Victim Cooperation in Intimate Partner Sexual Assault Cases: A Mixed Methods Examination

References

• Alderden, M. A., & Ullman, S. E. (2012a). Creating a more complete and current picture: Examining police and prosecutor decision-making when processing sexual assault cases. Violence Against Women, 18, 525-551. doi:10.1177/1077801212453867
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alderden, M. A., & Ullman, S. E. (2012b). Gender difference or indifference? Detective decision making in sexual assault cases. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27, 3-22. doi:10.1177/0886260511416465
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, I., Beattie, G., & Spencer, C. (2001). Can blaming victims of rape be logical? Attribution theory and discourse analytic perspectives. Human Relations, 54, 445-467. doi:10.1177/0018726701544003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belknap, J. (2015). The invisible woman: Gender, crime, and justice (4th ed.). Stamford, CT: Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Belsley, D. A., Kuh, E., & Welsch, R. E. (1980). Regression diagnostics. New York, NY: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Bergen, R. (2004). Studying wife rape: Reflections on the past, present, and future. Violence Against Women, 10, 1407-1416. doi:10.1177/1077801204270557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berman, J. (2004). Domestic sexual assault: A new opportunity for court response. Juvenile & Family Court Journal, 55, 23-34. doi:10.1111/j.1755-6988.2004.tb00166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernard, H. R. (2000). Social research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J. M., Hamilton, C., & O’Neill, D. (2007). Characteristics associated with rape attrition and the role played by scepticism or legal rationality by investigators and prosecutors. Psychology, Crime and Law, 13, 355-370. doi:10.1080/10683160601060507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, J. M., & King, J. (1998). Gender differences in police officers’ attitudes towards rape: Results of an exploratory study. Psychology, Crime and Law, 4, 265-279. doi:10.1080/10683169808401760
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buzawa, E. S., & Buzawa, C. G. (1996). Domestic violence: The criminal justice system responses. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, A. (2005). Situational analysis: Grounded theory after the postmodern turn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson, M., & Dinovitzer, R. (2001). Victim cooperation and the prosecution of domestic violence in a specialized court. Justice Quarterly, 18, 593-622. doi:10.1080/07418820100095031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dichter, M. E., Cerulli, C., Kothari, C. L., Barg, F. K., & Rhodes, K. V. (2011). Engaging with criminal prosecution: The victim’s perspective. Women & Criminal Justice, 21, 21-37. doi:10.1080/08974454.2011.536053
   Google Scholar
• Edward, K. E., & MacLeod, M. D. (1999). The reality and myth of rape: Implications for the criminal justice system. Expert Evidence, 7, 37-58. doi:10.1023/A:1008917714094
   Google Scholar
• Estrich, S. (1987). Real rape. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Finkelhor, D., & Yllo, K. (1985). License to rape: Sexual abuse of wives. New York, NY: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Finn, P. (1989). Statutory authority in the use and enforcement of civil protection orders against domestic abuse. Family Law Quarterly, 23, 43-73. Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy1.lib.asu.edu/stable/25739797
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, D. (1991). Preventing and provoking wife battery through criminal sanctioning: A look at the risks. In D. D. Knudsen & J. L. Miller (Eds.), Abused and battered: Social and legal responses to family violence (pp. 191-209). New Brunswick, NJ: Aldine Transaction.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, J. (Ed.). (1991). Regression diagnostics: An introduction (Vol. 79). Newburry Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Garofalo, J. (1977). Public opinion about crime: The attitudes of victims and nonvictims in selected cities. Washinton, DC: Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
   Google Scholar
• Glendon, A. J. (1997). Review of selected 1996 California legislation: Evidence: Battling domestic violence through the admission of character evidence. Pacific Law Journal, 28, 789-1157.
   Google Scholar
• Gmel, G. (2001). Imputation of missing values in the case of a multiple item instrument measuring alcohol consumption. Statistics in Medicine, 20, 2369-2381. doi:10.1002/sim.837
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman, L., Bennett, L., & Dutton, M. A. (1999). Obstacles to victims’ cooperation with the criminal prosecution of their abusers: The role of social support. Violence and Victims, 14, 427-444. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10751049
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gordon, M. T., & Riger, S. (1989). The female fear: The social cost of rape. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grubb, A., & Turner, E. (2012). Attribution of blame in rape cases: A review of the impact of rape myth acceptance, gender role conformity, and substance use on victim blaming. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 17, 443-452. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2012.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, B. (1993). Battered women and the criminal justice system. American Behavioral Scientist, 36, 624-638.10.1177/0002764293036005007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, B. (1996). Victim issues [On-line]. [email protected]
   Google Scholar
• Hester, M. (2005). Making it through the criminal justice system: Attrition and domestic violence. Social Policy and Society, 5, 79-90.
   Google Scholar
• Hindelang, M. J. (1974). Public opinion regarding crime, criminal justice, and related topics. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 11, 101-116. doi:10.1177/002242787401100202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirschel, D., & Hutchison, I. W. (2003). The voices of domestic violence victims: Predictors of victim preference for arrest and the relationship between preference for arrest and revictimization. Crime & Delinquency, 49, 313-336. doi:10.1177/0011128702251067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmstrom, L. L., & Burgess, A. W. (1978). The victim of rape: Institution reactions. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, W., & Vaughn, M. S. (1996). Support and confidence: Public attitudes toward the police. In T. J. Flanagan & D. R. Longmire (Eds.), Americans view crime and justice: A national public opinion survey (pp. 31-45). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, B. E., Kuck, D. L., & Schander, P. R. (1997). Rape myth acceptance and sociodemographic characteristics: A multidimensional analysis. Sex Roles, 36, 693-707. doi:10.1023/A:1025671021697
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, J. (2001). Worlds apart? Women, rape and the police reporting process. British Journal of Criminology, 41, 679-706. doi:10.1093/bjc/41.4.679
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahn, A. S., Jackson, J., Kully, C., Badger, K., & Halvorsen, J. (2003). Calling it rape: Differences in experiences of women who do or do not label their sexual assault as rape. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 27, 233-242. doi:10.1111/1471-6402.00103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser, K. A., O’Neal, E. N., & Spohn, C. (2015). “Victim refuses to cooperate”: A focal concerns analysis of victim cooperation in sexual assault cases. Victims & Offenders, 1-26. doi:10.1080/15564886.2015.107886410.1080/15564886.2015.1078864
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerstetter, W. A., & Van Winkle, B. (1990). Who decides?: A study of the complainant’s decision to prosecute in rape cases. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17, 268-283. doi:10.1177/0093854890017003003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingsnorth, R. F., & Macintosh, R. C. (2004). Domestic violence: Predictors of victim support for official action. Justice Quarterly, 21, 301-328. doi:10.1080/07418820400095821
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingsnorth, R. F., MacIntosh, R. C., & Sutherland, S. (2002). Criminal charge or probation violation? Prosecutorial discretion and implications for research in criminal court processing. Criminology, 40, 553-578. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.2002.tb00966.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konradi, A. (2007). Taking the stand: Rape survivors and the prosecution of rapists. Westport, CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Koss, M. P. (1993). Detecting the scope of rape: A review of prevalence research methods. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 8, 198-222. doi:10.1177/088626093008002004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J., Lee, C., & Lee, W. (2012). Attitudes toward women, rape myths, and rape perceptions among male police officers in South Korea. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 36, 365-376. doi:10.1177/0361684311427538
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerman, L. G. (1980). Prosecution of spouse abuse: Innovations in criminal justice response. Washington, DC: Center for Women Policy Studies.
   Google Scholar
• McEwan, J. (2003). The verdict of the court: Passing judgment in law and psychology. Oxford: Hart.
   Google Scholar
• Morse, J. M. (1994). Designing funded qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.). (pp. 220-235). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Morse, J. M., Barrett, M., Mayan, M., Olson, K., & Spiers, J. (2002). Verification strategies for establishing reliability and validity in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1, 13-22.
   Google Scholar
• O’Neal, E. N., & Beckman, L. O. (2016). Intersections of race, ethnicity, and gender: Reframing knowledge surrounding barriers to social services among Latina intimate partner violence victims. Violence Against Women. Advanced online publication. doi:10.1177/1077801216646223
   Google Scholar
• O’Neal, E. N., & Spohn, C. (2016). When the perpetrator is a partner: Arrest and charging decisions in intimate partner sexual assault cases—A focal concerns analysis. Violence Against Women. Advanced online publication. doi:10.1177/1077801216650289
   Google Scholar
• O’Neal, E. N., Tellis, K., & Spohn, C. (2015). Prosecuting intimate partner sexual assault: Legal and extra-legal factors that influence charging decisions. Violence Against Women, 21, 1237-1258. doi:10.1177/1077801215591630
   Google Scholar
• Page, A. D. (2010). True colors: Police officers and rape myth acceptance. Feminist Criminology, 5, 315-334. doi:10.1177/1557085110384108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson, D. (2011). The linkage between secondary victimization by law enforcement and rape case outcomes. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26, 328-347. doi:10.1177/0886260510362889
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson, D., & Campbell, R. (2010). Why rape survivors participate in the criminal justice system. Journal of Community Psychology, 38, 191-205.10.1002/jcop.v38:2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollard, P. (1992). Judgements about victims and attackers in depicted rapes: A review. British Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 307-326. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.1992.tb00975.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratt, T., & Godsey, T. W. (2003). Social support, inequality, and homicide: A cross-national test of an integrated theoretical model. Criminology, 41, 101-133. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.2003.tb00999
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sack, E. J. (2010). Is domestic violence a crime? Intimate partner rape as allegory. St. John’s Journal of Legal Commentary, 24, 535-566.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, E. M. (2008). Domestic violence law reform in the twenty-first century: Looking back and looking forward. Family Law Quarterly, 42, 353-363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuller, R. A., & Stewart, A. (2000). Police responses to sexual assault complaints: The role of perpetrator/complainant intoxication. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 551. doi:0147-7307/00/1000-0535$18.00/1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuman, H., Steeh, C., Bobo, L., & Krysan, M. (1997). Racial attitudes in America. Cambridge, MS: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sleath, E., & Bull, R. (2012). Comparing rape victim and perpetrator blaming in a police officer sample: Differences between police officers with and without special training. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 39, 642-661. doi:10.1177/0093854811434696
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sleath, E., & Bull, R. (2015). A brief report on rape myth acceptance: Differences between police officers, law students, and psychology students in the United Kingdom. Violence and Victims, 30, 136-147.10.1891/0886-6708.VV-D-13-00035
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spohn, C., Beichner, D., & Davis-Frenzel, E. (2001). Prosecutorial justifications for sexual assault case rejection: Guarding the “gateway to justice”. Social Problems, 48, 206-235. Retrieved from https://doi.org.ezproxy1.lib.asu.edu/10.1525/sp.2001.48.2.20610.1525/sp.2001.48.2.206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spohn, C., & Horney, J. (1992). Rape law reform: A grassroots revolution and its impact. New York, NY: Plenum Press.10.1007/978-1-4899-0709-7
   Google Scholar
• Spohn, C., Rodriguez, N., & Koss, M. P. (2008, November). The “victim declined to prosecute”: Accounting for lack of cooperation in sexual assault cases. Annual Meeting of the American Society of Criminology, St. Louis, MO.
   Google Scholar
• Spohn, C., & Tellis, K. M. (2012). The criminal justice system’s response to sexual violence. Violence Against Women, 18, 169-192. doi:10.1177/1077801212440020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spohn, C., & Tellis, K. (2014). Policing & prosecuting sexual assault: Inside the criminal justice system. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Tellis, K. M. (2010). Rape as a part of domestic violence: A qualitative analysis of case narratives and official reports. El Paso, CA: LFB Scholarly Publishing LLC.
   Google Scholar
• Tellis, K., & Spohn, C. (2008). The sexual stratification hypothesis revisited: Testing assumptions about simple versus aggravated rape. Journal of Criminal Justice, 36, 252-261. doi:10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2008.04.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (2006). Extent, nature, and consequences of rape victimization: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R. (1989). The psychology of procedural justice: A test of the group-value model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 830-838. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.57.5.830
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2014). National crime victimization survey. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar