Using molecular dynamics for the refinement of atomistic models of GPCRs by homology modeling

References

• Archer, E., Maigret, B., Escrieut, C., Pradayrol, L., & Fourmy, D. (2003). Rhodopsin crystal: New template yielding realistic models of G-protein-coupled receptors? Trends in Pharmacological Sciences, 24, 36–40. doi:10.1016/S0165-6147(02)00009-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bissantz, C., Logean, A., & Rognan, D. (2004). High-throughput modeling of human G-protein coupled receptors: Amino acid sequence alignment, three-dimensional model building, and receptor library screening. Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences, 44, 1162–1176. doi:10.1021/ci034181a
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blüml, K., Mutschler, E., & Wess, J. (1994). Functional role in ligand binding and receptor activation of an asparagine residue present in the sixth transmembrane domain of all muscarinic acetylcholine receptors. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 269, 18870–18876.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlsson, J., Coleman, R. G., Setola, V., Irwin, J. J., Fan, H., Schlessinger, A., … Shoichet, B. K. (2011). Ligand discovery from a dopamine D3 receptor homology model and crystal structure. Nature Chemical Biology, 7, 769–778. doi:10.1038/nchembio.662
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavasotto, C. N., & Palomba, D. (2015). Expanding the horizons of G protein-coupled receptor structure-based ligand discovery and optimization using homology models. Chemical Communications, 51, 13576–13594. doi:10.1039/c5cc05050b
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cordomí, A., Edholm, O., & Perez, J. J. (2007). Effect of different treatments of long-range interactions and sampling conditions in molecular dynamic simulations of rhodopsin embedded in a dipalmitoyl phosphatidylcholine bilayer. Journal of Computational Chemistry, 28, 1017–1030. doi:10.1002/jcc.20579
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costanzi, S., Skorski, M., Deplano, A., Habermehl, B., Mendoza, M., Wang, K., … Gao, J. (2016). Homology modeling of a class A GPCR in the inactive conformation: A quantitative analysis of the correlation between model/templatesequence identity and model accuracy. Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modeling, 70, 140–152. doi:10.1016/j.jmgm.2016.10.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutolo, P., Basdevant, N., Bernadat, G., Bachelerie, F., & Ha-Duong, T. (2017). Interaction of chemokine receptor CXCR4 in monomeric and dimeric state with its endogenous ligand CXCL12: Coarse-grained simulations identify differences. Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics, 35, 399–412. doi:10.1080/07391102.2016.1145142
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Essmann, U., Perera, L., Berkowitz, M. L., Darden, T., Lee, H., & Pedersen, L. G. (1995). A smooth particle mesh Ewald method. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 103, 8577–8593. doi:10.1063/1.470117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evers, A., Gohlke, H., & Klebe, G. (2003). Ligand-supported homology modelling of protein binding-sites using knowledge-based potentials. Journal of Molecular Biology, 334, 327–345. doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2003.09.032
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fanelli, F., & De Benedetti, P. G. (2011). Update 1 of: Computational modeling approaches to structure function analysis of G protein-coupled receptors. Chemical Reviews, 111, PR438–PR535. doi: 10.1021/cr100437t
   Google Scholar
• Friesner, R. A., Banks, J. L., Murphy, R. B., Halgren, T. A., Klicic, J. J., Mainz, D. T., … Shenkin, P. S. (2004). Glide: A new approach for rapid accurate docking and scoring. 1. Method and assessment of docking accuracy. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 47, 1739–1749. doi:10.1021/jm0306430
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gandhimathi, A., & Sowdhamini, R. (2016). Molecular modelling of human 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor (5-HT2A) and virtual screening studies towards the identification of agonist and antagonist molecules. Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics, 34, 952–970. doi:10.1080/07391102.2015.1062802
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldfeld, D. A., Zhu, K., Beuming, T., & Friesner, R. A. (2013). Loop prediction for a GPCR homology model: Algorithms and results. Proteins, 81, 214–228. doi:10.1002/prot.24178
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossfield, A. (2011). Recent progress in the study of G protein-coupled receptors with molecular dynamics computer simulations. Biochimica Biophyica. Acta, 1808, 1868–1878. doi:10.1016/j.bbamem.2011.03.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haga, K., Kruse, A. C., Asada, H., Yurugi-Kobayashi, T., Shiroishi, M., Zhang, C., … Kobayashi, T. (2012). Structure of the human M2 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor bound to an antagonist. Nature, 482, 547–551. doi:10.1038/nature10753
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, S. J., Hamdan, F. F., Kim, S. K., Jacobson, K. A., Bloodworth, L. M., Li, B., & Wess, J. (2005). Identification of an agonist-induced conformational change occurring adjacent to the ligand-binding pocket of the M3 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor. Journal Biological Chemistry, 280, 34849–34858. doi:10.1074/jbc.M506711200
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorgensen, W. L., Chandrasekhar, J., Madura, J. D., Impey, R. W., & Klein, M. L. (1983). Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water. Journal of Chemical Physics, 79, 926–935. doi:10.1063/1.445869
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaminski, G., Friesner, R. A., Tirado-Rives, J., & Jorgensen, W. L. (2001). Evaluation and reparametrization of the OPLS-AA force field for proteins via comparison with accurate quantum chemical calculations on peptides. Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 105, 6474–6487. doi:10.1021/jp003919d
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katritch, V., Cherezov, V., & Stevens, R. C. (2013). Structure-function of the G protein–coupled receptor superfamily. Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology, 53, 531–556. doi:10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-032112-135923
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobilka, B. (2013). The structural basis of G-protein-coupled receptor signaling (Nobel Lecture). Angewante Chemie International Edition, 52, 6380–6388. doi:10.1002/anie.201302116
   Google Scholar
• Kow, R. L., & Nathanson, N. M. (2012). Muscarinic receptors become crystal clear. Nature, 482, 480–481. doi:10.1038/482480a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruse, A. C., Hu, J., Pan, A. C., Arlow, D. H., Rosenbaum, D. M., Rosemond, E., … Kobilka, B. K. (2012). Structure and dynamics of the M3 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor. Nature, 482, 552–556. doi:10.1038/nature10867
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kufareva, I., Katritch, V., Participants of GPCR Dock 2013, Stevens, R. C., & Abagyan, R. (2014). Advances in GPCR modeling evaluated by the GPCR dock 2013 assessment: Meeting new challenges. Structure, 22, 1120–1139. doi:10.1016/j.str.2014.06.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labute, P. (2008). Protonate3D: Assignment of ionization states and hydrogen coordinates to macromolecular structures. Proteins, 75, 187–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latek, D., Pasznik, P., Carlomagno, T., & Filipek, S. (2013). Towards improved quality of GPCR models by usage of multiple templates and profile-profile comparison. PLoS ONE, 8, e56742. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0056742
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, S., Gether, U., & Kobilka, B. K. (1996). Ligand stabilization of the β2 adrenergic receptor: Effect of DTT on receptor conformation monitored by circular dichroism and fluorescence spectroscopy. Biochemistry, 35, 14445–14451. doi:10.1021/bi961619+
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupala, C. S., Rasaeifar, B., Gomez-Gutierrez, P., & Perez, J. J. (2015). Effect of template selection on the construction of atomistic models of GPCRs by homology modeling. Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics, 33, 127–128. doi:10.1080/07391102.2015.1032830
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez-Archundia, M., Cordomi, A., Garriga, P., & Perez, J. J. (2012). Molecular modeling of the M3 acetylcholine muscarinic receptor and its binding site. Journal of Biomedicine and Biotechnology, 1–12. Article ID 789741. doi: 10.1155/2012/789741
   Google Scholar
• Miyamoto, S., & Kollman, P. A. (1992). Settle: An analytical version of the SHAKE and RATTLE algorithm for rigid water models. Journal of Computational Chemistry, 13, 952–962. doi:10.1002/jcc.540130805
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mobarec, J. C., Sanchez, R., & Filizola, M. (2009). Modern homology modeling of G-protein coupled receptors: Which structural template to use? Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 52, 5207–5216. doi:10.1021/jm9005252
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nayeem, A., Sitkoff, D., & Krystek, S., Jr. (2006). A comparative study of available software for high-accuracy homology modeling: From sequence alignments to structural models. Protein Science, 15, 808–824. doi:10.1110/ps.051892906
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nowroozi, A., & Shahlaei, M. (2017). A coupling of homology modeling with multiple molecular dynamics simulation for identifying representative conformation of GPCR structures: A case study on human bombesin receptor subtype-3. Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics, 35, 250–272. doi:10.1080/07391102.2016.1140593
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostermeier, C., & Michel, H. (1997). Crystallization of membrane proteins. Current Opinion on Structural Biolology, 7, 697–701. doi:10.1016/S0959-440X(97)80080-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Overington, J. P., Al-Lazikani, B., & Hopkins, A. L. (2006). How many drug targets are there? Nature Reviews on Drug Discovery, 5, 993–996. doi:10.1038/nrd2199
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palczewski, K., Kumasaka, T., Hori, T., Behnke, C. A., Motoshima, H., Fox, B. A., & Miyano, M. (2000). Crystal structure of rhodopsin: A G protein-coupled receptor. Science, 289, 739–745. doi:10.1126/science.289.5480.739
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajagopal, S., Rajagopal, K., & Lefkowitz, R. J. (2010). Teaching old receptors new tricks: Biasing seven-transmembrane receptors. Nature Reviews on Drug Discovery, 9, 373–386. doi:10.1038/nrd3024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rataj, K., Witek, J., Mordalski, S., Kosciolek, T., & Bojarski, A. J. (2014). Impact of template choice on homology model efficiency in virtual screening. Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Modeling, 54, 1661–1668. doi:10.1021/ci500001f
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez, D., Ranganathan, A., & Carlsson, J. (2014). Strategies for improved modeling of GPCR-drug complexes: Blind predictions of serotonin receptors bound to ergotamine. Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Modeling, 54, 2004–2021. doi:10.1021/ci5002235
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadiq, S. K., Guixà-González, R., Dainese, E., Pastor, M., De Fabritiis, G., & Selent, J. (2013). Molecular modeling and simulation of membrane lipid-mediated effects on GPCRs. Current Medicinal Chemistry, 20, 22–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salon, J. A., Lodowski, D. T., & Palczewski, K. (2011). The significance of G protein-coupled receptor crystallography for drug discovery. Pharmacology Reviews, 63, 901–937. doi:10.1124/pr.110.003350
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiöth, H. B., & Fredriksson, R. (2005). The GRAFS classification system of G-protein coupled receptors in comparative perspective. General and Comparative Endocrinology, 142, 94–101. doi:10.1016/j.ygcen.2004.12.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shimamura, T., Shiroishi, M., Weyand, S., Tsujimoto, H., Winter, G., Katritch, V., … Iwata, S. (2011). Structure of the human histamine H1 receptor complex with doxepin. Nature, 475, 65–70. doi:10.1038/nature10236
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shonberg, J., Kling, R. C., Gmeiner, P., & Löber, S. (2015). GPCR crystal structures: Medicinal chemistry in the pocket. Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry, 23, 3880–3906. doi:10.1016/j.bmc.2014.12.034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simms, J., Hall, N. E., Lam, P. H. C., Miller, L. J., Christopoulos, A., Abagyan, R., & Sexton, P. M. (2009). Homology modeling of GPCRs. Methods in Molecular Biology, 552, 97–113. doi:10.1007/978-1-60327-317-6_7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Spyrakis, F., & Cavasotto, C. N. (2015). Open challenges in structure-based virtual screening: Receptor modeling, target flexibility consideration and active site water molecules description. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, 583, 105–119. doi:10.1016/j.abb.2015.08.002
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, T., McLean, K. C., McRobb, F. M., Manallack, D. T., Chalmers, D. K., & Yuriev, E. (2014). Homology modeling of human muscarinic acetylcholine receptors. Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Modeling, 54, 243–253. doi:10.1021/ci400502u
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Der Spoel, D., Lindahl, E., Hess, B., Groenhof, G., Mark, A. E., & Berendsen, H. J. (2005). GROMACS: Fast, flexible, and free. Journal of Computational Chemistry, 26, 1701–1718. doi:10.1002/jcc.20291
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatakrishnan, A. J., Deupi, X., Lebon, G., Tate, C. G., Schertler, G. F., & Babu, M. M. (2013). Molecular signatures of G-protein-coupled receptors. Nature, 494, 186–194. doi:10.1038/nature11896
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worth, C. L., Kleinau, G., & Krause, G. (2009). Comparative sequence and structural analyses of G-protein-coupled receptor crystal structures and implications for molecular models. PLoS ONE, 4, e7011. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0007011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, M., & Li, M. (2012). Revisiting the homology modeling of G-protein coupled receptors: β1-Adrenoceptor as an example. Molecular BioSystems, 8, 1686–1693. doi:10.1039/c2mb05491d
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar