“What’s the deal with these strange substances in our food?” The representation of food additives by Belgian consumer organizations, 1960–1995

Works Cited

• Bearth, Angela, et al. “The Consumer’s Perception of Artificial Food Additives: Influences on Acceptance, Risk and Benefit Perceptions.” Food Quality and Preference, vol. 38, 2014, pp. 14–23. doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.05.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, Ulrich, et al. Reflexive Modernization: Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order. Stanford University Press, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, Ulrich. Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. Sage, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Bruhn, Christine M. “Consumer Attitudes Towards Food Additives.” Food Additives, edited by A. Larry Branen, et al., Marcel Dekker, Inc., 2005, pp. 101–7.
   Google Scholar
• Buchler, Sandra, et al. “Food Risks, Old and New Demographic Characteristics and Perceptions of Food Additives, Regulation and Contamination in Australia.” Journal of Sociology, vol. 46, no. 4, 2010, pp. 353–74. doi: 10.1177/1440783310384449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobbold, Carolyn. “Responding to the Colourful Use of Chemicals in Nineteenth-Century Food.” Actes D’història de la Ciència i de la Tècnica, vol. 10, 2017, pp. 38–44.
   Google Scholar
• Coupain, Nicolas. Distributie in België. Dertig jaar omwentelingen. Lannoo Campus, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Degreef, Filip. “Convenience Foods, as Portrayed by a Consumer Organisation. Test-Aankoop/Test-Achats (1960–1995).” Appetite, vol. 94, 2015, pp. 26–33. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2015.03.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Degreef, Filip. “New Food Technologies and Trust in Food (1960-1995).” Tasting Cultures: Thoughts for Food, edited by José Pires, Inter-Disciplinary Press, 2015, pp. 53–69.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, Mary. Risk Acceptability According to the Social Sciences. Sage, 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, Mary, and Aaron Wildavsky. Risk and Culture: An Essay on the Selection of Technological and Environmental Dangers. University of California Press, 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Elvbakken, Kari Tove, et al. “Regulation for Safe Food: A Comparison of Five European Countries.” Scandinavian Political Studies, vol. 31, no. 2, 2008, pp. 125–48. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9477.2008.00199.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eurobarometer. European Consumers. Their Interests, Aspirations and Knowledge on Consumer Affairs. Commission of the European Communities, 1976, pp. 1–97.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, Greg, et al. “Consumers’ Ratings of the Natural and Unnatural Qualities of Foods.” Appetite, vol. 54, no. 3, 2010, pp. 557–63. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2010.02.014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• French, Michael, and Jim Phillips. Cheated not Poisoned? Food Regulation in the United Kingdom, 1875-1938. Manchester University Press, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Gratzer, Walter. Terrors of the Table: The Curious History of Nutrition. Oxford University Press, pp. 211–12.
   Google Scholar
• Green, Judith, et al. “Short Cuts to Safety: Risk and Rules of Thumb in Accounts of Food Choice.” Health, Risk & Society, vol. 5, no. 1, 2003, pp. 33–52. doi: 10.1080/1369857031000065998.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guillem-Llobat, Ximo. “Losing the Global View in the Establishment of New Limits to Food Quality. The Regulation of the Food Market in Spain (1880-1936).” Food & History, vol. 6, no. 1, 2008, pp. 215–46. doi: 10.1484/J.FOOD.1.100452.
   Google Scholar
• Haen, Dirk. “The Paradox of E-Numbers: Ethical, Aesthetic, and Cultural Concerns in the Dutch Discourse on Additives.” Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, vol. 27, no. 1, 2014, pp. 27–42. doi: 10.1007/s10806-013-9440-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilton, Matthew. Prosperity for All: Consumer Activism in an Era of Globalization. Cornell University Press, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Hisano, Ai. “The Rise of Synthetic Colors in the American Food Industry, 1870-1940.” Business History Review, vol. 90, no. 03, 2016, pp. 483–504. doi: 10.1017/S0007680516001021.
   Google Scholar
• Jas, Nathalie. “Adapting to Reality. The Emergence of an International Expertise on Food Additives and Contaminants in the 1950’s and Early 1960’s.” Toxicants, Health and Regulation since 1945, edited by Soraya Boudia and Nathalie Jas, Routlegde, 2013, pp. 47–69.
   Google Scholar
• Kajanne, Anna, and Anna-Maija Pirttilä-Backman. “Toward an Understanding of Laypeople’s Notions about Additives in Food: Clear-Cut Viewpoints about Additives Decrease with Education.” Appetite, vol. 27, no. 3, 1996, pp. 207–22. doi: 10.1006/appe.1996.0047.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleijnen, Mirella, et al. “An Exploration of Consumer Resistance to Innovation and Its Antecedents.” Journal of Economic Psychology, vol. 30, no. 3, 2009, pp. 344–57. doi: 10.1016/j.joep.2009.02.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levenstein, Harvey. Fear of Food: A History of Why We Worry about What We Eat. University of Chicago Press, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Lofstedt, Ragnar E. “Risk Communication and the FSA: The Food Colourings Case.” Journal of Risk Research, vol. 12, no.5, 2009, pp. 537–57. doi: 10.1080/13669870903132695.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehta, Michael D. “From Biotechnology to Nanotechnology. What Can We Learn from Earlier Technologies?” Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, vol. 24, no. 1, 2004, pp. 34–9. doi: 10.1177/0270467604263119.
   Google Scholar
• Nath, Giselle. “Reproducing or Contesting the Global? Belgian Organized Consumerism and Its International Entanglements (1957-1995).” International Review of Social History, vol. 60, no. 3, 2015, pp. 413–48. doi: 10.1017/S0020859015000498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nath, Giselle. Shaping Consumer Interests: Belgian Consumer Movements between Technocracy, Social Democracy and Cold War Internationalization (1957-2000). 2016. Ghent University, Unpublished Doctoral thesis, p. 50.
   Google Scholar
• Onuf, Nicholas Greenwood. Making Sense, Making Worlds. Constructivism in Social Theory and International Relations. Routlegde, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Prättälä, Ritva, et al. “Consumer Opinions and Practices Related to Food Additives in the Purchase Situation.” Journal of Consumer Studies and Home Economics, vol. 9, no. 3, 1985, pp. 237–45. doi: 10.1111/j.1470-6431.1985.tb00458.x.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsingh, Brigit Lee Naida. The History of International Food Safety Standards and the Codex Alimentarius (1955-1995). 2011. University of Toronto, Unpublished Doctoral thesis.
   Google Scholar
• Richards, Lyn. Handling Qualitative Data: A Practical Guide. Sage, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Rozin, Paul, et al. “Additivity Dominance: Additives Are More Potent and More Often Lexicalized across Languages than Are Subtractives.” Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 4, no. 6, 2009, pp. 475–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rozin, Paul, et al. “European and American Perspectives on the Meaning of Natural.” Appetite, vol. 59, no. 2, 2012, pp. 448–55. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2012.06.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saldaña, Johnny. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. Sage, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Scholliers, Peter. “Convenience Foods. What, Why, and When.” Appetite, vol. 94, 2015, pp. 2–6. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2015.02.017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholliers, Peter. “Defining Food Risks and Food Anxieties Throughout History.” Appetite, vol. 51, no. 1, 2008, pp. 3–6. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2008.02.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholliers, Peter. “Food Fraud and the Big City: Brussels’ Responses to Food Anxieties in the Nineteenth Century.” Food and the City in Europe since 1800, edited by Peter J. Atkins, Routledge, 2007, pp. 78–89.
   Google Scholar
• Scholliers, Peter. Food Culture in Belgium. Greenwood Press, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, Gareth. Transformations of Retailing in Europe after 1945. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Shim, Soon-Mi, et al. “Consumers’ Knowledge and Safety Perceptions of Food Additives: Evaluation on the Effectiveness of Transmitting Information on Preservatives.” Food Control, vol. 22, no. 7, 2011, pp. 1054–60. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2011.01.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegrist, Michael. “Factors Influencing Public Acceptance of Innovative Food Technologies and Products.” Trends in Food Science & Technology, vol. 19, no. 11, 2008, pp. 603–8. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2008.01.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegrist, Michael, et al. “Lay People’s Perception of Food Hazards: Comparing Aggregated Data and Individual Data.” Appetite, vol. 47, no. 3, 2006, pp. 324–32. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2006.05.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sirrs, Christopher. “Toxicants, Health and Regulation since 1945.” Social History of Medicine, vol. 27, no.1, 2014, pp. 177–8. doi: 10.1093/shm/hkt084.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, Hyunjin, and Norbert Schwarz. “If It’s Difficult to Pronounce, It Must Be Risky. Fluency, Familiarity, and Risk Perception.” Psychological Science, vol. 20, no. 2, 2009, pp. 135–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02267.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoff, Heiko. “Zur Kritik der Chemisierung und Technisierung der Umwelt. Risiko-Und Präventionspolitik von Lebensmittelzusatzstoffen in den 1950er Jahren.” Technikgeschichte, vol. 81, no. 3, 2014, pp. 229–50. doi: 10.5771/0040-117X-2014-3-229.
   Google Scholar
• Tarnavölgyi, Gábor. “Analysis of Consumers Attitudes towards Food Additives Using Focus Group Survey.” Agriculturae Conspectus Scientificus, vol. 68, no. 3, 2003, pp. 193–6.
   Google Scholar
• Ueland, Ø., et al. “State of the Art in Benefit-Risk Analysis: Consumer Perception.” Food and Chemical Toxicology, vol. 50, no. 1, 2012, pp. 67–76. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2011.06.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verbeke, Wim, et al. “Challenges and Prospects for Consumer Acceptance of Cultured Meat.” Journal of Integrative Agriculture, vol. 14, no. 2, 2015, pp. 285–94. doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(14)60884-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verbeke, Wim, et al. “Why Consumers Behave as They Do with Respect to Food Safety and Risk Information.” Analytica Chimica Acta, vol. 586, no. 1-2, 2007, pp. 2–7. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2006.07.065.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verbruggen, Ronald. “Food Additives in the European Union.” Food Additives, edited by A. Larry Branen, et al., Marcel Dekker Inc., 2005, pp. 108–98.
   Google Scholar
• Verriet, Jon, and Frédéric Leroy. “Yogurt’s Flexible Image During Its Rise in Popularity in Post-War Belgium.”Appetite, vol. 108, 2017, pp. 132–40. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2016.09.028.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wandel, Margareta. “Food Labelling from a Consumer Perspective.” British Food Journal, vol. 99, no. 6, 1997, pp. 212–9. doi: 10.1108/00070709710181559.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, Bee. Swindled: The Dark History of Food Fraud, from Poisoned Candy to Counterfeit Coffee. Princeton University Press, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, Linhai, et al. “Public Risk Perception of Food Additives and Food Scares. The Case in Suzhou, China.” Appetite, vol. 70, 2013, pp. 90–8. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2013.06.091.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zachmann, Karin, and Per Ostby. “Food, Technology, and Trust: An Introduction.” History and Technology, vol. 27, no.1, 2011, pp. 1–10. doi: 10.1080/07341512.2011.548970.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zinn, Jens O. “Heading into the Unknown: Everyday Strategies for Managing Risk and Uncertainty.” Health, Risk & Society vol. 10, no. 5, 2008, pp. 439–50. doi: 10.1080/13698570802380891.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar