Does local resistance impact the transnational normative environment? The case of female genital mutilation (FGM)

References

• Acharya, A. (2004). How ıdeas spread: Whose norms matter? Norm localization and ınstitutional change in Asian regionalism. International Organization, 58(2), 239–275. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818304582024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acharya, A. (2013). The R2P and norm diffusion: Towards a framework of norm circulation. Global Responsibility to Protect, 5(4), 466–479. https://doi.org/10.1163/1875984X-00504006
   Google Scholar
• Acharya, A. (2018). Constructing global order: Agency and change in world politics. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Adel, H. (2018). Egypt struggles to end female genital mutilation. Reuters, 8 March. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-womens-day-egypt/egypt-struggles-to-end-female-genital-mutilation-idUSKCN1GK1ZL
   Google Scholar
• Adhikari, B., & Salahi, L. (2010). Female genital cutting: Affecting young girls in America. ABC News, 8 June. https://www.abcnews.go.com
   Google Scholar
• African Union. (2003). Protocol to the African charter on human and peoples’ rights on the rights of women in Africa. https://au.int/en/treaties/protocol-african-charter-human-and-peoples-rights-rights-women-africa
   Google Scholar
• Akinsulure-Smith, A. M., & Chu, T. (2017). Knowledge and attitudes toward female genital cutting among West African male immigrants in New York City. Health Care for Women İnternational, 38(5), 463–477. https://doi.org/10.1080/07399332.2017.1294593
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alamri, Y. (2016). The patient’s perspective: Female genital mutilation in Arab and Islamic history. Health Care for Women İnternational, 37(12), 1259–1260. https://doi.org/10.1080/07399332.2016.1256401
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arora, K. S., & Jacobs, A. J. (2016). Female genital alteration: A compromise solution. Journal of Medical Ethics, 42(3), 148–154. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2014-102375
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baer, M., & Brysk, A. (2009). New rights for private wrongs: Female genital mutilation and global framing dialogues. İn C. Bob (Ed.), The ınternational struggle for new human rights. University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, H. S. (1963). Outsiders: Studies in the sociology of deviance. The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bennet, A., & Checkel, J. T. (2015). Process tracing: From philosophical roots to best practices. In A. Bennet & J. T. Checkel (eds.) Process tracing: From metaphor to analytic tool. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berg, R., & Denison, C. E. (2013). A tradition in transition: Factors perpetuating and hindering the continuance of female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C) summarized in a systematic review. Health Care for Women İnternational, 34(10), 837–859. https://doi.org/10.1080/07399332.2012.721417
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishai, D., Bonnenfant, Y.-T., Darwish, M., Adam, T., Bathija, H., Johansen, E., & Huntington, D. (2010). Estimating the obstetric costs of female genital mutilation in six African countries. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 88(4), 281–288. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.09.064808
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloomfield, A. (2016). Norm antipreneurs and theorising resistance to normative change. Review of International Studies, 42(2), 310–333. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026021051500025X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boddy, J. (2007a). Gender crusades: The female circumcision controversy in cultural perspective. İn Y. Hernlund & B. Shell-Duncan (Eds.), Transcultural bodies: Female genital cutting in global context. Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boddy, J. (2007b). Civilizing women: British crusades in colonial Sudan. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boyle, E. H., McMorris, B. J., & Gómez, M. (2002). Local conformity to ınternational norms: The case of female genital cutting. International Sociology, 17(1), 5–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580902017001001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyle, E. H., & Carbone-López, K. (2006). Movement frames and African women’s explanations for opposing female genital cutting. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 47(6), 435–465. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020715206070266
   Google Scholar
• Brady, M. (1999). Female genital mutilation: Complications and risk of HIV transmission. AIDS Patient Care and STDs, 13(12), 709–716. https://doi.org/10.1089/apc.1999.13.709
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braddy, C. M., & Files, J. A. (2007). Female genital mutilation: Cultural awareness and clinical considerations. Journal of Midwifery & Women’s Health, 52(2), 158–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmwh.2006.11.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Checkel, J. T. (1997). International norms and domestic politics: Bridging the rationalist–constructivist divide. European Journal of International Relations, 3(4), 473–495. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066197003004003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chorev, N. (2012). Changing global norms through reactive diffusion: The case of ıntellectual property protection of AIDS drugs. American Sociological Review, 77(5), 831–853. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122412457156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cloward, K. (2015). Elites, exit options, and social barriers to norm change: The complex case of female genital mutilation. Studies in Comparative International Development, 50(3), 378–407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12116-015-9175-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cloward, K. (2016). When norms collide local responses to activism against female genital mutilation and early marriage. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Committee on Bioethics. (2010). Policy statement: Ritual genital cutting of female minors pediatrics. The Official Journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics, 125, 1088–1093.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cortell, A. P., & Davis, J. W. (1996). How do ınternational ınstitutions matter? The domestic ımpact of ınternational rules and norms. International Studies Quarterly, 40(4), 451–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/2600887
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cortell, A. P., & Davis, J. W. (2000). Understanding the domestic ımpact of ınternational norms: A research agenda. International Studies Review, 2(1), 65–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/1521-9488.00184
   Google Scholar
• Deitelhoff, N. (2020). What’s in a name? Contestation and backlash against international norms and institutions. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 22(4), 715–727. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369148120945906
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deitelhoff, N., & Zimmermann, L. (2020). Things we lost in the fire: How different types of contestation affect the robustness of international norms. International Studies Review, 22(1), 52–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorkenoo, E. (1994). Cutting the rose—Female genital mutilation: The practice and its prevention. Minority Rights Group.
   Google Scholar
• Dorkenoo, E. (2007). A statistical study to estimate the prevalence of female genital cutting in England and Wales. Forward: Safeguarding rights and dignity. www.forwarduk.org.uk.
   Google Scholar
• Ebetürk, I. (2021). Global diffusion of laws: The case of minimum age of marriage legislation, 1965–2015. European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology, 8(3), 294–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/23254823.2021.1887749
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, C. (2012). Stop telling us how to behave: Socialization or ınfantilization? International Studies Perspectives, 13(2), 135–145. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-3585.2012.00458.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FIGO Committee for the Study of Ethical Aspects of Human Reproduction and Women’s Health. (2010). Ethical issues in obstetrics and gynecology. FIGO.
   Google Scholar
• Finnemore, M., & Sikkink, K. (1998). International norm dynamics and political change. International Organization, 52(4), 887–917. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081898550789
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flockhart, T. (2006). Complex socialization: A framework for the study of state socialization. European Journal of International Relations, 12(1), 89–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066106061331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gele, A. A., Bø, B. P., & Sundby, J. (2013). Attitudes toward female circumcision among men and women in two districts in Somalia: Is ıt time to rethink our eradication strategy in Somalia? Obstetrics and Gynecology İnternational, 2013, 312734. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/312734
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goldberg, H., Stupp, P., Okoroh, E., Besera, G., Goodman, D., & Danel, I. (2016). Female genital mutilation/cutting in the United States: Updated estimates of women and girls at risk, 2012. Public Health Reports (Washington, D.C.: 1974), 131(2), 340–347. https://doi.org/10.1177/003335491613100218
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutterman, E., & Lohaus, M. (2018). What is the “anti-corruption” norm in global politics? Norm robustness and contestation in the transnational governance of corruption. In I. Kubbe & A. Engelbert (Eds.), Corruption and norms. Why ınformal rules matter (pp. 241–268). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hertel, S. (2017). Re-framing human rights advocacy: The rise of economic rights. İn S. Hopgood, J. Snyder, & L. Vinjamuri (Eds.), Human rights futures. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haas, P. M. (1992). Epistemic communities and ınternational policy coordination. International Organization, 46(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300001442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernlund, Y., & Shell-Duncan, B. (2007). Transcultural positions: Negotiating rights and culture. İn Y. Hernlund & B. Shell-Duncan (Eds.), Transcultural bodies: Female genital cutting in global context. Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnstone, I. (2007). The secretary-general as norm entrepreneur. In S. Chesterman (Ed.), Secretary or general? The un secretary-general in world politics. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keck, M. E., & Sikkink, K. (1998). Activists beyond borders: Advocacy networks ın ınternational politics. Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Klotz, A. (1995). Norms in international relations: The struggle against apartheid. Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koski, A., & Heymann, J. (2017). Thirty-year trends in the prevalence and severity of female genital mutilation: A comparison of 22 countries. BMJ Global Health, 2(4), bmjgh-2017-000467–8. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000467
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kun, K. E. (1997). Female genital mutilation: The potential for increased risk of HIV infection. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics: The Official Organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 59(2), 153–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0020-7292(97)00201-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leye, E., Van Eekert, N., Shamu, S., Esho, T., & Barrett, H. (2019). Debating medicalization of female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C): Learning from(policy) experiences across countries. Reproductive Health, 16(1), 158. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-019-0817-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levitt, P., & Merry, S. (2009). Vernacularization on the ground: Local uses of international women’s rights in Peru, China, India and the United States. Global Networks, 9(4), 441–461. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0374.2009.00263.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackie, G. (1996). Ending foot binding and ınfibulation: A convention account. American Sociological Review, 61(6), 999–1017. https://doi.org/10.2307/2096305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacReady, N. (2010). APP retracts statement on controversial procedure. The Lancet, 376(9734), 15. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61042-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madsen, D. H. (2018). Localising the global: Resolution 1325 as a tool for promoting women’s rights women’s. Studies International Forum, 66, 70–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2017.11.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathews, B. (2011). Female genital mutilation: Australian law, policy and practical challenges for doctor. The Medical Journal of Australia, 194(3), 139–141. https://doi.org/10.5694/j.1326-5377.2011.tb04197.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1998). The ınstitutional dynamics of ınternational political orders. International Organization, 52(4), 943–969. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081898550699
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nabaneh, S., & Muula, A. S. (2019). Female genital mutilation/cutting in Africa: A complex legal and ethical landscape. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 145(2), 253–257. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.12792
   Google Scholar
• Nadelmann, E. A. (1990). Global prohibition regimes: The evolution of norms in ınternational society. International Organization, 44(4), 479–526. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300035384
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyangweso, M. (2014). Female genital cutting in ındustrialized countries: Mutilation or cultural tradition? Praeger. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300035384
   Google Scholar
• Ogunsiji, O. (2015). Female Genital Mutilation (FGM): Australian midwives’ knowledge and attitudes. Health Care for Women İnternational, 36(11), 1179–1193. https://doi.org/10.1080/07399332.2014.992521
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osezua, O. C., & Edobor, A. E. (2021). Female genital mutilation/cutting in Africa: Patriarchy and policy. In O. Yacob-Haliso & T. Falola (Eds.), The palgrave handbook of African women’s studies. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Paxton, P., Hughes, M. M., & Green, J. L. (2006). The ınternational women’s movement and women’s political representation, 1893–2003. American Sociological Review, 71(6), 898–920. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240607100602
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearce, A. J., & Bewley, S. (2014). Medicalization of female genital mutilation. Harm reduction or unethical? Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Reproductive Medicine, 24(1), 29–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ogrm.2013.11.003
   Google Scholar
• Restoy, E., & Elbe, S. (2021). Drilling down in norm diffusion: Norm domestication, “glocal” power, and community-based organizations in global health. Global Studies Quarterly, 1(3), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1093/isagsq/ksab025
   Google Scholar
• Risse, T., & Sikkink, K. (1999). The socialization of international human rights norms into domestic practices: İntroduction. İn T. Risse, S. Ropp, & K. Sikkink (eds.) Power of human rights: International norms and domestic change. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz, I. J., Martínez, P. A., & Belchí, C. A. (2017). Dismantling the man-made myths upholding female genital mutilation. Health Care for Women International, 38(5), 478–491.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shell-Duncan, B. (2001). The medicalization of female “circumcision”: Harm reduction or promotion of a dangerous practice? Social Science & Medicine (1982), 52(7), 1013–1028. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00208-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shweder, R. A. (2000). What about ‘female genital mutilation’? And why understanding culture matters in the first place.” Daedalus, 129(4), 209–232.
   Google Scholar
• Skaine, R. (2005). Female genital mutilation: legal, cultural, and medical issues. Mcfarland.
   Google Scholar
• Thrasher, J. (2018). Evaluating bad norms. Social Philosophy and Policy, 35(1), 196–216. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265052518000055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turone, F. (2004). Controversy surrounds proposed Italian alternative to female genital mutilation. BMJ (Clinical Research ed.), 328(7434), 247. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.328.7434.247-b
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Un, M. B. (2019). Contesting global gender equality norms: The case of Turkey. Review of International Studies, 45(5), 828–847.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations. (2006). The impact of harmful traditional practices on the girl child. United Nations. https://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/egm/elim-disc-viol-girlchild/ExpertPapers/EP.4%20%20%20Raswork.pdf
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. (2008). Harmful traditional practices affecting the health of women and children. Fact Sheet 23. https://www.un.org/ruleoflaw/blog/document/harmful-traditional-practices-affecting-the-health-of-women-and-children-fact-sheet-no-23/
   Google Scholar
• UNICEF. (2008). Changing a harmful social convention: Female genital mutilation/cutting. https://www.unicef-irc.org/publications/pdf/fgm_eng.pdf
   Google Scholar
• UNICEF. (2013). Female genital mutilation/cutting: A statistical overview and exploration of the dynamics of change. https://data.unicef.org/resources/fgm-statistical-overview-and-dynamics-of-change/
   Google Scholar
• UNICEF. (2016). Unicef’s data work on Fgm/C. https://www.unicef.org/media/files/FGMC_2016_brochure_final_UNICEF_SPREAD.pdf
   Google Scholar
• UNICEF. (2020a). Female genital mutilation in the middle East and North Africa. https://www.unicef.org/mena/media/7096/file/FGM%20MENA%20Draft%202_6_High%20Res.pdf.pdf
   Google Scholar
• UNICEF. (2020b). Approximately 1 in 4 survivors of female genital mutilation were cut by a health care provider. 5 February. https://www.unicef.org/press-releases/approximately-1-4-fgm-survivors-were-cut-health-care-provider
   Google Scholar
• UNICEF. (2021). The decline of female genital mutilation in Ethiopia and Kenya. https://www.unicef.org/esa/media/8891/file/The-Decline-of-FGM-Ethiopia-Kenya-2021.pdf
   Google Scholar
• UNFPA. (2018). Brief on the medicalization of female genital mutilation. https://www.unfpa.org/resources/brief-medicalization-female-genital-mutilation
   Google Scholar
• Valderrama, J. (2002). Female genital mutilation: Why are we so radical? The Lancet, 359(9305), 529–530. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07655-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wadesango, N., Rembe, S., & Chabaya, O. (2011). Violation of women’s rights by harmful traditional practices. The Anthropologist, 13(2), 121–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/09720073.2011.11891187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldner, D. (2012). Process tracing and causal mechanisms. İn H. Kincaid (Ed.), Handbook of the philosophy of social science. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• WHO. (1982). Female circumcision: Statement of WHO position and activities. World Health Organization.
   Google Scholar
• WHO. (1997). Female genital mutilation: A joint WHO/UNICEF/UNFPA statement. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/41903
   Google Scholar
• WHO. (2008a). Eliminating female genital mutilation: An interagency statement - OHCHR, UNAIDS, UNDP, UNECA, UNESCO, UNFPA, UNHCR, UNICEF, UNIFEM, WHO. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/43839
   Google Scholar
• WHO. (2008b). Female genital mutilation Sixty-First World Health Assembly, 21 May. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/23532/A61_R16-en.pdf?sequence=1
   Google Scholar
• WHO. (2010). Global strategy to stop health-care providers from performing female genital mutilation. World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/fgm/rhr_10_9/en
   Google Scholar
• WHO. (n.d.). Female genital mutilation (FGM). https://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/topics/fgm/prevalence/en/
   Google Scholar
• WMA. (2017). WMA statement on female genital mutilation. https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-statement-on-female-genital-mutilation/
   Google Scholar
• Wiener, A. (2018). Contestation and constitution of norms in global ınternational relations. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Windle, S., Kamanu, C., & Anyanwu, E. (2009). Harmful traditional practices and women’s health: Female genital mutilation. İn John Ehiri (Ed.), Maternal and child health: Global challenges, programs, and policies. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Winterbottom, A., Koomen, J., & Burford, G. (2009). Female genital cutting: Cultural rights and rites of defiance in Northern Tanzania. African Studies Review, 52(1), 47–71. https://doi.org/10.1353/arw.0.0142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolff, J., & Zimmermann, L. (2016). Between banyans and battle scenes: Liberal norms, contestation, and the limits of critique. Review of International Studies, 42(3), 513–534. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210515000534
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wunderlich, C. (2014). A “rogue” gone norm entrepreneurial? Iran within the nuclear nonproliferation regime. İn W. Wolfgang, W. Werner, & M. Onderco (Eds.), Deviance in ınternational relations ‘rogue states’ and ınternational security. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Yüksel, G., Stetter, S., & Walter, J. (2016). Localizing modern female subjectivities: World society and the spatial negotiation of gender norms in Turkey. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, 41(2), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/0304375416689691
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar