References
- Agnew, R. (1991). The interactive effects of peer variables on delinquency. Criminology, 29(1), 47–72. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1991.tb01058.x
- Agnew, R. (1994). The techniques of neutralization and violence. Criminology, 32(4), 555–580. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1994.tb01165.x
- Aizenman, J. (1998). Buffer stocks and precautionary savings with loss aversion. Journal of International Money and Finance, 17(6), 931–947. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-5606(98)00035-7
- Ajzen, I. (1998). Models of human social behavior and their application to health psychology. Psychology & Health, 13(4), 735–739. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/08870449808407426
- Ajzen I. (1988). Attitudes, personality, and behavior. Chicago, IL: Dorsey Press.
- Akers, R. L., Krohn, M. D., Lanza-Kaduce, L., & Radosevich, M. (1979). Social learning and deviant behavior: A specific test of a general theory. American Sociological Review, 44(4), 636–655.
- Akers, R. (1990). Rational choice, deterrence, and social learning theory in criminology: The path not taken. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 81(3), 653–676. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/1143850
- Akers, R. L., & Cochran, J. K. (1985). Adolescent marijuana use: A test of three theories of deviant behavior. Deviant Behavior, 6(4), 323–346.
- Akers, R. L. (1998). Social learning and social structure. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
- Ali, M. (1977). Probability and utility estimates for racetrack bettors. Journal of Political Economy, 85(4), 803–815. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/260600
- Allen, J. P., Porter, M. R., McFarland, F. C., Marsh, P., McElhany, K. B., & Boykin, K. (2005). The two faces of adolescents' success with peers: Adolescent popularity, social adaptation, and deviant behavior. Child Development, 76(3), 747–760. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00875.x
- Anderson, E. (1999). Code of the street: Decency, violence, and the moral life of the inner city. New York, NY: W.W Norton.
- Anderson, C., John, O. P., Keltner, D., & Kring, A. M. (2001). Who attains social status? Effects of personality and physical attractiveness in social groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(1), 116–132. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.81.1.116
- Arora, M., & Kumari, S. (2015). Risk taking in financial decisions as a function of age, gender: Mediating role of loss aversion and regret. International Journal of Applied Psychology, 5(4), 83–89.
- Bellemare, C., Krause, M., Kröger, S., & Zhang, C. (2005). Myopic loss aversion: Information feedback vs. investment flexibility. Economics Letters, 87(3), 319–324. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2004.12.011
- Berndt, T. (1979). Developmental changes in conformity to peers and parents. Developmental Psychology, 15(6), 608–616. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.15.6.608
- Beyth-Marom, R., Austin, L., Fischhoff, B., Palmgren, C., & Jacobs-Quadrel, M. (1993). Perceived consequences of risky behaviors: Adults and adolescents. Developmental Psychology, 29(3), 549–563. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.29.3.549
- Bowman, D., & Rabin, M. (1999). Loss aversion in a consumption–savings model. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 38(2), 155–178.
- Brown, B. B., & Larson, J. (2009). Peer relationships in adolescence. In R. M. Lerner & L. Steinberg (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology: Contextual influences on adolescent development (p. 74–103). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
- Burgess, R., & Akers, R. (1966). A Differential association-reinforcement theory of criminal behavior. Social Problems, 14(2), 128–147. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/798612
- Camerer, C. (1998). Prospect theory in the wild: Evidence from the field. In Camerer, C. F., Loewenstein, G., & Rabin, M. (Eds.) Advances in behavioral economics (pp. 148–161). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Cohen, J. (1977). Sources of peer group homogeneity. Sociology of Education, 50(4), 227–241. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2112497
- Conger, R. (1976). Social control and social learning models of delinquent behavior: A synthesis. Criminology, 14(1), 17–40. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1976.tb00002.x
- Costello, B. (2010). Peer influence toward conformity. Journal of Crime and Justice, 33(1), 97–116. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0735648X.2010.9721281
- Costello, B. J., & Hope, T. L. (2016). Peer pressure, peer prevention: The role of friends in crime and conformity. New York, NY: Routledge.
- Costello, B., & Zozula, C. (2018). Peer influence: Mechanisms and motivations. Deviant Behavior, 39(1), 94–110. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2016.1260387
- Crosbie, J. (1998). Negative reinforcement and punishment. In Lattal, K. A. & Perone, M. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in human operant behavior (pp. 163–189). Boston, MA: Springer.
- Dodge, K. A., Dishion, T. J., & Lansford, J. E. (2007). Deviant peer influences in programs for youth: Problems and solutions. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
- Eggleston, E. P., Laub, J. H., & Sampson, R. J. (2004). Methodological sensitivities to latent class analysis of long-term criminal trajectories. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 20(1), 1–26. doi:https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOQC.0000016696.02763.ce
- Engström, P., Nordblom, K., Ohlsson, H., & Persson, A. (2015). Tax compliance and loss aversion. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 7(4), 132–164.
- Exum, M. L., Turner, M. G., & Hartman, J. L. (2012). Self-reported intentions to offend: All talk and no action? American Journal of Criminal Justice, 37(4), 523–543. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-011-9148-9
- Fryer, R. G., Levitt, S. D., & Sadoff, S. (2012). Enhancing the efficacy of teacher incentives through loss aversion: A field experiment. NBER Working Paper Series, 1–36.
- Gardner, M., & Steinberg, L. (2005). Peer influence on risk taking, risk preference, and risky decision making in adolescence and adulthood: An experimental study. Developmental Psychology, 41(4), 625–635. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.41.4.625
- Giordano, P., Cernkovich, S., & Pugh, M. (1986). Friendships and delinquency. American Journal of Sociology, 91(5), 1170–1202. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/228390
- Goldman, L., Giles, H., & Hogg, M. A. (2014). Going to extremes: Social identity and communication processes associated with gang membership. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 17(6), 813–832.
- Grasmick, H. G., & Bursik, R. J. Jr, (1990). Conscience, significant others, and rational choice: Extending the deterrence model. Law & Society Review, 24(3), 837–861.
- Haigh, M., & List, J. (2005). Do professional traders exhibit myopic loss aversion? An experimental analysis. The Journal of Finance, 60(1), 523–534. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2005.00737.x
- Haynie, D. (2001). Delinquent peers revisited: Does network structure matter? American Journal of Sociology, 106(4), 1013–1057. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/320298
- Hirschi, T. (1969). Causes of delinquency. New Brunswick, NJ: Routledge.
- Hirschi, T. (1986). On the Compatibility of Rational Choice and Social Control Theories of Crime. In D. Cornish and R, Clarke (Eds.) The Reasoning Criminal: Rational Choice Perspectives on Offending. New York, NY: Springer-Verla.
- Hoeben, E. M., & Thomas, K. J. (2019). Peers and offender decision‐making. Criminology & Public Policy, 18(4), 759–784.
- Holt, T., Burruss, G., & Bossler, A. (2010). Examining the importance of a full social learning model in the virtual world. Journal of Crime and Justice, 33(2), 31–61. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0735648X.2010.9721287
- Hughes, R., & Huby, M. (2002). The application of vignettes in social and nursing research. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 37(4), 382–386. doi:https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2002.02100.x
- Hughes, L. A. (2013). Group cohesiveness, gang member prestige, and delinquency and violence in Chicago, 1959–1962. Criminology, 51(4), 795–832. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12020
- Hull, C. L. (1943). Principles of behavior (Vol. 422). New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
- Jeffery, C. R. (1965). Criminal behavior and learning theory. The Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology, and Police Science, 56(3), 294–300. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/1141238
- Jervis, R. (1992). Political implications of loss aversion. Political Psychology, 13(2), 187–204. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/3791678
- Jullien, B., & Bernard, S. (1997). Estimating preferences under risk: The case of racetrack bettors. IDEI and GREMAQ Toulouse University Working Paper.
- Kahneman, J., Knetsch, R., & Thaler, R. H. (1990). Experimental tests of the endowment effect and the Coase theorem. Journal of Political Economy, 98(6), 1325–1348. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/261737
- Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–2922. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185
- Kapadia, F., Frye, V., Bonner, S., Emmanuel, P. J., Samples, C. L., & Latka, M. H. (2012). Perceived peer safer sex norms and sexual risk behaviors among substance-using Latino adolescents. AIDS Education and Prevention: Official Publication of the International Society for AIDS Education, 24(1), 27–40. doi:https://doi.org/10.1521/aeap.2012.24.1.27
- Kreager, D. A. (2004). Strangers in the halls: Isolation and delinquency in school networks. Social Forces, 83(1), 351–390. doi:https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2004.0117
- Kreager, D. A., Rulison, K., & Moody, J. (2011). Delinquency and the structure of adolescent peer groups. Criminology : An Interdisciplinary Journal, 49(1), 95–127. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2010.00219.x
- Levin, I., Schneider, S., & Gaeth, G. (1998). All frames are not created equal: A typology and critical analysis of framing effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 76(2), 149–188. doi:https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1998.2804
- Loughran, T. A., Paternoster, R., Chalfin, A., & Wilson, T. (2016). Can rational choice be considered a general theory of crime? Evidence from individual-level panel data. Criminology, 54(1), 86–112. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12097
- Loughran, T. A., Paternoster, R., & Thomas, K. J. (2014). Incentivizing responses to self-report questions in perceptual deterrence studies: An investigation of the validity of deterrence theory using Bayesian truth serum. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 30(4), 677–707. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-014-9219-4
- Marr, J., & Thau, S. (2014). Falling from great (and not-so-great) heights: How initial status position influences performance after status loss. Academy of Management Journal, 57(1), 223–248. doi:https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0909
- Matsueda, R. L., Huizinga, D., & Kreager, D. A. (2006). Deterring delinquents: A rational choice model of theft and violence. American Sociological Review, 71(1), 95–122. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240607100105
- McCarthy, B. (2002). New economics of sociological criminology. Annual Review of Sociology, 28(1), 417–442. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.140752
- McGloin, J. M. (2009). Delinquency balance: Revisiting peer influence. Criminology, 47(2), 439–477. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2009.00146.x
- McGloin, J. M., & Rowan, Z. R. (2015). A threshold model of collective crime. Criminology, 53(3), 484–512. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12077
- McGloin, J. M., & Thomas, K. J. (2016). Incentives for collective deviance: Group size and changes in perceived risk, cost, and reward. Criminology, 54(3), 459–486. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12111
- McGloin, J. M., & Thomas, K. J. (2019). Peer influence and delinquency. Annual Review of Criminology, 2(1), 241–264. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-criminol-011518-024551
- McPhail, C. (1991). The myth of the madding crowd. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
- Nagin, D. S. (2007). Moving choice to center stage in criminological research and theory. Criminology, 45(2), 259–272. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2007.00078.x
- Nagin, D., & Paternoster, R. (1994). Personal capital and social control: The deterrence implications of a theory of individual differences in criminal offending. Criminology, 32(4), 581–606. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1994.tb01166.x
- Nagin, D., & Pogarsky, G. (2001). Integrating celerity, impulsivity, and extralegal sanction threats into a model of general deterrence: Theory and evidence. Criminology, 39(4), 865–892. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2001.tb00943.x
- Nagin, D., & Pogarsky, G. (2004). Time and punishment: Delayed consequences and criminal behavior. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 20(4), 295–317. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-004-5866-1
- Osgood, D. W., Wilson, J. K., O'Malley, P. M., Bachman, J. G., & Johnston, L. D. (1996). Routine activities and individual deviant behavior. American Sociological Review, 61(4), 635–655. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2096397
- Paternoster, R., McGloin, J. M., Nguyen, H., & Thomas, K. J. (2013). The causal impact of exposure to deviant peers: An experimental investigation. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 50(4), 476–503. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427812444274
- Pickett, J. T., Barnes, J. C., Wilson, T., & Patrick Roche, S. (2020). Prospect theory and criminal choice: Experiments testing framing, reference dependence, and decision weights. Justice Quarterly, 37(6), 1140–1168.
- Piquero, N. L. (2012). The only thing we have to fear is fear itself: Investigating the relationship between fear of falling and white-collar crime. Crime & Delinquency, 58(3), 362–379.
- Piquero, A. R., Paternoster, R., Pogarsky, G., & Loughran, T. A. (2011). Elaborating the individual difference component in deterrence theory. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 7(1), 335–360. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-102510-105404
- Pogarsky, G. (2004). Projected offending and contemporaneous rule‐violation: Implications for heterotypic continuity. Criminology, 42(1), 111–136. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2004.tb00515.x
- Pratt, T. C., Cullen, F. T., Sellers, C. S., Thomas Winfree Jr, L., Madensen, T. D., Daigle, L. E., Fearn, N.E., & Gau, J. M. (2010). The empirical status of social learning theory: A meta‐analysis. Justice Quarterly, 27(6), 765–802.
- Prislin, R., Limbert, W. M., & Bauer, E. (2000). From majority to minority and vice versa: The asymmetrical effects of losing and gaining majority position within a group. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(3), 385–397. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.79.3.385
- Rambaran, J. A., Schwartz, D., Badaly, D., Hopmeyer, A., Steglich, C., & Veenstra, R. (2017). Academic functioning and peer influences: A short-term longitudinal study of network-behavior dynamics in middle adolescence. Child Development, 88(2), 523–543. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12611
- Ridgeway, C. L. (1978). Conformity, group-oriented motivation, and status attainment in small groups. Social Psychology, 41(3), 175–188. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/3033555
- Ridgeway, C. L. (1982). Status in groups: The importance of motivation. American Sociological Review, 47(1), 76–88. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2095043
- Romanowich, P., & Lamb, R. J. (2013). The effect of framing incentives as either losses or gains with contingency management for smoking cessation. Addictive Behaviors, 38(4), 2084–2088. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2013.01.007
- Sampson, R. J., & Bartusch, D. J. (1998). Legal cynicism and (subcultural?) tolerance of deviance: The neighborhood context of racial differences. Law & Society Review, 32(4), 777–804. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/827739
- Sampson, R. J., & Laub, J. H. (1993). Structural variations in juvenile court processing: Inequality, the underclass, and social control. Law & Society Review, 27(2), 285–311. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/3053938
- Schreck, C. J., Fisher, B. S., & Miller, J. M. (2004). The social context of violent victimization: A study of the delinquent peer effect. Justice Quarterly, 21(1), 23–47. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820400095731
- Schulenberg, J. E., Johnston, L. D., O'Malley, P. M., Bachman, J. G., Miech, R. A., & Patrick, M. E. (2018). Monitoring the future national survey results on drug use, 1975–2017: Volume II, college students and adults ages 19–55. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.
- Shea, J. (1995). Myopia, liquidity constraints, and aggregate consumption: A simple test. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 27(3), 798. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2077751
- Shefrin, H., & Statman, M. (1985). The disposition to sell winners too early and ride losers too long: Theory and evidence. The Journal of Finance, 40(3), 777–790. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1985.tb05002.x
- Short, J. F. & Strodtbeck, F. L. (1965). Group process and gang delinquency. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
- Sitren, A. H., & Applegate, B. K. (2007). Testing the deterrent effects of personal and vicarious experience with punishment and punishment avoidance. Deviant Behavior, 28(1), 29–55. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01639620600887261
- Stafford, M. C., & Warr, M. (1993). A reconceptualization of general and specific deterrence. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 30(2), 123–135. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427893030002001
- Steffensmeier, D., & Ulmer, J. T. (2013). Taking criminal opportunity seriously. In F. T. Cullen, P. Wilcox, R. J. Sampson, & B. D. Dooley (Eds.), Challenging criminological theory: The legacy of Ruth Rosner Kornhauser (pp. 361–397). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
- Stewart, E. A., Schreck, C. J., & Simons, R. L. (2006). “I ain’t gonna let no one disrespect me”: Does the code of the street reduce or increase violent victimization among African American adolescents? Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 43(4), 427–458. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427806292338
- Teunissen, R., Spijkerman, R., Prinstein, M. J., Cohen, G. L., Engels, R. C., & Scholte, R. H. (2012). Adolescents’ conformity to their peers’ pro-alcohol and anti-alcohol norms: The power of popularity. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 36(7), 1257–1267. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-0277.2011.01728.x
- Thomas, K. J. (2018). Revisiting delinquent attitudes: Measurement, dimensionality and behavioral effects. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 34(1), 313–341. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-016-9336-3
- Thomas, K. J., Hamilton, B. C., & Loughran, T. A. (2018). Testing the transitivity of reported risk perceptions: Evidence of coherent arbitrariness. Criminology, 56(1), 59–86. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12154
- Thomas, K. J., & Loughran, T. A. (2014). Rational choice and prospect theory. In Bruinsma, G. & Weisburd, D. (Eds.) Encyclopedia of criminology and criminal justice (pp. 4298-4306). New York, NY: Springer.
- Thomas, K. J., & Vogel, M. (2019). Testing a rational choice model of “desistance:” Decomposing changing expectations and changing utilities. Criminology, 57(4), 687–714. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12223
- Thornberry, T. (1987). Toward an interactional theory of delinquency. Criminology, 25(4), 863–892. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1987.tb00823.x
- Thornberry, T. P., Lizotte, A. J., Krohn, M. D., Farnworth, M., & Jang, S. J. (1994). Delinquent peers, beliefs, and delinquent behavior: A longitudinal test of interactional theory. Criminology, 32(1), 47–83. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1994.tb01146.x
- Topalli, V. (2005). When being good is bad: An expansion of neutralization theory. Criminology, 43(3), 797–836. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0011-1348.2005.00024.x
- Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1979). On the interpretation of intuitive probability: A reply to Jonathan Cohen. Cognition, 7(4), 409–411.
- Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1991). Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference-dependent model. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(4), 1039–1061. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2937956
- Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5(4), 297–323. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00122574
- Van Gelder, J. L. (2018). Present in your future: Pathways towards a new generation of crime research. Enschede, Netherlands: University of Twente.
- Warr, M. (2002). Companions in crime: The social aspects of criminal conduct. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
- Wechsler, H., Lee, J. E., Nelson, T. F., & Lee, H. (2003). Drinking and driving among college students: The influence of alcohol-control policies. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 25(3), 212–218. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/s0749-3797(03)00199-5
- Williams, K. R., & Hawkins, R. (1986). Perceptual research on general deterrence: A critical review. Law & Society Review, 20(4), 545–572. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/3053466