1,632
Views
13
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Advancing Wrongful Conviction Scholarship: Toward New Conceptual Frameworks

References

  • Anderson, D. & Anderson, B. (2009). Manufacturing guilt (2nd ed.). Black Point: Fernwood.
  • Bandes, S. (2006). Loyalty to one’s convictions: The prosecutor and tunnel vision. Howard Law Journal, 49, 475–494.
  • Barrilleaux, C. & Berkman, M. (2003). Do governors matter? Budgeting rules and the politics of state policymaking. Political Research Quarterly, 56, 409–417.
  • Bedau, H. A. & Radelet, M. L. (1987). Miscarriages of justice in potentially capital cases. Stanford Law Review, 40, 21–179.
  • Bernard, T. J. & Engel, R. S. (2001). Conceptualizing criminal justice theory. Justice Quarterly, 18, 1–30.
  • Bernard, T. J., Paoline, E. A., & Pare, P. (2005). General systems theory and criminal justice. Journal of Criminal Justice, 33, 203–211.
  • Blackstone, W. (1765-1769). Commentaries on the laws of England. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Burke, A. S. (2010). Talking about prosecutors. Cardozo Law Review, 31, 2119–2137.
  • Cassell, P. G. (1999). The guilty and the “innocent”: An examination of alleged cases of wrongful conviction from false confessions. Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 22, 523–597.
  • Cassell, P. G. (2004). In defense of the death penalty. In H. A. Bedau & P. G. Cassell (Eds.), Debating the death penalty: Should America have capital punishment? The experts on both sides make their case (pp. 183–217). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Clark, S. E. (2012a). Costs and benefits of eyewitness identification reform: Psychological science and public policy. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 238–259.
  • Clark, S. E. (2012b). Eyewitness identification reform: Data, theory, and due process. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 279–283.
  • Cole, G. F. (1970). The decision to prosecute. Law & Society Review, 4, 331–344.
  • Davies, A. L. B. & Worden, A. P. (2009). State politics and the right to counsel: A comparative analysis. Law & Society Review, 43, 187–220.
  • Criminal justice theory: Explaining the nature and behavior of criminal justice Duffee D. E. Maguire E. R. Routledge New York NY 2007
  • Duru, N. J. (2004). The Central Park Five, the Scottsboro Boys, and the myth of the bestial black man. Cardozo Law Review, 25, 1315–1346.
  • Eisenstein, J., Flemming, R. B., & Nardulli, P. F. (1988). The contours of justice: Communities and their courts. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
  • Findley, K. A. (2008). Toward a new paradigm of criminal justice: How the innocence movement merges crime control and due process. Texas Tech Law Review, 41, 133–175.
  • Findley, K. A. (2011). Defining innocence. Albany Law Review, 74, 1157–1208.
  • Forst, B. (2010/2011). Managing miscarriages of justice from victimization to reintegration. Albany Law Review, 74, 1209–1275.
  • Free, M. D. & Ruesink, M. (2012). Race and justice: Wrongful convictions of African-American men. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
  • Garland, D. (1990). Punishment and modern society: A study in social theory. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Goode, E. & Ben-Yehuda, N. (1994). Moral panics: The social construction of deviance. Cambridge, MA: Wiley.
  • Gould, J. B. & Leo, R. A. (2010). One-hundred years later: Wrongful convictions after a century of research. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 100, 825–868.
  • Grometstein, R. (2008). Wrongful conviction and moral panic: National and international perspectives on organized child sexual abuse. In C. R. Huff & M. Killias (Eds.), Wrongful conviction: International perspectives on miscarriages of justice (pp. 11–32). Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
  • Gross, S. R., Jacoby, K., Matheson, D. J., Montgomery, N., & Patil, S. (2005). Exonerations in the United States 1989 through 2003. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 95, 523–553.
  • Gross, S. R. & O’Brien, B. (2008). Frequency and predictors of false conviction: Why we know so little, and new data on capital cases. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 5, 927–962.
  • Gross, S. R., & Schaffer, M. (2012). Exonerations in the United States, 1989-2012. Retrieved from National Registry of Exonerations: http://www.exonerationregistry.org
  • Grounds, A. (2004). Psychological consequences of wrongful conviction and imprisonment. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 46, 165–182.
  • Harmon, T. R. (2001). Predictors of miscarriages of justice in capital cases. Justice Quarterly, 18, 949–968.
  • Harmon, T. R. & Lofquist, W. S. (2005). Too late for luck: A comparison of post-Furman exonerations and executions of the innocent. Crime and Delinquency, 51, 498–520.
  • Huff, C. R., Rattner, A., & Sagarin, E. (1996). Convicted but innocent: Wrongful conviction and public policy. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Innocence Project (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.innocenceproject.org/
  • Innocence Project. (2009). Making up for lost time: What the wrongly convicted endure and how to provide fair compensation. Retrieved from http:///www.innocenceproject.org/docs/Innocence_Project_Compensation_Report.pdf
  • Kraska, P. B. (2006). Criminal justice theory: Toward legitimacy and an infrastructure. Justice Quarterly, 23, 167–185.
  • Kraska, P. B. & Brent, J. J. (2011). Theorizing criminal justice (2nd ed.). Long Grove, Il: Waveland Press.
  • Leo, R. A. (2005). Rethinking the study of miscarriages of justice: Developing a criminology of wrongful conviction. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 21, 201–223.
  • Levine, T. R. & McCornack, S. A. (1991). The dark side of trust: Conceptualizing and measuring types of communicative suspicion. Communication Quarterly, 39, 325–340.
  • Lofquist, W. S. (2001). Whodunit? An examination of the production of a wrongful conviction. In S. D. Westervelt & J. A. Humphrey (Eds.), Wrongly convicted: Perspectives on failed justice (pp. 174–196). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
  • Marquis, J. (2005). The myth of innocence. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 95, 501–521.
  • Masip, J., Alonso, H., Garrido, E., & Antón, C. (2005). Generalized communicative suspicion (GCS) among police officers: Accounting for the investigator bias effect. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35, 1046–1066.
  • Medwed, D. S. (2012). Prosecution complex: America’s race to convict and its impact on the innocent. New York, NY: NYU Press.
  • Meissner, C. A. & Brigham, J. C. (2001). Thirty years of investigating the own-race bias in memory for faces: A meta-analytic review. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 7, 3–35.
  • Meissner, C. A. & Kassin, S. M. (2002). “He’s guilty!”: Investigator bias in judgments of truth and deception. Law and Human Behavior, 26, 469–480.
  • Miller, W. (1973). Ideology and criminal justice policy: Some current issues. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 64, 141–154.
  • Najdowski, C. J. (2011). Stereotype threat in criminal interrogations: Why innocent black suspects are at risk for confessing falsely. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 17, 562–591.
  • Norris, R. J. (2012). Assessing compensation statutes for the wrongly convicted. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 23, 352–374.
  • Norris, R. J., Bonventre, C. L., Redlich, A. D., & Acker, J. R. (2010/2011). “Than that one innocent suffer”: Evaluating state safeguards against wrongful conviction. Albany Law Review, 74, 1301–1364.
  • Ornstein, N. J. & Elder, S. (1978). Interest groups, lobbying, and policymaking. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
  • Owens, M. L. & Griffiths, E. (2011/2012). Uneven reparations for wrongful convictions: Examining the state politics of statutory compensation legislation. Albany Law Review, 75, 1283–1327.
  • Packer, H. L. (1968). The limits of the criminal sanction. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Paoline, E. A., Myers, S. M., & Worden, R. E. (2000). Police culture, individualism, and community policing: Evidence from two police departments. Justice Quarterly, 17, 575–605.
  • Poveda, T. G. (2001). Estimating wrongful convictions. Justice Quarterly, 18, 689–708.
  • Rafter, N. H. (1990). The social construction of crime and crime control. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 27, 376–389.
  • Redlich, A. D., & Petrila, J. (Eds.). (2009). Special issue: The age of innocence: Miscarriages of justice in the 21st Century. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 27, 297-489.
  • Reiman, J. & Leighton, P. (2010). The rich get richer and the poor get prison: Ideology, class, and criminal justice (9th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Risinger, D. M. (2007). Innocents convicted: An empirically justified factual wrongful conviction rate. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 97, 761–806.
  • Scheingold, S. A. (1984). The politics of law and order: Street crime and public policy. New York, NY: Longman.
  • Shelden, R. G. (2008). Controlling the dangerous classes: A history of criminal justice in America (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Simon, J. (1993). Poor discipline: Parole and the social control of the underclass, 1890-1990. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Skolnick, J. H. (1994). Justice without trial: Law enforcement in democratic society (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Wiley.
  • Sullivan, T. P. (2005). Electronic recording of custodial interrogations: Everybody wins. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 95, 1127–1144.
  • Sullivan, T. P. & Vail, A. W. (2009). The consequences of law enforcement officials’ failure to record custodial interviews as required by law. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 99, 215–234.
  • Terrill, W., Paoline, E. A., & Manning, P. K. (2003). Police culture and coercion. Criminology, 41, 1003–1034.
  • Thompson, W. C. (2008). Beyond bad apples: Analyzing the role of forensic science in wrongful convictions. Southwestern Law Review, 37, 1027–1050.
  • Vance, C. R., Jr (2010). A conviction integrity initiative. Albany Law Review State Constitutional Commentary, 73, 1213–1217.
  • Volokh, A. (1997). n guilty men. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 146, 173–211.
  • Walker, J. L. (1983). The origins and maintenance of interest groups in America. The American Political Science Review, 77, 390–406.
  • Wells, G. L. & Olson, E. A. (2001). The other-race effect in eyewitness identification: What do we do about it? Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 7, 230–246.
  • Wells, G. L., Steblay, N. K., & Dysart, J. E. (2012). Eyewitness identification reforms: Are suggestiveness-induced hits and guesses true hits? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 264–271.
  • Westervelt, S. D. & Cook, K. J. (2010). Framing innocents: The wrongly convicted as victims of state harm. Crime, Law, and Social Change, 53, 259–275.
  • Westervelt, S. D. & Cook, K. J. (2012). Life after death row: Exonerees’ search for community and identity. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
  • Westley, W. A. (1970). Violence and the police: A sociological study of law, custom, and morality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Zalman, M. (2006). Criminal justice system reform and wrongful conviction: A research agenda. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 17, 468–492.
  • Zalman, M. (2007). The search for criminal justice theory: Reflections on Kraska’s Theorizing Criminal Justice. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 18, 163–181.
  • Zimring, F. E., Hawkins, G., & Kamin, S. (2001). Punishment and democracy: Three strikes and you’re out in California. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.