Current progress on the production, modification, and applications of bacterial cellulose

References

• Rangaswamy BE, Vanitha KP, Hungund BS. Microbial cellulose production from bacteria isolated from rotten fruit. Int J Polym Sci. 2015;2015:1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Kumbhar JV, Rajwade JM, Paknikar KM. Fruit peels support higher yield and superior quality bacterial cellulose production. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2015;99(16):6677–6691.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aydin YA, Aksoy ND. Isolation and characterization of an efficient bacterial cellulose producer strain in agitated culture: Gluconacetobacter hansenii P2A. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2014;98(3):1065–1075.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moniri M, Boroumand Moghaddam A, Azizi S, et al. Production and status of bacterial cellulose in biomedical engineering. Nanomaterials (Basel). 2017;7(9):257.
   Google Scholar
• Augimeri RV, Varley AJ, Strap JL. Establishing a role for bacterial cellulose in environmental interactions: lessons learned from diverse biofilm-producing proteobacteria. Front Microbiol. 2015;6:1282
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng M, Laromaine A, Roig A. Bacterial cellulose films: influence of bacterial strain and drying route on film properties. Cellulose. 2014;21(6):4455–4469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin N, Santos TMA, Auer GK, et al. Bacterial cellulose as a substrate for microbial cell culture. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2014;80(6):1926–1932.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu M, Liu L, Jia S, et al. Complete genome analysis of Gluconacetobacter xylinus CGMCC 2955 for elucidating bacterial cellulose biosynthesis and metabolic regulation. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):6266.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang S-S, Han Y-H, Ye Y-X, et al. Physicochemical characterization of high-quality bacterial cellulose produced by Komagataeibacter sp. strain W1 and identification of the associated genes in bacterial cellulose production. RSC Adv. 2017;7(71):45145–45155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svensson A, Nicklasson E, Harrah T, et al. Bacterial cellulose as a potential scaffold for tissue engineering of cartilage. Biomaterials. 2005;26(4):419–431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vergara BS, Idowu PMH, Sumangil JH. Nata de Coco – a Filipino delicacy. National Academy of Science and Technology. Metro Manila, Philippines: Island Publishing House, Philippines, Bicutan; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Rivas B, Moldes AB, Domínguez JM, et al. Development of culture media containing spent yeast cells of Debaryomyces hansenii and corn steep liquor for lactic acid production with Lactobacillus rhamnosus. Int J Biol Macromol. 2004;97(1):93–98.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan JL, Strumillo J, Zimmer J. Crystallographic snapshot ofcellulose synthesis and membrane translocation. Nature. 2013;493(7431):181–186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ji K, Wang W, Zeng B, et al. Bacterial cellulose synthesis mechanism of facultative anaerob Enterobacter sp. FY-07. Sci Rep. 2016;6(1):21863.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ruka DR, Simon GP, Dean KM. Altering the growth conditions of Gluconacetobacter xylinus to maximize the yield of bacterial cellulose. Carbohyd Polym. 2012;89(2):613–622.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Indrianingsih AW, Rosyida VT, Jatmiko TH, et al. Preliminary study on biosynthesis and characterization of bacteria cellulose films from coconut water. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci. 2017;101:012010.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng K-C, Catchmark JM, Demirci A. Enhanced production of bacterial cellulose by using a biofilm reactor and its material property analysis. J Biol Eng. 2009;3(1):12.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tonouchi N, Tsuchida T, Yoshinaga F, et al. Characterization of the biosynthetic pathway of cellulose from glucose and fructose in Acetobacter xylinum. Biosci Biotech Biochem. 1996;60(8):1377–1379.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh J-T, Wang M-J, Lai J-T, et al. A novel static cultivation of bacterial cellulose production by intermittent feeding strategy. J Taiwan Inst Chem E. 2016;63:46–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bae S, Shoda M. Bacterial cellulose production by fed-batch fermentation in molasses medium. Biotechnol Prog. 2004;20(5):1366–1371.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shezad O, Khan S, Khan T, et al. Production of bacterial cellulose in static conditions by a simple fed-batch cultivation strategy. Korean J Chem Eng. 2009;26(6):1689–1692.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubey S, Singh J, Singh RP. Biotransformation of sweet lime pulp waste into high-quality nanocellulose with an excellent productivity using Komagataeibacter europaeus SGP37 under static intermittent fed-batch cultivation. Bioresour Technol. 2018;247:73–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsutani M, Ito K, Azuma Y, et al. Adaptive mutation related to cellulose producibility in Komagataeibacter medellinensis (Gluconacetobacter xylinus) NBRC 3288. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2015;99(17):7229–7240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singhsa P, Narain R, Manuspiya H. Physical structure variations of bacterial cellulose produced by different Komagataeibacter xylinus strains and carbon sources in static and agitated conditions. Cellulose. 2018;25(3):1571–1581.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu M, Zhong C, Wu X-Y, et al. Metabolomic profiling coupled with metabolic network reveals differences in Gluconacetobacter xylinus from static and agitated cultures. Biochem Eng J. 2015;101:85–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reiniati I, Hrymak AN, Margaritis A. Kinetics of cell growth and crystalline nanocellulose production by Komagataeibacter xylinus. Biochem Eng J. 2017;127:21–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin S-P, Hsieh S-C, Chen K-I, et al. Semi-continuous bacterial cellulose production in a rotating disk bioreactor and its materials properties analysis. Cellulose. 2014;21(1):835–844.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu S-C, Li M-H. Production of bacterial cellulose membranes in a modified airlift bioreactor by Gluconacetobacter xylinus. J Biosci Bioeng. 2015;120(4):444–449.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan X, Gao Y, He W, et al. Production of nano bacterial cellulose from beverage industrial waste of citrus peel and pomace using Komagataeibacter xylinus. Carbohydr Polym. 2016;151:1068–1072.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin D, Lopez-Sanchez P, Li R, et al. Production of bacterial cellulose by Gluconacetobacter hansenii CGMCC 3917 using only waste beer yeast as nutrient source. Bioresour Technol. 2014;151:113–119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çakar F, Özer I, Aytekin AÖ, et al. Improvement production of bacterial cellulose by semi-continuous process in molasses medium. Carbohydr Polym. 2014;106:7–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavka A, Guo X, Tang S-J, et al. Production of bacterial cellulose and enzyme from waste fiber sludge. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2013;6(1):25.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Uzyol HK, Sacan MT. Bacterial cellulose production by Komagataeibacter hansenii using algae-based glucose. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2017;24(12):11154–11162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jozala AF, Pértile RAN, dos Santos CA, et al. Bacterial cellulose production by Gluconacetobacter xylinus by employing alternative culture media. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2015;99(3):1181–1190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu J-M, Liu R-H. Thin stillage supplementation greatly enhances bacterial cellulose production by Gluconacetobacter xylinus. Carbohydr Polym. 2012;90(1):116–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Z, Wang L, Hua J, et al. Production of nano bacterial cellulose from waste water of candied jujube-processing industry using Acetobacter xylinum. Carbohydr Polym. 2015;120:115–119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang C, Guo H-J, Xiong L, et al. Using wastewater after lipid fermentation as substrate for bacterial cellulose production by Gluconacetobacter xylinus. Carbohydr Polym. 2016;136:198–202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohite BV, Salunke BK, Patil SV. Enhanced production of bacterial cellulose by using Gluconacetobacter hansenii NCIM 2529 strain under shaking conditions. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2013;169(5):1497–1511.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molina-Ramírez C, Castro M, Osorio M, et al. Effect of different carbon sources on bacterial nanocellulose production and structure using the low pH resistant strain Komagataeibacter medellinensis. Materials. 2017;10(6):639.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsouko E, Kourmentza C, Ladakis D, et al. Bacterial cellulose production from industrial waste and by-product streams. Int J Mol Sci. 2015;16(12):14832–14849.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lin S-P, Loira Calvar I, Catchmark JM, et al. Biosynthesis, production and applications of bacterial cellulose. Cellulose. 2013;20(5):2191–2219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urbina L, Hernández-Arriaga AM, Eceiza A, et al. By-products of the cider production: an alternative source of nutrients to produce bacterial cellulose. Cellulose. 2017;24(5):2071–2082.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin S-P, Huang Y-H, Hsu K-D, et al. Isolation and identification of cellulose-producing strain Komagataeibacter intermedius from fermented fruit juice. Carbohydr Polym. 2016;151:827–833.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuo C-H, Chen J-H, Liou B-K, et al. Utilization of acetate buffer to improve bacterial cellulose production by Gluconacetobacter xylinus. Food Hydrocoll. 2016;53:98–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saichana N, Matsushita K, Adachi O, et al. Acetic acid bacteria: a group of bacteria with versatile biotechnological applications. Biotechnol Adv. 2015;33(6):1260–1271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu M, Li S, Xie Y, et al. Enhanced bacterial cellulose production by Gluconacetobacter xylinus via expression of Vitreoscilla hemoglobin and oxygen tension regulation. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2018;102(3):1155–1165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castro C, Vesterinen A, Zuluaga R, et al. In situ production of nanocomposites of poly(vinyl alcohol) and cellulose nanofibrils from Gluconacetobacter bacteria: effect of chemical crosslinking. Cellulose. 2014;21(3):1745–1756.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin S-P, Liu C-T, Hsu K-D, et al. Production of bacterial cellulose with various additives in a PCS rotating disk bioreactor and its material property analysis. Cellulose. 2016;23(1):367–377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cacicedo ML, Castro MC, Servetas I, et al. Progress in bacterial cellulose matrices for biotechnological applications. Bioresour Technol. 2016;213:172–180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molina-Ramirez C, Enciso C, Torres-Taborda M, et al. Effects of alternative energy sources on bacterial cellulose characteristics produced by Komagataeibacter medellinensis. Int J Biol Macromol. 2018;117:735–741.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keshk SM. Vitamin C enhances bacterial cellulose production in Gluconacetobacter xylinus. Carbohydr Polym. 2014;99:98–100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Augimeri RV, Strap JL. The phytohormone ethylene enhances cellulose production, regulates CRP/FNRKx transcription and causes differential gene expression within the bacterial cellulose synthesis operon of Komagataeibacter (Gluconacetobacter) xylinus ATCC 53582. Front Microbiol. 2015;6:1459.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee K-Y, Buldum G, Mantalaris A, et al. More than meets the eye in bacterial cellulose: biosynthesis, bioprocessing, and applications in advanced fiber composites. Macromol Biosci. 2014;14(1):10–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song JE, Su J, Noro J, et al. Bio-coloration of bacterial cellulose assisted by immobilized laccase. AMB Expr. 2018;8(1):19.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chao Y, Mitarai M, Sugano Y, et al. Effect of addition of watersoluble polysaccharides on bacterial cellulose production in a 50-L airlift reactor. Biotechnol Prog. 2001;17(4):781–785.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng H-P, Wang P-M, Chen J-W, et al. Cultivation of Acetobacter xylinum for bacterial cellulose production in a modified airlift reactor. Biotechnol Appl Biochem. 2002;35(2):125–132.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Serafica G, Mormino R, Bungay H. Inclusion of solid particles in bacterial cellulose. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2002;58(6):756–760.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang P, Chen L, Zhang Q, et al. Using in situ nanocellulose-coating technology based on dynamic bacterial cultures for upgrading conventional biomedical materials and reinforcing nanocellulose hydrogels. Biotechnol Progress. 2016;32(4):1077–1084.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu H, Jiang X. Structure and properties of bacterial cellulose produced using a trickling bed reactor. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2014;172(8):3844–3861.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zabowoska M, Bodin A, Bäckdahl H, et al. Microporous bacterial cellulose as a potential scaffold for bone regeneration. Acta Biomater. 2010;6:2540–2547.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naeem MA, Alfred M, Lv P, et al. Three-dimensional bacterial cellulose-electrospun membrane hybrid structures fabricated through in-situ self-assembly. Cellulose. 2018;25(12):6823–6830.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong F, Wei B, Chen L. Preliminary study on biosynthesis of bacterial nanocellulose tubes in a novel double-silicone-tube bioreactor for potential vascular prosthesis. BioMed Res Int. 2015;2015:1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Igarashi K, Uchihashi T, Koivula A, et al. Visualization of cellobiohydrolase I from Trichoderma reesei moving on crystalline cellulose using high-speed atomic force microscopy. Methods Enzymol. 2012;510:169–182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma T, Ji K, Wang W, et al. Cellulose synthesized by Enterobacter sp. FY-07 under aerobic and anaerobic conditions. Bioresour Technol. 2012;126:18–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menchaca-Nal S, Londoño-Calderón CL, Cerrutti P, et al. Facile synthesis of cobalt ferrite nanotubes using bacterial nanocellulose as template. Carbohydr Polym. 2016;137:726–731.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fijalkowski K, Żywicka A, Drozd R, et al. Increased water content in bacterial cellulose synthesized under rotating magnetic fields. Electromagn Biol Med. 2017;36(2):192–201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paximada P, Dimitrakopoulou EA, Tsouko E, et al. Structural modification of bacterial cellulose fibrils under ultrasonic irradiation. Carbohydr Polym. 2016;150:5–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habibi Y. Key advances in the chemical modification of nanocelluloses. Chem Soc Rev. 2014;43(5):1519–1542.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morales-Narváez E, Golmohammadi H, Naghdi T, et al. Nanopaper as an optical sensing platform. Acs Nano. 2015;9(7):7296–7305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu C-N, Fuh S-C, Lin S-P, et al. TEMPO-oxidized bacterial cellulose pellicle with silver nanoparticles for wound dressing. Biomacromolecules. 2018;19(2):544–554.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandes SCM, Sadocco P, Alonso-Varona A, et al. Bioinspired antimicrobial and biocompatible bacterial cellulose membranes obtained by surface functionalization with aminoalkyl groups. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2013;5(8):3290–3297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avila Ramirez JA, Gómez Hoyos C, Arroyo S, et al. Acetylation of bacterial cellulose catalyzed by citric acid: use of reaction conditions for tailoring the esterification extent. Carbohydr Polym. 2016;153:686–695.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasconcelos NF, Feitosa JPA, da Gama FMP, et al. Bacterial cellulose nanocrystals produced under different hydrolysis conditions: properties and morphological features. Carbohydr Polym. 2017;155:425–431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopes TD, Riegel-Vidotti IC, Grein A, et al. Bacterial cellulose and hyaluronic acid hybrid membranes: production and characterization. Int J Biol Macromol. 2014;67:401–408.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammadkazemi F, Faria M, Cordeiro N. In situ biosynthesis of bacterial nanocellulose-CaCO3 hybrid bionanocomposite: one-step process. Mater Sci Eng C. 2016;65:393–399.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehnad D, Mirzaei H, Emam-Djomeh Z, et al. Thermal and antimicrobial properties of chitosan–nanocellulose films for extending shelf life of ground meat. Carbohydr Polym. 2014;109:148–154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poonguzhali R, Khaleel Basha S, Sugantha Kumari V. Novel asymmetric chitosan/PVP/nanocellulose wound dressing: in vitro and in vivo evaluation. Int J Biol Macromol. 2018;112:1300–1309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foresti ML, Vazquez A, Boury B. Applications of bacterial cellulose as precursor of carbon and composites with metal oxide, metal sulfide and metal nanoparticles: a review of recent advances. Carbohydr Polym. 2017;157:447–467.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Römling U, Galperin MY. Bacterial cellulose biosynthesis: diversity of operons, subunits, products and functions. Trends Microbiol. 2015;23(9):545–557.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urbina L, Guaresti O, Requies J, et al. Design of reusable novel membranes based on bacterial cellulose and chitosan for the filtration of copper in wastewaters. Carbohydr Polym. 2018;193:362–372.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mangayil R, Rajala S, Pammo A, et al. Engineering and characterization of bacterial nanocellulose films as low cost and flexible sensor material. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2017;9(22):19048–19056.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abbasi-Moayed S, Golmohammadi H, Hormozi-Nezhad MR. A nanopaper-based artificial tongue: a ratiometric fluorescent sensor array on bacterial nanocellulose for chemical discrimination applications. Nanoscale. 2018;10(5):2492–2502.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamboni L, Li Y, Liu J, et al. Silk sericin-functionalized bacterial cellulose as a potential wound-healing biomaterial. Biomacromolecules. 2016;17(9):3076–3084.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Napavichayanun S, Amornsudthiwat P, Pienpinijtham P, et al. Interaction and effectiveness of antimicrobials along with healing-promoting agents in a novel biocellulose wound dressing. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2015;55:95–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eming SA, Martin P, Tomic-Canic M. Wound repair and regeneration: mechanisms, signaling, and translation. Sci Transl Med. 2014;6(265):265sr6–265sr6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sulaeva I, Henniges U, Rosenau T, et al. Bacterial cellulose as a material for wound treatment: Properties and modifications. A review. Biotechnol Adv. 2015;33(8):1547–1571.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bajpai AK, Rajesh Kumar Saini JB, Agrawal P, et al. Wound-dressing implants. In Smart biomaterial devices: polymers in biomedical sciences. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 2016. p. 106–113.
   Google Scholar
• Abouhmad A, Mamo G, Dishisha T, et al. T4 lysozyme fused with cellulose-binding module for antimicrobial cellulosic wound dressing materials. J Appl Microbiol. 2016;121(1):115–125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouabhia M, Asselin J, Tazi N, et al. Production of biocompatible and antimicrobial bacterial cellulose polymers functionalized by RGDC grafting groups and gentamicin. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2014;6(3):1439–1446.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ataide JA, de Carvalho NM, Rebelo MDA, et al. Bacterial nanocellulose loaded with bromelain: assessment of antimicrobial, antioxidant and physical-chemical properties. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):18031.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhang P, Chen L, Zhang Q, et al. Using in situ dynamic cultures to rapidly biofabricate fabric-reinforced composites of chitosan/bacterial nanocellulose for antibacterial wound dressings. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:260
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiegand C, Moritz S, Hessler N, et al. Antimicrobial functionalization of bacterial nanocellulose by loading with polihexanide and povidone-iodine. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2015;26(10):245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pourali P, Yahyaei B, Ajoudanifar H, et al. Impregnation of the bacterial cellulose membrane with biologically produced silver nanoparticles. Curr Microbiol. 2014;69(6):785–793.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elayaraja S, Zagorsek K, Li F, et al. In situ synthesis of silver nanoparticles into TEMPO-mediated oxidized bacterial cellulose and their antivibriocidal activity against shrimp pathogens. Carbohydr Polym. 2017;166:329–337.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moniri M, Boroumand Moghaddam A, Azizi S, et al. Molecular study of wound healing after using biosynthesized BNc/Fe3O4 nanocomposites assisted with a bioinformatics approach. Int J Nanomedicine. 2018;13:2955–2971.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu L-P, Yang X-N, Ye L, et al. Preparation and characterization of a photocatalytic antibacterial material: graphene oxide/TiO2/bacterial cellulose nanocomposite. Carbohydr Polym. 2017;174:1078–1086.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abeer MM, Mohd Amin MCI, Martin C. A review of bacterial cellulose-based drug delivery systems: their biochemistry, current approaches and future prospects. J Pharm Pharmacol. 2014;66(8):1047–1061.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavaloiu R-D, Stoica A, Stroescu M, et al. Controlled release of amoxicillin from bacterial cellulose membranes. Cent Eur J Chem. 2014;12(9):962–967.
   Google Scholar
• Shao W, Liu H, Wang S, et al. Controlled release and antibacterial activity of tetracycline hydrochloride-loaded bacterial cellulose composite membranes. Carbohydr Polym. 2016;145:114–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moritz S, Wiegand C, Wesarg F, et al. Active wound dressings based on bacterial nanocellulose as drug delivery system for octenidine. Int J Pharm. 2014;471(1–2):45–55.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alkhatib Y, Dewaldt M, Moritz S, et al. Controlled extended octenidine release from a bacterial nanocellulose/Poloxamer hybrid system. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2017;112:164–176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saïdi L, Vilela C, Oliveira H, et al. Poly (N-methacryloyl glycine)/nanocellulose composites as pH-sensitive systems for controlled release of diclofenac. Carbohydr Polym. 2017;169:357–365.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang L, Chen X, Nguyen TX, et al. Nano-cellulose 3D-networks as controlled-release drug carriers. J Mater Chem B. 2013;1(23):2976–2984.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoshi T, Yamazaki K, Sato Y, et al. Production of hollow-type spherical bacterial cellulose as a controlled release device by newly designed floating cultivation. Heliyon. 2018;4(10):e00873.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldmann E-M, Sundberg JF, Bobbili B, et al. Description of a novel approach to engineer cartilage with porous bacterial nanocellulose for reconstruction of a human auricle. J Biomater Appl. 2013;28(4):626–640.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannes Ahrem DP, Endres M, Conrad D, et al. Laser-structured bacterial nanocellulose hydrogels support ingrowth and differentiation of chondrocytes and show potential as cartilage implants. Acta Biomater. 2014;10(3):1341–1353.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez Ávila H, Feldmann E-M, Pleumeekers MM, et al. Novel bilayer bacterial nanocellulose scaffold supports neocartilage formation in vitro and in vivo. Biomaterials. 2015;44:122–133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundberg J, Götherström C, Gatenholm P. Biosynthesis and in vitro evaluation of macroporous mineralized bacterial nanocellulose scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomed Mater Eng. 2015;25(1):39–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sybele Saska LNT, Moreira Spinola de Castro Raucci L, Scarel-Caminaga RM, et al. Nanocellulose-collagen-apatite composite associated with osteogenic growth peptide for bone regeneration. Int J Biol Macromol. 2017;103:467–476.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keskin Z, Sendemir Urkmez A, Hames EE. Novel keratin modified bacterial cellulose nanocomposite production and characterization for skin tissue engineering. Mater Sci Eng C. 2017;75:1144–1153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krontiras P, Gatenholm P, Hägg DA. Adipogenic differentiation of stem cells in three-dimensional porous bacterial nanocellulose scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res. 2015;103(1):195–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reis EMD, Berti FV, Colla G, et al. Bacterial nanocellulose-IKVAV hydrogel matrix modulates melanoma tumor cell adhesion and proliferation and induces vasculogenic mimicry in vitro. J Biomed Mater Res. 2017;106(8):2741–2749.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bottan S, Robotti F, Jayathissa P, et al. Surface-structured bacterial cellulose with guided assembly-based biolithography (GAB). Acs Nano. 2015;9(1):206–219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leitao AF, Faria MA, Faustino AM, et al. A novel small-caliber bacterial cellulose vascular prosthesis: production, characterization, and preliminary in vivo testing. Macromol Biosci. 2016;16(1):139–150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber C, Reinhardt S, Eghbalzadeh K, et al. Patency and in vivo compatibility of bacterial nanocellulose grafts as small-diameter vascular substitute. J Vasc Surg. 2018;68(6S):177S.e1–187S.e1.
   Google Scholar
• Ullah H, Santos HA, Khan T. Applications of bacterial cellulose in food, cosmetics and drug delivery. Cellulose. 2016;23(4):2291–2314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhai X, Lin D, Liu D, et al. Emulsions stabilized by nanofibers from bacterial cellulose: new potential food-grade Pickering emulsions. Food Res Int. 2018;103:12–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhai X, Lin D, Zhao Y, et al. Bacterial cellulose relieves diphenoxylate-induced constipation in rats. J Agric Food Chem. 2018;66(16):4106–4117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khorasani AC, Shojaosadati SA. Bacterial nanocellulose-pectin bionanocomposites as prebiotics against drying and gastrointestinal condition. Int J Biol Macromol. 2016;83:9–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheldon RA, van Pelt S. Enzyme immobilisation in biocatalysis: why, what and how. Chem Soc Rev. 2013;42(15):6223–6235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai Q, Hu C, Yang N, et al. Enhanced activity and stability of industrial lipases immobilized onto spherelike bacterial cellulose. Int J Biol Macromol. 2018;109:1174–1181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim JH, Park S, Kim H, et al. Alginate/bacterial cellulose nanocomposite beads prepared using Gluconacetobacter xylinus and their application in lipase immobilization. Carbohydr Polym. 2017;157:137–145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan H, Chen L, Hong FF, et al. Evaluation of nanocellulose carriers produced by four different bacterial strains for laccase immobilization. Carbohydr Polym. 2018;196:457–464.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampaio LMP, Padrão J, Faria J, et al. Laccase immobilization on bacterial nanocellulose membranes: antimicrobial, kinetic and stability properties. Carbohydr Polym. 2016;145:1–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drozd R, Rakoczy R, Wasak A, et al. The application of magnetically modified bacterial cellulose for immobilization of laccase. Int J Biol Macromol. 2018;108:462–470.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estevinho BN, Samaniego N, Talens-Perales D, et al. Development of enzymatically-active bacterial cellulose membranes through stable immobilization of an engineered beta-galactosidase. Int J Biol Macromol. 2018;115:476–482.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zywicka A, Peitler D, Rakoczy R, et al. Wet and dry forms of bacterial cellulose synthetized by different strains of Gluconacetobacter xylinus as carriers for yeast immobilization. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2016;180(4):805–816.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang Q, Zhou X, Deng W, et al. Freestanding bacterial cellulose-graphene oxide composite membranes with high mechanical strength for selective ion permeation. Sci Rep. 2016;6(1):33185.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Xu T, Jiang Q, Ghim D, et al. Catalytically active bacterial nanocellulose-based ultrafiltration membrane. Small. 2018;14(15):e1704006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park M, Lee D, Shin S, et al. Flexible conductive nanocellulose combined with silicon nanoparticles and polyaniline. Carbohydr Polym. 2016;140:43–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abbasi-Moayed S, Golmohammadi H, Bigdeli A, et al. A rainbow ratiometric fluorescent sensor array on bacterial nanocellulose for visual discrimination of biothiols. Analyst. 2018;143(14):3415–3424.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei H, Rodriguez K, Renneckar S, et al. Preparation and evaluation of nanocellulose-gold nanoparticle nanocomposites for SERS applications. Analyst. 2015;140(16):5640–5649.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei H, Vikesland PJ. pH-Triggered molecular alignment for reproducible SERS detection via an AuNP/nanocellulose platform. Sci Rep. 2015;5(1)
   Google Scholar
• Jang WD, Hwang JH, Kim HU, et al. Bacterial cellulose as an example product for sustainable production and consumption. Microb Biotechnol. 2017;10(5):1181–1185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balat M. Production of bioethanol from lignocellulosic materials via the biochemical pathway: a review. Energ Convers Manage. 2011;52(2):858–875.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva NHCS, Drumond I, Almeida IF, et al. Topical caffeine delivery using biocellulose membranes: a potential innovative system for cellulite treatment. Cellulose. 2014;21(1):665–674.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montrikittiphant T, Tang M, Lee K-Y, et al. Bacterial cellulose nanopaper as reinforcement for polylactide composites: renewable thermoplastic NanoPaPreg. Macromol Rapid Commun. 2014;35(19):1640–1645.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabarsa T, Sheykhnazari S, Ashori A, et al. Preparation and characterization of reinforced papers using nano bacterial cellulose. Int J Biol Macromol. 2017;101:334–340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fillat A, Martínez J, Valls C, et al. Bacterial cellulose for increasing barrier properties of paper products. Cellulose. 2018;25(10):6093–6105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pircher N, Veigel S, Aigner N, et al. Reinforcement of bacterial cellulose aerogels with biocompatible polymers. Carbohyd Polym. 2014;111:505–513.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schutt BD, Serrano B, Cerro RL, et al. Production of chemicals from cellulose and biomass-derived compounds through catalytic sub-critical water oxidation in a monolith reactor. Biomass Bioenerg. 2002;22(5):363–375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar