The binding modes of cationic porphyrin-anthraquinone hybrids to DNA duplexes: in silico study

References

• AutoDockTools (Version 1.4.6 ed.). (2007). La Jolla, CA: The Scripps Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Berendsen, H. J. C., Postma, J. P. M., van Gunsteren, W. F., DiNola, A., & Haak, J. R. (1984). Molecular dynamics with coupling to an external bath. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 81, 3684–3690.10.1063/1.448118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brovarets, O. O., Yurenko, Y. P., Dubey, I. Y., & Hovorun, D. M. (2012). Can DNA-binding proteins of replisome tautomerize nucleotide bases? Ab initio model study. Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics, 29, 1101–1109.10.1080/07391102.2011.672624
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brovarets, O. O., Yurenko, Y. P., & Hovorun, D. M. (2013). Intermolecular CH···O/N H-bonds in the biologically important pairs of natural nucleobases: A thorough quantum-chemical study. Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics.. Advance online publicationdoi:10.1080/07391102. 2013, 799439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Case, D. A., Darden, T. A., Cheatham, T. E., Simmerling, C. L., Wang, J., Duke, R. E., … Kollman, P. A. (2006). AMBER 9. San Francisco, CA: University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Darden, T., York, D., & Pedersen, L. (1993). Particle mesh Ewald: An N⋅log(N) method for Ewald sums in large systems. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 98, 10089–10092.10.1063/1.464397
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiel, R. J. (1989). Porphyrin—Nucleic acid interactions: A review. Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics, 6, 1259–1274.10.1080/07391102.1989.10506549
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodsell, D. S., Morris, G. M., & Olson, A. J. (1996). Automated docking of flexible ligands: Applications of autodock. Journal of Molecular Recognition, 9, 1–5.10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1352
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guliaev, A. B., & Leontis, N. B. (1999). Cationic 5,10,15,20-tetrakis(N-methylpyridinium-4-yl)porphyrin fully intercalates at 5′ -CG-3′ steps of duplex DNA in solution. Biochemistry, 38, 15425–15437.10.1021/bi9913808
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holt, P. A., Chaires, J. B., & Trent, J. O. (2008). Molecular docking of intercalators and groove-binders to nucleic acids using AutoDock and Surflex. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 48, 1602–1615.10.1021/ci800063v
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou, J.-Q., Chen, S.-B., Tan, J.-H., Ou, T.-M., Luo, H.-B., Li, D., … Huang, Z.-S. (2010). New Insights into the structures of ligand−quadruplex complexes from molecular dynamics simulations. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 114, 15301–15310.10.1021/jp106683n
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphrey, W., Dalke, A., & Schulten, K. (1996). VMD: Visual molecular dynamics. Journal of Molecular Graphics, 14, 33–38.10.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishikawa, Y., Yamashita, A., & Uno, T. (2001). Efficient photocleavage of DNA by cationic porphyrin-acridine hybrids with the effective length of diamino alkyl linkage. Chemical & Pharmaceutical Bulletin, 49, 287–293.10.1248/cpb.49.287
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jia, T., Jiang, Z.-X., Wang, K., & Li, Z.-Y. (2006). Binding and photocleavage of cationic porphyrin–phenylpiperazine hybrids to DNA. Biophysical Chemistry, 119, 295–302.10.1016/j.bpc.2005.09.025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, M.-Y., Gleason-Guzman, M., Izbicka, E., Nishioka, D., & Hurley, L. H. (2003). The different biological effects of telomestatin and TMPyP4 can be attributed to their selectivity for interaction with intramolecular or intermolecular G-Quadruplex structures. Cancer Research, 63, 3247–3256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kollman, P. A., Massova, I., Reyes, C., Kuhn, B., Huo, S., Chong, L., … Cheatham, T. E. (2000). Calculating structures and free energies of complex molecules:  Combining molecular mechanics and continuum models. Accounts of Chemical Research, 33, 889–897.10.1021/ar000033j
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, D., Shekar, K. P. C., Mishra, B., Kurihara, R., Ogura, M., & Ito, T. (2013). Cationic porphyrin-quinoxaline conjugate as a photochemically triggered novel cytotoxic agent. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters, 23, 3221–3224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, H., Fedorova, O. S., Trumble, W. R., Fletcher, T. R., & Czuchajowski, L. (1997). Site-specific photomodification of DNA by porphyrin−oligonucleotide conjugates synthesized via a solid phase H-phosphonate approach. Bioconjugate Chemistry, 8, 49–56.10.1021/bc960074t
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maraval, A., Franco, S., Vialas, C., Pratviel, G., Blasco, M. A., & Meunier, B. (2003). Porphyrin-aminoquinoline conjugates as telomerase inhibitors. Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry, 1, 921–927.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez, C. R., & Iverson, B. L. (2012). Rethinking the term “pi-stacking”. Chemical Science, 3, 2191–2201.10.1039/c2sc20045g
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, G. M., Goodsell, D. S., Halliday, R. S., Huey, R., Hart, W. E., Belew, R. K., & Olson, A. J. (1998). Automated docking using a Lamarckian genetic algorithm and an empirical binding free energy function. Journal of Computational Chemistry, 19, 1639–1662.10.1002/(ISSN)1096-987X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orosz, Á., Mező, G., Herényi, L., Habdas, J., Majer, Z., Myśliwa-Kurdziel, B., … Csík, G. (2013). Binding of new cationic porphyrin–tetrapeptide conjugates to nucleoprotein complexes. Biophysical Chemistry, 177–178, 14–23.10.1016/j.bpc.2013.03.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pasternack, R. F., Gibbs, E. J., & Villafranca, J. J. (1983). Interactions of porphyrins with nucleic acids. Biochemistry, 22, 2406–2414.10.1021/bi00279a016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponomareva, A. G., Yurenko, Y. P., Zhurakivsky, R. O., van Mourik, T., & Hovorun, D. M. (2013). Structural and energetic properties of the potential HIV-1 reverse transcriptase inhibitors d4A and d4G: A comprehensive theoretical investigation. Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/07391102. 2013, 789401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryckaert, J.-P., Ciccotti, G., & Berendsen, H. J. C. (1977). Numerical integration of the cartesian equations of motion of a system with constraints: Molecular dynamics of n-alkanes. Journal of Computational Physics, 23, 327–341.10.1016/0021-9991(77)90098-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sari, M. A., Battioni, J. P., Dupre, D., Mansuy, D., & Le Pecq, J. B. (1990). Interaction of cationic porphyrins with DNA: Importance of the number and position of the charges and minimum structural requirements for intercalation. Biochemistry, 29, 4205–4215.10.1021/bi00469a025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Špačková, N., Cheatham, T. E., III, Ryjáček, F., Lankaš, F., van Meervelt, L., Hobza, P., & Šponer, J. (2003). Molecular dynamics simulations and thermodynamics analysis of DNA−drug complexes. Minor groove binding between 4′,6-Diamidino-2-phenylindole and DNA duplexes in solution. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 125, 1759–1769.10.1021/ja025660d
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tjahjono, D. H., Akutsu, T., Yoshioka, N., & Inoue, H. (1999). Cationic porphyrins bearing diazolium rings: Synthesis and their interaction with calf thymus DNA. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects, 1472, 333–343.10.1016/S0304-4165(99)00139-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tjahjono, D. H., Kartasasmita, R. E., Nawawi, A., Mima, S., Akutsu, T., Yoshioka, N., & Inoue, H. (2006). Binding of tetrakis(pyrazoliumyl)porphyrin and its copper(II) and zinc(II) complexes to poly(dG-dC)2 and poly(dA-dT)2. JBIC Journal of Biological Inorganic Chemistry, 11, 527–538.10.1007/s00775-006-0105-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vedachalam, S., Choi, B.-H., Pasunooti, K. K., Ching, K. M., Lee, K., Yoon, H. S., & Liu, X.-W. (2011). Glycosylated porphyrin derivatives and their photodynamic activity in cancer cells. MedChemComm, 2, 371–377.10.1039/c0md00175a
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veverková, L., Záruba, K., Koukolová, J., & Král, V. (2010). Oxoanion binding: A change of selectivity for porphyrin–alkaloid conjugates as a result of substitution pattern. New Journal of Chemistry, 34, 117–122.10.1039/b9nj00387h
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, K., Zhang, Z., Wu, L., & Li, Z.-Y. (2007). Synthesis, and DNA-binding and DNA-photocleavage properties of multiply charged porphyrins. Chemistry & Biodiversity, 4, 514–522.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, S., Li, Z., Ren, L., Chen, B., Liang, F., Zhou, X., … Cao, X. (2006). Dicationic pyridium porphyrins appending different peripheral substituents: Synthesis and studies for their interactions with DNA. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry, 14, 2956–2965.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamamoto, T., Tjahjono, D. H., Yoshioka, N., & Inoue, H. (2003). Interaction of dicationic bis(imidazoliumyl)porphyrinatometals with DNA. Bulletin of the Chemical Society of Japan, 76, 1947–1955.10.1246/bcsj.76.1947
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, L., Tan, C.-H., Hsieh, M.-J., Wang, J., Duan, Y., Cieplak, P., … Luo, R. (2006). New-generation Amber united-atom force field. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 110, 13166–13176.10.1021/jp060163v
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, P., Xu, L.-C., Huang, J.-W., Zheng, K.-C., Liu, J., Yu, H.-C., & Ji, L.-N. (2008). DNA binding and photocleavage properties of a novel cationic porphyrin-anthraquinone hybrid. Biophysical Chemistry, 134, 72–83.10.1016/j.bpc.2008.01.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar