455
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

The privacy protection scale in obstetrics and gynecology: A scale development study

ORCID Icon &
Pages 642-656 | Received 12 Jan 2022, Accepted 19 May 2022, Published online: 17 Jun 2022

References

  • Aktaş, S., & Pasinlioğlu, T. (2016). The effect of empathic communication skills of midwives on labor and post labor period. Journal of Anatolia Nursing and Health Sciences, 16, 38–45.
  • Akyüz, E., & Erdemir, F. (2013). Surgical patients’ and nurses’ opinions and expectations about privacy in care. Nursing Ethics, 20(6), 660–671.
  • Alpar, R. (2014). Applied statistics and validity reliability with examples from health and educational sciences (Vol. 3). Detail Publishing.
  • Arslan, E., & Demir, H. (2017). Attıtudes of health workers related to patıent confıdentıalıty: A qualıtatıve research. Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal University Journal of Graduate School of Social Sciences, 4(17), 191–220.
  • Bekmezci, H., & Özkan, H. (2015). The importance of privacy in midwifery practices. Journal of Health Science and Profession, 2(1), 113–124.
  • Bekmezci, H., Ozkan, H., & Koç, O. (2016). Evaluating the Privacy perceived by mothers in the labor. Turkiye Klinikleri Journal of Health Sciences, 1(2), 104–110. https://doi.org/10.5336/healthsci.2016-50736
  • Bonilla-Escobar, F. J., Ortega-Lenis, D., Rojas-Mirquez, J. C., & Ortega-Loubon, C. (2016). Panamanian women’s experience of vaginal examination in labour: A questionnaire validation. Midwifery, 36(1), 8–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2016.02.022
  • Cakmur, H. (2012). Measurement-reliability-validity in research. TAF Preventive Medicine Bulletin, 11(3), 339–344. https://doi.org/10.5455/pmb.1-1322486024
  • Carpenter, S. (2018). Ten steps in scale development and reporting: A guide for researchers. Communication Methods and Measures, 12(1), 25–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2017.1396583
  • DeVellis, R. (2016). Scale development theory and applications. SAGE Publications.
  • Diler, R. (2014). Privacy training and its importance. Gazıosmanpasa University Journal of Faculty of Theology, 2(1), 70–98.
  • Erbil, N., Şenkul, A., Sağlam, Y., & Ergül, N. (2008). Determination of attitudes with gynecologic examination and anxiety of Turkish women before gynecologic examination. International Journal of Human Sciences, 5(1), 1–13.
  • Eser, D. (Ed.). (2017). Factor analysis. In T. Totan (Ed.), Scale development theories and applications (Vol. 3, p. 59). Nobel Academic Publishing.
  • Esin, N. (2014). Data collection methods and tools & reliability and validity of data collection tools. Nobel Medical Bookstore.
  • Güneş, G., & Karaçam, Z. (2018). Vaginal examination experiences of women in postpartum period: A qualitative research. Dokuz Eylül University Faculty of Nursing Electronic Journal, 11(2), 87–95.
  • Karagöz, Y. (2014). SPSS applied biostatistics (Vol. 1). Nobel Publishing.
  • Karakoç, F., & Dönmez, L. (2014). Basic principles of scale development. Medical Education World, 40(1), 39–49.
  • Lai, C. Y., & Levy, V. (2002). Hong Kong Chinese women’s experiences of vaginal examinations in labour. Midwifery, 18(4), 296–303.
  • Larkin, P., Begley, C. M., & Devane, D. (2009). Women’s experiences of labour and birth: An evolutionary concept analysis. Midwifery, 25(2), e49–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2007.07.010
  • Leino- Kilpi, H., Valimaki, M., Dassen, T., Gasull, M., Lemonidou, C., Scott, A., Arndt, M., & Kaljonen, A. (2002). Maintaining privacy on post-natal wards: A study in five European countries. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 37(2), 145–154. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2002.02070.x
  • Lipovetsky, S. (2017). Factor analysis by limited scales: Which factors to analyze? Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 16(1), 233–245. https://doi.org/10.22237/jmasm/1493597520
  • LoBiondo-Wood, G., & Haber, J. (2010). Nursing research: Methods and critical appraisal for evidence-based practice. Mosby&Elsevier.
  • Louangrath, P. I., & Sutanapong, C. (2018). Validity and reliability of survey scales. International Journal of Research & Methodology in Social Science, 4(3), 99–114.
  • Oztürk, M., Alan, S., & Kadıoğlu, S. (2019). Ethical issues in the delivery room: A field study. Cukurova Medical Journal, 44(1), 183–194.
  • Polit, D., & Beck, C. (2010). Essentials of nursing research: Methods, appraisal and utilization (Vol. 7). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
  • Sjöblom, L., Idvall, E., & Lindgren, H. (2014). Nordic Home birth Research Group. Creating a safe haven women’s experiences of the midwife’s professional skills during planned home birth in four Nordic countries. Birth, 41(1), 100–107. https://doi.org/10.1111/birt.12092
  • Tabachnick, B., & Fidel, L. (2014). Using multivariate statistics (Vol. 6 ed.). Pearson Education Limited.
  • Taşkın, Ç., & Akat, Ö. (2010). Structural equation modeling in research methods. Ekin Publishing.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.