Measuring Procedural Justice in Police-Citizen Encounters

References

• Blader, S. L., & Tyler, T. R. (2003). What constituted fairness in work settings? A four-component model of procedural justice. Human Resource Management Review, 13, 107–126.
   Google Scholar
• Bollen, K. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Brockner, J., Ackerman, G., Greenberg, J., Gelfand, M. J., Francesco, A. M., Chen, Z. X., … Shapiro, D. (2001). Culture and procedural justice: The influence of power distance on reactions to voice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 300–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunson, R. K., & Miller, J. (2006). Young black men and urban policing in the United States. The British Journal of Criminology, 46, 613–640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr, P. J., Napolitano, L., & Keating, J. (2007). We never call the cops and here is why: A qualitative examination of legal cynicism in three Philadelphia neighborhoods. Criminology, 45, 445–480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, J. (2012). Cognitive dissonance theory. In P. A. M. Van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgiins (Eds.), The handbook of theories of social psychology ( Vol. 1) (pp. 377–397). London: Saga publication.
   Google Scholar
• Côté, S., Moon, S., Miners, C. T. H. (2008). Emotion regulation in the workplace. In N. M. Ashkanasy & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), Research companion to emotion in organizations (pp. 284–300). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Dai, M., Frank, J., & Sun, I. (2011). Procedural justice during police-citizen encounters: The effects of process-based policing on citizen compliance and demeanor. Journal of Criminal Justice, 39, 159–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai, M., & Nation, D. (2009). Understanding non-coercive, procedurally fair behavior by the police during encounters. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 37, 170–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeJong, C. (2004). Gender differences in officer attitude and behavior: Providing comfort to citizens. Women in Criminal Justice, 15, 1–32.
   Google Scholar
• Diamantopoulos, A., Riefler, P., & Roth, K. P. (2008). Advancing formative measurement models. Journal of Business Research, 61, 1203–1218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamantopoulos, A., & Winklhofer, H. M. (2001). Index construction with formative indicators: An alternative to scale development. Journal of Marketing Research, 38, 269–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, J. R. (2011). The fallacy of formative measurement. Organizational Research Methods, 14, 370–388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott, I., Thomas, S., & Ogloff, J. (2013). Procedural justice in victim-police interactions and victims’ recovery from victimization experience. Policing and Society. Early publication online: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2013.784309
   Google Scholar
• Engel, R. S. (2003). Explaining suspects resistance and disrespect toward police. Journal of Criminal Justice, 31, 475–492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foley, T., & Terrill, W. (2008). Police comfort and victims. Victims and Offenders, 3, 192–216.
   Google Scholar
• Gau, J. M. (2011). The convergent and discriminant validity of procedural justice and police legitimacy: An empirical test of core theoretical propositions. Journal of Criminal Justice, 39, 489–498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gau, J. M., & Brunson, R. K. (2010). Procedural justice and order maintenance policing: A study of inner-city young men’s perceptions of police legitimacy. Justice Quarterly, 27, 255–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gau, J. M., Corsaro, N., Stewart, E. A., & Brunson, R. K. (2012). Examining macro-level impacts on procedural justice and police legitimacy. Journal of Criminal Justice, 40, 333–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gould, J. B., & Mastrofski, S. D. (2004). Suspect searches: Assessing police behavior under the constitution. Criminology and Public Policy, 3, 316–362.
   Google Scholar
• Heider, F. (1946). Attitudes and cognitive organization. The Journal of Psychology, 21, 107–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Hinds, L., & Murphy, K. (2007). Public satisfaction with police: Using procedural justice to improve police legitimacy. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 40, 27–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochschild, A. R. (1983). The managed heart. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jonathan-Zamir, T., & Weisburd, D. (2013). The effects of security threats on antecedents of police legitimacy: Findings from a quasi-experiment in Israel. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 50, 3–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kish-Gephart, J. J., Detert, J. R., Trevino, L. K., & Edmondson, A. C. (2009). Silenced by fear: The nature, sources, and consequences of fear at work. Research in Organizational Behavior, 29, 163–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kochel, T., Parks, R. B., & Mastrofski, S. D. (2011). Examining police effectiveness as precursor to legitimacy and cooperation with police. Justice Quarterly, 30, 895–925.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York, NY: Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• MacKenzie, S. B., Podsakoff, P. M., & Jarvis, C. B. (2005). The problem of measurement model misspecification in behavioral and organizational research and some recommended solutions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 710–730.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mastrofski, S. D., Parks, R. B., & McCluskey, J. D. (2010). Systematic social observation in criminology. In A. R. Piquero & D. Weisburd (Eds.), Handbook of quantitative criminology (pp. 225–247). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Mastrofski, S. D., Parks, R. B., Reiss, A. J., Jr., Worden, R. E., DeJong, C., Snipes, J. B., & Terrill, W. (1998). Systematic observation of public police: Applying field research methods to policy issues. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, US Department of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Mastrofski, S. D., Reisig, M. D., & McCluskey, J. D. (2002). Police disrespect toward the public: An encounter-based analysis. Criminology, 40, 519–552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mastrofski, S. D., Snipes, J. B., Parks, R. B., & Maxwell, C. D. (2000). The helping hand of the law: Police control of citizens on request. Criminology, 38, 307–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mastrofski, S. D., Snipes, J. B., & Supina, A. E. (1996). Compliance on demand: The public’s response to specific police requests. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 33, 269–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazerolle, L., Bennett, S., Antrobus, E., & Eggins, E. (2012). Procedural justice, routine encounters and citizen perceptions of police: Main findings from the Queensland community engagement trial (QCET). Journal of Experimental Criminology, 8, 343–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazerolle, L., Bennett, S., Davis, J., Sargeant, E., & Manning, M. (2013). Legitimacy in policing: A systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews. doi:10.4073/csr.2013.1
   Google Scholar
• McCluskey, J. D. (2003). Police requests for compliance: Coercive and procedurally just tactics. New York, NY: LFB Scholarly.
   Google Scholar
• McCluskey, J. D., Mastrofski, S. D., & Parks, R. B. (1999). To acquiesce or rebel: Predicting citizen compliance with police requests. Police Quarterly, 2, 389–416.
   Google Scholar
• McIver, J. P., & Parks, R. B. (1983). Evaluating police performance: Identification of effective and ineffective police actions. In R. R. Bennett (Ed.), The police working environment: Policy issues for the eighties (pp. 21–44). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, S. L., & Hefner, K. (2013). Procedural justice for victims and offenders?: Exploring restorative justice processes in Australia and the US. Justice Quarterly. Early publication online: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2012.760643
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, K., Hinds, L., & Fleming, J. (2008). Encouraging public cooperation and support for police. Policing and Society, 18, 136–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nation, D. D. (2011). Citizens’ preferences about police work. El Paso, TX: LFB Scholarly.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2004). Fairness and effectiveness in policing: The evidence. In W. Skogan & K. Frydl (Eds.), Committee to review research on police policy and practices. Committee on law and justice, division of behavioral and social sciences and education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Newcomb, T. M. (1968). Interpersonal balance. In R. P. Abelson (Ed.), Theories of cognitive consistency: A sourcebook (pp. 28–51). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, R. M. (2007). A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Quality & Quantity, 41, 673–690.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paternoster, R., Brame, R., Bachman, R., & Sherman, L. W. (1997). Do fair procedures matter? The effect of procedural justice on spouse assault. Law and Society Review, 31, 163–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pizio, W. C. (2012). Police officers’ encounters with disrespectful citizens. El Paso, TX: LFB Scholarly.
   Google Scholar
• Rabe-Hemp, C. E. (2008). Female officers and the ethic of care: Does officer gender impact police behaviors? Journal of Criminal Justice, 36, 426–434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reisig, M. D., Bratton, J., & Gertz, M. J. (2007). The construct validity and refinement of process-based policing measures. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, 1005–1028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reisig, M. D., McCluskey, J. D., Mastrofski, S. D., & Terrill, W. (2004). Suspect disrespect toward the police. Justice Quarterly, 21, 241–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reiss, A. J., Jr. (1971). The police and the public. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rossler, M. T., & Terrill, W. (2012). Police responsiveness to service-related requests. Police Quarterly, 15, 3–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seron, C., Pereria, J., & Kovath, J. (2004). Judging police misconduct: “Street-level” versus professional policing. Law & Society Review, 38, 665–710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulhofer, S. J., Tyler, T. R., & Huq, A. Z. (2011). American policing at a crossroads: Unsustainable policies and the procedural justice alternative. The Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 101, 335–374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skogan, W. G. (2006). The promise of community policing. In D. Weisburd & A. A. Braga (Eds.), Police innovation: Contrasting perspectives (pp. 27–43). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stoutland, S. E. (2001). The multiple dimensions of trust in resident/police relations in Boston. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 38, 226–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, I. Y. (2003). A comparison of police field training officers’ and nontraining officers- conflict resolution styles: Controlling versus supportive strategies. Police Quarterly, 6, 22–50.
   Google Scholar
• Sun, I. Y. (2006). Police response to victims of domestic and non-domestic violence. Journal of Health and Human Services Administration, 29, 145–172.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sun, I. Y., & Payne, B. K. (2004). Racial differences in resolving conflicts: A comparison between black and white police officers. Crime & Delinquency, 50, 516–541.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, I. Y., Payne, B. K., & Wu, Y. (2008). The impact of situational factors, officer characteristics, and neighborhood context on police behavior: A multilevel analysis. Journal of Criminal Justice, 36, 22–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunshine, J., & Tyler, T. R. (2003). The role of procedural justice and legitimacy in shaping public support for policing. Law and Society Review, 37, 513–548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tankebe, J. (2009). Public cooperation with the police in Ghana: Does procedural fairness matter. Criminology, 47, 1265–1293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terrill, W. (2001). Police coercion: Application of the force continuum. New York, NY: LFB Scholarly.
   Google Scholar
• Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R. (2001). Public trust and confidence in legal authorities: What do majority and minority group members want from legal authorities? Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 19, 215–235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R. (2004, May). Enhancing police legitimacy. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 593, 84–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R. (2006). Why people obey to the law. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R. (2009). Legitimacy and criminal justice: The benefits of self-regulation. Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 7, 307–359.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R. (2011). Why people cooperate. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R., & Fagan, J. (2008). Legitimacy and cooperation: Why do people help the police fight crime in their communities? Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 6, 231–275.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R., & Huo, Y. J. (2002). Trust in the law: Encouraging public cooperation with the police and courts. New York, NY: Russell-Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. & Jackson, J. (2012, September 4). Future challenges in the study of legitimacy and criminal justice. Yale Law School, Public Law Working, 264. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=2141322 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2141322
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. A. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology 25 (pp. 115–191). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R., Schulhofer, S., & Huq, A. (2010). Legitimacy and deterrence effects in counterterrorism policing: A study of Muslim Americans. Law and Society Review, 44, 365–401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R., Sherman, L. W., Strang, H., Barnes, G. C., & Woods, D. J. (2007). Reintegrative shaming, procedural justice, and recidivism: The engagement of offenders psychological mechanisms in the Canberra RISE drinking-and-driving experiment. Law and Society Review, 41, 553–586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R., & Wakslak, C. J. (2004). Profiling and police legitimacy: Procedural justice, attributions of motive and acceptance of police authority. Criminology, 18, 267–274.
   Google Scholar
• Weisburd, D., Hinkle, J. C., Famega, C., & Ready, J. (2011). The possible “backfire” effects of hot spots policing: An experimental assessment of impacts on legitimacy, fear and collective efficacy. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 7, 297–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar