2015;37:98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Micheli M, Bececco V, Gardi T, et al. Encapsulation of black mulberry microcuttings: studies on capsules and synthetic seeds. Acta Hortic. 2017;1155:65–70.
   Google Scholar
• Gomes F, Clemente M, Figueiredo P, et al. Castanea spp. hybrid clones in vitro conservation: synthetic seeds vs. slow growth storage. Acta Hortic. 2017;1155:37–44.
   Google Scholar
• Attree SM, Pomeroy MK, Fowke LC. Production of vigorous, desiccation tolerant white spruce (Picea glauca [Moench.] Voss.) synthetic seeds in a bioreactor. Plant Cell Rep. 1994;13:601–606.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lata H, Chandra S, Khan IA, et al. Cannabis sativa L. micropropagation in temporary immersion bioreactor system. Planta Med. 2010;76:76–P9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hohe A, Reski R. Optimisation of a bioreactor culture of the moss Physcomitrella patens for mass production of protoplasts. Plant Sci. 2002;163:69–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etienne H, Dechamp E, Barry-Etienne D, et al. Bioreactors in coffee micropropagation. Braz J Plant Physiol. 2006;18:45–54.
   Google Scholar
• Lai CC, Lin HM, Nalawade SM, et al. Hyperhydricity in shoot cultures of Scrophularia yoshimurae can be effectively reduced by ventilation of culture vessels. J Plant Physiol. 2005;162:355–361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machado MP, da Silva ALP, Biasi LA, et al. Influence of calcium content of tissue on hyperhydricity and shoot-tip necrosis of in vitro regenerated shoots of Lavandula angustifolia Mill. Braz Arch Biol Technol. 2014;57:636–643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saldanha CW, Otoni CG, Rocha DI, et al. CO2-enriched atmosphere and supporting material impact the growth, morphophysiology and ultrastructure of in vitro Brazilian-ginseng [Pfaffia glomerata (Spreng.) Pedersen] plantlets. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult. 2014;118:87–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kliphuis AMJ, Martens DE, Janssen M, et al. Effect of O2:CO2 ratio on the primary metabolism of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2011;108:2390–2402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giusti S, Mazzei D, Cacopardo L, et al. Environmental control in flow bioreactors. Processes. 2017;5:16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuk IH, Baskar D, Duffy PH, et al. Overcoming challenges in WAVE bioreactors without feedback controls for pH and dissolved oxygen. Biotechnol Progress. 2011;27:1397–1406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardarelli M, Cardona Suárez CM. Influence of ozone treatments on in vitro propagation of Lilium in bioreactor. Acta Hortic. 2017;1155:381–386.
   Google Scholar
• Lauridsen H, Hansen K, Nørgård MØ, et al. From tissue to silicon to plastic: three-dimensional printing in comparative anatomy and physiology. R Soc Open Sci. 2016;3:150643
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weyand B, Nöhre M, Schmälzlin E, et al. Noninvasive oxygen monitoring in three-dimensional tissue cultures under static and dynamic culture conditions. Biores Open Access. 2015;4:266–277.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmälzlin E, van Dongen JT, Klimant I, et al. An optical multifrequency phase-modulation method using microbeads for measuring intracellular oxygen concentrations in plants. Biophys J. 2005;89:1339–1345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ast C, Schmälzlin E, Löhmannsröben HG, et al. Optical oxygen micro- and nanosensors for plant applications. Sensors (Basel). 2012;12:7015–7032.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zabalza A, van Dongen JT, Froehlich A, et al. Regulation of respiration and fermentation to control the plant internal oxygen concentration. Plant Physiol. 2009;149:1087–1098.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thibeaux R, Perrin E, Smaniotto B, et al. Using X-ray computed tomography for quantification of cell proliferation within a perfusion bioreactor. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng. 2015;18:2072–2073.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staedler YM, Masson D, Schönenberger J. Plant tissues in 3D via X-ray tomography: Simple contrasting methods allow high-resolution imaging. PLoS One. 2013;8:e75295. 2013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karunakaran C, Lahlali R, Zhu N, et al. Factors influencing real time internal structural visualization and dynamic process monitoring in plants using synchrotron-based phase contrast X-ray imaging. Sci Rep. 2015;5:12119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zermatten E, Vetsch JR, Ruffoni D, et al. Micro-computed tomography based computational fluid dynamics for the determination of shear stresses in scaffolds within a perfusion bioreactor. Ann Biomed Eng. 2014;42:1085–1094.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teixeria da Silva JA, Dobránszki J. Plant thin cell layers: update and perspectives. Folia Hort. 2015;27:183–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teixeira da Silva JA. The role of thin cell layers in regeneration and transformation in orchids. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult. 2013;113:149–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman LAC, Whiteley JP, Byrne HM, et al. Mathematical modelling of cell layer growth in a hollow fibre bioreactor. J Theor Biol. 2017;418:36–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seviour RJ, McNeil B, Fazenda ML, et al. Operating bioreactors for microbial exopolysaccharide production. Critic Rev Biotechnol. 2011;31:170–185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmid J, Sieber V, Rehm B. Bacterial exopolysaccharides: biosynthesis pathways and engineering strategies. Front Microbiol. 2015;6:496.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahboubi A, Ylitervo P, Doyen W, et al. Reverse membrane bioreactor: Introduction to a new technology for biofuel production. Biotechnol Adv. 2016; 34:954–975.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erland LAE, Saxena PK. Melatonin natural health products and supplements: Presence of serotonin and significant variability of melatonin content. J Clin Sleep Med. 2017;13:275–281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erland LAE, Murch SJ, Reiter RJ, et al. A new balancing act: The many roles of melatonin and serotonin in plant growth and development. Plant Signal Behav. 2015;10:e1096469
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verma P, Sharma A, Ahmad Khan S, et al. Over-expression of Catharanthus roseus tryptophan decarboxylase and strictosidine synthase in rol gene integrated transgenic cell suspensions of Vinca minor. Protoplasma. 2015;252:373–381.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones AMP, Saxena PK, Murch SJ. Elicitation of secondary metabolism in Echinacea purpurea L. by gibberellic acid and triazoles. Eng Life Sci. 2009;9:205–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talei D, Valdiani A, Maziah M, et al. Analysis of the anticancer phytochemicals in Andrographis paniculata Nees. under salinity stress. Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:1.
   Google Scholar
• Rosnow J, Offermann S, Park J, et al. In vitro cultures and regeneration of Bienertia sinuspersici (Chenopodiaceae) under increasing concentrations of sodium chloride and carbon dioxide. Plant Cell Rep. 2011;30:1541–1553.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khattak MSK, Abiri R, Valdiani A, et al. Somatic embryogenesis and in-vitro regeneration of rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivars under one-step and multiple-step salinity stresses. J Plant Breed Genet. 2017;5:99–111.
   Google Scholar
• Yogalakshmi KN, Joseph K. Effect of transient sodium chloride shock loads on the performance of submerged membrane bioreactor. Biores Technol. 2010;101:7054–7061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang J, Pathak N, Chekli L, et al. Performance of a novel fertilizer-drawn forward osmosis aerobic membrane bioreactor (FDFO-MBR): Mitigating salinity build-up by integrating microfiltration. Water. 2017;9:21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosio VE, Islan GA, Martínez YN, et al. Nanodevices for the immobilization of therapeutic enzymes. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2016;36:447–464.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopez-Ponnada EV, Lynn TJ, Peterson M, et al. Application of denitrifying wood chip bioreactors for management of residential non-point sources of nitrogen. J Biol Eng. 2017;11:16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar