The challenges of using NAD⁺-dependent formate dehydrogenases for CO₂ conversion

References

• Yaashikaa PR, Kumar PS, Varjani SJ, et al. A review on photochemical, biochemical and electrochemical transformation of CO2 into value-added products. J CO₂ Util. 2019;33:131–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amao Y. Formate dehydrogenase for CO2 utilization and its application. J CO₂ Util. 2018;26:623–641.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen CF, Lange L, Meyer AS. Classification and enzyme kinetics of formate dehydrogenases for biomanufacturing via CO2 utilization. Biotechnol Adv. 2019;37(7):107408.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sultana S, Sahoo PC, Martha S, et al. A review of harvesting clean fuels from enzymatic CO2 reduction. RSC Adv. 2016;6(50):44170–44194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olah GA. Beyond oil and gas: the methanol economy. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2005;44(18):2636–2639.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvarez-Guerra M, Quintanilla S, Irabien A. Conversion of carbon dioxide into formate using a continuous electrochemical reduction process in a lead cathode. Chem Eng J. 2012;207–208:278–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Innocent B, Liaigre D, Pasquier D, et al. Electroreduction of carbon dioxide to formate on lead electrode in aqueous medium. J Appl Electrochem. 2009;39(2):227–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fellay C, Yan N, Dyson PJ, et al. Selective formic acid decomposition for high‐pressure hydrogen generation: a mechanistic study. Chemistry. 2009;15(15):3752–3760.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enthaler S, von Langermann J, Schmidt T. Carbon dioxide and formic acid—the couple for environmental-friendly hydrogen storage? Energy Environ Sci. 2010;3(9):1207–1217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long NVD, Lee J, Koo KK, et al. Recent progress and novel applications in enzymatic conversion of carbon dioxide. Energies. 2017;10(4):473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al‐Mamoori A, Krishnamurthy A, Rownaghi AA, et al. Carbon capture and utilization update. Energy Technol. 2017;5(6):834–849.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi J, Jiang Y, Jiang Z, et al. Enzymatic conversion of carbon dioxide. Chem Soc Rev. 2015;44(17):5981–6000.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aresta M, Dibenedetto A, Quaranta E. Reaction mechanisms in carbon dioxide conversion. Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Li H, Opgenorth PH, Wernick DG, et al. Liao JC, Integrated electromicrobial conversion of CO2 to higher alcohols. Science. 2012;335(6076):1596–1596.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang H, Yeon YJ, Lee S, et al. Electro-biocatalytic production of formate from carbon dioxide using an oxygen-stable whole cell biocatalyst. Bioresour Technol. 2015;185:35–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamenara D, Seoane G, Méndez PS, et al. Redox biocatalysis: fundamentals and applications. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc.; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Aldridge S. Industry backs biocatalysis for greener manufacturing. Nat Biotechnol. 2013;31(2):95–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudlicky T, Reed JW. Applications of biotransformations and biocatalysis to complexity generation in organic synthesis. Chem Soc Rev. 2009;38(11):3117–3132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lou WY, Chen L, Zhang BB, et al. Using a water-immiscible ionic liquid to improve asymmetric reduction of 4-(trimethylsilyl)-3-butyn-2-one catalyzed by immobilized Candida parapsilosis CCTCC M203011 cells. BMC Biotechnol. 2009;9(1):90.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bräutigam S, Dennewald D, Schürmann M, et al. Whole-cell biocatalysis: evaluation of new hydrophobic ionic liquids for efficient asymmetric reduction of prochiral ketones. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2009;45(4):310–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bräutigam S, Bringer-Meyer S, Weuster-Botz D. Asymmetric whole cell biotransformations in biphasic ionic liquid/water-systems by use of recombinant Escherichia coli with intracellular cofactor regeneration. Tetrahedron. 2007;18(16):1883–1887.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg JM, Tymoczko JL, Stryer L. 9.1 Proteases: facilitating a difficult reaction. In Biochemistry. 5th ed. New York (NY): W. H. Freeman; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• McArdle WD, Katch FI, Katch VL. Essentials of exercise physiology. USA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Blumenfeld LA, Tikhonov AN. Principles of enzyme catalysis. Biophysical thermodynamics of intracellular processes. New York: Springer; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Schmid A, Dordick JS, Hauer B, et al. Industrial biocatalysis today and tomorrow. Nature. 2001;409(6817):258–268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhosale SH, Rao MB, Deshpande VV. Molecular and industrial aspects of glucose isomerase. Microbiol Rev. 1996;60(2):280–300.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vidal LS, Kelly CL, Mordaka PM, et al. Review of NAD(P)H-dependent oxidoreductases: properties, engineering and application. Biochim Biophys Acta Proteins Proteom. 2018;1866(2):327–347.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Berkel WJH, Kamerbeek NM, Fraaije MW. Flavoprotein monooxygenases, a diverse class of oxidative biocatalysts. J Biotechnol. 2006;124(4):670–689.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• da Silva SM, Pimentel C, Valente FMA, et al. Tungsten and molybdenum regulation of formate dehydrogenase expression in Desulfovibrio vulgaris Hildenborough. J Bacteriol. 2011;193(12):2909–2916.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Bok FAM, Hagedoorn PL, Silva PJ, et al. Two W-containing formate dehydrogenases (CO2-reductases) involved in syntrophic propionate oxidation by Syntrophobacter fumaroxidans. Eur J Biochem. 2003;270(11):2476–2485.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tishkov VI, Popov VO. Catalytic mechanism and application of formate dehydrogenase. Biochemistry. 2004;69(11):1252–1267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VanLinden MR, Skoge RH, Ziegler M. Discovery, metabolism and functions of NAD and NADP. Biochemist. 2015;37(1):9–13.
   Google Scholar
• Popov VO, Tishkov VI. NAD+-dependent formate dehydrogenase. From a model enzyme to a versatile biocatalyst. In: Uversky VN, editor. Protein structures: Kaleidoscope of strucutural properties and functions. Kerala, India: Research Signpost; 2003. p. 441–473.
   Google Scholar
• Hille R, Hall J, Basu P. The mononuclear molybdenum enzymes. Chem Rev. 2014;114(7):3963–4038.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popov VO, Lamzin VS. NAD+-dependent formate dehydrogenase. Biochem. J. 1994;302(3):967.
   Google Scholar
• Almendra MJ, Brondino CD, Gavel O, et al. Purification and characterization of a tungsten-containing formate dehydrogenase from Desulfovibrio gigas. Biochemistry. 1999;38(49):16366–16372.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cone JE, Del Río RM, Davis JN, et al. Chemical characterization of the selenoprotein component of clostridial glycine reductase: identification of selenocysteine as the organoselenium moiety. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1976;73(8):2659–2663.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graentzdoerffer A, Rauh D, Pich A, et al. Molecular and biochemical characterization of two tungsten- and selenium-containing formate dehydrogenases from Eubacterium acidaminophilum that are associated with components of an iron-only hydrogenase. Arch Microbiol. 2003;179(2):116–130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reda T, Plugge CM, Abram NJ, et al. Reversible interconversion of carbon dioxide and formate by an electroactive enzyme. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105(31):10654–10658.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maia LB, Moura JJ, Moura I. Molybdenum and tungsten-dependent formate dehydrogenases. J Biol Inorg Chem. 2015;20(2):287–309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Axley MJ, Bock A, Stadtman TC. Catalytic properties of an Escherichia coli formate dehydrogenase mutant in which sulfur replaces selenium. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1991;88(19):8450–8454.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen GT, Axley MJ, Hacia J, et al. Overproduction of a selenocysteine-containing polypeptide in Escherichia coli: the fdhF gene product. Mol Microbiol. 1992;6(6):781–785.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gladyshev VN, Boyington JC, Khangulov SV, et al. Characterization of crystalline formate dehydrogenase H from Escherichia coli. Stabilization, EPR spectroscopy, and preliminary crystallographic analysis. J Biol Chem. 1996;271(14):8095–8100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyington JC, Gladyshev VN, Khangulov SV, et al. Crystal structure of formate dehydrogenase H: catalysis involving Mo, molybdopterin, selenocysteine, and an Fe4S4 cluster. Science. 1997;275(5304):1305–1308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enoch HG, Lester RL. The purification and properties of formate dehydrogenase and nitrate reductase from Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 1975;250(17):6693–6705.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alissandratos A, Kim HK, Matthews H, et al. Clostridium carboxidivorans strain P7T recombinant formate dehydrogenase catalyzes reduction of CO(2) to formate. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013;79(2):741–744.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartmann T, Leimkühler S. The oxygen-tolerant and NAD+-dependent formate dehydrogenase from Rhodobacter capsulatus is able to catalyze the reduction of CO2 to formate. FEBS J. 2013;280(23):6083–6096.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bassegoda A, Madden C, Wakerley DW, et al. Reversible interconversion of CO2 and formate by a molybdenum-containing formate dehydrogenase. J Am Chem Soc. 2014;136(44):15473–15476.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu X, Niks D, Mulchandani A, et al. Efficient reduction of CO2 by the molybdenum-containing formate dehydrogenase from Cupriavidus necator (Ralstonia eutropha). J Biol Chem. 2017;292(41):16872–16879.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choe H, Joo JC, Cho DH, et al. Efficient CO2-reducing activity of NAD-dependent formate dehydrogenase from Thiobacillus sp. KNK65MA for formate production from CO2 gas. PLOS One. 2014;9(7):e103111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinals C, Depiereux E, Feytmans E. Prediction of structurally conserved regions of D-specific hydroxy acid dehydrogenases by multiple alignment with formate dehydrogenase. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1993;192(1):182–188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choe H, Ha JM, Joo JC, et al. Structural insights into the efficient CO2-reducing activity of an NAD+-dependent formate dehydrogenase from Thiobacillus sp. KNK65MA. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2015;71(Pt 2):313–323.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jayathilake BS, Bhattacharya S, Vaidehi N, et al. Efficient and selective electrochemically driven enzyme-catalyzed reduction of carbon dioxide to formate using formate dehydrogenase and an artificial cofactor. Acc Chem Res. 2019;52(3):676–685.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alissandratos A, Easton CJ. Biocatalysis for the application of CO2 as a chemical feedstock. Beilstein J Org Chem. 2015;11(1):2370–2387.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ducat DC, Silver PA. Improving carbon fixation pathways. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2012;16(3–4):337–344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tishkov VI, Popov VO. Protein engineering of formate dehydrogenase. Biomol Eng. 2006;23(2–3):89–110.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alpdağtaş S, Yücel S, Kapkaç HA, et al. Discovery of an acidic, thermostable and highly NADP+ dependent formate dehydrogenase from Lactobacillus buchneri NRRL B-30929. Biotechnol Lett. 2018;40(7):1135–1147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alpdağtaş S, Çelik A, Ertan F, et al. DMSO tolerant NAD (P) H recycler enzyme from a pathogenic bacterium, Burkholderia dolosa PC543: effect of N‐/C‐terminal his tag extension on protein solubility and activity. Eng Life Sci. 2018;18(12):893–903.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fogal S, Beneventi E, Cendron L, et al. Structural basis for double cofactor specificity in a new formate dehydrogenase from the acidobacterium Granulicella mallensis MP5ACTX8. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2015;99(22):9541–9554.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamzin VS, Dauter Z, Popov VO, et al. High resolution structures of Holo and Apo formate dehydrogenase. J Mol Biol. 1994;236(3):759–785.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, et al. The protein data bank. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28(1):235–242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schirwitz K, Schmidt A, Lamzin VS. High‐resolution structures of formate dehydrogenase from Candida boidinii. Protein Sci. 2007;16(6):1146–1156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castillo R, Oliva M, Marti S, et al. A theoretical study of the catalytic mechanism of formate dehydrogenase. J Phys Chem B. 2008;112(32):10012–10022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alberty RA, Silbey RS. Physical chemistry. New York (NY): John Wiley & Sons; 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Brasseur GP, Orlando JJ, Tyndall GS, editors. Atmospheric chemistry and global change. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Aslan AS, Valjakka J, Ruupunen J, et al. Chaetomium thermophilum formate dehydrogenase has high activity in the reduction of hydrogen carbonate (HCO3−) to formate. Protein Eng Des Sel. 2017;30(1):47–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çakar MM, Ruupunen J, Mangas-Sanchez J, et al. Engineered formate dehydrogenase from Chaetomium thermophilum, a promising enzymatic solution for biotechnical CO2 fixation. Biotech Lett. 2020;42(11):2251–2262.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pala U, Yelmazer B, Çorbacioglu M, et al. Functional effects of active site mutations in NAD+-dependent formate dehydrogenases on transformation of hydrogen carbonate to formate. Protein Eng Des Sel. 2018;31(9):327–335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruschig U, Müller U, Willnow P, et al. CO2 reduction to formate by NADH catalysed by formate dehydrogenase from Pseudomonas oxalaticus. Eur J Biochem. 1976;70(2):325–330.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nilov DK, Shabalin IG, Popov VO, et al. Molecular modeling of formate dehydrogenase: the formation of the Michaelis complex. J Biomol Struct Dyn. 2012;30(2):170–179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baccour M, Lamotte A, Sakai K, et al. Production of formate from CO2 gas under ambient conditions: towards flow-through enzyme reactors. Green Chem. 2020;22(12):3727–3733.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altaş N, Aslan AS, Karataş E, et al. Heterologous production of extreme alkaline thermostable NAD+-dependent formate dehydrogenase with wide-range pH activity from Myceliophthora thermophila. Process Biochem. 2017;61:110–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bommarius AS, Blum JK, Abrahamson MJ. Status of protein engineering for biocatalysts: how to design an industrially useful biocatalyst. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2011;15(2):194–200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Z, Zeng AP. Protein engineering approaches to chemical biotechnology. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2016;42:198–205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bickerstaff GF. Immobilization of enzymes and cells: methods in biotechnology. Vol. 1. Totowa: Humana Press; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Chibata I, Tosa T, Sato T. Biocatalysis: immobilized cells and enzymes. J Mol Catal. 1986;37(1):1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Hartmeier W. Immobilized biocatalysts-from simple to complex systems. Tibtech. 1985;3(6):149–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katchalski-Katzir E. Immobilized enzymes: learning from past successes and failures. Trends Biotechnol. 1993;11(11):471–478.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheetham PSJ. The use of biotransformations for the production of flavours and fragrances. Trends Biotechnol. 1993;11(11):478–488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du Y, Gao J, Zhou L, et al. Enzyme nanocapsules armored by metal-organic frameworks: a novel approach for preparing nanobiocatalyst. Chem Eng J. 2017;327:1192–1197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du Y, Gao J, Zhou L, et al. MOF-based nanotubes to hollow nanospheres through protein-induced soft-templating pathways. Adv Sci. 2019;6(6):1801684.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavares APM, Silva CG, Dražić G, et al. Laccase immobilization over multi-walled carbon nanotubes: kinetic, thermodynamic and stability studies. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2015;454:52–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao J, Kong W, Zhou L, et al. Monodisperse core-shell magnetic organosilica nanoflowers with radial wrinkle for lipase immobilization. Chem Eng J. 2017;309:70–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lasmi K, Derder H, Kermad A, et al. Tyrosinase immobilization on functionalized porous silicon surface for optical monitoring of pyrocatechol. Appl Surf Sci. 2018;446:3–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu DM, Chen J, Shi YP. Tyrosinase immobilization on aminated magnetic nanoparticles by physical adsorption combined with covalent crosslinking with improved catalytic activity, reusability and storage stability. Anal Chim Acta. 2018;1006:90–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El‐Zahab B, Donnelly D, Wang P. Particle‐tethered NADH for production of methanol from CO2 catalyzed by coimmobilized enzymes. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2008;99(3):508–514.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolivar JM, Wilson L, Ferrarotti SA, et al. Evaluation of different immobilization strategies to prepare an industrial biocatalyst of formate dehydrogenase from Candida boidinii. Enzyme Microb Technol. 2007;40(4):540–546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolivar JM, Rocha-Martin J, Mateo C, et al. Coating of soluble and immobilized enzymes with ionic polymers: full stabilization of the quaternary structure of multimeric enzymes. Biomacromolecules. 2009;10(4):742–747.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Netto CG, Nakamura M, Andrade LH, et al. Improving the catalytic activity of formate dehydrogenase from Candida boidinii by using magnetic nanoparticles. J Mol Catal. 2012;84:136–143.
   Google Scholar
• Mateo C, Palomo JM, Fernandez-Lorente G, et al. Improvement of enzyme activity, stability and selectivity via immobilization techniques. Enzyme Microb Technol. 2007;40(6):1451–1463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrigues RC, Ortiz C, Berenguer-Murcia Á, et al. Modifying enzyme activity and selectivity by immobilization. Chem Soc Rev. 2013;42(15):6290–6307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dominguez-Benetton X, Srikanth S, Satyawali Y. Enzymatic electrosynthesis: an overview on the progress in enzyme-electrodes for the production of electricity, fuels and chemicals. J Microb Biochem Technol. 2013. DOI:https://doi.org/10.4172/1948-5948.s6-007
   Google Scholar
• Lu Y, Jiang Z-y, Xu S-W, et al. Efficient conversion of CO2 to formic acid by formate dehydrogenase immobilized in a novel alginate–silica hybrid gel. Catal Today. 2006;115(1–4):263–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshimoto M, Yamashita T, Yamashiro T. Stability and reactivity of liposome-encapsulated formate dehydrogenase and cofactor system in carbon dioxide gas-liquid flow. Biotechnol Prog. 2010;26(4):1047–1053.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aytar BS, Bakir U. Preparation of cross-linked tyrosinase aggregates. Process Biochem. 2008;43(2):125–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoevaart R, Wolbers MW, Golubovic M, et al. Preparation, optimization, and structures of cross-linked enzyme aggregates (CLEAs). Biotechnol Bioeng. 2004;87(6):754–762.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim MH, Park S, Kim YH, et al. Immobilization of formate dehydrogenase from Candida boidinii through cross-linked enzyme aggregates. J Mol Catal. 2013;97:209–214.
   Google Scholar
• Munasinghe PC, Khanal SK. Biomass-derived syngas fermentation into biofuels: opportunities and challenges. Bioresour Technol. 2010;101(13):5013–5022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim Y-K, Park SE, Lee H, et al. Enhancement of bioethanol production in syngas fermentation with Clostridium ljungdahlii using nanoparticles. Bioresour Technol. 2014;159:446–450.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim YK, Lee H. Use of magnetic nanoparticles to enhance bioethanol production in syngas fermentation. Bioresour Technol. 2016;204:139–144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim YK, Lee SY, Oh BK. Enhancement of formic acid production from CO2 in formate dehydrogenase reaction using nanoparticles. RSC Adv. 2016;6(111):109978–109982.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maia LB, Fonseca L, Moura I, et al. Reduction of carbon dioxide by a molybdenum-containing formate dehydrogenase: a kinetic and mechanistic study. J Am Chem Soc. 2016;138(28):8834–8846.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez-Lafuente R. Stabilization of multimeric enzymes: strategies to prevent subunit dissociation. Enzyme Microb Technol. 2009;45(6–7):405–418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yildirim D, Alagöz D, Toprak A, et al. Tuning dimeric formate dehydrogenases reduction/oxidation activities by immobilization. Process Biochem. 2019;85:97–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walcarius A, Nasraoui R, Wang Z, et al. Factors affecting the electrochemical regeneration of NADH by (2,2′-bipyridyl) (pentamethylcyclopentadienyl)-rhodium complexes: impact on their immobilization onto electrode surfaces. Bioelectrochemistry. 2011;82(1):46–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali I, Gill A, Omanovic S. Direct electrochemical regeneration of the enzymatic cofactor 1,4-NADH employing nano-patterned glassy carbon/Pt and glassy carbon/Ni electrodes. Chem Eng J. 2012;188:173–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu J, Antonietti M. Bio-inspired NADH regeneration by carbon nitride photocatalysis using diatom templates. Energy Environ Sci. 2013;6(5):1486–1493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barin R, Biria D, Rashid-Nadimi S, et al. Enzymatic CO2 reduction to formate by formate dehydrogenase from Candida boidinii coupling with direct electrochemical regeneration of NADH. J CO₂ Util. 2018;28:117–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amao Y, Shuto N. Formate dehydrogenase–viologen-immobilized electrode for CO2 conversion, for development of an artificial photosynthesis system. Res Chem Intermed. 2014;40(9):3267–3276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Liu J, Ong J, et al. Specific and sustainable bioelectro-reduction of carbon dioxide to formate on a novel enzymatic cathode. Chemosphere. 2016;162:228–234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srikanth S, Maesen M, Dominguez-Benetton X, et al. Enzymatic electrosynthesis of formate through CO2 sequestration/reduction in a bioelectrochemical system (BES). Bioresour Technol. 