Evidence and opportunities for developing non-transgenic genome edited crops using site-directed nuclease 1 approach

References

• Greene EA, Codomo CA, Taylor NE, et al. Spectrum of chemically induced mutations from a large-scale reverse-genetic screen in Arabidopsis. Genetics. 2003;164:731–740. doi: 10.1093/genetics/164.2.731.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCallum CM, Comai L, Greene EA, et al. Targeted screening for induced mutations. Nat Biotechnol. 2000;18:455–457. doi: 10.1038/74542.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tadele Z, Mba C, Till BJ. TILLING for mutations in model plants and crops. In: Jain SM, Brar DS, editors. Molecular techniques in crop improvement. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; 2010. p. 307–332. doi: 10.1007/978-90-481-2967-6_13.
   Google Scholar
• Mamrutha HM, Kumar R, Venkatesh K, et al. Genetic transformation of wheat – present status and future potential. J Wheat Res. 2014;6:107–119.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar R, Kaur A, Pandey A, et al. CRISPR-based genome editing in wheat: a comprehensive review and future prospects. Mol Biol Rep. 2019;46:3557–3569. doi: 10.1007/s11033-019-04761-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson AL, Linsley PS. Recognizing and avoiding siRNA off-target effects for target identification and therapeutic application. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2010;9:57–67. doi: 10.1038/nrd3010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Travella S, Klimm TE, Keller B. RNA interference-based gene silencing as an efficient tool for functional genomics in hexaploid bread wheat. Plant Physiol. 2006;142:6–20. doi: 10.1104/pp.106.084517.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mamrutha HM, Kumar R, Wadhwa Z, et al. A improving grain weight in wheat through CRISPR/Cas9 mediated genome editing. Wheat Barley News Lett. 2020;13:2.
   Google Scholar
• Abdallah NA, Prakash CS, McHughen AG. Genome editing for crop improvement: challenges and opportunities. GM Crops Food. 2015;6:183–205. doi: 10.1080/21645698.2015.1129937.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamburova VS, Nikitina EV, Shermatov SE, et al. Genome editing in plants: an overview of tools and applications. Int J Agron. 2017;2017:1–15. doi: 10.1155/2017/7315351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu X, Qi T, Yang Q, et al. Host-induced gene silencing of the MAPKK gene PsFUZ7 confers stable resistance to wheat stripe rust. Plant Physiol. 2017;175:1853–1863. doi: 10.1104/pp.17.01223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaidi SS-A, Vanderschuren H, Qaim M, et al. New plant breeding technologies for food security. Science. 2019;363:1390–1391. doi: 10.1126/science.aav6316.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arpaia S, Birch ANE, Chesson A, et al. Scientific opinion addressing the safety assessment of plants developed using zinc finger nuclease 3 and other site-directed nucleases with similar function. EFSA J. 2012;10(10):2943.
   Google Scholar
• van de Wiel CCM, Schaart JG, Lotz LAP, et al. New traits in crops produced by genome editing techniques based on deletions. Plant Biotechnol Rep. 2017;11:1–8. doi: 10.1007/s11816-017-0425-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matres JM, Hilscher J, Datta A, et al. Genome editing in cereal crops: an overview. Transgenic Res. 2021;30:461–498. doi: 10.1007/s11248-021-00259-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Cheng X, Shan Q, et al. Simultaneous editing of three homoeoalleles in hexaploid bread wheat confers heritable resistance to powdery mildew. Nat Biotechnol. 2014;32:947–951. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2969.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abe F, Haque E, Hisano H, et al. Genome-edited triple-recessive mutation alters seed dormancy in wheat. Cell Rep. 2019;28:1362–1369.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.06.090.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang A, Liu Y, Wang F, et al. Enhanced rice salinity tolerance via CRISPR/Cas9-targeted mutagenesis of the OsRR22 gene. Mol Breed. 2019;39:47. doi: 10.1007/s11032-019-0954-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okada A, Arndell T, Borisjuk N, et al. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knockout of Ms1 enables the rapid generation of male-sterile hexaploid wheat lines for use in hybrid seed production. Plant Biotechnol J. 2019;17:1905–1913. doi: 10.1111/pbi.13106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sánchez-León S, Gil-Humanes J, Ozuna CV, et al. Low-gluten, nontransgenic wheat engineered with CRISPR/Cas9. Plant Biotechnol J. 2018;16:902–910. doi: 10.1111/pbi.12837.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh M, Kumar M, Albertsen MC, et al. Concurrent modifications in the three homeologs of Ms45 gene with CRISPR–Cas9 lead to rapid generation of male sterile bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Plant Mol Biol. 2018;97:371–383. doi: 10.1007/s11103-018-0749-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brauer EK, Balcerzak M, Rocheleau H, et al. Genome editing of a deoxynivalenol-induced transcription factor confers resistance to Fusarium graminearum in wheat. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2020;33:553–560. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-11-19-0332-R.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clasen BM, Stoddard TJ, Luo S, et al. Improving cold storage and processing traits in potato through targeted gene knockout. Plant Biotechnol J. 2016;14:169–176. doi: 10.1111/pbi.12370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veillet F, Perrot L, Chauvin L, et al. Transgene-free genome editing in tomato and potato plants using Agrobacterium-mediated delivery of a CRISPR/Cas9 cytidine base editor. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20:402. doi: 10.3390/ijms20020402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haun W, Coffman A, Clasen BM, et al. Improved soybean oil quality by targeted mutagenesis of the fatty acid desaturase 2 gene family. Plant Biotechnol J. 2014;12:934–940. doi: 10.1111/pbi.12201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shan Q, Zhang Y, Chen K, et al. Creation of fragrant rice by targeted knockout of the OsBADH2 gene using TALEN technology. Plant Biotechnol J. 2015;13:791–800. doi: 10.1111/pbi.12312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li M, Li X, Zhou Z, et al. Reassessment of the four yield-related genes Gn1a, DEP1, GS3, and IPA1 in rice using a CRISPR/Cas9 system. Front Plant Sci. 2016;7:377. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00377.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang F, Wang C, Liu P, et al. Enhanced rice blast resistance by CRISPR/Cas9-targeted mutagenesis of the ERF transcription factor gene OsERF922. PLOS One. 2016;11:e0154027. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154027.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang L, Mao B, Li Y, et al. Knockout of OsNramp5 using the CRISPR/Cas9 system produces low Cd-accumulating indica rice without compromising yield. Sci Rep. 2017;7:14438. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-14832-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou H, He M, Li J, et al. Development of commercial thermo-sensitive genic male sterile rice accelerates hybrid rice breeding using the CRISPR/Cas9-mediated TMS5 editing system. Sci Rep. 2016;6:37395. doi: 10.1038/srep37395.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim Y-A, Moon H, Park C-J. CRISPR/Cas9-targeted mutagenesis of Os8N3 in rice to confer resistance to Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae. Rice. 2019;12:67. doi: 10.1186/s12284-019-0325-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheng X, Sun Z, Wang X, et al. Improvement of the rice “easy-to-shatter” trait via CRISPR/Cas9-mediated mutagenesis of the qSH1 gene. Front Plant Sci. 2020;11:619. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.00619.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao S, Qin X, Luo L, et al. CRISPR/Cas9-induced mutagenesis of semi-rolled leaf1, 2 confers curled leaf phenotype and drought tolerance by influencing protein expression patterns and ROS scavenging in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Agronomy. 2019;9:728. doi: 10.3390/agronomy9110728.
   Google Scholar
• Wang F, Han T, Song Q, et al. The rice circadian clock regulates tiller growth and panicle development through strigolactone signaling and sugar sensing. Plant Cell. 2020;32(10):3124–3138. doi: 10.1105/tpc.20.00289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou J, Peng Z, Long J, et al. Gene targeting by the TAL effector PthXo2 reveals cryptic resistance gene for bacterial blight of rice. Plant J. 2015;82:632–643. doi: 10.1111/tpj.12838.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macovei A, Sevilla NR, Cantos C, et al. Novel alleles of rice eIF4G generated by CRISPR/Cas9-targeted mutagenesis confer resistance to Rice tungro spherical virus. Plant Biotechnol. 2018;16(11):1918–1927.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santosh Kumar VV, Verma RK, Yadav SK, et al. CRISPR–Cas9 mediated genome editing of drought and salt tolerance (OsDST) gene in indica mega rice cultivar MTU1010. Physiol Mol Biol Plants. 2020;26:1099–1110. doi: 10.1007/s12298-020-00819-w.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin X, Anand A, Quick P, et al. Editing a stomatal developmental gene in rice with CRISPR/Cpf1. In: Qi Y, editor. Plant genome editing with CRISPR systems. Methods and protocols. New York, NY: Springer; 2019. p. 257–268.
   Google Scholar
• Yin X, Biswal AK, Dionora J, et al. CRISPR–Cas9 and CRISPR–Cpf1 mediated targeting of a stomatal developmental gene EPFL9 in rice. Plant Cell Rep. 2017;36:745–757. doi: 10.1007/s00299-017-2118-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baysal C, He W, Drapal M, et al. Inactivation of rice starch branching enzyme IIb triggers broad and unexpected changes in metabolism by transcriptional reprogramming. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020;117:26503–26512. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2014860117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez L, Soto E, Farré G, et al. CRISPR/Cas9 mutations in the rice Waxy/GBSSI gene induce allele-specific and zygosity-dependent feedback effects on endosperm starch biosynthesis. Plant Cell Rep. 2019;38:417–433. doi: 10.1007/s00299-019-02388-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan MSS, Basnet R, Islam SA, et al. Mutational analysis of OsPLDα1 reveals its involvement in phytic acid biosynthesis in rice grains. J Agric Food Chem. 2019;67:11436–11443. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.9b05052.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang J, Zhao J, Duan W, et al. TaAMT2;3a, a wheat AMT2-type ammonium transporter, facilitates the infection of stripe rust fungus on wheat. BMC Plant Biol. 2019;19:239. doi: 10.1186/s12870-019-1841-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang M, Liu Y, Liu Y, et al. Mutation of inositol 1,3,4-trisphosphate 5/6-kinase6 impairs plant growth and phytic acid synthesis in rice. Plants. 2019;8:114. doi: 10.3390/plants8050114.
   Google Scholar
• Akama K, Akter N, Endo H, et al. An in vivo targeted deletion of the calmodulin-binding domain from rice glutamate decarboxylase 3 (OsGAD3) increases γ-aminobutyric acid content in grains. Rice. 2020;13:20. doi: 10.1186/s12284-020-00380-w.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li T, Liu B, Spalding MH, et al. High-efficiency TALEN-based gene editing produces disease-resistant rice. Nat Biotechnol. 2012;30:390–392. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shan Q, Wang Y, Li J, et al. Targeted genome modification of crop plants using a CRISPR–Cas system. Nat Biotechnol. 2013;31:686–688. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2650.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mao C, He J, Liu L, et al. OsNAC2 integrates auxin and cytokinin pathways to modulate rice root development. Plant Biotechnol J. 2020;18(2):429–442. doi: 10.1111/pbi.13209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li C, Liu C, Qi X, et al. RNA-guided Cas9 as an in vivo desired-target mutator in maize. Plant Biotechnol J. 2017;15:1566–1576. doi: 10.1111/pbi.12739.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bage SA, Barten TJ, Brown AN, et al. Genetic characterization of novel and CRISPR–Cas9 gene edited maize brachytic 2 alleles. Plant Gene. 2020;21:100198. doi: 10.1016/j.plgene.2019.100198.
   Google Scholar
• Xie K, Wu S, Li Z, et al. Map-based cloning and characterization of Zea mays male sterility33 (ZmMs33) gene, encoding a glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase. Theor Appl Genet. 2018;131:1363–1378. doi: 10.1007/s00122-018-3083-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aggarwal S, Kumar A, Bhati KK, et al. RNAi-mediated downregulation of inositol pentakisphosphate kinase (IPK1) in wheat grains decreases phytic acid levels and increases Fe and Zn accumulation. Front Plant Sci. 2018;9:259. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regina A, Bird A, Topping D, et al. High-amylose wheat generated by RNA interference improves indices of large-bowel health in rats. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:3546–3551. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0510737103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loukoianov A, Yan L, Blechl A, et al. Regulation of VRN-1 vernalization genes in normal and transgenic polyploid wheat. Plant Physiol. 2005;138:2364–2373. doi: 10.1104/pp.105.064287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan L, Loukoianov A, Blechl A, et al. The wheat VRN2 gene is a flowering repressor down-regulated by vernalization. Science. 2004;303:1640–1644. doi: 10.1126/science.1094305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gasparis S, Orczyk W, Zalewski W, et al. The RNA-mediated silencing of one of the Pin genes in allohexaploid wheat simultaneously decreases the expression of the other, and increases grain hardness. J Exp Bot. 2011;62:4025–4036. doi: 10.1093/jxb/err103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao B, Wu TT, Ma SS, et al. TaD27-B gene controls the tiller number in hexaploid wheat. Plant Biotechnol J. 2020;18:513–525. doi: 10.1111/pbi.13220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouyang X, Hong X, Zhao X, et al. Knock out of the PHOSPHATE 2 gene TaPHO2-A1 improves phosphorus uptake and grain yield under low phosphorus conditions in common wheat. Sci Rep. 2016;6:29850. doi: 10.1038/srep29850.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sestili F, Pagliarello R, Zega A, et al. Enhancing grain size in durum wheat using RNAi to knockdown GW2 genes. Theor Appl Genet. 2019;132:419–429. doi: 10.1007/s00122-018-3229-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakuma S, Golan G, Guo Z, et al. Unleashing floret fertility in wheat through the mutation of a homeobox gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019;116:5182–5187. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1815465116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qi T, Zhu X, Tan C, et al. Host-induced gene silencing of an important pathogenicity factor PsCPK1 in Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici enhances resistance of wheat to stripe rust. Plant Biotechnol J. 2018;16:797–807. doi: 10.1111/pbi.12829.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rupp JS, Cruz L, Trick HN, et al. RNAi-mediated silencing of endogenous wheat genes EIF(Iso)4E-2 and EIF4G induce resistance to multiple RNA viruses in transgenic wheat. Crop Sci. 2019;59:2642–2651. doi: 10.2135/cropsci2018.08.0518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu H, Li H, Hao C, et al. TaDA1, a conserved negative regulator of kernel size, has an additive effect with TaGW2 in common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Plant Biotechnol J. 2020;18:1330–1342. doi: 10.1111/pbi.13298.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen W, Kastner C, Nowara D, et al. Host-induced silencing of Fusarium culmorum genes protects wheat from infection. J Exp Bot. 2016;67:4979–4991. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erw263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao Y, Sui X, Xu L, et al. Plant-mediated RNAi of grain aphid CHS1 gene confers common wheat resistance against aphids: RNAi of grain aphid CHS1. Pest Manag Sci. 2018;74:2754–2760. doi: 10.1002/ps.5062.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panwar V, Jordan M, McCallum B, et al. Host-induced silencing of essential genes in Puccinia triticina through transgenic expression of RNAi sequences reduces severity of leaf rust infection in wheat. Plant Biotechnol J. 2018;16:1013–1023. doi: 10.1111/pbi.12845.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang J, Wang M, Li W, et al. Reducing expression of a nitrate-responsive bZIP transcription factor increases grain yield and N use in wheat. Plant Biotechnol J. 2019;17:1823–1833. doi: 10.1111/pbi.13103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang X, Zhi P, Fan Q, et al. Wheat CHD3 protein TaCHR729 regulates the cuticular wax biosynthesis required for stimulating germination of Blumeria graminis f.sp. tritici. J Exp Bot. 2019;70:701–713. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ery377.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huai B, Yang Q, Qian Y, et al. ABA-induced sugar transporter TaSTP6 promotes wheat susceptibility to stripe rust. Plant Physiol. 2019;181:1328–1343. doi: 10.1104/pp.19.00632.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hazard B, Zhang X, Colasuonno P, et al. Induced mutations in the starch branching enzyme II (SBEII) genes increase amylose and resistant starch content in durum wheat. Crop Sci. 2012;52:1754–1766. doi: 10.2135/cropsci2012.02.0126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovina R, Brunazzi A, Gasparini G, et al. Development of a TILLING resource in durum wheat for reverse- and forward-genetic analyses. Crop Pasture Sci. 2014;65:112. doi: 10.1071/CP13226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong C, Dalton-Morgan J, Vincent K, et al. A modified TILLING method for wheat breeding. Plant Genome. 2009;2:39–47. doi: 10.3835/plantgenome2008.10.0012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang H, Meng Q, Xu J, et al. Knock-down of stress inducible OsSRFP1 encoding an E3 ubiquitin ligase with transcriptional activation activity confers abiotic stress tolerance through enhancing antioxidant protection in rice. Plant Mol Biol. 2015;87:441–458. doi: 10.1007/s11103-015-0294-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo M, Wang R, Wang J, et al. ALT1, a Snf2 family chromatin remodeling ATPase, negatively regulates alkaline tolerance through enhanced defense against oxidative stress in rice. PLOS One. 2014;9:e112515. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112515.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu K, Wu B, Wang J, et al. Blocking amino acid transporter OsAAP3 improves grain yield by promoting outgrowth buds and increasing tiller number in rice. Plant Biotechnol J. 2018;16:1710–1722. doi: 10.1111/pbi.12907.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ning Y, Jantasuriyarat C, Zhao Q, et al. The SINA E3 ligase OsDIS1 negatively regulates drought response in rice. Plant Physiol. 2011;157:242–255. doi: 10.1104/pp.111.180893.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li D, Liu H, Yang Y, et al. Down-regulated expression of RACK1 gene by RNA interference enhances drought tolerance in rice. Rice Sci. 2009;16:14–20. doi: 10.1016/S1672-6308(08)60051-7.
   Google Scholar
• Ko MR, Song M-H, Kim JK, et al. RNAi-mediated suppression of three carotenoid-cleavage dioxygenase genes, OsCCD1, 4a, and 4b, increases carotenoid content in rice. J Exp Bot. 2018;69:5105–5116. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ery300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie Y, Niu B, Long Y, et al. Suppression or knockout of SaF/SaM overcomes the Sa-mediated hybrid male sterility in rice. J Integr Plant Biol. 2017;59:669–679. doi: 10.1111/jipb.12564.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marko D, El-Shershaby A, Carriero F, et al. Identification and characterization of a thermotolerant TILLING allele of heat shock binding protein 1 in tomato. Genes. 2019;10:516. doi: 10.3390/genes10070516.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gauffier C, Lebaron C, Moretti A, et al. A TILLING approach to generate broad-spectrum resistance to potyviruses in tomato is hampered by eIF4E gene redundancy. Plant J. 2016;85:717–729. doi: 10.1111/tpj.13136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzucato A, Cellini F, Bouzayen M, et al. A TILLING allele of the tomato Aux/IAA9 gene offers new insights into fruit set mechanisms and perspectives for breeding seedless tomatoes. Mol Breed. 2015;35:22. doi: 10.1007/s11032-015-0222-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knoll JE, Ramos ML, Zeng Y, et al. TILLING for allergen reduction and improvement of quality traits in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). BMC Plant Biol. 2011;11:81. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-11-81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabetta W, Alba V, Blanco A, et al. sunTILL: a TILLING resource for gene function analysis in sunflower. Plant Methods. 2011;7:20. doi: 10.1186/1746-4811-7-20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahmani-Mardas F, Troadec C, Boualem A, et al. Engineering melon plants with improved fruit shelf life using the TILLING approach. PLOS One. 2010;5:e15776. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0015776.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chawade A, Sikora P, Bräutigam M, et al. Development and characterization of an oat TILLING-population and identification of mutations in lignin and β-glucan biosynthesis genes. BMC Plant Biol. 2010;10:86. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-10-86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nekrasov V, Wang C, Win J, et al. Rapid generation of a transgene-free powdery mildew resistant tomato by genome deletion. Sci Rep. 2017;7:482. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-00578-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mao Y, Botella JR, Liu Y, et al. Gene editing in plants: progress and challenges. Natl Sci Rev. 2019;6:421–437. doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwz005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aliaga-Franco N, Zhang C, Presa S, et al. Identification of transgene-free CRISPR-edited plants of rice, tomato, and Arabidopsis by monitoring DsRED fluorescence in dry seeds. Front Plant Sci. 2019;10:1150. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.01150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu R-F, Li H, Qin R-Y, et al. Generation of inheritable and “transgene clean” targeted genome-modified rice in later generations using the CRISPR/Cas9 system. Sci Rep. 2015;5:11491. doi: 10.1038/srep11491.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung YJ, Lee HJ, Kim JH, et al. CRISPR/Cas9-targeted mutagenesis of F3′ H, DFR and LDOX, genes related to anthocyanin biosynthesis in black rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Biotechnol Rep. 2019;13:521–531. doi: 10.1007/s11816-019-00579-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Liang Z, Zong Y, et al. Efficient and transgene-free genome editing in wheat through transient expression of CRISPR/Cas9 DNA or RNA. Nat Commun. 2016;7:12617. doi: 10.1038/ncomms12617.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang Z, Chen K, Li T, et al. Efficient DNA-free genome editing of bread wheat using CRISPR/Cas9 ribonucleoprotein complexes. Nat Commun. 2017;8:14261. doi: 10.1038/ncomms14261.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandrasekaran J, Brumin M, Wolf D, et al. Development of broad virus resistance in non-transgenic cucumber using CRISPR/Cas9 technology: virus resistance in cucumber using CRISPR/Cas9. Mol Plant Pathol. 2016;17:1140–1153. doi: 10.1111/mpp.12375.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu B, Li D, Liu X, et al. Engineering non-transgenic gynoecious cucumber using an improved transformation protocol and optimized CRISPR/Cas9 system. Mol Plant. 2017;10:1575–1578. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2017.09.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malnoy M, Viola R, Jung M-H, et al. DNA-free genetically edited grapevine and apple protoplast using CRISPR/Cas9 ribonucleoproteins. Front Plant Sci. 2016;7:1904.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen R, Xu Q, Liu Y, et al. Generation of transgene-free maize male sterile lines using the CRISPR/Cas9 system. Front Plant Sci. 2018;9:1180. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Zhang X, Chen R, et al. Generation of transgene-free semidwarf maize plants by gene editing of gibberellin-oxidase20-3 using CRISPR/Cas9. Front Plant Sci. 2020;11:1048. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.01048.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta S, Kumar A, Patel R, et al. Genetically modified crop regulations: scope and opportunity using the CRISPR–Cas9 genome editing approach. Mol Biol Rep. 2021;48:4851–4863. doi: 10.1007/s11033-021-06477-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt SM, Belisle M, Frommer WB. The evolving landscape around genome editing in agriculture: many countries have exempted or move to exempt forms of genome editing from GMO regulation of crop plants. EMBO Rep. 2020;21:e50680. doi: 10.15252/embr.202050680.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobrovidova O. Russia joins in global gene-editing bonanza. Nature. 2019;569:319–320. doi: 10.1038/d41586-019-01519-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Safety Assessment of Genome Edited Plants. Office Memorandum, F. No. C-12013/3/2020-CS-III dated 30.03.2022. MoEFCC; 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Waltz E. Gene-edited CRISPR mushroom escapes US regulation. Nature. 2016;532:293–293. doi: 10.1038/nature.2016.19754.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemmon ZH, Reem NT, Dalrymple J, et al. Rapid improvement of domestication traits in an orphan crop by genome editing. Nat Plants. 2018;4:766–770. doi: 10.1038/s41477-018-0259-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zsögön A, Čermák T, Naves ER, et al. De novo domestication of wild tomato using genome editing. Nat Biotechnol. 2018;36:1211–1216. doi: 10.1038/nbt.4272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metje-Sprink J, Sprink T, Hartung F. Genome-edited plants in the field. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2020;61:1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2019.08.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar