Dispersed Group Decision Making Using Nonsimultaneous Computer Conferencing: A Report of Research

References

• Bui, T.;Sivasankaran, T. R.; Fijol, Y.; and Woodburg, M. A. Identifying organizational opportunities for gdss use: some experimental evidence. Transactions of the Seventh International Conference on Decision Support Systems, San Francisco, CA (June 1987), 68–75.
   Google Scholar
• Daft, R.; Lengel, R. H.; and Trevino, L. K. Message equivocality, media selection, and manager performance: implications for information systems. MIS Quarterly, 11, 3 (September 1987), 355–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Brabander, B., and Thiers, G. Successful information system development in relation to situational factors which affect effective communication between mis-users and edp-specialists. Management Science, 30, 2 (February 1984), 137–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dennis, A. R.; George, J. F.; Jessup, L. M.; Nunamaker, J. F., Jr.; and Vogel, D. K. Information technology to support electronic meetings. MIS Quarterly, 12, 4 (December 1988), 591–624.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dennis, A. R.; Nunamaker, J. F., Jr.; and Vogel, D. K. Gdss laboratory experiments and field studies: closing the gap. Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, vol. 3 (1989), 300–309.
   Google Scholar
• DeSanctis, G., and Courtney, J. F. Toward friendly user mis implementation. Communications of the ACM, 29, 10 (October 1983), 732–738.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeSanctis, G., and Gallupe, B. A foundation for the study of group decision support systems. Management Science, 33, 5 (May 1987), 589–609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeSanctis, G., and Gallupe, B. Group decision support systems: a new frontier. Data Base (Winter 1985), 3–10.
   Google Scholar
• DeSanctis, G., and Gallupe, B. Information system support for group decision making. Working Paper Series, MISRC-WP-85-10, Management Information Systems Research Center, University of Minnesota (October 1984).
   Google Scholar
• Doyle, M., and Straus, D. How to Make Meetings Work, New York, 1976.
   Google Scholar
• Gallupe, B. Experimental research into group decision support systems: practical issues and problems. Proceedings of the Nineteenth Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (1986), 515–523.
   Google Scholar
• Gallupe, R. B., and McKeen, J.D. Beyond computer-mediated communication: an experimental study into the use of a group decision support system for face-to-face versus remote meetings. Proceedings of the ASAC 1988 Conference, Halifax, Nova Scotia, 103–116.
   Google Scholar
• George, J. F. A comparison of four recent gdss experiments. Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, vol. 3 (1989), 397–402.
   Google Scholar
• George, J. F. Group decision support systems. EDP Analyzer, 25, 1 (January 1987), 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Herold, D. Improving the performance effectiveness of groups through a task-contingent selection of intervention strategies. Academy of Management Review, 3, 2 (April 1978), 315–325.
   Google Scholar
• Heslin, R., and Dunphy, D. Three dimensions of member satisfaction in small groups. Human Relations, 17 (1964), 99–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiemstra, G. Teleconferencing concern for face, and organizational culture. Communication Yearbook 6, Michael Burgoon, ed. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, 1982, 874–904.
   Google Scholar
• Hiltz, S. R.; Johnson, K.; Aronovitch, C.; and Turoff, M. Face-to-Face vs. Computerized Conferences: A Controlled Experiment. Vol. I. Research Report No. 12, Newark, New Jersey Institute of Technology, August 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Hiltz, S. R.; Turoff, M.; and Johnson, K. The effect of structure, task, and individual attributes on consensus in computerized conferencing. Computer Message Systems, R. P. Uhlig, ed. Amsterdam: North-Holland/IFIP, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Huber, G. Issues in the design of group decision support systems. MIS Quarterly (September 1984), 195–204.
   Google Scholar
• Jelassi, M. T., and Beauclair, R. A. An integrated framework for group decision support systems design. Information & Management, 13 (1987), 143–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jessup, L. M.; Tansik, D. A.; and Laase, T. D. Group problem solving in an automated environment: the effects of anonymity and proximity on group process and outcome with a group decision support system. Proceedings of the 1988 Annual Meeting of the Acting Management Anaheim, CA (August 1988), 237–240.
   Google Scholar
• Kiesler, S. The hidden messages in computer networks. Harvard Business Review (January/February 1986), 46–59.
   Google Scholar
• Kiesler, S.; Siegel, J.; and McGuire, T. W. Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. American Psychologist (October 1984), 1123–1134.
   Google Scholar
• Korzenny, F., and Bower, C. Testing the theory of electronic propinquity: organizational teleconferencing. Communication Research, 8, 4 (October 1981), 479–498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leathers, D. G. Quality of group communication as a determinant of group product. Speech Monographs, 39 (1972), 166–173.
   Google Scholar
• Loftin, R. D., and Moosebrucker, J. M. Organization development methods in the management of information systems. MIS Quarterly (September 1982), 15–28.
   Google Scholar
• McIntyre, S. C.; Konsynski, B. R.; and Nunamaker, J. F., Jr. Automating planning environments: knowledge integration and model scripting. Journal of Management Information Systems, 2 (Spring 1986), 49–69.
   Google Scholar
• Nunamaker, J. F., Jr; Applegate, L. M.; and Konsynski, B.R. Facilitating group creativity: experience with a group decision support system. Journal of Management Information Systems, 5 (Spring 1987), 5–19.
   Google Scholar
• Pfeiffer, J. W., and Jones, J. E., eds. Murder one: information sharing. A Handbook of Structured Experiences for Human Relations Training,vol. 6. San Diego: University Associates, Inc., 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Rice, R., and Associates.The New Media: Communication, Research, and Technology. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. M., and Kincaid, D. L. Communication Networks: Toward a New Paradigm for Research. New York: The Free Press, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Siegel, J.; Dubrovsky, V.; Kiesler, S.; and McGuire, T. W. Group processes in computer-mediated communication. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 31 (1986), 157–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, J., and Vanecek, M. Computer conferencing and task-oriented decisions: implications for group decision support. Irrformation & Management, 14 (1988), 123–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, J. Communication Quality in Information Systems Development: The Effect of Computer-Mediated Communication on Task-Oriented Problem Solving. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. University of North Texas (May 1986).
   Google Scholar
• Sproull, L., and Kiesler, S. Reducing social context cues: electronic mail in organizational communication. Management Science, 32, 11 (November 1986), 1492–1512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turoff, M., and Hiltz, S. R. Computer support for group versus individual decisions. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 30, 1 (January 1982), 82–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar