Functional group surface modifications for enhancing the formation and performance of exoelectrogenic biofilms on the anode of a bioelectrochemical system

References

• Logan BE, Rabaey K. Conversion of wastes into bioelectricity and chemicals by using microbial electrochemical technologies. Science. 2013;339:906–906.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logan BE. Scaling up Microbial fuel cells and other bioelectrochemical systems. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010;85(6):1665–1671.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pant D, Singh A, Van Bogaert G. Bioelectrochemical systems (BES) for sustainable energy production and product recovery from organic wastes and industrial wastewaters. Rsc Adv. 2012;2(4):1248–1263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maheux AF, Berube E, Boudreau DK, et al. Ability of three DNA-based assays to identify presumptive Escherichia coli colonies isolated from water by the culture-based MFC agar method. Water Res. 2011;45(8):2638–2646.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isosaari P, Sillanpää M. Use of sulfate-reducing and bioelectrochemical reactors for metal recovery from mine water. Sep Purif Rev. 2017;46(1):1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang X, Cheng SA, Feng YJ, et al. Use of carbon mesh anodes and the effect of different pretreatment methods on power production in microbial fuel cells. Environ Sci Technol. 2009;43(17):6870–6874.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wadgaonkar SL, Nancharaiah YV, Esposito G, et al. Environmental impact and bioremediation of seleniferous soils and sediments. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2018;38(6):941–956.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seviour TW, Hinks J. Bucking the current trend in bioelectrochemical systems: a case for bioelectroanalytics. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2018;38(4):634–646.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim Y, Logan BE. Microbial Desalination cells for energy production and desalination. Desalination. 2013;308:122–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parawira W. Biotechnological production of biodiesel fuel using biocatalysed transesterification: a review. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2009;29(2):82–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng SA, Logan BE. Sustainable and efficient biohydrogen production via electrohydrogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104(47):18871–18873.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logan BE, Cheng SA, Watson V, et al. Graphite fiber brush anodes for increased power production in air-cathode microbial fuel cells. Environ Sci Technol. 2007;41(9):3341–3346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logan BE. Exoelectrogenic bacteria that power microbial fuel cells. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2009;7(5):375–381.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren H, Pyo S, Lee J, et al. A high power density miniaturized microbial fuel cell having carbon nanotube anodes. J Power Sources. 2015;273:823–830.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang P, Duan R, Jiang Y, et al. One-year operation of 1000-L modularized microbial fuel cell for municipal wastewater treatment. Water Res. 2018;141:1–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wrighton KC, Thrash JC, Melnyk RA, et al. Evidence for direct electron transfer by a Gram-positive bacterium isolated from a microbial fuel cell. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011;77(21):7633–7639.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sleutels T, Ter Heijne A, Buisman CJN, et al. Bioelectrochemical systeems: an outlook for practical applications. Chemsuschem. 2012;5(6):1012–1019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logan BE, Wallack MJ, Kim KY, et al. Assessment of microbial fuel cell configurations and power densities. Environ Sci Technol Lett. 2015;2(8):206–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li F, Li YX, Sun LM, et al. Engineering Shewanella oneidensis enables xylose-fed microbial fuel cell. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2017;10(1):196–206.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jiang XB, Shen JY, Lou S, et al. Comprehensive comparison of bacterial bommunities in a membrane-free bioelectrochemical system for removing different mononitrophenols from wastewater. Bioresource Technol. 2016;216:645–652.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang HC, Cheng HY, Cui D, et al. Corrugated stainless-steel mesh as a simple engineerable electrode module in bio-electrochemical system: hydrodynamics and the effects on decolorization performance. J Hazard Mater. 2017;338:287–295.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang YR, Gong L, Jiang JK, et al. Response of anodic biofilm to hydrodynamic shear in two-chamber bioelectrochemical systems. Electrochim Acta. 2017;258:1304–1310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mousset E, Wang ZX, Hammaker J, et al. Electrocatalytic phenol degradation by a novel nanostructured carbon fiber brush cathode coated with graphene ink. Electrochim Acta. 2017;258:607–617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding WJ, Cheng SA, Yu LL, et al. Effective swine wastewater treatment by combining microbial fuel cells with flocculation. Chemosphere. 2017;182:567–573.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroeder U. Anodic electron transfer mechanisms in microbial fuel cells and their energy efficiency. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2007;9:2619–2629.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou M, Chi M, Luo J, et al. An overview of electrode materials in microbial fuel cells. J Power Sources. 2011;196(10):4427–4435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li FJ, Liu WF, Sun Y, et al. Enhancing hydrogen production with Ni-P coated nickel foam as cathode catalyst in single chamber microbial electrolysis cells. Int J Hydrogen Energ. 2017;42(6):3641–3646.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang JW, Cheng SA, Sun Y, et al. Improving the power generation of microbial fuel cells by modifying the anode with single-wall carbon nanohorns. Biotechnol Lett. 2017;39(10):1515–1520.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo K, Freguia S, Dennis PG, et al. Effects of surface charge and hydrophobicity on anodic biofilm formation, community composition, and current generation in bioelectrochemical systems. Environ Sci Technol. 2013;47(13):7563–7570.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu XW, Huang YX, Sun XF, et al. Conductive carbon nanotube ehydrogel as a bioanode for enhanced microbial electrocatalysis. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces.. 2014;6(11):8158–8164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang G, Sun Y, Yuan Z, et al. Application of surface-modified carbon powder in microbial fuel cells. Chinese J Catal. 2014;35(5):770–775.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sekoai PT, Awosusi AA, Yoro KO, et al. Microbial cell immobilization in biohydrogen production: a short overview. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2018;38(2):157–171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bol M, Ehret AE, Albero AB, et al. Recent advances in mechanical characterisation of biofilm and their significance for material modelling. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2013;33:145–171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliveira NM, Martinezgarcia E, Xavier J, et al. Biofilm formation as a response to ecological competition. Plos Biol. 2015;13:1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puckett SD, Taylor E, Raimondo T, et al. The relationship between the nanostructure of titanium surfaces and bacterial attachment. Biomaterials. 2010;31(4):706–713.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bos R, van der Mei HC, Busscher HJ. Physico-chemistry of initial microbial adhesive interactions - its mechanisms and methods for study. Fems Microbiol Rev. 1999;23(2):179–230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain R, Jordan N, Weiss S, et al. Extracellular polymeric substances govern the surface charge of biogenic elemental selenium nanoparticles. Environ Sci Technol. 2015;49(3):1713–1720.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomes IB, Meireles A, Gonçalves AL, et al. Standardized reactors for the study of medical biofilms: a review of the principles and latest modifications. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2018;38(5):657–670.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauman M. Electronic structure and chemical bonding. Phys Today. 1966;19:89–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park D, Yun YS, Park JM. XAS and XPS studies on chromium-binding groups of biomaterial during Cr(VI) biosorption. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2008;317(1):54–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai B, Tang XH, Li HR, et al. Power production enhancement with a polyaniline modified anode in microbial fuel cells. Biosens Bioelectron. 2011;28(1):373–377.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catal T, Li K, Bermek H, et al. Electricity production from twelve monosaccharides using microbial fuel cells. J Power Sources. 2008; 175 (1):196–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li HR, Feng YL, Tang XH, et al. The Factors affecting biofilm formation in the mediatorless microbial fuel cell. Chem Biochem Eng Q. 2010;24:341–346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeung T, Gilbert GE, Shi J, et al. Membrane phosphatidylserine regulates surface charge and protein localization. Science. 2008;319(5860):210–213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson WP, Logan BE. Enhanced transport of bacteria in porous media by sediment-phase and aqueous-phase natural organic matter. Water Res. 1996;30(4):923–931.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sultana ST, Babauta JT, Beyenal H. Electrochemical biofilm control: a review. Biofouling. 2015;31(9-10):745–758.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng SA, Logan BE. Ammonia treatment of carbon cloth anodes to enhance power generation of microbial fuel cells. Electrochem Commun. 2007;9(3):492–496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flaxer V, Marque M, Donose BC, et al. Plasma treatment of electrodes significantly enhances the development of anodic electrochemically active biofilms. Electrochim Acta. 2013;108:566–574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu YY, Guo CX, Yong YC, et al. Nitrogen doped carbon nanoparticles enhanced extracellular electron transfer for high-performance microbial fuel cells anode. Chemosphere. 2015;140:26–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saito T, Mehanna M, Wang X, et al. Effect of nitrogen addition on the performance of microbial fuel cell anodes. Bioresource Technol. 2011;102(1):395–398.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terada A, Okuyama K, Nishikawa M, et al. The Effect of surface charge property on Escherichia coli initial adhesion and subsequent biofilm formation. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2012;109(7):1745–1754.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terada A, Yuasa A, Tsuneda S, et al. Elucidation of dominant effect on initial bacterial adhesion onto polymer surfaces prepared by radiation-induced graft polymerization. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2005;43(2):99–107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santoro C, Babanova S, Artyushkova K, et al. Influence of anode surface chemistry on microbial fuel cell operation. Bioelectrochem. 2015; 106:141–149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai X, Huang L, Yang G, et al. Transcriptomic, proteomic, and bioelectrochemical characterization of an exoelectrogen Geobacter soli grown with different electron acceptors. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:1075–1089.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busalmen JP, Esteve-Núñez ABRAHAM, Berná ANTONIO, et al. C-type cytochromes wire electricity-producing bacteria to electrodes. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2008;47(26):4874–4877.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picot M, Lapinsonniere L, Rothballer M, et al. Graphite anode surface modification with controlled reduction of specific aryl diazonium salts for improved microbial fuel cells power output. Biosens Bioelectron. 2011;28(1):181–188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottenbos B, Grijpma DW, van der Mei HC, et al. Antimicrobial effects of positively charged surfaces on adhering gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. J Antimicrob Chemoth. 2001;48(1):7–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Hanley H, Coyle C, Buongiorno J, et al. Separate effects of surface roughness, wettability, and porosity on the boiling critical heat flux. Appl Phys Lett. 2013;103:58–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boks NP, Norde W, Mei H, et al. Forces Involved in bacterial adhesion to hydrophilic and hydrophobic surfaces. Microbiol-SGM. 2008;154(10):3122–3133.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lai Y, Pan F, Xu C, et al. In situ surface-modification-induced superhydrophobic patterns with reversible wettability and adhesion. Adv Mater. 2013;25(12):1682–1686.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Wang L, Levanen E. Superhydrophobic surfaces for the reduction of bacterial adhesion. Rsc Adv. 2013;3(30):12003–12020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hizal F, Rungraeng N, Lee J, et al. Nanoengineered superhydrophobic surfaces of aluminum with extremely low bacterial adhesivity. Acs Appl Mater Interfaces. 2017;9(13):12118–12129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Z, Elimelech M, Lin S. Environmental applications of interfacial materials with special wettability. Environ Sci Technol. 2016;50(5):2132–2150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobayashi M, Terayama Y, Yamaguchi H, et al. Wettability and antifouling behavior on the surfaces of superhydrophilic polymer brushes. Langmuir. 2012;28(18):7212–7222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang W, Lu Y, Zhu H, et al. Superdurable coating fabricated from a double-sided tape with long term “zero” bacterial adhesion. Adv Mater. 2017;29:1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Yang SF, Li Y, et al. The influence of cell and substratum surface hydrophobicities on microbial attachment. J Biotechnol. 2004;110(3):251–256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan Y, Hays MP, Hardwidge PR, et al. Surface characteristics influencing bacterial adhesion to polymeric substrates. Rsc Adv. 2017;7(23):14254–14261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Artyushkova K, Cornejo JA, Ista LK, et al. Relationship between surface chemistry, biofilm structure, and electron transfer in Shewanella anodes. Biointerphases. 2015;10(1):019013–019012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epifanio M, Inguva S, Kitching M, et al. Effects of atmospheric air plasma treatment of graphite and carbon felt electrodes on the anodic current from Shewanella attached cells. Bioelectrochemistry. 2015;106:186–193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He YR, Xiao X, Li WW, et al. Enhanced electricity production from microbial fuel cells with plasma-modified carbon paper anode. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2012;14(28):9966–9971.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li BK, Logan BE. Bacterial adhesion to glass and metal-oxide surfaces. Colloid Surface B. 2004;36(2):81–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb K, Hlady V, Tresco PA. Relative importance of surface wettability and charged functional groups on NIH 3T3 fibroblast attachment, spreading, and cytoskeletal organization. J Biomed Mater Res. 1998;41(3):422–430.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall KC, Blainey BL. Role of bacterial adhesion in biofilm formation and biocorrosion. Amsterdam: Springer; 1991. 1:29–46.
   Google Scholar
• Sharp RR, Cunningham AB, Komlos J, et al. Observation of thick biofilm accumulation and structure in porous media and corresponding hydrodynamic and mass transfer effects. Water Sci Technol. 1999;7:195–201.
   Google Scholar
• Karl S, Logan BE. Effect of molecular scale roughness of glass beads on colloidal and bacterial deposition. Environ Sci Technol. 2002;36:184–189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terada A, Yuasa A, Kushimoto T, et al. Bacterial adhesion to and viability on positively charged polymer surfaces. Microbiology (Reading, Engl)). 2006;152(Pt 12):3575–3583.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liu J, Liu J, He W, et al. Enhanced electricity generation for microbial fuel cell by using electrochemical oxidation to modify carbon cloth anode. J Power Sources. 2014;265:391–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hidalgo D, Sacco A, Hernandez S, et al. Electrochemical and impedance characterization of microbial fuel cells based on 2D and 3D anodic electrodes working with seawater microorganisms under continuous operation. Bioresource Technol. 2015;195:139–146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben-Yoav H, Melamed S, Freeman A, et al. Whole-cell biochips for bio-sensing: integration of live cells and inanimate surfaces. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2011;31(4):337–353.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghigo JM. Are there biofilm-specific physiological pathways beyond a reasonable doubt? Res Microbiol. 2003;154(1):1–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costerton JW, Lewandowski Z, Caldwell DE, et al. Microbial biofilms. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1995;49:711–745.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busscher HJ, Bos R, van der Mei HC. Initial microbial adhesion is a determinant for the strength of biofilm adhesion. Fems Microbiol Lett. 1995;128(3):229–234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang Y, Deng C, Chen J, et al. Accelerating the start-up of the cathodic biofilm by adding acyl-homoserine lactone signaling molecules. Bioresour Technol. 2018;266:548–554.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kadier A, Kalil MS, Abdeshahian P, et al. Recent advances and emerging challenges in microbial electrolysis cells (MECs) for microbial production of hydrogen and value-added chemicals. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 2016;61:501–525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar G, Bakonyi P, Zhen G, et al. Microbial electrochemical systems for sustainable biohydrogen production: surveying the experiences from a start-up viewpoint. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 2017;70:589–597.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georgieva N, Bryaskova R, Lazarova N, et al. PVA-based hybrid materials for immobilization of trichosporon cutaneum R57 efficient in removal of chromium ions. C R Acad Bulg Sci. 2013;66:35–44.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Li J, Ye D, et al. Tubular bamboo charcoal for anode in microbial fuel cells. J Power Sources. 2014;272:277–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitsos HM, Roberts RS, Jones WJ, et al. An experimental study of mass diffusion and reaction rate in an anaerobic biofilm. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1992;39(11):1141–1146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karamanev DG, Nikolov LN. Influence of some physiochemical parameters on bacterial activity of biofilm. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1988;31(4):295–299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guimerà X, Dorado AD, Bonsfills A, et al. Dynamic characterization of external and internal mass transport in heterotrophic biofilms from microsensors measurements. Water Res. 2016;102:551–560.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pocaznoi D, Erable B, Etcheverry L, et al. Forming microbial anodes under delayed polarisation modifies the electron transfer network and decreases the polarisation time required. Bioresource Technol. 2012;114:334–341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logan BE, Hamelers B, Rozendal RA, et al. Microbial fuel cells: methodology and technology. Environ Sci Technol. 2006;40(17):5181–5192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsili E, Baron DB, Shikhare ID, et al. Shewanella secretes flavins that mediate extracellular electron transfer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA.. 2008;105(10):3968–3973.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron D, LaBelle E, Coursolle D, et al. Electrochemical measurement of electron transfer kinetics by Shewanella oneidensis MR-1. J Biol Chem. 2009;284(42):28865–28873.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michelson K, Sanford RA, Valocchi AJ, et al. Nanowires of Geobacter sulfurreducens require redox cofactors to reduce metals in pore spaces too small for cell passage. Environ Sci Technol. 2017;51(20):11660–11668.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reguera G, McCarthy KD, Mehta T, et al. Extracellular electron transfer via microbial nanowires. Nature. 2005;435(7045):1098–1101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsili E, Rollefson JB, Baron DB, et al. Microbial biofilm voltammetry: direct electrochemical characterization of catalytic electrode-attached biofilms. Appl Environ Microb. 2008;74(23):7329–7337.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crittenden SR, Sund CJ, Sumner JJ. Mediating electron transfer from bacteria to a gold electrode via a self-assembled monolayer. Langmuir. 2006;22(23):9473–9476.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breuer M, Rosso KM, Blumberger J. Electron flow in multiheme bacterial cytochromes is a balancing act between heme electronic interaction and redox potentials. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111(2):611–616.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi L, Squier TC, Zachara JM, et al. Respiration of metal (hydr)oxides by Shewanella and Geobacter: a key role for multihaem c-type cytochromes. Mol Microbiol. 2007;65(1):12–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okamoto A, Nakamura R, Ishii K, et al. In vivo electrochemistry of c-type cytochrome-mediated electron-transfer with chemical marking. Chembiochem. 2009;10(14):2329–2332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou ZM, Swenson RP. The cumulative electrostatic effect of aromatic stacking interactions and the negative electrostatic environment of the flavin mononucleotide binding site is a major determinant of the reduction ootential for the flavodoxin from desulfovibrio vulgaris hildenborough. Biochemistry. 1996;35:15980–15988.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El Kasmi A, Wallace JM, Bowden EF, et al. Controlling interfacial electron-transfer kinetics of cytochrome c with mixed self-assembled monolayers. J Am Chem Soc. 1998;120(1):225–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding CM, Lv ML, Zhu Y, et al. Wettability-regulated extracellular electron transfer from the living organism of Shewanella loihica PV-4. Angew Chem Int Ed.. 2015;54(5):1446–1451.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang X, Guo K, Li H, et al. Electrochemical treatment of graphite to enhance electron transfer from bacteria to electrodes. Bioresource Technol. 2011;102(3):3558–3560.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qu XG, Lu TH, Dong SJ, et al. Electrochemical reaction of cytochrome-c at gold electrodes modified with thiophene containing one functional-group. Bioelectrochem bioennerg. 1994;2:153–156.
   Google Scholar
• Contera SA, Lemaitre V, de Planque MRR, et al. Unfolding and extraction of a transmembrane alpha-helical peptide: dynamic force spectroscopy and molecular dynamics simulations. Biophys J. 2005;89(5):3129–3140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khedr MG. Nanofiltration of oil field-produced water for reinjection and optimum protection of oil formation. Desalin Water Treat. 2015;55:3460–3468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pohl S, Madzgalla M, Manz W, et al. Biofouling on polymeric heat exchanger surfaces with E. coli and native biofilms. Biofouling. 2015;31(9–10):699–707.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrari M, Benedetti A, Santini E, et al. Biofouling control by superhydrophobic surfaces in shallow euphotic seawater. Colloid Surface A. 2015;480:369–375.
   Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Wang XY, Huang YC, et al. Study on the structure of candida albicans-staphylococcus epidermidis mixed species biofilm on polyvinyl chloride biomaterial. Cell Biochem Biophys. 2015;73(2):461–468.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan Y, Zhou S, Tang J. In situ investigation of cathode and local biofilm microenvironments reveals important roles of OH- and oxygen transport in microbial fuel cells. Environ Sci Technol. 2013;47(9):4911–4917.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chae KJ, Choi M, Ajayi FF, et al. Mass transport through a proton exchange membrane (Nafion) in microbial fuel cells. Energy Fuels. 2008;22(1):169–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiller JC, Liao CJ, Lewis K, et al. Designing surfaces that kill bacteria on contact. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA.. 2001;98(11):5981–5985.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu WF, Cheng SA, Sun D, et al. Inhibition of microbial growth on air cathodes of single chamber microbial fuel cells by incorporating enrofloxacin into the catalyst layer. Biosens Bioelectron. 2015;72:44–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu N, Chen X, Zhang T, et al. Improved performance of membrane free single-chamber air-cathode microbial fuel cells with nitric acid and ethylenediamine surface modified activated carbon fiber felt anodes. Bioresource Technol. 2011;102(1):422–426.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie X, Ye M, Hu LB, et al. Carbon nanotube-coated macroporous sponge for microbial fuel cell electrodes. Eenerg Environ Sci. 2012;5(1):5265–5270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park DH, Kim SK, Shin IH, et al. Electricity production in biofuel cell using modified graphite electrode with neutral red. Biotechnol Lett. 2000;22(16):1301–1304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baranitharan E, Khan MR, Prasad DMR, et al. Effect of biofilm formation on the performance of microbial fuel cell for the treatment of palm oil mill effluent. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng. 2015;38(1):15–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gooding JJ. Advances in interfacial design sensors: aryl diazonium salts for electrochemical biosensors and for modifying carbon and metal electrodes. Electroanalysis. 2008;20(6):573–582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng Y, Yang Q, Wang X, et al. Treatment of carbon fiber brush anodes for improving power generation in air-cathode microbial fuel cells. J Power Sources. 2010;195(7):1841–1844.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowy DA, Tender LM, Zeikus JG, et al. Harvesting energy from the marine sediment-water interface II- Kinetic activity of anode materials. Biosens Bioelectron. 2006;21(11):2058–2063.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng C, Ma L, Li F, et al. A polypyrrole/anthraquinone-2,6-disulphonic disodium salt (PPy/AQDS)-modified anode to improve performance of microbial fuel cells. Biosens Bioelectron. 2010;25(6):1516–1520.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang D, Li B. Novel electrode materials to enhance the bacterial adhesion and increase the power generation in microbial fuel cells (MFCs). Water Sci Technol. 2009;59(3):557–563.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou M, Chi M, Wang H, et al. Anode modification by electrochemical oxidation: a new practical method to improve the performance of microbial fuel cells. Biochem Eng J. 2012;60:151–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Li J, Ye D, et al. Enhanced performances of microbial fuel cells using surface-modified carbon cloth anodes: a comparative study. Int J Hydrogen Energ. 2014;39(33):19148–19155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park DH, Zeikus JG. Impact of electrode composition on electricity generation in a single-compartment fuel cell using Shewanella putrefaciens. Appl Microbiol Biot. 2002;59:58–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu N, Zhou SG, Zhuang L, et al. Electricity generation from starch processing wastewater using microbial fuel cell technology. Biochem Eng J. 2009;3:246–251.
   Google Scholar
• Gajda I, Greenman J, Ieropoulos IA. Recent advancements in real-world microbial fuel cell applications. Curr Opin Electrochem. 2018; 11:78–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balaji M, Jegatheeswaran S, Selvam S, et al. Highly biological active antibiofilm, anticancer and osteoblast adhesion efficacy from MWCNT/PPy/Pd nanocomposite. Appl Surf Sci. 2018;434:400–411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park S, You J, Ahn Y, et al. Evaluating the effects of organic matter bioavailability on nanofiltration membrane using real-time monitoring. J Membrane Sci. 2018;548:519–525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randriamahazaka H, Ghilane J. Electrografting and controlled surface functionalization of carbon based surfaces for electroanalysis. Electroanalysis. 2016;28(1):13–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park HJ, Jung HW, Han SW. Functional and proteomic analyses reveal that wxcB is involved in virulence, motility, detergent tolerance, and biofilm formation in Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria. Biochem Bioph Res Co. 2014;452(3):389–394.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren H, Torres CI, Parameswaran P, et al. Improved current and power density with a micro-scale microbial fuel cell due to a small characteristic length. Biosens Bioelectron. 2014;61:587–592.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun D, Cheng SA, Wang AJ, et al. Temporal-spatial changes in viabilities and electrochemical properties of anode biofilms. Environ Sci Technol. 2015;8:5227–5235.
   Google Scholar