The Effect of Pretrial Detention on Sentencing in Two Federal Districts

References

• Albonetti, C. (1991). An integration of theories to explain judicial discretion. Social Problems, 38, 247-266.10.2307/800532
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allan, A., Allan, M., Giles, M., Drake, D., & Froyland, I. (2005). An observational study of bail decision-making. Psychiatry, Psychology, and Law, 12, 319-333.10.1375/pplt.12.2.319
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, D. A., Bonta, J., & Wormith, S. (2006). The recent past and near future of risk and/or needs assessment. Crime & Delinquency, 52, 7-27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ares, C., Rankin, A., & Sturz, H. (1963). The Manhattan Bail project: An interim report on the pre-trial use of pre-trial parole. New York University Law Review, 38, 67-95.
   Google Scholar
• Austin, J., & Irwin, J. (2012). It’s about time: America’s imprisonment binge (4th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Baer, H., Jr. (1996). The alpha & (and) omega of supervised release. Albany Law Review, 60, 267-302.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, J. S., Jr. (2008). Revisiting the explosive growth of federal crimes (legal memorandum no. 26). Washington, DC: The Heritage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Bechtel, K., Lowenkamp, C. T., & Holsinger, A. (2011). Identifying the predictors of pretrial failure: A meta-analysis. Federal Probation, 75, 78-87.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, J., & Stowell, J. (2007). The impact of the Federal Pretrial Services Act of 1982 on the release, supervision, and detention of pretrial defendants. Federal Probation, 71, 31-38.
   Google Scholar
• Cadigan, T. P. (2007). Pretrial services in the federal system: Impact of the Pretrial Services Act of 1982. Federal Probation, 71, 10-15.
   Google Scholar
• Cadigan, T. P. (2009). Implementing evidence-based practices in federal pretrial services. Federal Probation, 73, 30-32.
   Google Scholar
• Cadigan, T. P., & Lowenkamp, C. T. (2011a). Implementing risk assessment in the federal pretrial services system. Federal Probation, 75, 30-34.
   Google Scholar
• Cadigan, T. P., & Lowenkamp, C. T. (2011b). Preentry: The key to long-term criminal justice success? Federal Probation, 75, 74-77.
   Google Scholar
• Clear, T. R. (2007). Imprisoning communities: How mass incarceration makes disadvantaged neighborhoods worse. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, T. H., & Reaves, B. A. (2007). State court processing statistics, 1990–2004: Pretrial release of felony defendants in state courts. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Daly, K., & Bordt, R. (1995). Sex effects and sentencing: A review of the statistical literature. Justice Quarterly, 12, 143-177.
   Google Scholar
• Doerner, J. K. (2012). Gender disparities in sentencing departures: An examination of U.S. federal courts. Women & Criminal Justice, 22, 176-205.
   Google Scholar
• Doerner, J. K., & Demuth, S. (2010). The independent and joint effects of race/ethnicity, gender, and age on sentencing outcomes in U.S. Federal Courts. Justice Quarterly, 27(1) 1-27.10.1080/07418820902926197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzmaurice, C., & Pease, K. (1986). The psychology of judicial sentencing. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foote, C. (1954). Compelling appearance in court: Administration of bail in Philadelphia. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 102, 1031-1079.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, J. (2008). Applied regression analysis and generalized linear models. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Frankel, M. E. (1973). Criminal sentences: Law without order. New York, NY: Hill and Wang.
   Google Scholar
• Free, M. D., Jr (2004). Bail and pretrial release decisions. Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice, 2, 23-44.10.1300/J222v02n04_02
   Google Scholar
• Freiburger, T. L. (2011). The impact of gender, offense type, and familial role on the decision to incarcerate. Social Justice Research, 24, 143-167.10.1007/s11211-011-0133-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freiburger, T. L., & Hilinski, C. M. (2011). Probation officers’ recommendations and final sentencing outcomes. Journal of Crime and Justice, 34, 45-61.10.1080/0735648X.2011.554746
   Google Scholar
• Frost, N. A., & Clear, T. R. (2012). New directions in correctional research. Justice Quarterly, 29, 619-649.10.1080/07418825.2012.703223
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldkamp, J. (1980). The effects of detention on judicial decisions: A closer look. Justice System Journal, 5, 234-257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottfredson, M. R., & Gottfredson, D. M. (1988). Decision-making in criminal justice: Toward the rational exercise of discretion. New York, NY: Plenum.10.1007/978-1-4757-9954-5
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, T., & Wooldredge, J. (2006). Sex-based disparities in felony dispositions before versus after sentencing reform in Ohio. Criminology, 44, 893-923.10.1111/crim.2006.44.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagan, J., Nagel, I. H., & Albonetti, C. (1980). The differential sentencing of white-collar offenders in ten federal district courts. American Sociological Review, 45, 802-820.10.2307/2094896
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrington, M. P., & Spohn, C. (2007). Defining sentence type: Further evidence against use of the total incarceration variable. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 44, 36-63.10.1177/0022427806295001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, T., & Reaves, B. (1999). Felony defendants in large urban counties, 1996. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Hogan, T. (2012). 2011 annual report of the director: Judicial business of the United States Courts. Washington, DC: Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts.
   Google Scholar
• Hogarth, J. (1971). Sentencing as a human process. Buffalo, NY: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, M., Daudistel, H., & Farrell, R. (1987). Determinants of charge reductions and final dispositions in cases of burglary and robbery. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 24, 233-254.10.1177/0022427887024003004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irwin, J. (1985). The jail: Managing the underclass in American society. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, Brian (2006). The multilevel context of criminal sentencing: Integrating judge- and county-level influences. Criminology, 44, 259-298.10.1111/crim.2006.44.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kellough, G., & Wortley, S. (2002). Remand for plea. Bail decisions and plea bargaining as commensurate decisions. British Journal of Criminology, 42, 186-210.10.1093/bjc/42.1.186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, S., Petersilia, J., & Turner, S. (1990). Race and imprisonment decisions in California. Science, 247, 812-816.10.1126/science.2305254
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer, J., & Steffensmeier, D. (1993). Race and imprisonment decisions. The Sociological Quarterly, 34, 357-376.10.1111/tsq.1993.34.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La Vigne, N., & Samuels, J. (2012). The growth & increasing cost of the federal prison system: Drivers and potential solutions. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Leiber, M. J., & Fox, K. C. (2005). Race and the impact of detention on juvenile justice decision making. Crime & Delinquency, 51, 470-497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lizotte, A. J. (1978). Extra-legal factors in Chicago’s criminal courts: Testing the conflict model of criminal justice. Social Problems, 25, 564-580.10.2307/800105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowenkamp, C. T., & Whetzel, J. (2009). The development of an actuarial risk assessment instrument for U.S. pretrial services. Federal Probation, 73, 33-36.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, M. J. (2007). Big prisons, big dreams. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maddala, G. (2001). Introduction to econometrics. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, O. (2005). A meta-analysis of race and sentencing research: Explaining the inconsistencies. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 21, 439-466.10.1007/s10940-005-7362-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, M. A., & Talarico, S. M. (1987). The social contexts of criminal sentencing. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.10.1007/978-1-4612-4732-6
   Google Scholar
• Neubauer, D. W. (2002). America’s courts and the criminal justice system. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Oleson, J. C. (2011). Blowing out all the candles: Some thoughts on the twenty-fifth anniversary of the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984. University of Richmond Law Review, 45, 693-763.
   Google Scholar
• Panzarella, R. (2002). Theory and practice of probation on bail in the report of John Augustus. Federal Probation, 66, 38-42.
   Google Scholar
• Petersilia, J. (2003). When prisoners come home: Parole and prisoner reentry. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Philips, M. T. (2007). Pretrial detention and case outcomes, part 1: Nonfelony cases. New York: New York City Criminal Justice Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Philips, M. T. (2008). Pretrial detention and case outcomes, part 2: Felony cases. New York: New York City Criminal Justice Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Philips, M. T. (2012). A decade of bail research in New York City. New York: New York City Criminal Justice Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Posner, R. A. (2008). How judges think. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rankin, A. (1964). The effect of pretrial detention. New York University Law Review, 39, 641-655.
   Google Scholar
• Raudenbush, S., & Bryk, A. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Raudenbush, S., Bryk, A., & Congdon, R. (2011). HLM 7: Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
   Google Scholar
• Reitler, A. K., Sullivan, C. J., & Frank, J. (2013). The effects of legal and extralegal factors on detention decisions in US district courts. Justice Quarterly, 30, 340-368.10.1080/07418825.2012.668925
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacks, M., & Ackerman, A. R. (2014). Bail and sentencing: Does pretrial detention lead to harsher punishment? Criminal Justice Policy Review, 25, 59–77.
   Google Scholar
• Scalia, J. (1996). Noncitizens in the federal criminal justice system, 1984–1994. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Shapland, J. (1982). Between conviction and sentence. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Spohn, C. (2009a). How do judges decide? The search for fairness and justice in punishment (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Spohn, C. (2009b). Race, sex, and pretrial detention in federal court: Indirect effects and cumulative disadvantage. University of Kansas Law Review, 879-901.
   Google Scholar
• Spohn, C., & Holleran, D. (2000). The imprisonment penalty paid by young, unemployed black and Hispanic male offenders. Criminology, 38, 281-306.10.1111/crim.2000.38.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffensmeier, D., & Demuth, S. (2000). Ethnicity and sentencing outcomes in U.S. federal courts: Who is punished more harshly? American Sociological Review, 65, 705-729.10.2307/2657543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffensmeier, D., & Motivans, M. (2000). Older men and older women in the arms of criminal law: Offending patterns and sentencing outcomes. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 55, S141-S151.10.1093/geronb/55.3.S141
   Google Scholar
• Steffensmeier, D., Ulmer, J. T., & Kramer, J. H. (1998). The interaction of race, gender, and age in criminal sentencing: The punishment cost of being young, black, and male. Criminology, 36, 763-798.10.1111/crim.1998.36.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stith, K., & Cabranes, J. A. (1998). Fear of judging: Sentencing guidelines in the federal courts. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tartaro, C., & Sedelmaier, C. M. (2009). A tale of two counties: The impact of pretrial release, race, and ethnicity upon sentencing decisions. Criminal Justice Studies, 22, 203-221.10.1080/14786010902975507
   Google Scholar
• Tonry, M. (1996). Sentencing matters. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ulmer, J. T. (1997). Social worlds of sentencing. Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Sentencing Commission (2012). Sentencing guidelines manual. Washington, DC: United States Sentencing Commission.
   Google Scholar
• VanNostrand, M., & Keebler, G. (2007). Our journey toward pretrial justice. Federal Probation, 71, 20-25.
   Google Scholar
• VanNostrand, M., & Keebler, G. (2009). Pretrial risk assessment in the federal court. Federal Probation, 73, 3-29.
   Google Scholar
• Wacquant, L. (2009). Prisons of poverty. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minneapolis Press.
   Google Scholar
• Western, B. (2006). Punishment and inequality in America. New York, NY: Russell Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, M. R. (2003). The effect of pretrial detention on imprisonment decisions. Criminal Justice Review, 28, 299-316.10.1177/073401680302800206
   Google Scholar
• Willison, D. (1984). The effects of counsel on the severity of criminal sentences: A statistical assessment. The Justice Journal, 9, 87-101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wooldredge, J. (2012). Distinguishing race effects on pre-trial release and sentencing decisions. Justice Quarterly, 29, 41-75.10.1080/07418825.2011.559480
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, J., & Spohn, C. (2010). Inter-district disparity in sentencing in three U.S. district courts. Crime & Delinquency, 56, 290-322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar