1,653
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Commercial surrogacy: Landscapes of empowerment or oppression explored through integrative review

ORCID Icon, &
Received 16 Aug 2023, Accepted 05 Jan 2024, Published online: 22 Jan 2024

References

  • Achmad, C. (2022). Key considerations: Children’s rights & surrogacy. UNICEF, Retrieved 18 May from https://www.unicef.org/media/115331/file
  • Arvidsson, A., Johnsdotter, S., & Essén, B. (2015). Views of Swedish commissioning parents relating to the exploitation discourse in using transnational surrogacy. PLoS One, 10(5), e0126518. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126518
  • Attawet, J. (2021). Mapping transnational commercial surrogacy arrangements in South and Southeast Asia. The Medico-Legal Journal, 89(2), 128–132. https://doi.org/10.1177/0025817220985099
  • Attawet, J. (2022). The nexus between self-perception and behavioural responses of gestational surrogates’ risk experiences. Human Fertility (Cambridge, England), 25(3), 562–568. https://doi.org/10.1080/14647273.2020.1870171
  • Attawet, J., Wang, A., & Sullivan, E. (2022). Womb for work’ experiences of Thai women and gestational surrogacy practice in Thailand. Human Fertility (Cambridge, England), 25(5), 912–923. https://doi.org/10.1080/14647273.2021.1937716
  • Bartky, S. L. (2015). Femininity and domination: Studies in the phenomenology of oppression. Routledge.
  • Birenbaum-Carmeli, D., & Montebruno, P. (2019). Incidence of surrogacy in the USA and Israel and implications on women’s health: A quantitative comparison. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 36(12), 2459–2469. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-019-01612-9
  • Brandão, P., & Garrido, N. (2023). Commercial surrogacy: An overview. Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetricia: Revista da Federacao Brasileira Das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia, 44(12), 1141–1158. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1759774
  • Davis, E. (2012). The rise of gestational surrogacy and the pressing need for international regulation. Minn. J. Int’l L, 21, 120.
  • Ellenbogen, A., Feldberg, D., & Lokshin, V. (2021). Surrogacy: A worldwide demand. Implementation and ethical considerations. Gynecol Reprod Endocrinol Metab, 2, 66–73.
  • Fayemi, A. K., & Chimakonam, A. E. (2022). Global justice in the context of transnational surrogacy: An African bioethical perspective. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 43(2-3), 75–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-022-09581-4
  • Fellmeth, A. X., & Horwitz, M. (2021). Guide to Latin in international law. Oxford University Press.
  • Gezinski, L. B., Karandikar, S., Huber, S., & Levitt, A. (2018). Commissioning parents’ experiences with international surrogacy: A qualitative study. Health & Social Work, 43(3), 175–184. https://doi.org/10.1093/hsw/hly018
  • Ghosh, S. (2015). Wombs in labour: Transnational commercial surrogacy in India. Global Public Health, 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2015.1076023
  • Gunnarsson Payne, J., Korolczuk, E., & Mezinska, S. (2020). Surrogacy relationships: A critical interpretative review. Upsala Journal of Medical Sciences, 125(2), 183–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/03009734.2020.1725935
  • Guzman, V. R. (2016). A comparison of surrogacy laws of the US to other countries: Should there be a uniform federal law permitting commercial surrogacy. International In-House Counsel Journal, 38, 619.
  • Hibino, Y. (2022). Ongoing commercialization of gestational surrogacy due to globalization of the reproductive market before and after the pandemic. Asian Bioethics Review, 14(4), 349–361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41649-022-00215-4
  • Hopia, H., Latvala, E., & Liimatainen, L. (2016). Reviewing the methodology of an integrative review. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 30(4), 662–669. https://doi.org/10.1111/scs.12327
  • JBI. (2014). Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewers’ Manual. The Joanna Briggs Institute.
  • Joanna Briggs Institute. (2014). Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewers’ Manual (2014 ed.). The Joanna Briggs Institute.
  • Kindregan, C. P., & White, D. (2013). International fertility tourism: The potential for stateless children in cross-border commercial surrogacy arrangements. Suffolk Transnat’l L. Rev, 36, 527.
  • Millbank, J. (2015). Rethinking “commercial” surrogacy in Australia. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 12(3), 477–490. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-014-9557-9
  • Mitra, S., & Schicktanz, S. (2016). Failed surrogate conceptions: Social and ethical aspects of preconception disruptions during commercial surrogacy in India. Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine, 11(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13010-016-0040-6
  • Nadimpally, S., & Venkatachalam, D. (2016). Marketing reproduction: Assisted reproductive technologies and commercial surrogacy in India. Indian Journal of Gender Studies, 23(1), 87–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/0971521515612865
  • Nelson, E. (2013). Global trade and assisted reproductive technologies: Regulatory challenges in international surrogacy. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics: A Journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 41(1), 240–253. https://doi.org/10.1111/jlme.12016
  • Petpailin, P. (2022). Thailand is revising surrogacy laws to allow foreigners to hire Thais to bear children. Thaiger, Retrieved 1 June from https://thethaiger.com/news/national/thailand-is-revising-surrogacy-laws-to-allow-foreigners-to-hire-thais-to-bear-children
  • Piersanti, V., Consalvo, F., Signore, F., Del Rio, A., & Zaami, S. (2021). Surrogacy and “procreative tourism”. What does the future hold from the ethical and legal perspectives? Medicina, 57(1), 47. https://www.mdpi.com/1648-9144/57/1/47 https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina57010047
  • Riggs, D. W. (2016). Narratives of choice amongst white Australians who undertake surrogacy arrangements in India. The Journal of Medical Humanities, 37(3), 313–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10912-015-9330-z
  • Rotabi, K. S., Mapp, S., Cheney, K., Fong, R., & McRoy, R. (2017). Regulating commercial global surrogacy: The best interests of the child. Journal of Human Rights and Social Work, 2(3), 64–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41134-017-0034-3
  • Rozée, V., Unisa, S., & de La Rochebrochard, E. (2019). Sociodemographic characteristics of 96 Indian surrogates: Are they disadvantaged compared with the general population? PLoS One, 14(3), e0214097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214097
  • Rudrappa, S. (2018). Why is India’s ban on commercial surrogacy bad for women. NCJ Int’l L, 43, 70.
  • Saravanan, S. (2013). An ethnomethodological approach to examine exploitation in the context of capacity, trust and experience of commercial surrogacy in India. Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine, 8(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1747-5341-8-10
  • Sifris, A. (2015). The family courts and parentage of children conceived through overseas commercial surrogacy arrangements: A child-centred approach. Journal of Law and Medicine, 23(2), 396–412.
  • Sifris, R. (2015). Commercial surrogacy and the human right to autonomy.
  • Smietana, M., Rudrappa, S., & Weis, C. (2021). Moral frameworks of commercial surrogacy within the US, India and Russia. Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters, 29(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/26410397.2021.1878674
  • Stuhmcke, A. (2015). The regulation of commercial surrogacy: The wrong answers to the wrong questions. J Law Med, 23(02), 333–345.
  • Stuvøy, I. (2018). Accounting for the money-made parenthood of transnational surrogacy. Anthropology & Medicine, 25(3), 280–295. https://doi.org/10.1080/13648470.2017.1392100
  • Tanderup, M., Reddy, S., Patel, T., & Nielsen, B. B. (2015a). Informed consent in medical decision-making in commercial gestational surrogacy: A mixed methods study in New Delhi, India. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 94(5), 465–472. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.12576
  • Tanderup, M., Reddy, S., Patel, T., & Nielsen, B. B. (2015b). Reproductive ethics in commercial surrogacy: Decision-making in IVF clinics in New Delhi, India. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 12(3), 491–501. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-015-9642-8
  • Torres, G., Shapiro, A., & Mackey, T. K. (2019). A review of surrogate motherhood regulation in South American countries: Pointing to a need for an international legal framework. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 19(1), 46. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2182-1
  • Tremellen, K., & Everingham, S. (2016). For love or money? Australian attitudes to financially compensated (commercial) surrogacy. The Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 56(6), 558–563. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajo.12559
  • Vora, K. (2017). Transnational reproduction: Race, kinship and commercial surrogacy in India. In Daisy Deomampo (Vol. 2016; pp. 288) NYU Press.In: Wiley Online Library.
  • Watson, C. (2016). Womb rentals and baby-selling: Does surrogacy undermine the human dignity and rights of the surrogate mother and child? The New Bioethics: A Multidisciplinary Journal of Biotechnology and the Body, 22(3), 212–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/20502877.2016.1238582
  • Whittemore, R., & Knafl, K. (2005). The integrative review: Updated methodology. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 52(5), 546–553. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03621.x
  • Wilkinson, S. (2016). Exploitation in international paid surrogacy arrangements. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 33(2), 125–145. https://doi.org/10.1111/japp.12138
  • Zannettino, L., Lines, L., Grant, J., & de Lacey, S. L. (2019). Untangling the Threads: Stakeholder perspectives of the legal and ethical issues involved in preparing Australian consumers for commercial surrogacy overseas. Journal of Law and Medicine, 27(1), 94–107. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=shib&db=mnh&AN=31682344&site=ehost-live&custid=s3684040