Staff Quality and Treatment Effectiveness: An Examination of the Relationship between Staff Factors and the Effectiveness of Correctional Programs

References

• Andrews, D. A., & Kiessling, J. J. (1980). Program structure and effective correctional practices: A summary of the CaVIC research. In R. R. Ross & P. Gendreau (Eds.), Effective correctional treatment (pp. 441–463). Toronto: Butterworth.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, D. A., Zinger, I., Hoge, R. D., Bonta, J., Gendreau, P., & Cullen, F. T. (1990). Does correctional treatment work? A clinically relevant and psychologically informed meta-analysis. Criminology, 28, 369-404.10.1111/crim.1990.28.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnosky, R. (2004). Outcome evaluation of Washington State’s research-based programs for juvenile offenders. Olympia: Washington State Institute for Public Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Braswell, M., & Mongold, J. (2009). The process of correctional counseling and treatment. In M. Braswell & P. Van Voorhis (Eds.), Correctional counseling and rehabilitation (7th ed.) (pp. 3–24). Cincinnati, OH: Andersen Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Drake, E. K., Aos, S., & Miller, M. G. (2009). Evidenced-based public policy options to reduce crime and criminal justice costs: Implications in Washington State. Victims and Offenders, 4, 170-196.10.1080/15564880802612615
   Google Scholar
• Dowden, C., & Andrews, D. A. (1999). What works for female offenders? A meta-analytic review. Crime and Delinquency, 45, 438-452.10.1177/0011128799045004002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowden, C., & Andrews, D. A. (2003). Does family intervention work for delinquents? Results of a meta-analysis. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 45, 327-342.10.3138/cjccj.45.3.327
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowden, C., & Andrews, D. A. (2004). The importance of staff practice in delivering effective correctional treatment: A meta-analytic review of Core Correctional Practice. International Journal of Offender Therapy Comparative Criminology, 48, 203-214.10.1177/0306624X03257765
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliot, W. N., & Shrink, J. L. (2009). Understanding the special challenges faced by the correctional counselor in the prison setting. In M. Braswell & P. Van Voorhis (Eds.), Correctional counseling and rehabilitation (7th ed.) (pp. 24–44). Cincinnati, OH: Andersen Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Fulton, B., Stichman, A., Travis, L., & Latessa, E. (1997). Moderating probation and parole officer attitudes to achieve desired outcomes. The Prison Journal, 77, 295-312.10.1177/0032855597077003005
   Google Scholar
• Gendreau, P. (1996). The principles of effective interventions with offenders. In A. T. Harland (Ed.), Choosing correctional options that work: Defining the demand and evaluating the supply (pp. 117–130). Washington, DC: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gendreau, P., Andrews, D. A., & Theriault, Y. (2010). Correctional Program Assessment Inventory-2010© (CPAI-2010©). Beresford: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Gendreau, P., Goggin, C., & Smith, P. (1999). The forgotten issue in effective correctional treatment: Program implementation. International Journal of Offender Therapy Comparative Criminology, 43, 180-187.10.1177/0306624X99432005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanson, R. K., Bourgon, G., Helmus, L., & Hodgson, S. (2009). The principles of effective correctional treatment also apply to sexual offenders: A meta-analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36, 865-891.10.1177/0093854809338545
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassembaum, G. G., Ward, D., & Wilner, D. (1970). Prison treatment and parole survival. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Latessa, E. J. (2004). The challenge of change: Correctional programs and evidence based practices. Criminology and Public Policy, 3, 547-560.10.1111/cpp.2004.3.issue-4
   Google Scholar
• Lipsey, M. W. (2009). Primary factors that characterize effective interventions with juvenile offenders: A meta-analytic overview. Victims & Offenders, 4, 124-147.10.1080/15564880802612573
   Google Scholar
• Lipsey, M. W., Landenberger, N. A., & Wilson, S. J. (2007). Effects of cognitive-behavioral programs for criminal offenders. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 6, 1-30.
   Google Scholar
• Lowenkamp, C. T., Flores, A., Holsinger, A., Makarios, M. D., & Latessa, E. J. (2010). Intensive supervision programs: Does program philosophy and the principles of effective intervention matter? Journal of Criminal Justice, 38, 368-375.10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2010.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowenkamp, C. T., Latessa, E. J., & Smith, P. (2006). Does correctional program quality really matter? The impact of adhering to the principles of effective intervention. Criminology and Public Policy, 5, 575-594.10.1111/cpp.2006.5.issue-3
   Google Scholar
• Lowenkamp, C. T., Makarios, M. D., Latessa, E. J., Lemke, R. L., & Smith, P. (2010). Community corrections facilities for juvenile offenders in Ohio: An examination of treatment integrity and recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37, 695-708.10.1177/0093854810363721
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makarios, M. D., Steiner, B., & Travis, L. (2010). Examining the predictors of recidivism of in men and women released from prison in Ohio. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37, 1377-1391.10.1177/0093854810382876
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKenzie, D. L. (2000). Evidence-based corrections: Identifying what works. Crime & Delinquency, 46, 457-471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quay, H. (1977). The three faces of evaluation research: What can be expected to work. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 4, 341-354.10.1177/009385487700400402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaffer, D. K. (2011). Looking into the black box of drug courts: A meta-analytic review. Justice Quarterly, 28, 493-521.10.1080/07418825.2010.525222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar