An Application of Expectancy Theory for Assessing User Motivation to Utilize an Expert System

References

• Ajzen, I., and Fishbein, M. Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Ashton, R., and Kramer, S. Students as surrogates in behavioral accounting research: some evidence. Journal of Accounting Research, 18, 1 (Spring 1980), 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagozzi, R.P. Attitudes, intentions and behavior: a test of some key hypotheses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 4 (October 1981), 607–627.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagozzi, R.P. A field investigation of causal relations among cognitions, affects, intentions and behavior. Journal of Marketing Research, 19, 4 (November 1982), 562–584.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, D.; Ravichandran, R.; and Randall, D. Exploring contrasting formulations of expectancy theory. Decision Sciences, 20, 1 (Winter 1989), 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barki, H., and Huff, S.L. Changes, attitude to change, and decision support system success. Information and Management, 9, 5 (December 1985), 261–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benedetti, J. Expert systems grow slowly. Systems/3X World, 16, 3 (March 1988), 16–20.
   Google Scholar
• Brancheau, J.C, and Wetherbe, J.C. Key issues in information systems management. MIS Quarterly, 11, 1 (March 1987), 23–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, J., and Womer, K. Hierarchical vs. non-nested tests for contracting expectancy-valance models: some effects of cognitive characteristics. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 20, 3 (July 1985), 335–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, F.D.; Bagozzi, R.P; and Warshaw, P.R. User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35, 8 (August 1989), 982–1003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeSanctis, G. Expectancy theory as explanation of voluntary use of a decision support system. Psychological Reports, 52 (February 1983), 247–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferris, K.R. A test of the expectancy theory of motivation in an accounting environment. The Accounting Review, 52, 3 (July 1977), 605–615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishbein, M., and Ajzen, I. Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Ford, F.N. Decision support systems and expert systems: a comparison. Information & Management, 18, 1 (January 1985), 21–26.
   Google Scholar
• Ginzberg, M.J. An organizational contingencies view of accounting and information systems implementation. Accounting, Organizations, and Society, 5, 4 (1980), 369–382.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, S., and Chervany, N.L. Evaluating information system effectiveness—part II: comparing evaluator viewpoints. MIS Quarterly, 5, 4 (December 1981), 79–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrell, A.M.; Caldwell, C.; and Doty, E. Within-person expectancy theory predictions of accounting students’ motivation to achieve academic success. The Accounting Review, 60, 4 (October 1985), 724–735.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrell, A.M., and Stahl, M.J. Modeling managers’ effort-level decisions for a within-persons examination of expectancy theory in a budget setting. Decision Sciences, 15, 1 (Winter 1984), 52–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ives, B., and Olson, M.H. User involvement and MIS success: a review of research. Management Science, 30, 5 (May 1984), 586–603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, K.K. User satisfaction: a synthesis of three different perspectives. Journal of Information Systems, 4 (Fall 1989), 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Lees, J.D. Successful development of small business information systems. Journal of System Management, 38, 8 (September 1987), 32–39.
   Google Scholar
• Liang, T.P. Expert systems as decision aids: issues and strategies. Journal of Information Systems, 2, 2 (Spring 1988), 41–50.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, E. Expert systems for business applications: potentials and limitations. Journal of Systems Management, stems Management, 37, 7 (July 1986), 18–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucas, H.C. Performance and the use of an information system. Management Science, 21, 8 (April 1975), 908–919.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucas, H.C. Why Information Systems Fail. New York: Columbia University Press, 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Lucas, H.C. The Implementation of Computer-Based Models. New York: National Association of Accountants, 1976.
   Google Scholar
• Luconi, F.L.; Malone, T.W.; and Morton, M.S.S. Expert systems: the next challenge for managers. Sloan Management Review, 27, 4 (Summer 1986), 3–13.
   Google Scholar
• Maish, A. M. A user’s behavior toward his MIS. MIS Quarterly, 3, 1 (March 1979), 39–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKee, T.E. Expert systems: the final frontier? The CPA Journal, 56, 7 (July 1986), 42–46.
   Google Scholar
• Melone, N.P. A theoretical assessment of the user-satisfaction construct in information systems research. Management Science, 36, 1 (January 1990), 76–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, T., and Beach, L. Expectancy theory, decision theory, and occupational preference and choice. In M.F. Kaplan and S. Schwartz (eds.), Human Judgment and Decision Processes in Applied Settings. New York: Academic Press, 1977, 203–226.
   Google Scholar
• Montgomery, D.C. Design and Analysis of Experiments. New York: John Wiley, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Niederman, F.; Brancheau, J.C.; and Wetherbe, J.C. Information system’s management issues in the 1990’s. MIS Research Center, University of Minnesota working paper, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Rademacher, R.A. Critical factors for systems success. Journal of Systems Management, 40, 6 (June 1989), 15–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robey, D. User attitudes and management information system use. Academy of Management Journal, 22, 3 (September 1979), 527–538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, M.J., and Bonfield, E.H. The Fishbein extended model and consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 2, 2 (September 1975), 118–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saltzer, E. Cognitive moderators of the relationship between behavioral intentions and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 2 (August 1981), 260–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shim, J.K., and Rice, J.S. Expert systems applications to managerial accounting. Journal of Systems Management, 39, 6 (June 1988), 6–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snead, K., Jr., and Harrell, A. M. An application of expectancy theory to examine managers’ motivation to utilize a decision support system. Unpublished working paper, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Stahl, M.J., and Harrell, A. M. Modeling effort decisions with behavioral decision theory: toward an individual differences model of expectancy theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 27, 3 (June 1981), 303–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stahl, M. J., and Harrell, A. M. Using decision modeling to measure second level valences in expectancy theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 32, 1 (August 1983), 23–34.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, J.A. Observations on the use of behavioral models in information systems research and practice. Information and Management, 5, 4&5 (September/November 1982), 207–213.
   Google Scholar
• Vroom, V.C. Work and Motivation. New York: Wiley, 1964.
   Google Scholar
• Warshaw, P.R. Predicting purchase and other behaviors from general and contextually specific intentions. Journal of Marketing Research, 17, 1 (February 1980), 26–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warshaw, P.R. A new model of predicting behavioral intentions: an alternative to Fishbein. Journal of Marketing Research, 17, 2 (May 1980), 153–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warshaw, P.R., and Davis, F.D. Self-understanding and the accuracy of behavioral expectations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 10, 1 (March 1984), 111–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warshaw, P.R., and Davis, F.D. Disentangling behavioral intention and behavioral expectation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 3 (May 1985), 213–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warshaw, P.R., and Davis, F.D. The accuracy of behavioral intention versus behavioral expectation for predicting behavioral goals. Journal of Psychology, 119, 6 (November 1985), 599–602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf, G., and Connolly, T. Between-subject designs in testing expectancy models: a methodological note. Decision Sciences, 12, 1 (January 1981), 39–45.
   Google Scholar
• Zedeck, S. An information processing model and approach to the study of motivation. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 18, 1 (February 1977), 47–77
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zmud, D.E. The role of individual differences in MIS implementation success. Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual Meeting of the American Institute for Decision Sciences, vol. 1, 1980, p. 215.
   Google Scholar