A Multi-Theoretical Framework to Assess Gendered Stalking Victimization: The Utility of Self-Control, Social Learning, and Control Balance Theories

References

• Akers, R. L. (1973). Deviant behavior: A social learning approach. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Akers, R. L. (1991). Self-control as a general theory of crime. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 7, 201-211.
   Google Scholar
• Akers, R. L. (1998). Social learning and social structure: A general theory of crime and deviance. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Akers, R. L. (2003). A social learning theory of crime. In F. T. Cullen, & R. Agnew (Eds.), Criminological theory: Past to present (2nd ed., pp. 142-154). Cary, NC: Roxbury.
   Google Scholar
• Akers, R. L., & Jensen, G. F. (2006). The empirical status of social learning theory of crime and deviance: The past, present, and future. In F. T. Cullen, J. P. Wright, & K. R. Blevins (Eds.), Taking stock: The status of criminological theory (pp. 37-66). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Alarid, L. F., Burton, Jr, V., & Cullen, F. T. (2000). Gender and crime among felony offenders: Assessing the generality of social control and differential association theories. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 37, 171-199.10.1177/0022427800037002002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron, S. W., & Forde, D. R. (2007). Street youth crime: A test of control balance theory. Justice Quarterly, 24, 335–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron, S. W., Forde, D. R., & Kay, F. M. (2007). Self-control, risky lifestyles, and situation: The role of opportunity and context in the general theory. Journal of Criminal Justice, 35, 119-136.10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2007.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaver, K. M., Wright, J. P., DeLisi, M., & Vaughn, M. G. (2008). Genetic influences on the stability of low self-control: Results from a longitudinal sample of twins. Journal of Criminal Justice, 36, 478-485.10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2008.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjerregaard, B. (2000). An empirical study of stalking victimization. Violence and Victims, 15, 389-406.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Black, M. C., Basile, K. C., Breiding, M. J., Smith, S. G., Walters, M. L., Merrick, M. T., … Stevens, M. R. (2011). The National intimate partner and sexual violence survey (NISVS): 2010 summary report. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
   Google Scholar
• Brewster, M. P. (2000). Stalking by former intimates: Verbal threats and other predictors of physical violence. Violence and Victims, 15, 41-54.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Burgess, R. L., & Akers, R. L. (1966). A differential association-reinforcement theory of criminal behavior. Social Problems, 14, 128-147.10.2307/798612
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catalano, S. (2012). Stalking victims in the United States—Revised. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics, NCJ 224527.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, L. E., & Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44, 588-608.10.2307/2094589
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Couper, M. P. (2000). Web surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 64, 464-494.10.1086/318641
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Couper, M. P. (2011). The future modes of data collection. Public Opinion Quarterly, 75, 889-908.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curry, T. R. (2005). Integrating motivating and constraining forces in deviance causation: A test of causal chain hypotheses in control balance theory. Deviant Behavior, 26, 571-599.10.1080/01639620500218286
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curry, T. R., & Piquero, A. R. (2003). Control ratios and defiant acts of deviance: Assessing additive and conditional effects with constraints and impulsivity. Sociological Perspectives, 46, 397-415.10.1525/sop.2003.46.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daly, K., & Chesney-Lind, M. (1988). Feminism and criminology. Justice Quarterly, 5, 497-538.10.1080/07418828800089871
   Google Scholar
• Davis, K. E., Ace, A., & Andra, M. (2000). Stalking perpetrators and psychological maltreatment of partners: Anger-jealousy, attachment insecurity, need for control, and break-up context. Violence and Victims, 15, 407-425.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• DeLisi, M., & Hochstetler, A. L. (2002). An exploratory assessment of tittle’s control balance theory: Results from the national youth survey. The Justice Professional, 15, 261-272.10.1080/08884310215666
   Google Scholar
• Dillman, D. A. (2000). Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Dye, M. L., & Davis, K. E. (2003). Stalking and psychological abuse: Common factors and relationship-specific characteristics. Violence and Victims, 18, 163-180.10.1891/vivi.2003.18.2.163
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eagley, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Finney, A. (2006). Domestic violence, sexual assault and stalking: Findings from the 2004/2005 British Crime Survey. London: Home Office Research, Development and Statistics Directorate.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, B. S., Cullen, F. T., & Turner, M. G. (2000). The sexual victimization of college women. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, B. S., Cullen, F. T., & Turner, M. G. (2002). Being pursued: Stalking victimization in a national study of college women. Criminology & Public Policy, 1, 257-308.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, K. A., Gover, A. R., & Kaukinen, C. (2009). The effects of low self-control and childhood maltreatment on stalking victimization among men and women. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 34, 181-197.10.1007/s12103-009-9064-4
   Google Scholar
• Fox, K. A., Nobles, M. R., & Akers, R. L. (2011). Is stalking a learned phenomenon? An empirical test of social learning theory. Journal of Criminal Justice, 39, 39-47.10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2010.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, K. A., Nobles, M. R., & Fisher, B. S. (2011). Method behind the madness: An examination of stalking measurements. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 16, 74-84.10.1016/j.avb.2010.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franklin, C. A. (2011). An investigation of the relationship between self-control and alcohol-induced sexual assault victimization. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38, 263-285.10.1177/0093854810394800
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fremouw, W. J., Westrup, D., & Pennypacker, J. (1997). Stalking on campus: The prevalence and strategies for coping with stalking. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 42, 666-669.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottfredson, M. R., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grasmick, H. G., Tittle, C. R., Bursik, R. J., Jr, & Arneklev, B. J. (1993). Testing the core empirical implications of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 30, 5-29.10.1177/0022427893030001002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haugaard, J. J., & Seri, L. G. (2003). Stalking and other forms of intrusive contact after the dissolution of adolescent dating or romantic relationships. Violence and Victims, 18, 279-297.10.1891/vivi.2003.18.3.279
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hay, C., & Forrest, W. (2006). The development of self-control: Examining self-control theory’s stability thesis. Criminology, 44, 739-774.10.1111/crim.2006.44.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickman, M., & Piquero, A. R. (2001). Exploring the relationships between gender, control balance, and deviance. Deviant Behavior, 22, 323-351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickman, M., Piquero, A. R., Lawton, B. A., & Greene, J. R. (2001). Applying tittle’s control balance theory to police deviance. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management, 24, 497-519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, G. E., & Lauterbach, C. (2004). Control balance theory and exploitation: An examination of contingencies. Criminal Justice Studies, 17, 291-310.10.1080/1478601042000281123
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, G. E., Lauterbach, C., & Tewksbury, R. (2005). Control balance theory and violence: An examination of contingencies. Sociological Focus, 38, 241-260.10.1080/00380237.2005.10571268
   Google Scholar
• Hindelang, M. J., Gottfredson, M. R., & Garofalo, J. (1978). Victims of personal crime: An empirical foundation for a theory of personal victimization. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
   Google Scholar
• Holtfreter, K., Reisig, M. D., & Pratt, T. C. (2008). Low self-control, routine activities, and fraud victimization. Criminology, 46, 189-220.10.1111/j.1745-9125.2008.00101.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplowitz, M. D., Hadlock, T. D., & Levine, R. (2004). A comparison of web and mail survey response rates. Public Opinion Quarterly, 68, 94-101.10.1093/poq/nfh006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerley, K. R., Xu, X., & Sirisunyaluck, B. (2008). Self-control, intimate partner abuse, and intimate partner victimization: Testing the general theory of crime in Thailand. Deviant Behavior, 29, 503-532.10.1080/01639620701673156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kienlen, K. K., Birmingham, D. L., Solberg, K. B., O’Regan, J. T., & Meloy, J. R. (1997). A comparative study of psychotic and nonpsychotic stalking. Journal of American Academic Psychiatry & Law, 25, 317-334.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J. (2012). Gender and stalking: Current intersections and future directions. Sex Roles, 66, 418-426.10.1007/s11199-011-0093-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lauritsen, J. L. (2003). How families and communities influence youth victimization. Washington, DC: Juvenile Justice Bulletin, U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
   Google Scholar
• Lauritsen, J. L., & Carbone-Lopez, K. (2011). Gender differences in risk factors for violent victimization: An examination of individual-, family-, and community-level predictors. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 48, 538-565.10.1177/0022427810395356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, S. F., Fremouw, W. J., Del Ben, K., & Farr, C. (2001). An investigation of the psychological characteristics of stalkers: Empathy, problem-solving, attachment and borderline personality features. Journal of Forensic Science, 46, 80-84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyndon, A. E., Sinclair, H. C., MacArthur, J., Fay, B., Ratajack, E., & Collier, K. E. (2012). An introduction to issues of gender in stalking research. Sex Roles, 66, 299-310.10.1007/s11199-011-0106-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCreedy, K., & Dennis, B. (1996). Sex related offenses and fear of crime on campus. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 12, 69-80.
   Google Scholar
• Mears, D. P., Ploeger, M., & Warr, M. (1998). Explaining the gender gap in delinquency: Peer influence and moral evaluations of behavior. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 35, 251-266.10.1177/0022427898035003001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meier, R. F., & Miethe, T. D. (1993). Understanding theories of criminal victimization. Crime and Justice, 17, 459-499.10.1086/449218
   Google Scholar
• Mendelsohn, B. (1956). The victimology. Etudes Internationales de Psycho-Sociologie Criminelle, 3, 25-26 (in French).
   Google Scholar
• Mustaine, E. E., & Tewksbury, R. (1999). A routine activity theory explanation for women’s stalking victimizations. Violence Against Women, 5, 43-62.10.1177/10778019922181149
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Myers, M. A., & LaFree, G. D. (1982). Sexual assault and its prosecution: A comparison with other crimes. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 73, 1282-1305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neter, J., Wasserman, W., & Kutner, M. H. (1985). Applied linear statistical models: Regression, analysis of variance, and experimental design. Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin.
   Google Scholar
• Ngo, F. T., & Paternoster, R. (2011). Cybercrime victimization: An examination of individual and situational level factors. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 5, 773-793.
   Google Scholar
• Ngo, F. T., & Paternoster, R. (2013). Stalking, gender, and coping strategies: A partial test of Broidy and Agnew’s gender/general strain theory hypotheses. Victims & Offenders, 8, 94-117.
   Google Scholar
• Nobles, M. R., & Fox, K. A. (2013). Assessing stalking behaviors in a control balance theory framework. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 40, 737-762.10.1177/0093854813475346
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nobles, M. R., Fox, K. A., Piquero, N. L., & Piquero, A. R. (2009). Career dimensions of stalking victimization and perpetration. Justice Quarterly, 26, 476-503.10.1080/07418820802427833
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nobles, M. R., Reyns, B., Fox, K. A., & Fisher, B. S. (in press). Comparing cyberstalking and traditional stalking victimization using a nationally representative sample. Justice Quarterly.
   Google Scholar
• Pathè, M., & Mullen, P. E. (1997). The impact of stalkers on their victims. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 170, 12-17.10.1192/bjp.170.1.12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paternoster, R., Brame, R., Mazerolle, P., & Piquero, A. (1998). Using the correct statistical test for the equality of regression coefficients. Criminology, 36, 859-866.10.1111/crim.1998.36.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, C. L., Nobles, M. R., & Fox, K. A. (2010). Look who’s stalking: Obsessive pursuit and attachment theory. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38, 282-290.10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2010.02.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piquero, A. R., & Hickman, M. (1999). An empirical test of tittle’s control balance theory. Criminology, 37, 319-342.10.1111/crim.1999.37.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piquero, A. R., & Hickman, M. (2003). Extending tittle’s control balance theory to account for victimization. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 30, 282-301.10.1177/0093854803030003002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piquero, A. R., MacIntosh, R., & Hickman, M. J. (2001). Applying Rasch modeling to the validity of a control balance scale. Journal of Criminal Justice, 29, 493-505.10.1016/S0047-2352(01)00112-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piquero, N. L., & Piquero, A. R. (2006). Control balance and exploitative corporate crime. Criminology, 44, 397-430.10.1111/crim.2006.44.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratt, T. C., & Cullen, F. T. (2000). The empirical status of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime: A meta-analysis. Criminology, 38, 931-964.10.1111/crim.2000.38.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratt, T., Turanovic, J., Fox, K. A., & Wright, K. (2014). Self-control and victimization: A meta-analysis. Criminology, 52, 87-116.10.1111/crim.2014.52.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reisig, M. D., Pratt, T. C., & Holtfreter, K. (2009). Perceived risk of internet theft victimization: Examining the effects of social vulnerability and financial impulsivity. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36, 369-384.10.1177/0093854808329405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reyns, B. W., Henson, B., & Fisher, B. S. (2011). Being pursued online: Applying cyber lifestyle-routine activities theory to cyberstalking victimization. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38, 1149-1169.10.1177/0093854811421448
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampson, R. J. (1985). Neighborhood and crime: The structural determinants of personal victimization. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 22, 7-40.10.1177/0022427885022001002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schreck, C. J. (1999). Criminal victimization and low self-control: An extension and test of a general theory of crime. Justice Quarterly, 16, 633-654.10.1080/07418829900094291
   Google Scholar
• Schreck, C. J., Fisher, B. S., & Miller, J. M. (2004). The social context of violent victimization: A study of the delinquent peer effect. Justice Quarterly, 21, 23-47.10.1080/07418820400095731
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schreck, C. J., Stewart, E. A., & Fisher, B. S. (2006). Self-control, victimization, and their influence on risky lifestyles: A longitudinal analysis using panel data. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 22, 319-340.10.1007/s10940-006-9014-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schreck, C. J., Wright, R. A., & Miller, J. M. (2002). A study of individual and situational antecedents of violent victimization. Justice Quarterly, 19, 159-180.10.1080/07418820200095201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheehan, K. B., & McMillan, S. J. (1999). Response variation in e-mail surveys: An exploration. Journal of Advertising Research, 39, 45-54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, D. A., & Paternoster, R. (1987). The gender gap in theories of deviance: Issues and evidence. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 24, 140-172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, E. A., Elifson, K. W., & Sterk, C. E. (2004). Integrating the general theory of crime into an explanation of violent victimization among female offenders. Justice Quarterly, 21, 159-181.10.1080/07418820400095771
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, M., & Fisher, B. S. (2013). Vulnerabilities and opportunities 101: The extent, nature, and impact of stalking and cyberstalking among college students and implications for campus policies and programs. In B. S. Fisher, & J. J. Sloan III (Eds.), Campus crime: Legal, social and policy perspectives (3rd ed., pp. 236-260). Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas Publisher.
   Google Scholar
• Tittle, C. R. (1995). Control balance: Toward a general theory of deviance. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tittle, C. R. (1997). Thoughts stimulated by Braithwaite’s analysis of control balance theory. Theoretical Criminology, 1, 99-110.10.1177/1362480697001001006
   Google Scholar
• Tittle, C. R. (1999). Continuing the discussion of control balance. Theoretical Criminology, 3, 344-352.10.1177/1362480699003003007
   Google Scholar
• Tittle, C. R. (2004). Refining control balance theory. Theoretical Criminology, 8, 395-428.10.1177/1362480604046657
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (1998). Stalking in America: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Tonin, E. (2004). The attachment styles of stalkers. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 15, 584-590.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turanovic, J., & Pratt, T. C. (2014). ‘Can’t stop, won’t stop’: Self-control, risky lifestyles, and repeat victimization. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 30, 29-56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Hentig, H. (1948). Remarks on the interaction of perpetrator and victim. Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology, and Police Science, 31, 303-309.
   Google Scholar
• Walby, S., & Allen, J. (2004). Domestic violence, sexual assault and stalking: Findings from the British Crime Survey. London: Home Office Research, Development and Statistics Directorate.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, P. B., & Dunaway, R. G. (1998). An application of control balance theory to incarcerated sex offenders. Journal of the Oklahoma Criminal Justice Research Consortium, 4, 1-12.
   Google Scholar