Punishment in Indian Country: Ironies of Federal Punishment of Native Americans

References

• Alvarez, A., & Bachman, R. (1996). American Indians and sentencing disparity: An Arizona test. Journal of Criminal Justice, 24, 549-561.10.1016/S0047-2352(96)00039-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, A., & Spohn, C. (2010). Lawlessness in the federal sentencing process: A test for uniformity and consistency in sentence outcomes. Justice Quarterly, 27, 362-393.10.1080/07418820902936683
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, D. J., & Curran, P. J. (2005). Probing interactions in fixed and multilevel regression: Inferential and graphical techniques. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 40, 373-400.10.1207/s15327906mbr4003_5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, B. A., Morgan, G. B., Kromrey, J. D., & Ferron, J. M. (2010). The impact of small cluster size on multilevel models: A Monte Carlo examination of two-level models with binary and continuous predictors. JSM Proceedings, Survey Research Methods Section, 4057-4067.
   Google Scholar
• Bushway, S., Johnson, B. D., & Slocum, L. A. (2007). Is the magic still there? The use of the Heckman two-step correction for selection bias in criminology. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 23, 151-178.10.1007/s10940-007-9024-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobie, K. (2011, February). Tiny little laws: A plague of sexual violence in Indian country. Harper’s Magazine, 55-64.
   Google Scholar
• Droske, T. J. (2008). Correcting Native American sentencing disparity post-Booker. Marquette Law Review, 91, 723-813.
   Google Scholar
• Engen, R., & Gainey, R. (2000). Conceptualizing legally relevant factors under guidelines: A reply to Ulmer. Criminology, 38, 1245-1252.10.1111/crim.2000.38.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Everett, R. S., & Wojtkiewicz, R. A. (2002). Difference, disparity, and race: Ethnic bias in federal sentencing. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 18, 189-211.10.1023/A:1015258732676
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feimer, S., Pommersheim, F., & Wise, S. (1990). ‘Marking time’: Does race make a difference? A study of disparate sentencing in South Dakota. Journal of Crime and Justice, 13, 86-102.10.1080/0735648X.1990.9721404
   Google Scholar
• Fischman, J., & Schanzenbach, M. (2012). Racial disparities under the federal sentencing guidelines: The role of judicial discretion and mandatory minimums. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 9, 729-764.10.1111/jels.2012.9.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franklin, T. W. (2013). Sentencing Native Americans in US federal courts: An examination of disparity. Justice Quarterly, 30, 310-339.10.1080/07418825.2011.605072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzales, A., Schofield, G., & Schmitt, G. (2005). Public law 280 and law enforcement in Indian country: Research priorities. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Hagan, J. (1989). Why is there so little criminal justice theory? Neglected macro- and micro-level links between organization and power. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 26, 116-135.10.1177/0022427889026002002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartley, R., & Tillyer, R. (2012). Defending the homeland: Judicial sentencing practices for federal immigration offenses. Justice Quarterly, 29, 76-104.10.1080/07418825.2011.585140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeffries, S., & Bond, C. E. W. (2012). The impact of indigenous status on adult sentencing: A review of the statistical research literature from the United States, Canada, and Australia. Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice, 10, 223-243.10.1080/15377938.2012.700830
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, B. D., Ulmer, J. T., & Kramer, J. H. (2008). The social context of guideline circumvention: The case of federal district courts. Criminology, 46, 711-783.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer, J. H., & Ulmer, J. T. (2009). Sentencing guidelines: Lessons from Pennsylvania. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
   Google Scholar
• Kurlychek, M., & Johnson, B. D. (2004). The juvenile penalty: A comparison of juvenile and young adult sentencing outcomes in criminal court. Criminology, 42, 485-515.10.1111/crim.2004.42.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leiber, M. J. (1994). A comparison of juvenile court outcomes for Native Americans, African Americans, and whites. Justice Quarterly, 11, 257-279.10.1080/07418829400092251
   Google Scholar
• Leiber, M. J., Johnson, J., Fox, K., & Lacks, R. (2007). Differentiating among racial/ethnic groups and its implications for understanding juvenile justice decision making. Journal of Criminal Justice, 35, 471-484.10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2007.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lockwood, K., Hart, T., & Stewart, A. (2015). First nations peoples and judicial sentencing: Main effects and the impact of contextual variability. British Journal of Criminology, 55, 769-789.10.1093/bjc/azv005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maas, C. J. M., & Hox, J. J. (2005). Sufficient sample sizes for multilevel modeling. Methodology, 1, 86-92.10.1027/1614-2241.1.3.86
   Google Scholar
• Miller, L., & Eisenstein, J. (2005). The federal/state criminal prosecution nexus: A case study in cooperation and discretion. Law and Social Inquiry, 30, 239-268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, O. (2005). A meta-analysis of race and sentencing research: Explaining the inconsistencies. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 21, 439-466.10.1007/s10940-005-7362-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, B. (2006). ‘Nobody trusts them!’ Under- and over-policing Native American communities. Critical Criminology, 14, 411-444.10.1007/s10612-006-9007-z
   Google Scholar
• Pommersheim, F. (1991). Tribal-state relations: Hope for the future? South Dakota Law Review, 36, 239-276.
   Google Scholar
• Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (Vol. 1). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Reitler, A. K., Sullivan, C., & Frank, J. (2013). The effects of legal and extralegal factors on detention decisions in US district courts. Justice Quarterly, 30, 340-368.10.1080/07418825.2012.668925
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez, N. (2003). The impact of ‘strikes’ in sentencing decisions: Punishment for only some habitual offenders. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 14, 106-127.10.1177/0887403402250918
   Google Scholar
• Rouse, L. P., & Hanson, J. R. (1991). American Indian stereotyping, resource competition, and status-based prejudice. American Indian Culture and Research Journal, 15, 1-17.10.17953/aicr.15.3.u34376346jj27v32
   Google Scholar
• Savelsberg, J. (1992). Law that does not fit society: Sentencing guidelines as a neoclassical reaction to the dilemmas of substantivized law. American Journal of Sociology, 97, 1346-1381.10.1086/229904
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shermer, L., & Johnson, B. D. (2010). Criminal prosecutions: Examining prosecutorial discretion and charge reductions in U.S. federal district courts. Justice Quarterly, 27, 394-430.10.1080/07418820902856972
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snijders, T., & Bosker, R. (1999). An introduction to basic and multilevel analysis. London: Sage Press.
   Google Scholar
• Snipp, C. M. (1986). The changing political and economic status of the American Indians. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 45, 145-158.10.1111/ajes.1986.45.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snipp, C. M. (1992). Sociological perspectives on American Indians. Annual Review of Sociology, 18, 351-371.10.1146/annurev.so.18.080192.002031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spohn, C. (2000). Thirty years of sentencing reform: The quest for a racially neutral sentencing process. In Policies, Processes and Decisions of the Criminal Justice System. Criminal Justice 2000 (Vol. 3). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Spohn, C., & Fornango, R. (2009). U.S. attorneys and substantial assistance departures: Testing for interprosecutor disparity. Criminology, 47, 813-846.10.1111/crim.2009.47.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starr, S. B., & Rehavi, M. (2013). Mandatory sentencing and racial disparity: Assessing the role of prosecutors and the effects of Booker. Yale Law Journal, 123, 2-80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffensmeier, D. J., Ulmer, J. T., & Kramer, J. H. (1998). The interaction of race, gender, and age in criminal sentencing: The punishment cost of being young, black, and male. Criminology, 36, 763-798.10.1111/crim.1998.36.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinman, E. (2012). Settler colonial power and the American Indian sovereignty movement: Forms of domination, strategies of transformation. American Journal of Sociology, 117, 1073-1130.10.1086/662708
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tredeau, E. (2011). Tribal control in federal sentencing. California Law Review, 99, 1409-1438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulmer, J. T. (2005). The localized uses of federal sentencing guidelines in four U.S. District Courts: Evidence of processual order. Symbolic Interaction, 28, 255-279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulmer, J. T. (2012). Recent developments and new directions in sentencing research. Justice Quarterly, 29, 1-40.10.1080/07418825.2011.624115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulmer, J. T., & Bradley, M. S. (2006). Variation in trial penalties among serious violent offenses. Criminology, 44, 631-670.10.1111/crim.2006.44.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulmer, J. T., & Johnson, B. D. (2004). Sentencing in context: A multilevel analysis. Criminology, 42, 137-178.10.1111/crim.2004.42.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulmer, J. T., & Kramer, J. H. (1996). Court communities under sentencing guidelines: Dilemmas of formal rationality and sentencing disparity. Criminology, 34, 383-408.10.1111/crim.1996.34.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulmer, J. T., Light, M., & Kramer, J. H. (2011). Does increased judicial discretion lead to increased disparity? The ‘liberation’ of judicial sentencing discretion in the wake of the Booker/Fanfan decision. Justice Quarterly, 28, 799-837.10.1080/07418825.2011.553726
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulmer, J. T., Painter-Davis, N., & Tinik, L. (2016). Disproportional imprisonment of Black and Hispanic males: Sentencing discretion, processing outcomes, and policy structures. Justice Quarterly, 33, 642-681.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United States Department of Justice. (2004). American Indians and crime. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics, Office of Justice Programs. Retrieved from https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/otj/docs/american_indians_and_crime.pdf
   Google Scholar
• United States Sentencing Commission. (2012). Report on the continuing impact of United States v. Booker on federal sentencing. Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://www.ussc.gov/news/congressional-testimony-and-reports/booker-reports/report-continuing-impact-united-states-v-booker-federal-sentencing
   Google Scholar
• United States Sentencing Commission. (2013). Quick facts: Native Americans in the federal offender population. Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://www.ussc.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/research-and-publications/quick-facts/Quick_Facts_Native_American_Offenders.pdf
   Google Scholar
• United States v. Big Crow. (1990). Eighth Circuit Court of the United States. 898 F.2d 1326.
   Google Scholar
• Weidner, R., Frase, R. S., & Schultz, J. (2005). The impact of contextual factors on the decision to imprison in large urban jurisdictions: A multilevel analysis. Crime & Delinquency, 51, 400-424.10.1177/0011128704271467
   Google Scholar
• Wilmot, K., & Delone, M. (2010). Sentencing of Native Americans: A multistage analysis under the minnesota sentencing guidelines. Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice, 8, 151-180.10.1080/15377938.2010.502821
   Google Scholar
• Zatz, M., Lujan, C., & Snyder-Joy, Z. (1991). American Indians and criminal justice: Some conceptual and methodological considerations. In M. Lynch & E. Patterson (Eds.), Race and criminal justice (pp. 100–112). New York, NY: Harrow and Heston Press.
   Google Scholar