Social Organization in Prison: A Social Network Analysis of Interpersonal Relationships among Dutch prisoners

References

• Adams, J., & Schaefer, D. R. (2016). How initial prevalence moderates network-based smoking change: Estimating contextual effects with stochastic actor-based models. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 57(1), 22–38. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0022146515627848
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aebi, M. F., Tiago, M. M., Berger-Kolopp, L., & Burkhardt, C. (2018). Council of Europe annual penal statistics. SPACE I – Prison populations. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
   Google Scholar
• Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497–529. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.117.3.497
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beer, A. M., Morgan, R. D., Garland, J. T., & Spanierman, L. B. (2007). The role of romantic/intimate relationships in the well-being of incarcerated females. Psychological Services, 4(4), 250–261. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/1541-1559.4.4.250
   Google Scholar
• Boone, M., & Moerings, M. (Eds.). (2007). Dutch prisons. The Hague: Eleven International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Boone, M., Athoff, M., & Koenraadt, F. (2016). Het leefklimaat in justitiële inrichtingen. Den Haag: Boom juridisch.
   Google Scholar
• Borgatti, S. P., Mehra, A., Brass, D. J., & Labianca, G. (2009). Network analysis in the social sciences. Science, 323(5916), 892–895. doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1165821
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bronson, E. F. (2008). He ain’t my brother… he’s my friend’ friendship in medium security prison. Critical Issues in Justice and Politics, 1(1), 63–74.
   Google Scholar
• Crewe, B. (2009). The prisoner society: Power, adaptation and social life in an English prison. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Looff, J., Van de Haar, M., Van Gemmert, N., & Valstar, H. (2017). DJI in getal 2012–2016. Den Haag: DJI.
   Google Scholar
• Desmond, A. M. (1991). The relationship between loneliness and social interaction in women prisoners. Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services, 29(3), 4–10. Retrieved from cmedm. (2037987)
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Durkheim, E. (1951). Suicide a study in sociology. Retrieved from https://trove.nla.gov.au/version/557234
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, E. M. (1990). Emotional, social, and physical health characteristics of older men in prison. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 31(4), 251–265. doi:https://doi.org/10.2190/QE9H-GV5T-KCJ6-EMJ4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodreau, S. M., Kitts, J. A., & Morris, M. (2009). Birds of a feather, or friend of a friend? Using exponential random graph models to investigate adolescent social networks. Demography, 46(1), 103–125. doi:https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.0.0045
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grund, T. U., & Densley, J. A. (2015). Ethnic homophily and triad closure: Mapping internal gang structure using exponential random graph models. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 31(3), 354–370. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1043986214553377
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, J. A. (2011). Sex differences in friendship expectations: A meta-analysis. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 28(6), 723–747. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407510386192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handcock, M. S., Hunter, D. R., Butts, C. T., Goodreau, S. M., & Morris, M. (2008). statnet: Software tools for the representation, visualization, analysis and simulation of network data. Journal of Statistical Software, 24(1), 1548–7660. doi:https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v024.i01
   Google Scholar
• Handcock, M. S., Hunter, D. R., Butts, C. T., Goodreau, S. M., Krivitsky, P. N., Bender-deMoll, S., & Morris, M. (2016). Package “statnet”: Software tools for the statistical analysis of network data. The Statnet Project (http://www.statnet.org)
   Google Scholar
• Hart, C. B. (1995). Gender differences in social support among inmates. Women & Criminal Justice, 6(2), 67–88. doi:https://doi.org/10.1300/J012v06n02_04
   Google Scholar
• Hunter, D. R., Goodreau, S. M., & Handcock, M. S. (2008). Goodness of fit of social network models. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 103(481), 248–258. doi:https://doi.org/10.1198/016214507000000446
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irwin, J., & Cressey, D. R. (1962). Thieves, convicts and the inmate culture. Social Problems, 10(2), 142–155. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/799047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kossinets, G. (2006). Effects of missing data in social networks. Social Networks, 28(3), 247–268. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2005.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krabill, J. J., & Aday, R. H. (2007). Exploring the social world of aging female prisoners. Women & Criminal Justice, 17(1), 27–53. doi:https://doi.org/10.1300/J012v17n01_02
   Google Scholar
• Kreager, D. A., Palmen, H., Dirkzwager, A. J. E., & Nieuwbeerta, P. (2016). Doing your own time: Peer integration, aggression and mental health in Dutch male detainment facilities. Social Science & Medicine, 151, 92–99. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.01.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreager, D. A., Schaefer, D. R., Bouchard, M., Haynie, D. L., Wakefield, S., Young, J., & Zajac, G. (2016). Toward a criminology of inmate networks. Justice Quarterly, 33(6), 1000–1028. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2015.1016090
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreager, D. A., Young, J. T. N., Haynie, D. L., Bouchard, M., Schaefer, D. R., & Zajac, G. (2017). Where “old heads” prevail: Inmate hierarchy in a men’s prison unit. American Sociological Review, 82(4), 685–718. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122417710462
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liebling, A., & Arnold, H. (2012). Social relationships between prisoners in a maximum security prison: Violence, faith, and the declining nature of trust. Journal of Criminal Justice, 40(5), 413–424. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2012.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindquist, C. H. (2000). Social integration and mental well-being among jail inmates. Sociological Forum, 15(3), 431–455. doi:https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007524426382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubbers, M. J., & Snijders, T. A. B. (2007). A comparison of various approaches to the exponential random graph model: A reanalysis of 102 student networks in school classes. Social Networks, 29(4), 489–507. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2007.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27(1), 415–444. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moerings, M. (2007). Persistent offenders. In M. Boone & M. Moerings (Eds.), Dutch prisons (pp. 187–205). Den Haag: BJu Publishers
   Google Scholar
• Pager, D. (2003). The mark of a criminal record. American Journal of Sociology, 108(5), 937–975. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/374403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papachristos, A. V. (2013). The importance of cohesion for gang research, policy, and practice: Civil gang injunctions. Criminology & Public Policy, 12(1), 49–58. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasbash, J., Browne, W., Goldstein, H., Yang, M., Plewis, I., Healy, M., & Lewis, T. (2000). A user’s guide to MLwiN. London: Institute of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Schaefer, D. R., Bouchard, M., Young, J. T. N., & Kreager, D. A. (2017). Friends in locked places: An investigation of prison inmate network structure. Social Networks, 51, 88–103. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2016.12.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sentse, M., Kiuru, N., Veenstra, R., & Salmivalli, C. (2014). A social network approach to the interplay between adolescents’ bullying and likeability over time. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43(9), 1409–1420. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-014-0129-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Severance, T. A. (2005). “You know who you can go to”: Cooperation and exchange between incarcerated women. The Prison Journal, 85(3), 343–367. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885505279522
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrivastava, R. S. (1973). Formation and functioning of friendship groups : A sociological study among prison inmates. Sociological Bulletin, 22(1), 98–111. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0038022919730107
   Google Scholar
• Simons, D. J. (2014). The value of direct replication. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(1), 76–80. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691613514755
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skarbek, D. (2014). The social order of the underworld: How prison gangs govern the American penal system. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Steglich, C., Snijders, T. A. B., & Pearson, M. (2010). Dynamic networks and behavior: Separating selection from influence. Sociological Methodology, 40(1), 329–393. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9531.2010.01225.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sykes, G. M. (1958). The society of captives: A study of a maximum security prison. Retrieved from http://press.princeton.edu/titles/8390.html
   Google Scholar
• Trammell, R. (2009). Values, rules, and keeping the peace: How men describe order and the inmate code in California prisons. Deviant Behavior, 30(8), 746–771. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01639620902854662
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valente, T. W. (2012). Network interventions. Science, 337(6090), 49–53. doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1217330
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Ginneken, E. F. J. C., Palmen, H., Bosma, A. Q., Nieuwbeerta, P., & Berghuis, M. L. (2018). The life in custody study: The quality of prison life in Dutch prison regimes. Journal of Criminological Research, Policy and Practice, 4(4), 253–268. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/JCRPP-07-2018-0020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veenstra, R., Dijkstra, J. K., & Kreager, D. A. (2018). Pathways, networks, and norms: A sociological perspective on peer research. In Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups (2nd ed., pp. 45–63). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Veenstra, R., Dijkstra, J. K., Steglich, C., & Van Zalk, M. H. W. (2013). Network-behavior dynamics. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23(3), 399–412. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visher, C. A., & Travis, J. (2003). Transitions from prison to community: Understanding individual pathways. Annual Review of Sociology, 29(1), 89–113. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.29.010202.095931
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volker, B., De Cuyper, R., Mollenhorst, G., Dirkzwager, A., van der Laan, P., & Nieuwbeerta, P. (2016). Changes in the social networks of prisoners: A comparison of their networks before and after imprisonment. Social Networks, 47, 47–58. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2016.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wakefield, S., & Uggen, C. (2010). Incarceration and Stratification. Annual Review of Sociology, 36(1), 387–406. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102551
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walmsley, R. (2015). World prison population list (11th ed.). Retrieved from http://www.prisonstudies.org/sites/default/files/resources/downloads/world_prison_population_list_11th_edition_0.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Weerman, F. M. (2011). Delinquent peers in context: A longitudinal network analysis of selection and influence effects. Criminology, 49(1), 253–286. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2010.00223.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wulf-Ludden, T. (2013). Interpersonal relationships among inmates and prison violence. Journal of Crime and Justice, 36(1), 116–136. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0735648X.2012.755467
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, J., Shoham, D. A., Tesdahl, E., & Gesell, S. B. (2015). Network interventions on physical activity in an afterschool program: An agent-based social network study. American Journal of Public Health, 105(S2), S236–S243. doi:https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2014.302277
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar