Examining Cumulative Disadvantage against American Indian Defendants in Federal Courts

References

• Albonetti, C.A. (1997). Sentencing under the federal sentencing guidelines: Effects of defendant characteristics, guilty pleas, and departures on sentence outcomes for drug offenses, 1991–1992. Law & Society Review, 31,789–822. https://doi.org/10.2307/3053987
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allison, J. (2019). Beyond VAWA: Protecting native women from sexual violence within existing tribal jurisdictional structures. University of Colorado Law Review, 90, 225.
   Google Scholar
• Alvarez, A., & Bachman, R. (1996). American Indians and sentencing disparity: An Arizona test. Journal of Criminal Justice, 24, 549–561. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2352(96)00039-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Civil Liberties Union. (2014). Racial disparities in sentencing. New York, NY. https://www.aclu.org/other/aclu-submission-inter-american-commission-human-rights-racial-disparities-sentencing
   Google Scholar
• Bachman, R., Alvarez, A., & Perkins, C. (1996). Discriminatory imposition of the law. In M. O. Nielsen & R. A. Silverman (Eds.), Native Americans, crime, and justice (pp. 197–208). Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baumer, E. P. (2013). Reassessing and redirecting research on race and sentencing. Justice Quarterly, 30, 231–261. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2012.682602
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bird, M. (1999). What we want to be called: Indigenous peoples' perspectives on racial and ethnic identity labels. American Indian Quarterly, 23, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.2307/1185964
   Google Scholar
• Bushway, S., & Forst, B. (2013). Studying discretion in the processes that generate criminal justice sanctions. Justice Quarterly, 30, 199–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2012.682604
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bushway, S. D., & Piehl, A. M. (2001). Judging judicial discretion: Legal factors and racial discrimination in sentencing. Law & Society Review, 35, 733–764. https://doi.org/10.2307/3185415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, N. C. (2002). American Indians and law libraries: Acknowledging the third sovereign. Law Library Journal, 94, 7–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook-Lynn, E. (2007). Scandal. Wicazo Sa Review, 22(1), 85–89. https://doi.org/10.1353/wic.2007.0005
   Google Scholar
• Deer, S. (2004). Federal Indian law and violent crime: Native women and children at the mercy of the state. Social Justice, 31(4(98)), 17–30.
   Google Scholar
• Devine, P. G., Forscher, P. S., Austin, A. J., & Cox, W. T. (2012). Long-term reduction in implicit race bias: A prejudice habit-breaking intervention.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(6), 1267–1278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.06.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Droske, T. J. (2008). Correcting Native American sentencing disparity post-Booker. Marquette Law Review, 91, 723–813.
   Google Scholar
• Franklin, T. W. (2013). Sentencing native Americans in US federal courts: An examination of disparity. Justice Quarterly, 30, 310–339. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2011.605072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fryberg, S. A., Markus, H. R., Oyserman, D., & Stone, J. M. (2008). Of warrior chiefs and Indian princesses: The psychological consequences of American Indian mascots. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 30, 208–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973530802375003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geotting, N. (2010). The Marshall trilogy and the constitutional dehumanization of American Indians. Guild Practitioner, 65, 207.
   Google Scholar
• Goulette, N., Wooldredge, J., Frank, J., & Travis III, L. (2015). From initial appearance to sentencing: Do female defendants experience disparate treatment? Journal of Criminal Justice, 43(5), 406–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2015.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, S. (2011). Native American Mascots: A quantitative and qualitative study of students’ acceptability perceptions of native mascots versus theoretical use of other ethnic groups’ iconology by sports teams. McNair Scholars Research Journal, 7, 8.
   Google Scholar
• Hartley, R. D., Testa, A., & Martinez, E. (2020). Race, ethnicity, and punishment for federal sex offenses: Changing composition in child pornography and sex abuse cases and temporal disparity in sentencing over time. Sexual Abuse, 33, 891–922.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartley, R., & Tillyer, R. (2012). Defending the homeland: Judicial sentencing practices for federal immigration offenses. Justice Quarterly, 29, 76–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2011.585140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hermes, E. (2013). Law & order tribal edition: How the Tribal Law and Order Act has failed to increase tribal court sentencing authority. Arizona State Law Journal, 45, 675.
   Google Scholar
• Hirschfelder, A., Molin, P. F., Wakim, Y., & Dorris, M. A. (1999). American Indian stereotypes in the world of children: A reader and bibliography. Scarecrow Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, V. H., Kerr K., Ketcher, L. K., & Murphy, J. (2010). The forgotten minority: An analysis of American Indian employment patterns in state and local governments, 1991-2005. American Indian Quarterly, 34, 409–534.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, B. D., & Betsinger, S. (2009). Punishing the “model minority”: Asian‐American criminal sentencing outcomes in federal district courts.Criminology, 47, 1045–1090. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2009.00169.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, B. D., Ulmer, J. T., & Kramer, J. H. (2008). The social context of guidelines circumvention: The case of federal district courts.Criminology, 46, 737–783. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2008.00125.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Josey, C. S. (2015). Race and stereotypes in new media: An examination of how Internet news frames persons of color [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, J. A. (2012). Federal justice statistics program data linking system. Urban Institute, Justice Policy Center.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, B., Wang, X., & Cheon, H. (2019). Examining the impact of ecological contexts on gender disparity in federal sentencing. Justice Quarterly, 36(3), 466–502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer, K. L. & Wang, X. (2019) Assessing cumulative disadvantage against minority female defendants in state courts. Justice Quarterly, 36, 1284–1313. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2019.1685122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer, J. H., & Ulmer, J. T. (2009). Sentencing guidelines: lessons from Pennsylvania (p. 120). Lynne Rienner Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Kurlychek, M. C., & Johnson, B. D. (2019). Cumulative disadvantage in the American Criminal Justice System.Annual Review of Criminology, 2, 291–319. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-criminol-011518-024815
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutateladze, B., Andiloro, N., Johnson, B., and Spohn, C. (2014). Cumulative disadvantage: Examining racial and ethnic disparity in prosecution and sentencing. Criminology, 52, 514–551. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leiber, M. J. (1994). A comparison of juvenile court outcomes for Native Americans, African Americans, and Whites. Justice Quarterly, 11(2), 257–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418829400092251
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, M. (2019). Focally concerned about focal concerns: A conceptual and methodological critique of sentencing disparities research. Justice Quarterly, 36, 1148–1175. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2019.1686163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massey, D. S., & Denton, N. A. (1993). American apartheid: Segregation and the making of the underclass. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, L. L., & Eisenstein, J. (2005). The federal/state criminal prosecution nexus: A case study in cooperation and discretion.Law & Social Inquiry, 30(2), 239–268. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.2005.tb01012.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muñoz, E., & McMorris, B. (2002). Misdemeanor sentencing decisions: The cost of being Native American. The Justice Professional, 15, 239–259.
   Google Scholar
• Nagel, J., Ward, C., & Knapp, T. (1988). The politics of American Indian economic development: The reservation/urban nexus. In C. Matthew Snipp (Ed.), Public policy impacts on American Indian Economic Development. Native American Studies, University of New Mexico.
   Google Scholar
• Nielson, M.O. (1996). Contextualization for Native American crime and criminal justice involvement. In M. O. Nielson &amp & R. A. Silverman (Eds.), Native Americans, crime,and justice (pp. 10–20). Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ogden, S. (2006). “Pomo Woman, Ex-Prisoner Speaks Out.” Color of Violence: The Incite! Anthology. South End Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paternoster, R. (2011). Racial disparity under the federal sentencing guidelines pre- and post-Booker.Criminology & Public Policy, 10, 1063–1072. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9133.2011.00778.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, B. (2006). ‘Nobody trusts them!’ Under- and over-policing Native American communities. Critical Criminology, 14, 411–444. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-006-9007-z
   Google Scholar
• Pewewardy, C. (1991). Native American mascots and imagery: The struggle of unlearning Indian stereotypes. Journal of Navajo Education, 9, 19–23.
   Google Scholar
• Pewewardy, C. (1995, November). The Americanizing of “Pocahontas”: Misconceptions and assimilation of an American Indian heroine. In National Indian Education Association Annual Convention, Tucson, Arizona.
   Google Scholar
• Plaut, V. C., Thomas, K. M., & Goren, M. J. (2009). Is multiculturalism or color blindness better for minorities?Psychological Science, 20, 444–446. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02318.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poupart, L. M. (2002). Crime and justice in American Indian communities. Social Justice, 29(1/2 (87-88), 144–159.
   Google Scholar
• Prucha, F. P. (1984). American Indian policy in the twentieth century. The Western Historical Quarterly, 15, 4–18. https://doi.org/10.2307/968556
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez, N. (2010). The cumulative effect of race and ethnicity in juvenile court outcomes and why preadjudication detention matters. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 47, 391–413. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427810365905
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, L. (1998). Inventing the savage: The social construction of Native American criminality University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rouse, L. P., & Hanson, J. R. (1991). American Indian stereotyping, resource competition, and status-based prejudice.American Indian Culture and Research Journal, 15, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.17953/aicr.15.3.u34376346jj27v32
   Google Scholar
• Sampson, R. J., & Wilson, W. (1995). Toward a theory of race, crime, and urban inequality. In J. Hagan & R. D. Peterson (Eds.), Crime and inequality (pp. 37–56). Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sandefur, G. D. (1989). American Indian reservations: The first underclass areas? Focus, 12, 37–41.
   Google Scholar
• Shermer, L., & Johnson, B. D. (2010). Criminal prosecutions: Examining prosecutorial discretion and charge reductions in U.S. federal district courts. Justice Quarterly, 3, 27, 394–430. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820902856972
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snipp, C. M. (1986). The changing political and economic status of the American Indians: From captive nations to internal colonies.American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 45(2), 145–158. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1536-7150.1986.tb01915.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snipp, C. M. (1992). Sociological perspectives on American Indians.Annual Review of Sociology, 18(1), 351–371. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.18.080192.002031
   Google Scholar
• Spohn, C. (2008). Race, sex, and pretrial detention in federal court: Indirect effects and cumulative disadvantage. University of Kansas Law Review, 57, 879.
   Google Scholar
• Spohn, C. (2009). Race, sex, and pretrial detention in federal court: Indirect effects and cumulative disadvantage. University of Kansas Law Review, 57, 879.
   Google Scholar
• Spohn, C. C., Brennan, P. K., & Kim, B. (2018). Racial and ethnic disparities among female offenders adjudicated in federal courts: Explicating the patterns of disparities using a path model. In J. T. Ulmer & M. S. Bradley (Eds.), Handbook on punishment decisions locations of disparity: Vol. 2, The ASC division on corrections & sentencing handbook series (pp. 211–238). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stage, F. K., Carter, H. C., & Nora, A. (2004). Path analysis: An introduction and analysis of a decade of research. The Journal of Educational Research, 98, 5–13. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.98.1.5-13
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starr, S. B., & Rehavi, M. (2013). Mandatory sentencing and racial disparity: Assessing the role of prosecutors and the effects of Booker. Yale Law Journal, 123, 2–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffensmeier, D. (1980). Assessing the impact of the women’s movement on sex-based differences in the handling of adult criminal defendants. Crime and Delinquency, 26, 344–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/001112878002600305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffensmeier, D., Kramer, J., & Ulmer, J. (1995). Age differences in sentencing. Justice Quarterly, 12, 583–602.
   Google Scholar
• Steffensmeier, D., Ulmer, J., & Kramer, J. (1998). The interaction of race, gender, and age in criminal sentencing: The punishment cost of being young, black, and male. Criminology, 36, 763–797. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1998.tb01265.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinman, E. (2012). Settler colonial power and the American Indian sovereignty movement: Forms of domination, strategies of transformation.AJS; American Journal of Sociology, 117, 1073–1130. https://doi.org/10.1086/662708
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stolzenberg, L., D’Alessio, S.J., & Eitle, D. (2013). Race and cumulative discrimination in the prosecution of criminal defendants. Race and Justice, 3, 275–299. https://doi.org/10.1177/2153368713500317
   Google Scholar
• Sutton, J.R. (2013). Structural bias in the sentencing of felony defendants.Social Science Research, 42, 1207–1221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2013.04.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Sentencing Project. (2013). Report of the sentencing project to the United Nations human rights committee regarding racial disparities in the United States criminal justice system.
   Google Scholar
• Tootle, D. M. (1996). Economic opportunities and development. Racial/Ethnic Minorities in Rural Areas: Progress and Stagnation, 1980-90, (731–735), 100.
   Google Scholar
• Tribal Law & Order Act. (2010). National Congress of American Indians. http://www.ncai.org/tribal-vawa/resources/tribal-law-order-act.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Justice. (2017). Indian Country Investigations and Prosecutions Report. https://www.justice.gov/tribal/page/file/1113091/download
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Sentencing Commission. (2010). Demographic differences in federal Sentencing practices: An update of the Booker report’s multivariate regression analysis. United States Sentencing Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Ulmer, J. T. (2012). Recent developments and new directions in sentencing research. Justice Quarterly, 29, 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2011.624115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulmer, J. T. (2019). Criminal courts as inhabited institutions: Making sense of difference and similarity in sentencing. Crime & Justice, 48, 483–522. https://doi.org/10.1086/701504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulmer, J. T., & Bradley, M. S. (2018). Punishment in Indian Country: Ironies of federal punishment of Native Americans. Justice Quarterly, 35, 751–781. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2017.1341540
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulmer, J. T., & Bradley, M. S. (2019). Criminal justice in Indian Country: A theoretical and empirical agenda.Annual Review of Criminology, 2, 337–357. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-criminol-011518-024805
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulmer, J. T., Eisenstein, J., & Johnson, B. D. (2010). Trial penalties in federal sentencing: Extraguidelines factors and district variation. Justice Quarterly, 4, 27, 560–592. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820902998063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Western, B. (2006). Punishment and inequality in America. Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Wolburg, J. (2006). The demise of Native American mascots: It’s time to do the right thing.Journal of Consumer Marketing, 23, 4–5. https://doi.org/10.1108/07363760610641109
   Google Scholar
• Wooldredge, J., Frank, J., Goulette, N., & Travis, L. (2015). Is the impact of cumulative disadvantage on sentencing greater for black defendants? Criminology & Public Policy, 14, 187–223. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yellow Bird, M. (1999). Indian, American Indian, and Native Americans: Counterfeit identities. Winds of Change: A Magazine for American Indian Education and Opportunity, 14, 86.
   Google Scholar
• Zatz, M. (1987). The changing forms of racial/ethnic biases in sentencing. Crime and Delinquency, 24, 69–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427887024001005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zatz, M., Lujan, C., & Snyder-Joy, Z. (1991). American Indians and criminal justice: Some conceptual and methodological considerations. In M. J. Lynch & E. B. Patter- son (Eds.), Race and criminal justice (pp. 100–112). Harrow and Heston.
   Google Scholar