2014;165:350–354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aresta M, Dibenedetto A, Baran T, et al. An integrated photocatalytic/enzymatic system for the reduction of CO2 to methanol in bioglycerol–water. J Org Chem. 2014;10:2556–2565.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee SY, Lim SY, Seo D, et al. Light-driven highly selective conversion of CO2 to formate by electrosynthesized enzyme/cofactor thin film electrode. Adv Energy Mater. 2016;6(11):1502207–1502208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ullah N, Ali I, Omanovic S. Direct electrocatalytic reduction of coenzyme NAD+ to enzymatically-active 1,4-NADH employing an iridium/ruthenium-oxide electrode. Mater Chem Phys. 2015;149:413–417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim YH, Yoo YJ. Regeneration of the nicotinamide cofactor using a mediator-free electrochemical method with a tin oxide electrode. Enzyme Microb Technol. 2009;44(3):129–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohlmann C, Wolfgang M, Stephan L. Electroenzymatic synthesis. J Mol Catal B Enzym. 2008;51(3–4):57–72.
   Google Scholar
• Man F, Omanovic S. A kinetic study of NAD+ reduction on a ruthenium modified glassy carbon electrode. J Electroanal Chem. 2004;568:301–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim S, Kim MK, Lee SH, et al. Conversion of CO2 to formate in an electroenzymatic cell using Candida boidinii formate dehydrogenase. J Mol Catal. 2014;102:9–15.
   Google Scholar
• Kim SH, Chung GY, Kim SH, et al. Electrochemical NADH regeneration and electroenzymatic CO2 reduction on Cu nanorods/glassy carbon electrode prepared by cyclic deposition. Electrochim Acta. 2016;210:837–845.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Li P, Noh H, et al. Stabilization of formate dehydrogenase in a metal–organic framework for bioelectrocatalytic reduction of CO2. Angew Chem. 2019;131(23):7764–7768.
   Google Scholar
• Barin R, Biria D, Rashid-Nadimi S, et al. Investigating the enzymatic CO2 reduction to formate with electrochemical NADH regeneration in batch and semi-continuous operations. Chem Eng Process. 2019;140:78–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song H, Ma C, Liu P, et al. A hybrid CO2 electroreduction system mediated by enzyme-cofactor conjugates coupled with Cu nanoparticle-catalyzed cofactor regeneration. J CO₂ Util. 2019;34:568–575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vass I, Cser K, Cheregi O. Molecular mechanisms of light stress of photosynthesis. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2007;1113:114–122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amao Y. Solar fuel production based on the artificial photosynthesis system. ChemCatChem. 2011;3(3):458–474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wen FY, Li C. Hybrid artificial photosynthetic systems comprising semiconductors as light harvesters and biomimetic complexes as molecular cocatalysts. Acc Chem Res. 2013;46(11):2355–2364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee SH, Choi DS, Kuk SK, et al. Photobiocatalysis: activating redox enzymes by direct or indirect transfer of photoinduced electrons. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2018;57(27):7958–7985.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gulder T, Seel CJ. Biocatalysis fueled by light: on the versatile combination of photocatalysis and enzymes. ChemBioChem. 2019;20(15):1871–1897.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shih CF, Zhang T, Li J, et al. Powering the future with liquid sunshine. Joule. 2018;2(10):1925–1949.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kornienko N, Zhang JZ, Sakimoto KK, et al. Interfacing nature’s catalytic machinery with synthetic materials for semiartificial photosynthesis. Nature Nanotech. 2018;13(10):890–899.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majumdar P, Pant D, Patra S. Integrated photobioelectrochemical systems: a paradigm shift in artificial photosynthesis. Trends Biotechnol. 2017;35(4):285–287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng D, Zhang Y, Liu X, et al. Coupling natural systems with synthetic chemistry for light-driven enzymatic biocatalysis. Photosynth Res. 2020;143(2):221–231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wombwell C, Caputo CA, Reisner E. [NiFeSe]-hydrogenase chemistry. Acc Chem Res. 2015;48(11):2858–2865.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reisner E, Powell DJ, Cavazza C, et al. Visible light-driven H(2) production by hydrogenases attached to dye-sensitized TiO(2) nanoparticles. J Am Chem Soc. 2009;131(51):18457–18466.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachmeier A, Wang VC, Woolerton TW, et al. How light-harvesting semiconductors can alter the bias of reversible electrocatalysts in favor of H2 production and CO2 reduction. J Am Chem Soc. 2013;135(40):15026–15032.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolerton TW, Sheard S, Reisner E, et al. Efficient and clean photoreduction of CO(2) to CO by enzyme-modified TiO(2) nanoparticles using visible light. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132(7):2132–2133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tran NH, Nguyen D, Dwaraknath S, et al. An efficient light-driven P450 BM3 biocatalyst. J Am Chem Soc. 2013;135(39):14484–14487.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferry JG. Formate dehydrogenase. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 1990;7(3–4):377–382.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sládek NE. Human aldehyde dehydrogenases: potential pathological, pharmacological, and toxicological impact. J Biochem Mol Toxicol. 2003;17(1):7–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riveros‐Rosas H, Julián‐Sánchez A, Villalobos‐Molina R, et al. Diversity, taxonomy and evolution of medium‐chain dehydrogenase/reductase superfamily. Eur J Biochem. 2003;270(16):3309–3334.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kalyanasundaram K, Graetzel M. Artificial photosynthesis: biomimetic approaches to solar energy conversion and storage. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2010;21(3):298–310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyatani R, Amao Y. Photochemical synthesis of formic acid from CO2 with formate dehydrogenase and water-soluble zinc porphyrin. J Mol Catal. 2004;27(2–3):121–125.
   Google Scholar
• Tsujisho I, Toyoda M, Amao Y. Photochemical and enzymatic synthesis of formic acid from CO2 with chlorophyll and dehydrogenase system. Catal Comm. 2006;7(3):173–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ikeyama S, Katagiri T, Amao Y. The improvement of formic acid production from CO2 with visible-light energy and formate dehydrogenase by the function of the viologen derivative with carbamoylmethyl group as an electron carrier. J Photochem Photobiol. 2018;358:362–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuk SK, Singh RK, Nam DH, et al. Photoelectrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide to methanol through a highly efficient enzyme cascade. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2017;56(14):3827–3832.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim J, Lee SH, Tieves F, et al. Biocatalytic C = C bond reduction through carbon nanodot-sensitized regeneration of NADH analogues. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2018;57(42):13825–13828.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ou H, Yang P, Lin L, et al. Carbon nitride aerogels for the photoredox conversion of water. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2017;56(36):10905–10910.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishibashi T, Higashi M, Ikeda S, et al. Photoelectrochemical CO2 reduction to formate with the sacrificial reagent free system of semiconductor photocatalysts and formate dehydrogenase. ChemCatChem. 2019;11(24):6227–6235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi WS, Lee SH, Ko JW, et al. Human urine-fueled light-driven NADH regeneration for redox biocatalysis. ChemSusChem. 2016;9(13):1559–1564.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ikeyama S, Amao Y. An artificial co‐enzyme based on the viologen skeleton for highly efficient CO2 reduction to formic acid with formate dehydrogenase. ChemCatChem. 2017;9(5):833–838.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amao Y, Takahara S, Sakai Y. Visible-light induced hydrogen and formic acid production from biomass and carbon dioxide with enzymatic and artificial photosynthesis system. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2014;39(35):20771–20776.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noji T, Jin T, Nango M, et al. CO2 photoreduction by formate dehydrogenase and a Ru-complex in a nanoporous glass reactor. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2017;9(4):3260–3265.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishibashi T, Ikeyama S, Ito M, et al. Light-driven CO2 reduction to formic acid with a hybrid system of biocatalyst and semiconductor based photocatalyst. Chem Lett. 2018;47(12):1505–1508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ikeyama S, Abe R, Shiotani S, et al. Effective artificial co-enzyme based on single-electron reduced form of 2,2′-bipyridinium salt derivatives for formate dehydrogenase in the catalytic conversion of CO2 to formic acid. BCSJ. 2018;91(9):1369–1376.
   Google Scholar
• Ikeyama S, Amao Y. The effect of the functional ionic group of the viologen derivative on visible-light driven CO2 reduction to formic acid with the system consisting of water-soluble zinc porphyrin and formate dehydrogenase. Photochem Photobiol Sci. 2018;17(1):60–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ikeyama S, Abe R, Shiotani S, et al. Novel artificial coenzyme based on reduced form of diquat for formate dehydrogenase in the catalytic conversion of CO2 to formic acid. Chem Lett. 2016;45(8):907–909.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ikeyama S, Amao Y. Abnormal co-enzymatic behavior of a one-electron reduced bipyridinium salt with a carbamoyl group on the catalytic activity of CO2 reduction by formate dehydrogenase. New J Chem. 2018;42(19):15556–15560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ikeyama S, Amao Y. A novel electron carrier molecule based on a viologen derivative for visible light-driven CO2 reduction to formic acid with the system of zinc porphyrin and formate dehydrogenase. Sustainable Energy Fuels. 2017;1(8):1730–1733.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amao Y. Viologens for coenzymes of biocatalysts with the function of CO2 reduction and utilization. Chem Lett. 2017;46(6):780–788.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meng J, Tian Y, Li C, et al. A thiophene-modified double shell hollow gC3N4 nanosphere boosts NADH regeneration via synergistic enhancement of charge excitation and separation. Catal Sci Technol. 2019;9(8):1911–1921.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Li P, Zhou J, et al. Integration of enzymes and photosensitizers in a hierarchical meso-porous metal–organic framework for light-driven CO2 reduction. J Am Chem Soc. 2020;142(4):1768–1773.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hummel W, Kula MR. Dehydrogenases for the synthesis of chiral compounds. EJB Rev. 1989;14(1):1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Carrea G, Ottolina G. Stereoselective synthesis of drugs and drug precursors by hydrolases and oxidoreductases. Biocatal Biotransformation. 2000;18(2):119–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bommarius AS, Schwarm M, Stingl K, et al. Synthesis and use of enantiomerically pure tert-leucine. Tetrahedron . 1995;6(12):2851–2888.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brzica H, Breljak D, Burckhardt BC, et al. Oxalate: from the environment to kidney stones. Arh Hig Rada Toksiko. 2013;64(4):609–630.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose GA, editor. Oxalate metabolism in relation to urinary stone. In: The bloomsbury series in clinical science. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Worramongkona P, Seeda K, Phansomboon P, et al. A simple paper-based colorimetric device for rapid and sensitive urinary oxalate determinations. Anal Sci. 2018;34(1):103–108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hovda KE, Urdal P, Jacobsen D. Increased serum formate in the diagnosis of methanol poisoning. J Anal Toxicol. 2005;29(6):586–588.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barceloux DG, Bond GR, Krenzelok EP, et al. American academy of clinical toxicology practice guidelines on the treatment of methanol poisoning. J Clin Toxicol. 2002;40(4):415–446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthuvel A, Rajamani R, Sheeladevi R. Therapeutic response to single intravenous bolus administration of formate dehydrogenase in methanol-intoxicated rats. Toxicol Lett. 2006;161(2):89–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamamoto H, Mitsuhashi K, Kimoto N, et al. Robust NADH-regenerator: improved alpha-haloketone-resistant formate dehydrogenase. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2005;67(1):33–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slusarczyk H, Felber S, Kula MR, et al. Stabilization of NAD-dependent formate dehydrogenase from Candida boidinii by site-directed mutagenesis of cysteine residues. Eur J Biochem. 2000;267(5):1280–1289.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhao H, Van Der Donk WA. Regeneration of cofactors for use in biocatalysis. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2003;14(6):583–589.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollmann F, Arends IW, Buehler K. Biocatalytic redox reactions for organic synthesis: nonconventional regeneration methods. ChemCatChem. 2010;2(7):762–782.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiong J, Chen H, Liu R, et al. Tuning a bi-enzymatic cascade reaction in Escherichia coli to facilitate NADPH regeneration for ε-caprolactone production. Bioresour Bioprocess. 2021;8(1):1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar