Minority migrant men’s attitudes toward female genital mutilation: Developing strategies to engage men

References

• Ahmed, S., Hussain, M., & Vournas, G. (2001). Consultation with “hidden” and hard-to-reach groups: Methods, techniques and research practice. Paper presented at Consulting Hard to Reach Groups: Laria Seminar, Aston Business School, Birmingham. Retrieved from http://www.laria.gov.uk/content/features/68/feat1.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Akinsulure-Smith, A., & Chu, T. (2017). Knowledge and attitudes toward female genital cutting among West African male immigrants in New York City. Health Care for Women International, 38(5), 463–477. doi:10.1080/07399332.2017.1294593
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alcaraz, R. M., González, S. J., & Solano, R. C. (2014). Attitudes towards female genital mutilation: An integrative review. International Nursing Review, 61, 25–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg, R. C., & Denison, E. (2013). Tradition in transition: Factors perpetuating and hindering the continuance of female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C) summarized in a systematic review. Health Care for Women International, 34(10), 837–895. doi:10.1080/07399332.2012.721417
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyatzis, R. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Carlson, J., Casey, E., Edleson, J. L., Tolman, R. M., Walsh, T. B., & Kimball, E. (2015). Strategies to engage men and boys in violence prevention: A global organizational perspective. Violence Against Women, 21(11), 1406–1425. doi:10.1177/1077801215594888
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connell, R. (1995). Masculinities. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Culley, L., Hudson, N., & Rapport, F. (2007). Using focus groups with minority ethnic communities: Researching infertility in British South Asian communities. Qualitative Health Research, 17(1), 102–112. doi:10.1177/1049732306296506
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EIGE (European Institute for Gender Equality). (2014). Tender on collaborative study on the estimation of the number of women and girls at risk of FGM in selected EU member states (EIGE/2014/OPER/04). Vilnius, Lithuania: European Institute for Gender Equality.
   Google Scholar
• Elam, G., & Fenton, K. (2003). Researching sensitive issues and ethnicity: Lessons from sexual health. Ethnicity & Health, 8(1), 15–27. doi:10.1080/13557850303557
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EP (European Parliament). (2012). P7_TA(2012)0261. European Parliament resolution of 14 June 2012 on ending female genital mutilation (2012/2684(RSP)). Resolution on Ending Female Genital Mutilation, Retrieved from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+TA+P7-TA-2012-0261+0+DOC+PDF+V0//EN.
   Google Scholar
• Farquhar, C. (1999). Are focus groups suitable for “sensitive” topics? In R. Barbour & J. Kitzinger (Eds.), Developing focus group research: Politics, theory, and practice (pp. 47–63). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Flood, M. (2011). Involving men in efforts to end violence against women. Men and Masculinities, 14(3), 358–377. doi:10.1177/1097184X10363995
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flood, M. (2015). Work with men to end violence against women: A critical stocktake. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 17(2), 159–176. doi:10.1080/13691058.2015.1070435
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forslind, E. (2015). Flickor och kvinnor i Sverige som kan ha varit utsatta för könsstympning. En uppskattning av antalet. [Girls and women in Sweden who may have been subjected to genital mutilation. An estimation of the prevalence rate.] Stockholm, Sweden: Socialstyrelsen. Retrieved from http://www.socialstyrelsen.se/Lists/Artikelkatalog/Attachments/19677/2015-1-32.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Gebremariam, K., Assefa, D., & Weldegebreal, F. (2016). Prevalence and associated factors of female genital cutting among young adult females in Jigjiga district, eastern Ethiopia: A cross-sectional mixed study. International Journal of Women’s Health, 8, 357–365.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gele, A. A., Kumar, B., Hjelde, K. H., & Sundby, J. (2012). Attitudes toward female circumcision among Somali immigrants in Oslo: A qualitative study. International Journal of Women’s Health, 4(7), 7–17.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gele, A. A., Johansen, E. B., & Sundby, J. (2012). When female circumcision comes to the West: Attitudes toward the practice among Somali immigrants in Oslo. BMC Public Health, 12(1), 697. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-12-697
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hearn, J. (1998). The violences of men. How men talk about and how agencies respond to men’s violence to women. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hearn, J. (2012). A multi-faceted power analysis of men’s violence to known women: From hegemonic masculinity to the hegemony of men. The Sociological Review, 60(4), 589–610. doi:10.1111/j.1467-954X.2012.02125.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ismail, N. (1999). Urinary leakage and other complications of female genital mutilation (FGM) among Somali girls in Sweden (Master of Science Program Thesis). Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Isman, E., Ekéus, C., & Berggren, V. (2013). Perceptions and experiences of female genital mutilation after immigration to Sweden: An explorative study. Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare, 4(3), 93–98. doi:10.1016/j.srhc.2013.04.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson, T. (2004). Faderskapets omvandlingar. Frånvarons socialpsykologi. [The transformations of fatherhood. A social psychology of absence.] Gothenburg, Sweden: Daidalos.
   Google Scholar
• Johnsdotter, S., Moussa, K., Carlbom, A., Aregai, R., & Essén, B. (2009). “Never my daughters”: A qualitative study regarding attitude change toward female genital cutting among Ethiopian and Eritrean families in Sweden. Health Care for Women International, 30(1-2), 114–133. doi:10.1080/07399330802523741
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitzinger, J. (1994). The methodology of focus groups: The importance of interaction between research participants. Sociology of Health and Illness, 16(1), 103–121. doi:10.1111/1467-9566.ep11347023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitzinger, J., & Farquhar, C. (1999). The analytical potential of “sensitive moments” in focus group discussions. In R. Barbour & J. Kitzinger (Eds.), Developing focus group research: Politics, theory, and practice (pp. 156–172). London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Leininger, M. (1985). Ethnography and ethnonursing: Models and modes of qualitative data analysis. In M. Leininger (Ed.), Qualitative research methods in nursing (p. 33). New York, NY: Grune and Stratton.
   Google Scholar
• Marcusán, A. K., Singla, L. R., Secka, D. M., Utzet, M., & Le Charles, M. A. (2016). Female genital mutilation/cutting: Changes and trends in knowledge, attitudes, and practices among health care professionals in The Gambia. International Journal of Women’s Health, 8, 103–117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mergaert, L., Arnaut, C., Exterkate, M., O’Brien, S., Strid, S., & Leye, E. (2015). Estimation of girls at risk of female genital mutilation in the European Union. Vilnius, Lithuania: European Institute for Gender Equality.
   Google Scholar
• Murnen, S. K., Wright, C., & Kaluzny, G. (2002). If “boys will be boys”, then girls will be victims? A meta-analytic review of the research that relates masculine ideology to sexual aggression. Sex Roles, 46(11/12), 359–375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pease, B. (2008). Engaging men in men’s violence prevention: Exploring the tensions, dilemmas and possibilities. Australian Domestic and Family Violence Clearinghouse. Sydney, NSW: University of New South Wales.
   Google Scholar
• Pease, B. (2017). Men as allies in preventing men’s violence against women: Principles and practices for promoting accountability. Sydney, NSW: White Ribbon Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Schreier, M. (2012). Qualitative content analysis in practice. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, S., & Bogdan, R. (1984). Introduction to qualitative research methods: The search for meanings. New York, NY: Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• UN. (1989). Convention on the rights of the child. Adopted and opened for signature, ratification and accession by General Assembly resolution 44/25 of 20 November 1989. Retrieved from http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/ProfessionalInterest/crc.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• UN. (2016). United Nations children’s fund, Female genital mutilation/cutting: A global concern. New York, NY: UN.
   Google Scholar
• UNFPA. (2017). Frequently asked questions. Retrieved from http://www.unfpa.org/resources/female-genital-mutilation-fgm-frequently-asked-questions#banned_by_law.
   Google Scholar
• UNICEF. (2013). Female genital mutilation/cutting: A statistical overview and exploration of the dynamics of change. Retrieved from http://data.unicef.org/corecode/uploads/document6/uploaded_pdfs/corecode/FGM_Report_Summary_English__23August_hi-res_94.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• UNICEF. (2016). Female genital mutilation/cutting: A global concern. Retrieved from: https://www.unicef.org/media/files/FGMC_2016_brochure_final_UNICEF_SPREAD.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Vangen, S., Stoltenberg, C., Johansen, R. E., Sundby, J., & Stray-Pedersen, B. (2002). Perinatal complications among ethnic Somalis in Norway. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 81(4), 317–322. doi:10.1034/j.1600-0412.2002.810407.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varol, N., Turkmani, S., Black, K., Hall, J., & Dawson, A. (2015). The role of men in abandonment of female genital mutilation: A systematic review. BMC Public Health, 8(15), 1034–1050. doi:10.1186/s12889-015-2373-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO. (2016). Health risks of female genital mutilation. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/entity/reproductivehealth/topics/FGM/health_consequences_FGM/en/index.html.
   Google Scholar
• WHO, OHCHR, UNAIDS, UNDP, UNECA, UNESCO, UNFPA, UNHCR, UNICEF & UNIFEM. (2008). Eliminating female genital mutilation: An interagency statement. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO.
   Google Scholar