Do Morality and Self-Control Protect from Criminogenic Peer Influence? Testing Multidimensional Person–Environment Interactions

References

• Ai, C., & Norton, E. (2003). Interaction terms in logit and probit models. Economics Letters, 80(1), 123–129. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-1765(03)00032-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aiken, L., & West, S. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Akers, R. (1998). Social learning and social structure. A general theory of crime and deviance. Northeastern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Akers, R., & Jensen, G. (2006). The empirical status of Social Learning Theory of crime and deviance: The past, presence, and future. In F. Cullen, J. Wright, & K. Blevins (Eds.), Taking stock: The status of criminological theory (pp. 37–76). Transaction.]
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, R. (2008). Modern methods for robust regression. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, E. (1999). Code of the street. Decency, violence, and the moral life of the inner city. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Antonaccio, O., & Tittle, C. (2008). Morality, self-control, and crime. Criminology, 46(2), 479–510. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2008.00116.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arneklev, J., Grasmick, H., Tittle, C., & Bursik, R. (1993). Low self-control and imprudent behavior. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 9(3), 225–247. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01064461
   Google Scholar
• Baerveldt, C., Völker, B., & van Rossem, R. (2008). Revisiting selection and influence: An inquiry into the friendship networks of high school students and their association with delinquency. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 50(5), 559–587. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3138/cjccj.50.5.559
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, J., Raine, A., & Farrington, D. (2020). The interaction of biopsychological and socio-environmental influences on criminal outcomes. Justice Quarterly. (Online first) https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2020.1730425
   Google Scholar
• Barton-Crosby, J., & Hirtenlehner, H. (2020). The role of morality and self-control in conditioning the criminogenic effect of provocation. A Partial Test of Situational Action Theory. Deviant Behavior. (online first) https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2020.1738645
   Google Scholar
• Baumeister, R., Heatherton, D., & Tice, D. (1994). Losing control. How and why people fail at self-regulation. Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beier, H. (2018). Situational peer effects on adolescents’ alcohol consumption: The moderating role of supervision, activity structure, and personal moral rules. Deviant Behavior, 39(3), 363–379. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2017.1286173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bendixen, M., Endresen, I., & Olweus, D. (2003). Variety and frequency scales of antisocial involvement: Which one is better? Legal and Criminological Psychology, 8(2), 135–150. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1348/135532503322362924
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernasco, W., Ruiter, S., Bruinsma, G., Pauwels, L., & Weerman, F. (2013). Situational causes of offending: A fixed-effects analysis of space-time budget data. Criminology, 51(4), 895–926. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry, W., DeMeritt, J., & Esarey, J. (2010). Testing for interaction in binary logit and probit models: Is a product term essential? American Journal of Political Science, 54(1), 248–266. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00429.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boers, K., Reinecke, J., Seddig, D., & Mariotti, L. (2010). Explaining the development of adolescent violent delinquency. European Journal of Criminology, 7(6), 499–520. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370810376572
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boman, J., Stogner, J., Miller, B., Griffin, O., & Krohn, M. (2012). On the operational validity of perceptual peer delinquency: Exploring projection and elements contained in perceptions. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 49(4), 601–621. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427811419367
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowen, H. (2012). Testing moderating hypotheses in limited dependent variable and other nonlinear models: Secondary versus total interactions. Journal of Management, 38(3), 860–889. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309356324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braithwaite, J. (1989). Crime, shame and reintegration. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brauer, J., & Tittle, C. (2017). When crime is not an option: Inspecting the moral filtering of criminal action alternatives. Justice Quarterly, 34(5), 818–846. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2016.1226937
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, T. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bruinsma, G., Pauwels, L., Weerman, F., & Bernasco, W. (2015). Situational Action Theory: Cross-sectional and cross-lagged tests of its core propositions. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 57(3), 363–398. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3138/cjccj.2013.E24
   Google Scholar
• Burt, C. (2020). Self-control and crime: Beyond Gottfredson & Hirschi’s theory. Annual Review of Criminology, 3(1), 43–73. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-criminol-011419-041344
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Burt, C., Simons, R., & Simons, L. (2006). A longitudinal test of the effect of parenting and the stability of self-control: Negative evidence for the General Theory of Crime. Criminology, 44(2), 353–396. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2006.00052.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caspi, A., Moffitt, T., Silva, P., Stouthamer-Loeber, M., Krueger, R., & Schmutte, P. (1994). Are some people crime-prone? Replications of the personality–crime relationship across countries, genders, races, and methods. Criminology, 32(2), 163–195. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1994.tb01151.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., & Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A Routine Activity Approach. American Sociological Review, 44(4), 588–608. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/2094589
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig, J. (2019). Extending Situational Action Theory to white-collar crime. Deviant Behavior, 40(2), 171–186. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2017.1420444
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crump, R., Hotz, V., Imbens, G., & Mitnik, O. (2008). Nonparametric tests for treatment effect heterogeneity. Review of Economics and Statistics, 90(3), 389–405. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1162/rest.90.3.389
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLisi, M. (2017). Psychopathy as unified theory of crime. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Desmond, S., Bruce, A., & Stacer, M. (2012). Self-control, opportunity, and substance use. Deviant Behavior, 33(6), 425–447. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2011.584055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etzioni, A. (1988). The moral dimension. Toward a new economics. Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, T., Cullen, F., Burton, V., Dunaway, R., & Benson, M. (1997). The social consequences of self-control: Testing the General Theory of Crime. Criminology, 35(3), 475–504. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1997.tb01226.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishbein, D. (2001). Biobehavioral perspectives in criminology. Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Ford, J., & Blumenstein, L. (2013). Self-control and substance use among college students. Journal of Drug Issues, 43(1), 56–68. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0022042612462216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franken, A., Moffitt, T., Steglich, C., Dijkstra, J., Harakeh, Z., & Volleberg, W. (2016). The role of self-control and early adolescents' friendships in the development of externalizing behavior: The SNARE study. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 45(9), 1800–1811. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-015-0287-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friese, M., Frankenbach, J., Job, V., & Loschelder, D. D. (2017). Does self-control training improve self-control? A meta-analysis. Perspectives on Psychological Science: A Journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 12(6), 1077–1099. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617697076
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gallupe, O., McLevey, J., & Brown, S. (2019). Selection and influence: A meta-analysis of the association between peer and personal offending. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 35(2), 313–335. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-018-9384-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerstner, D., & Oberwittler, D. (2018). Who’s hanging out and what’s happening? A look at the interplay between unstructured socializing, crime propensity and delinquent peers using social network data. European Journal of Criminology, 15(1), 111–129. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370817732194
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glueck, S., & Glueck, E. (1950). Unraveling juvenile delinquency. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gottfredson, M., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A General Theory of Crime. Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gottfredson, M., & Hirschi, T. (2020). Modern control theory and the limits of criminal justice. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grasmick, H. G., Tittle, C. R., Bursik, R. J., & Arneklev, B. J. (1993). Testing the core empirical implications of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s General Theory of Crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 30(1), 5–29. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427893030001002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannon, L., DeFronzo, J., & Prochnow, J. (2001). Moral commitment and the effects of social influences on violent delinquency. Violence and Victims, 16(4), 427–439. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.16.4.427
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hardie, B. (2020). Studying situational interaction: Explaining behaviour by analysing person-environment convergence. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hay, C., & Meldrum, R. (2016). Self-control and crime over the life course. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Haynie, D., & Osgood, W. (2005). Reconsidering peers and delinquency: How do peers matter? Social Forces, 84(2), 1109–1130. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2006.0018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, G. (2004). Can low self-control help with the understanding of the software piracy problem? Deviant Behavior, 26(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01639620490497947
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilbe, J. (2011). Negative binomial regression. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, K., Howell, J., Hawkins, J., & Battin-Pearson, S. (1999). Childhood risk factors for adolescent gang membership: Results from the Seattle Social Development Project. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 36(3), 300–322. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427899036003003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hindelang, M., Gottfredson, M., & Garofalo, J. (1978). Victims of personal crime: An empirical foundation for a Theory of Personal Victimization. Ballinger.
   Google Scholar
• Hirtenlehner, H., & Baier, D. (2019). Self-control and offending in late adulthood. Investigating self-control’s interaction with opportunities and criminal associations in advanced age. Journal of Criminal Justice, 60, 117–129. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2018.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirtenlehner, H., & Hardie, B. (2016). On the conditional relevance of controls. An application of Situational Action Theory to shoplifting. Deviant Behavior, 37(3), 315–331. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2015.1026764
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirtenlehner, H., & Kunz, F. (2016). The interaction between self-control and morality in crime causation among older adults. European Journal of Criminology, 13(3), 393–409. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370815623567
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirtenlehner, H., Pauwels, L., & Mesko, G. (2015). Is the criminogenic effect of exposure to peer delinquency dependent on the ability to exercise self-control? Results from three countries. Journal of Criminal Justice, 43(6), 532–543. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2015.05.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirtenlehner, H., & Treiber, K. (2017). Can Situational Action Theory explain the gender gap in adolescent shoplifting? Results from Austria. International Criminal Justice Review, 27(3), 165–187. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1057567717690199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoeben, E., Meldrum, R., Walker, D., & Young, J. (2016). The role of peer delinquency and unstructured socializing in explaining delinquency and substance use: A state-of-the-art review. Journal of Criminal Justice, 47, 108–122. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2016.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, P. (2004). Robust statistics. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Inzlicht, M., Werner, K., Briskin, J., & Roberts, B. (2021). Integrating models of self-regulation. Annual Review of Psychology, 72(1), 319–345. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-061020-105721
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen Arnett, J. (1996). Sensation seeking, aggressiveness, and adolescent reckless behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 20(6), 693–702. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(96)00027-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karaca-Mandic, P., Norton, E., & Dowd, B. (2012). Interaction terms in nonlinear models. Health Services Research, 47(1 Pt 1), 255–274. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6773.2011.01314.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krohn, M., & Thornberry, T. (2008). Longitudinal perspectives on adolescent street gangs. In A. Liberman (Ed.), The long view of crime. A synthesis of longitudinal research (pp. 128–160). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kokkalera, S., Marshall, I. H., & Marshall, C. (2020). How exceptional is India? A test of Situational Action Theory. Asian Journal of Criminology, 15(3), 195–218. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11417-020-09312-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroneberg, C., Heintze, I., & Mehlkop, G. (2010). The interplay of moral norms and instrumental incentives in crime causation. Criminology, 48(1), 259–294. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2010.00187.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroneberg, C., & Schulz, S. (2018). Revisiting the role of self-control in Situational Action Theory. European Journal of Criminology, 15(1), 56–76. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370817732189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, E., & Laird, R. (2013). Parent and peer restrictions of opportunities attenuate the link between low self-control and antisocial behavior. Social Development, 22(4), 813–830. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeBlanc, M. (2006). Self-control and social control of deviant behavior in context: Development and interactions along the life-course. In R. Sampson & P.-O. Wikström (Eds.), The explanation of crime: Context, mechanisms, and development (pp. 195–242). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Longshore, D., & Turner, S. (1998). Self-control and criminal opportunity: Cross-sectional test of the General Theory of Crime. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 25(1), 81–98. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854898025001005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, I. H., & Enzmann, D. (2012). The generalizability of Self-Control Theory. In J. Junger-Tas, I. H. Marshall, D. Enzmann, M. Killias, M. Steketee, & B. Gruszczynska (Eds.), The many faces of youth crime (pp. 285–325). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, I. H., & Marshall, C. (2018). Shame and wrong: Is there a common morality among young people in France, the UK, the Netherlands, Germany, and the USA?. In S. Roché & M. Hough (Eds.), Minority youth and social integration: The ISRD-3 Study in Europe and the US (pp. 29–59). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Matsueda, R., & Anderson, K. (1998). The dynamics of delinquent peers and delinquent behavior. Criminology, 36(2), 269–306. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1998.tb01249.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGloin, J., & Shermer, L. (2009). Self-control and deviant peer network structure. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 46(1), 35–72. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427808326585
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mears, D., Ploeger, M., & Warr, M. (1998). Explaining the gender gap in delinquency: Peer group influence and moral evaluations of behavior. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 35(3), 251–266. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427898035003001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Megens, K., & Weerman, F. (2012). The social transmission of delinquency: Effects of peer attitudes and behaviors revisited. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 49(3), 420–443. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427811408432
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meldrum, R., & Hay, C. (2012). Do peers matter in the development of self-control? Evidence from a longitudinal study of youth. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 41(6), 691–703. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-011-9692-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meldrum, R., Young, J., & Weerman, F. (2009). Reconsidering the effect of self-control and delinquent peers: Implications of measurement for theoretical significance. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 46(3), 353–376. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427809335171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meldrum, R., Young, J., & Weerman, F. (2012). Changes in self-control during adolescence: Investigating the influence of the adolescent peer network. Journal of Criminal Justice, 40(6), 452–462. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2012.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messner, S. (2012). Morality, markets, and the ASC: 2011. Presidential address to the American Society of Criminology. Criminology, 50(1), 5–25. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2011.00264.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mize, T. (2019). Best practices for estimating, interpreting, and presenting nonlinear interaction effects. Sociological Science, 6(1), 81–117. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15195/v6.a4
   Google Scholar
• Mobarake, R., Juhari, R., Yaacob, S., & Esmaeili, N. (2014). The moderating role of self-control in the relationship between peer affiliation and adolescents’ antisocial behavior in Teheran, Iran. Asian Social Science, 10(9), 71–81. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v10n9p71
   Google Scholar
• Moffitt, T. (1993). Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review, 100(4), 674–701. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.100.4.674
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mood, C. (2010). Logistic regression: Why we cannot do what we think we can do, and what we can do about it. European Sociological Review, 26(1), 67–82. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcp006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morselli, C., & Tremblay, P. (2004). Criminal achievement, offender networks, and the benefits of low self-control. Criminology, 42(3), 773–804. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2004.tb00536.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagin, D., & Paternoster, R. (1993). Enduring individual differences and rational choice theories of crime. Law & Society Review, 27(3), 467–496. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/3054102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osgood, W., Finken, L., & McMorris, B. (2002). Analyzing multiple-item measures of crime and deviance II: Tobit regression analysis of transformed scores. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 18(4), 319–347. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021198509929
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osgood, D. W., Wilson, J. K., O'Malley, P. M., Bachman, J. G., & Johnston, L. D. (1996). Routine activities and individual deviant behavior. American Sociological Review, 61(4), 635–655. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/2096397
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ousey, G., & Wilcox, P. (2007). Interactions between antisocial propensity and life-course varying correlates of delinquent behavior: Differences by method of estimation and implications for theory. Criminology, 45(2), 313–442. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2007.00080.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsons, T. (1937). The structure of social action. Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paternoster, R., Brame, R., Mazerolle, P., & Piquero, A. (1998). Using the correct statistical test for the equality of regression coefficients. Criminology, 36(4), 859–866. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1998.tb01268.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pauwels, L., Svensson, R., & Hirtenlehner, H. (2018). Testing Situational Action Theory: A narrative review of studies published between 2006 and 2015. European Journal of Criminology, 15(1), 32–55. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370817732185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piquero, N. L., Gover, A., MacDonald, J., & Piquero, A. (2005). The influence of delinquent peers on delinquency: Does gender matter? Youth & Society, 36(3), 251–275. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X04265652
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratt, T. (2016). A self-control/life-course theory of criminal behavior. European Journal of Criminology, 13(1), 129–146. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370815587771
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratt, T., & Cullen, F. (2000). The empirical status of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s General Theory of Crime: A meta-analysis. Criminology, 38(3), 931–964. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2000.tb00911.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratt, T., Cullen, F., Sellers, C., Winfree, T., Madensen, T., Daigle, L., Fearn, N., & Gau, J. (2010). The empirical status of Social Learning Theory: A meta-analysis. Justice Quarterly, 27(6), 765–802. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820903379610
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rebellon, C., Straus, A., & Medeiros, R. (2008). Self-control in global perspective: An empirical assessment of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s General Theory within and across 32 national settings. European Journal of Criminology, 5(3), 331–361. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370808090836
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rebellon, C., & Modecki, K. (2014). Accounting for projection bias in models of delinquent peer influence: The utility and limits of latent variable approaches. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 30(2), 163–186. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-013-9199-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reiss, A., & Farrington, D. (1991). Advancing knowledge about co-offending: Results from a prospective longitudinal survey of London males. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 82(2), 360–395. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/1143811
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampson, R. (2012). Great American city. Chicago and the enduring neighborhood effect. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sampson, R., & Laub, J. (1993). Crime in the making. Pathways and turning points through life. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schlaefli, A., Rest, J., & Thoma, S. (1985). Does moral education improve moral judgment? A meta-analysis of intervention studies using the Defining Issues Test. Review of Educational Research, 55(3), 319–352. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543055003319
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schnell, R., Bachteler, T., & Reiher, J. (2010). Improving the use of self-generated identification codes. Evaluation Review, 34(5), 391–418. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X10387576
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoepfer, A., & Piquero, A. (2006). Self-control, moral beliefs, and criminal activity. Deviant Behavior, 27(1), 51–71. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/016396290968326
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seddig, D. (2014). Peer group association, the acceptance of norms and violent behaviour: A longitudinal analysis of reciprocal effects. European Journal of Criminology, 11(3), 319–339. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370813496704
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stams, G., Brugman, D., Dekovic, M., van Rosmalen, L., van der Laan, P., & Gibbs, J. (2006). The moral judgment of juvenile delinquents: a meta-analysis. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 34(5), 697–713. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-006-9056-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steketee, M. (2012). The lifestyles of youth and their peers. In J. Junger-Tas, I. H. Marshall, D. Enzmann, M. Killias, M. Steketee, & B. Gruszczynska (Eds.), The many faces of youth crime (pp. 237–255). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Stets, J., & Carter, M. (2012). A theory of the self for the sociology of morality. American Sociological Review, 77(1), 120–140. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122411433762
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stummvoll, G., Kromer, I., & Hager, I. (2010). Austria. In J. Junger-Tas, I.H. Marshall, D. Enzmann, M. Killias, M. Steketee, & B. Gruszczynska (Eds.), Juvenile delinquency in Europe and beyond. Results of the Second International Self-Report Delinquency Study (pp. 97–110). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Sweeten, G. (2012). Scaling criminal offending. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 28(3), 533–557. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-011-9160-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutherland, E. (1956). A sociological theory of criminal behavior. In A. Cohen, A. Lindesmith, & K. Schuessler (Eds.), The Sutherland papers (pp. 76–81). Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Svensson, R., & Oberwittler, D. (2010). It’s not the time they spend, It’s what they do: The interaction between delinquent friends and unstructured routine activity on delinquency. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38(5), 1006–1004. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2010.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svensson, R., Pauwels, L., & Weerman, F. (2010). Does the effect of self-control on adolescent offending vary by level of morality? A test in three countries. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37(6), 732–743. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854810366542
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svensson, R., Weerman, F., Pauwels, L., Bruinsma, G., & Bernasco, W. (2013). Moral emotions and offending: Do feelings of anticipated shame and guilt mediate the effect of socialization on offending? European Journal of Criminology, 10(1), 22–39. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370812454393
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, K., & McGloin, J. M. (2013). A dual-systems approach for understanding differential susceptibility to processes of peer influence. Criminology, 51(2), 435–474. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornberry, T., Krohn, M., Lizotte, A., Smith, C., & Tobin, K. (2003). Gangs and delinquency in developmental perspective. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Trasler, G. (1993). Conscience, opportunity, rational choice and crime. In R. Clarke & M. Felson (Eds.), Routine activity and rational choice (pp. 305–322). Transaction.
   Google Scholar
• Tsai, T., & Gill, J. (2013). Interactions in generalized linear models: Theoretical issues and an application to personal vote-earning attributes. Social Sciences, 2(2), 91–113. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci2020091
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. (2006). Why people obey the law. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vazsonyi, A., Mikuska, J., & Kelley, E. (2017). It’s time: A meta-analysis of the self-control–deviance link. Journal of Criminal Justice, 48, 48–63. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2016.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vazsonyi, A., Pickering, E., Junger, M., & Hessing, T. (2001). An empirical test of a General Theory of Crime: A four-nation comparative study of self-control and the prediction of deviance. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 38(2), 91–131. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427801038002001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, J., Nobles, M., & Fox, K. (2015). Disentangling self-control from its elements: A bifactor analysis. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 31(4), 595–627. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-014-9241-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warr, M. (2002). Companions in crime: The social aspects of criminal conduct. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Warr, M. (2009). Peers and delinquency. In M. Krohn, A. Lizotte, & G. Penly Hall (Eds.), Handbook on crime and deviance (pp. 383–404). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Warr, M., & Stafford, M. (1991). The influence of delinquent peers: What they think or what they do? Criminology, 29(4), 851–866. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1991.tb01090.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weerman, F., Bernasco, W., Bruinsma, G., & Pauwels, L. (2015). When is spending time with peers related to delinquency? The importance of where, what, and with whom. Crime & Delinquency, 61(10), 1386–1413. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128713478129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weerman, F., & Hoeve, M. (2012). Peers and delinquency among girls and boys: Are sex differences in delinquency explained by peer factors? European Journal of Criminology, 9(3), 228–244. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370811435736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weerman, F. M., & Smeenk, W. H. (2005). Peer similarity in delinquency for different types of friends: A comparison using two measurement methods. Criminology, 43(2), 499–523. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0011-1348.2005.00015.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wikström, P.-O. (2004). Crime as alternative. Towards a cross-level Situational Action Theory of crime causation. In J. McCord (Ed.), Beyond empiricism: Institutions and intentions in the study of crime (pp. 1–37). Transaction.
   Google Scholar
• Wikström, P.-O. (2010). Explaining crime as moral action. In S. Hitlin & S. Vaisey (Eds.), Handbook of the sociology of morality (pp. 211–240). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Wikström, P.-O. (2020). Explaining crime and criminal careers: The DEA model of Situational Action Theory. Journal of Developmental and Life-Course Criminology, 6(2), 188–203. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s40865-019-00116-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wikström, P.-O., & Butterworth, D. (2006). Adolescent crime: Individual differences and lifestyles. Willan.
   Google Scholar
• Wikström, P.-O., Mann, R., & Hardie, B. (2018). Young people's differential vulnerability to criminogenic exposure: Bridging the gap between people- and place-oriented approaches in the study of crime causation. European Journal of Criminology, 15(1), 10–31. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370817732477
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wikström, P.-O., Oberwittler, D., Treiber, K., & Hardie, B. (2012). Breaking rules. The social and situational dynamics of young people’s urban crime. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wikström, P.-O., & Svensson, R. (2010). When does self-control matter? The interaction between morality and self-control in crime causation. European Journal of Criminology, 7(5), 395–410. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370810372132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilcox, P., Land, K., & Hunt, S. (2003). Criminal circumstance. A dynamic multicontextual criminal opportunity theory. Aldine de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, R. (2012). Using the Margins command to estimate and interpret adjusted predictions and marginal effects. The Stata Journal: Promoting Communications on Statistics and Stata, 12(2), 308–331. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X1201200209
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, J., & Herrnstein, R. (1985). Crime and human nature. Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, B., Caspi, A., Moffitt, T., & Silva, P. (2001). The effects of social ties on crime vary by criminal propensity: A Life-Course Model of Interdependence. Criminology, 39(2), 321–351. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2001.tb00925.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yarbrough, A., Jones, S., Sullivan, C., Sellers, C., & Cochran, J. (2012). Social learning and self-control: Assessing the moderating potential of criminal propensity. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 56(2), 191–202. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X10396041
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, J., Rebellon, C., Barnes, J., & Weerman, F. (2014). Unpacking the black box of peer similarity in deviance: Understanding the mechanisms linking personal behavior, peer behavior, and perceptions. Criminology, 52(1), 60–86. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar