Patient experience of implant loss after immediate breast reconstruction: An interpretative phenomenological analysis

References

• Avis, N. E., Smith, K. W., & McKinlay, J. B. (1989). Accuracy of perceptions of heart attack risk: What influences perceptions and can they be changed?American Journal of Public Health, 79(12), 1608–1612. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.79.12.1608
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biganzoli, L., Marotti, L., Hart, C. D., Cataliotti, L., Cutuli, B., Kühn, T., Mansel, R. E., Ponti, A., Poortmans, P., Regitnig, P., van der Hage, J. A., Wengström, Y., & Rosselli Del Turco, M. (2017). Quality indicators in breast cancer care: An update from the EUSOMA working group. European Journal of Cancer (Oxford, England : 1990), 86, 59–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2017.08.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, T., Causarano, N., Platt, J., Jones, J. M., Hofer, S. O. P., O’Neill, A. C., & Zhong, T. (2018). Restoring wholeness: Women’s embodied experiences in considering post-mastectomy delayed breast reconstruction. Cogent Social Sciences, 4(1), 1479478. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2018.1479478
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colakoglu, S., Khansa, I., Curtis, M. S., Yueh, J. H., Ogunleye, A., Haewyon, C., Tobias, A. M., & Lee, B. T. (2011). Impact of complications on patient satisfaction in breast reconstruction. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 127(4), 1428–1436. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e318208d0d4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cromvoets, S. (2003). Reconstructing the self: Breast cancer and the post-surgical body. Health Sociology Review, 12(2), 137–145. https://doi.org/10.5172/hesr.12.2.137
   Google Scholar
• Ehlers, N. (2012). Tekhne of reconstruction: Breast cancer, norms, and fleshy rearrangements. Social Semiotics, 22(1), 121–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2012.640059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fallbjork, U., Frejeus, E., & Rasmussen, B. H. (2012). A preliminary study into women’s experiences of undergoing reconstructive surgery after breast cancer. European Journal of Oncology Nursing, 16(3), 220–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejon.2011.05.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gopie, J. P., Timman, R., Hilhorst, M. T., Hofer, S. O., Mureau, M. A., & Tibben, A. (2013). The short-term psychological impact of complications after breast reconstruction. Psycho-oncology, 22(2), 290–298. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.2089
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallberg, H., Lewin, R., Elander, A., & Hansson, E. (2018). TIGR® matrix surgical mesh—A two-year follow-up study and complication analysis in 65 immediate breast reconstructions . Journal of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery, 52(4), 253–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/2000656X.2018.1478841
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallberg, H., Lewin, R., Søfteland, M. B., Widmark-Jensen, E., Kogler, U., Lundberg, J., & Hansson, E. (2019). Complications, long-term outcome and quality of life following Surgisis® and muscle-covered implants in immediate breast reconstruction: A case-control study with a 6-year follow-up. European Journal of Plastic Surgery, 42(1), 33–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-018-1444-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson-King, D., & Henderson-King, E. (2005). Acceptance of cosmetic surgery: Scale development and validation. Body Image, 2(2), 137–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2005.03.003
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Henry, L. R., Morris, L. L., Downs, R., & Schwarz, R. E. (2017). The impact of immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy on time to first adjuvant treatment in women with breast cancer in a community setting. American Journal of Surgery, 213(3), 534–538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.11.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, K. S., Gillis, J., Williams, J. G., LeBlanc, M., Bezuhly, M., & Chorney, J. M. (2017). Women’s experiences with flap failure after autologous breast reconstruction: A qualitative analysis. Annals of Plastic Surgery, 78(5), 521–525. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000000910
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, O., & White, K. (2008). Exploring women’s experiences of TRAM flap breast reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer. Oncology Nursing Forum, 35(1), 81–88. https://doi.org/10.1188/08.ONF.81-88
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho, A. L., Klassen, A. F., Cano, S., Scott, A. M., & Pusic, A. L. (2013). Optimizing patient-centered care in breast reconstruction: The importance of preoperative information and patient-physician communication. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 132(2), 212e–220e. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e31829586fa
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. H. (1991). The endowment effect, loss aversion, and status-quo bias. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(1), 193–206. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.5.1.193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasper, A. S. (1995). The social construction of breast loss and reconstruction. Women’s Health, 1(3), 197–219. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9373380
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, A. J. (2001). The extent of patients’ understanding of the risk of treatments. Quality in Health Care, 10, i14–i18. doi:10.1136/qhc.0100014.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mahoney, B., Walklet, E., Bradley, E., Thrush, S., Skillman, J., Whisker, L., Barnes, N., Holcombe, C., & Potter, S. (2020). Experiences of implant loss after immediate implant-based breast reconstruction: Qualitative study. BJS Open, 4(3), 380–390. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs5.50275
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piot-Ziegler, C., Sassi, M. L., Raffoul, W., & Delaloye, J. F. (2010). Mastectomy, body deconstruction, and impact on identity: A qualitative study. British Journal of Health Psychology, 15(Pt 3), 479–510. https://doi.org/10.1348/135910709X472174
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Potter, S., Thomson, H. J., Greenwood, R. J., Hopwood, P., & Winters, Z. E. (2009). Health-related quality of life assessment after breast reconstruction. The British Journal of Surgery, 96(6), 613–620. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.6605
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandell, K. (2001). [Att (åter)skapa "det normala": Bröstoperationer och brännskador i plastikkirurgisk praktik] (Re)making "the normal": Breast surgery and burn injuries in the practice of plastic surgery (Vol. PhD). Lund Linköping unversity.
   Google Scholar
• Santana, M. J., Manalili, K., Jolley, R. J., Zelinsky, S., Quan, H., & Lu, M. (2018). How to practice person-centred care: A conceptual framework. Health Expectations, 21(2), 429–440. https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.12640
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, J., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Theory, method and research. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Spector, D. J., Mayer, D. K., Knafl, K., & Pusic, A. (2011). Women’s recovery experiences after breast cancer reconstruction surgery. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology, 29(6), 664–676. https://doi.org/10.1080/07347332.2011.615384
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timman, R., Gopie, J. P., Brinkman, J. N., Kleijne, A., Seynaeve, C., Menke-Pluymers, M. B. E., Ter Kuile, M. M., Tibben, A., & Mureau, M. A. M. (2017). Most women recover from psychological distress after postoperative complications following implant or DIEP flap breast reconstruction: A prospective long-term follow-up study. PLoS One, 12(3), e0174455. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174455
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinstein, N. D. (1989). Optimistic biases about personal risks. Science (New York, N.Y.), 246(4935), 1232–1233. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.2686031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, S., & Kitzinger, C. (2000). Thinking differently about thinking positive: A discursive approach to cancer patients’ talk. Social Science & Medicine, 50(6), 797–811. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00337-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar