Police Enforcement of Domestic Violence Laws: Supervisory Control or Officer Prerogatives?

References

• Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1977). Attitude–behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 888-918.10.1037/0033-2909.84.5.888
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, D. (1983). Police supervision on the street: An analysis of supervisor–officer interaction during the shift. Journal of Criminal Justice, 10, 91-109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, D. J. (1971). The social organization of arrest. Stanford Law Review, 23, 1087-1111.10.2307/1227728
   Google Scholar
• Brehm, J., & Gates, S. (1993). Donut shops and speed traps: Evaluating models of supervision on police behavior. American Journal of Political Science, 37, 555-581.10.2307/2111384
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brehm, J., & Gates, S. (1997). Working, shirking, and sabotage: Bureaucratic response to a democratic public. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brehm, J., & Gates, S. (2008). Teaching, tasks, and trust: Functions of the public executive. New York, NY: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Broderick, J. J. (1977). Police in a time of change. Morristown, PA: General Learning Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, M. K. (1988). Working the street: Police discretion and the dilemmas of reform. New York, NY: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models. Newbury, CT: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Buzawa, E. S., & Buzawa, C. G. (2003). Domestic violence: The criminal justice system response (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, K. C. (1969). Discretionary justice: A preliminary inquiry. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dugan, L. (2003). Domestic violence legislation: Exploring its impact on the likelihood of domestic violence, police involvement, and arrest. Criminology and Public Policy, 2, 283-312.10.1111/cpp.2003.2.issue-2
   Google Scholar
• Eitle, D. (2005). The influence of mandatory arrest policies, police organizational characteristics, and situational variables on the probability of arrest in domestic violence cases. Crime and Delinquency, 51, 573-597.10.1177/0011128705277784
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engel, R. S., & Worden, R. (2003). Police officers’ attitudes, behavior, and supervisory influences: An analysis of problem solving. Criminology, 41, 131-166.10.1111/crim.2003.41.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feder, L. (1997). Domestic violence and police response in a pro-arrest jurisdiction. Women and Criminal Justice, 8, 79-98.10.1300/J012v08n04_04
   Google Scholar
• Felson, R. B., & Ackerman, J. (2001). Arrest for domestic and other assaults. Criminology, 39, 655-676.10.1111/crim.2001.39.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferraro, K. (1989). Policing woman battering. Social Problems, 36, 61-74.10.2307/800550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garner, J., Fagan, J., & Maxwell, C. (1995). Published findings from the spouse assault replication program: A critical review. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 11, 3-28.10.1007/BF02221298
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glasman, L. R., & Albarracín, D. (2006). Forming attitudes that predict future behavior: A meta-analysis of the attitude–behavior relation. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 778-822.10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.778
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein, J. (1960). Police discretion not to invoke the criminal process: Low-visibility decisions in the administration of justice. The Yale Law Journal, 69, 543-594.10.2307/794445
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hersey, P., & Blanchard, K. (1982). Management of organizational behavior: Utilizing human resources. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Hirschel, D. (2008). Domestic violence cases: What research shows about arrest and dual arrest rates. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Hirschel, D., Buzawa, E., Pattavina, A., & Faggiani, D. (2007). Domestic violence and mandatory arrest laws: To what extent do they influence police arrest decisions? Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 98, 255-298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. R. (2004). Police officer frustrations about handling domestic violence calls. The Police Journal, 77, 207-219.10.1350/pojo.77.3.207.54090
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. R. (2006). Management influences on officer traffic enforcement productivity. International Journal of Police Science and Management, 8, 205-217.10.1350/ijps.2006.8.3.205
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. R. (2008a). Field supervisor behavior and officer on-duty personal business. International Journal of Police Science and Management, 10, 205-217.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. R. (2008b). Effectively communicating performance expectations to subordinates: Patrol officer perceptions. Law Enforcement Executive Forum, 8, 103-112.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. R. (2009). Using organizational characteristics to explain patrol officer drug arrest activity. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management, 32, 6-20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. R. (2010). Making domestic violence arrests: A test of expectancy theory. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management, 33, 531-547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. R. (2011). Officer attitudes and management influences on police work productivity. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 36, 293-306.10.1007/s12103-010-9090-2
   Google Scholar
• Kim, M. S., & Hunter, J. E. (2006). Attitude–behavior relations: A meta-analysis of attitudinal relevance and topic. Journal of Communication, 43, 101-143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klinger, D. A. (1997). Negotiating order in patrol work: An ecological theory of police response to deviance. Criminology, 35, 277-306.10.1111/crim.1997.35.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klinger, D. A. (2004). Environment and organization: Reviving a perspective on the police. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 593, 119-136.10.1177/0002716203262498
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komaki, J. L. (1986). Toward effective supervision: An operant analysis and comparison of managers at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 270-279.10.1037/0021-9010.71.2.270
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraus, S. J. (1991). Attitudes and the prediction of behavior ( Doctoral dissertation). Harvard University.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrenz, F., Lembo, J. F., & Schade, T. (1988). Time series analysis of the effect of a domestic violence directive on the number of arrests per day. Journal of Criminal Justice, 16, 493-498.10.1016/0047-2352(88)90080-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mastrofski, S. D., & Ritti, R. R. (1996). Police training and the effects of organization on drunk driving enforcement. Justice Quarterly, 13, 291-320.10.1080/07418829600092951
   Google Scholar
• Mignon, S. I., & Holmes, W. M. (1995). Police response to mandatory arrest laws. Crime and Delinquency, 41, 430-442.10.1177/0011128795041004004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moskos, P. (2008). The better part of valor: Court overtime pay as the main determinant of discretionary police arrests. Law Enforcement Executive Forum, 8, 77-94.
   Google Scholar
• Muir, W. K. (1977). Police: Streetcorner politicians. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paoline, E. A., Myers, S. M., & Worden, R. E. (2000). Police culture, individualism, and community policing: Evidence from two police departments. Justice Quarterly, 17, 575-605.10.1080/07418820000094671
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pattavina, A., Buzawa, E., Hirschel, D., & Faggiani, D. (2007). Policy, place, and perpetrators: Using NIBRS to explain arrest practices in intimate partner violence. Justice Research and Policy, 9, 31-52.10.3818/JRP.9.2.2007.31
   Google Scholar
• Priestley, W. J. (2004). The ineffectiveness of training on increasing time at the scene, acceptance for prosecution, and convictions of domestic violence cases. The Police Journal, 77, 309-326.
   Google Scholar
• Randall, D. M., & Wolff, J. A. (2011). The time interval in the intention–behavior relationship: Meta-analysis. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 405-418.
   Google Scholar
• Reaves, B. A. (2011). Census of state and local law enforcement agencies, 2008. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Reuss-Ianni, E., & Ianni, F. (1983). Street cops and management cops: The two cultures of policing. In M. Punch (Ed.), Control in the police organization (pp. 251-274). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Riksheim, E. C., & Chermak, S. M. (1993). Causes of police behavior revisited. Journal of Criminal Justice, 21, 353-382.10.1016/0047-2352(93)90019-J
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, A. L. (2000). The effect of a domestic violence policy change on police officers’ schemata. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 27, 600-624.10.1177/0093854800027005004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, A. L., & Chandek, M. S. (2000). The domestic violence arrest decision: Examining demographic, attitudinal, and situational variables. Crime and Delinquency, 46, 18-37.10.1177/0011128700046001002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuman, H., & Johnson, M. P. (1976). Attitudes and behavior. Annual Review of Sociology, 2, 161-207.10.1146/annurev.so.02.080176.001113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, S. S., & Wilk, M. B. (1965). An analysis of variance test for normality. Biometrika, 52, 591-599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherman, L. W. (1980). Causes of police behavior: The current state of quantitative research. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 17, 69-100.10.1177/002242788001700106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherman, L. W. (1992). Policing domestic violence: Experiments and dilemmas. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sherman, L. W., & Berk, R. A. (1984). The specific deterrent effects of arrest for domestic assault. American Sociological Review, 49, 261-272.10.2307/2095575
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson, S. S., Bouffard, L. A., Garner, J., & Hickman, L. (2006). The influence of legal reform on the probability of arrest in domestic violence cases. Justice Quarterly, 23, 297-316.10.1080/07418820600869087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Skogan, W. G., & Frydl, K. (2004). Fairness and effectiveness in policing: The evidence. Washington, DC: National Research Council of the National Academies.
   Google Scholar
• Skolnick, J. H. (1966). Justice without trial: Law enforcement in democratic society. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Sun, I. (2007). Policing domestic violence: Does officer gender matter? Journal of Criminal Justice, 35, 581-595.10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2007.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Maanen, J. (1983). Boss: First-line supervision in an American police agency. In M. Punch (Ed.), Control in the police organization (pp. 275-317). Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weinstein, A. G. (1972). Predicting behavior from attitudes. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36, 355-360.10.1086/268017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, S. O. (1972). A perspective on police professionalization. Law and Society Review, 7, 61-85.10.2307/3052829
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, J. Q. (1968). Varieties of police behavior: The management of law and order in eight communities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Worden, R. E. (1989). Situational and attitudinal explanations of police behavior: A theoretical reappraisal and empirical assessment. Law and Society Review, 23, 667-711.10.2307/3053852
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar