A Mathematical Model of Performance of Computer-Mediated Groups during Idea Generation

References

• Bouchard, T.J., and Hare, M. Size, performance and potential in brainstorming groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 54 (1970), 51–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bray, R.M.; Kerr, N.L.; and Atkin, R.S. Effects of group size, problem difficulty, and sex on group performance and member reactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 11 (1978), 1224–1240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, J.H., and Kerr, N.L. Thought experiments and the problem of sparse data in small group performance research. In P.S. Goodman (ed.), Designing Effective Work Groups, pp. 305–349. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Dennis, A.R., and Valacich, J.S. Computer brainstorms: more heads are better than one. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 4 (1993), 531–537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dennis, A.R.; Valacich, J.S.; and Nunamaker, J.F. An experimental investigation of the effects of group size in an electronic meeting environment. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 25 (1990), 1049–1057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeSanctis G.L., and Gallupe, B. A foundation for the study of group decision support systems. Management Science, 33 (1987), 589–609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diehl, M., and Stroebe, W. Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: toward the solution of a riddle. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53 (1987), 497–509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallupe, R.; Dennis, A.R.; Cooper, W.; Valacich, J.S.; Bastianutti, L.; and Nunamaker, J.F. Group size and electronic brainstorming. Academy of Management Journal, 35 (1992), 350–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grofman, B.; Feld, S.L.; and Owen, G. Group size and the performance of a composite group majority: statistical truths and empirical results. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 33 (1984), 350–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, G.W. Group versus individual performance: are N+1 heads better than one? Psychological Bulletin, 91 (1982), 517–539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamm, H., and Trommsdorff, G. Group versus individual performance on tasks requiring ideational proficiency (brainstorming): a review. European Journal of Social Psychology (1973), 361–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGrath, J. Groups: Interaction and Performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Mullen, B.; Johnson, C.; and Salas, E. Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: a meta-analytic integration. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 12, 1 (1991), 3–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunamaker Jr., J.F.; Dennis, A.R.; Valacich, J.S.; Vogel, D.R.; and George, J.F. Electronic meeting systems to support group work. Communications of the ACM, 34, 7 (1991), 40–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborn, A.F. Applied Imagination. New York: Scribner’s, 1953.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, M. Group Dynamics: The Psychology of Small Group Behavior, 3d ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Shiflett, S. Toward a general model of small group productivity. Psychological Bulletin, 86 (1979), 67–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stasser, G. Information salience and the discovery of hidden profiles by decision-making groups: a “thought experiment”. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 52 (1992), 156–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiner, I.D. Models for inferrring relationships between group size and potential group productivity. Behavioral Science, 11 (1966), 273–283.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Steiner, I.D. Group Process and Productivity. New York: Academic Press, 1972.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, D.; Berry, P.; and Block, C. Does group participation when using brainstorming facilitate or inhibit creative thinking? Administrative Science Quarterly, 3 (1958), 23–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valacich, J.S.; Dennis, A.R.; and Connolly, T. Idea generation in computer-based groups: a new ending to an old story. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 57 (1994), 448–467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valacich, J.S.; Dennis, A.R.; and Nunamaker Jr., J.F. Group size and anonymity effects on computer-mediated idea generation. Small Group Research, 2, 1 (1992), 49–73.
   Google Scholar
• Valacich, J.S.; Mennecke, B.E.; Wachter, R.; and Wheeler, B.C. Computer-mediated idea generation: the effects of group size and group heterogeneity. Proceedings of HICSS, 4 (1993), 152–160.
   Google Scholar
• Van de Ven, A.H., and Delbecq, A.L. Nominal versus interacting group processes for committee decision making. Academy of Management Journal (1971), 203–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yetton, P., and Bottger P. The relationship among group size, member ability, social decision schemes, and performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Performance, 32 (1983), 145–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar