3,471
Views
76
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Web Personalization Cues and Their Differential Effects on User Assessments of Website Value

References

  • Adobe. The state of online advertising - new insights into the beliefs of consumers and professional marketers (global report, regional comparisons). 2013, www.adobe.com/aboutadobe/pressroom/pdfs/Click_Here_Regional_Comparisons.pdf.
  • Adomavicius, G., and Tuzhilin, A. Toward the next generation of recommendation system: A survey of the state-of-the-art and possible extensions IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 17, 6 (2005), 734–749.
  • Agarwal, R., and Dhar, V. Big data, data science, and analytics: The opportunity and challenge for IS research. Information Systems Research, 25, 3 (2014), 443–448.
  • Agarwal, R., and Venkatesh, V. Assessing a firm’s web presence: A heuristic evaluation procedure for the measurement of usability. Information Systems Research, 13, 2 (2002), 168–186.
  • Ansari, A., and Mela, C.F. E-customization. Journal of Marketing Research, 40, 2 (2003), 131–145.
  • Awad, N.F., and Krishnan, M.S. The personalization privacy paradox: An empirical evaluation of information transparency and the willingness to be profiled online for personalization. MIS Quarterly, 30, 1 (2006), 13–28.
  • Baron, R.M., and Kenny, D.A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 6 (1986), 1173–1182.
  • Benbasat, I., and Zmud, R.W. The identity crisis within the IS discipline: Defining and communicating the discipline’s core properties. MIS Quartely, 27, 2 (2003), 183–194.
  • Benlian, A., and Hess, T. The signaling role of IT features in influencing trust and participation in online communities. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 15, 4 (2011), 7–56.
  • Benlian, A.; Titah, R.; and Hess, T. Differential effects of provider recommendations and consumer reviews in e-commerce transactions: An experimental study. Journal of Management Information Systems, 29, 1 (2012), 237–272.
  • Bollen, K.A., and Jackman, R.W. Regression diagnostics: An expository treatment of outliers and influential cases. In J. Fox and J.S. Long (eds.), Modern Methods of Data Analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1990, pp. 257–291.
  • Brown, B.; Sikes, J.; and Willmott, P. Bullish on digital: Mckinsey Global Survey results. McKinsey Quarterly, 12 (August 2013), 1–8.
  • Bush, A.A., and Tiwana, A. Designing sticky knowledge networks. Communications of the ACM, 48, 5 (2005), 66–71.
  • Chellappa, R.K., and Shivendu, S. An economic model of privacy: A property rights approach to regulatory choices for online personalization. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24, 3 (2007), 193–225.
  • Chin, W.W. The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. In G.A. Marcoulides (ed.), Modern Methods for Business Research. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1998, pp. 295–336.
  • Cyr, D. Return visits: A review of how web site design can engender visitor loyalty. Journal of Information Technology, 29, 1 (2014), 1–26.
  • Cyr, D.; Head, M.; Larios, H.; and Bing, P. Exploring human images in website design: A multi-method approach. MIS Quarterly, 33, 3 (2009), 539–566.
  • Dörr, J.; Wagner, T.; Benlian, A.; and Hess, T. Music as a service as an alternative to music piracy? Business and Information Systems Engineering, 5, 6 (2013), 1–14.
  • Eroglu, S.A.; Machleit, K.A.; and Davis, L.M. Empirical testing of a model of online store atmospherics and shopper responses. Psychology and Marketing, 20, 2 (2003), 139–150.
  • Fornell, C., and Larcker, D.F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 1 (1981), 39–50.
  • Franke, N.; Keinz, P.; and Steger, C.J. Testing the value of customization: When do customers really prefer products tailored to their preferences? Journal of Marketing, 73, 5 (2009), 103–121.
  • Franke, N.; Schreier, M.; and Kaiser, U. The “I designed it myself” effect in mass customization. Management Science, 56, 1 (2010), 125–140.
  • Galak, J.; Kruger, J.; and Loewenstein, G. Is variety the spice of life? It all depends on the rate of consumption. Judgment and Decision Making, 6, 3 (2011), 230–238.
  • Goodhue, D.L., and Thompson, R.L. Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Quarterly, 19, 2 (1995), 213–236.
  • Helson, H. Adaption-Level Theory: An Experimental and Systematic Approach to Behavior. New York: Harper and Row, 1964.
  • Ho, S.Y., and Bodoff, D. The effects of web personalization on user attitude and behavior: An integration of the elaboration likelihood model and consumer search theory. MIS Quarterly, 38, 2 (2014), 497–520.
  • Ho, S.Y.; Bodoff, D.; and Tam, K.Y. Timing of adaptive web personalization and its effects on online consumer behavior. Information Systems Research, 22, 3 (2011), 660–679.
  • Hong, W.-C.; Thong, J.Y.L.; and Tam, K.Y. The effects of information format and shopping task on consumers’ online shopping behavior: A cognitive fit perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 21, 3 (2005), 149–184.
  • Hong, W.-C.; Thong, J.Y.L.; and Tam, K.Y. Does animation attract online users’ attention? The effects of flash on information search performance and perceptions. Information Systems Research, 15, 1 (2004), 60–86.
  • Jacoby, J. Stimulus-organism-response reconsidered: An evolutionary step in modeling (consumer) behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 12, 1 (2002), 51–57.
  • Janiszewski, C.; Kuo, A.; and Tavassoli, N.T. The influence of selective attention and inattention to products on subsequent choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 39, 6 (2013), 1258–1274.
  • Jiang, Z., and Benbasat, I. The effects of presentation formats and task complexity on online consumers’ product understanding. MIS Quarterly, 31, 3 (2007), 475–500.
  • Jiang, Z., and Benbasat, I. Investigating the influence Information Systems Research, of the functional mechanisms of online product presentations. 18, 4 (2007), 454–470.
  • Jiang, Z.; Chan, J.; Tan, B.C.Y.; and Chua, W.S. Effects of interactivity on website involvement and purchase intention. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 11, 1 (2010), 34–59.
  • Kahn, B.E. Consumer variety-seeking among goods and services: An integrative review. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 2, 3 (1995), 139–148.
  • Kahneman, D. Attention and Effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1973.
  • Kamis, A.; Koufaris, M.; and Stern, T. Using an attribute-based decision support system for user-customized products online: An experimental investigation. MIS Quarterly, 32, 1 (2008), 159–177.
  • Kim, S.S., and Son, J.-Y. Out of dedication or constraint? A dual model of post-adoption phenomena and its empirical test in the context of online services. MIS Quarterly, 33, 1 (2009), 49–70.
  • Komiak, S.Y.X., and Benbasat, I. The effects of personalization and familiarity on trust and adoption of recommendation agents. MIS Quarterly, 30, 4 (2006), 941–960.
  • Koufaris, M. Applying the technology acceptance model and flow theory to online consumer behavior. Information Systems Research, 13, 2 (2002), 205–223.
  • Koufaris, M.; Kambil, A.; and Labarbera, P.A. Consumer behaviour in web-based commerce: An empirical study. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 6, 2 (2001), 115–138.
  • Kumar, N., and Benbasat, I. The influence of recommendations and consumer reviews on evaluations of websites. Information Systems Research, 17, 4 (2006), 425–439.
  • Kwon, K., and Kim, C. How to design personalization in a context of customer retention: Who personalizes what and to what extent? Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 11, 2 (2012), 101–116.
  • Li, D.; Browne, G.J.; and Wetherbe, J.C. Why do Internet users stick with a specific web site? A relationship perspective. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 10, 4 (2006), 105–141.
  • Li, T., and Unger, T. Willing to pay for quality personalization? Trade-off between quality and privacy. European Journal of Information Systems, 21, 6 (2012), 621–642.
  • Lindell, M.K., and Whitney, D.J. Accounting for common method variance in cross-selectional research designs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 1 (2001), 114–121.
  • Malhotra, N.K.; Kim, S.S.; and Patil, A. Common method variance in is research: A comparison of alternative approaches and a reanalysis of past research. Management Science, 52, 12 (2006), 1865–1883.
  • Marakas, G.M.; Johnson, R.D.; and Clay, P.F. The evolving nature of the computer self-efficacy construct: An empirical investigation of measurement construction, validity, reliability and stability over time. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 8, 1 (2007), 16–46.
  • Mehrabian, A., and Russell, J.A. An Approach to Environmental Psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1974.
  • Menon, S., and Kahn, B.E. Cross-category effects of induced arousal and pleasure on the internet shopping experience. Journal of Retailing, 78, 1 (2002), 4–5.
  • Orlikowski, W.J., and Iacono, C.S. Research commentary: Desperately seeking the “IT” in IT research—A call to theorizing the IT artifact. Informations Systems Research, 12, 2 (2001), 121–134.
  • Palmer, J.W. Web site usability, design, and performance metrics. Information Systems Research, 13, 2 (2002), 151–167.
  • Parboteeah, D.V.; Valacich, J.S.; and Wells, J.D. The influence of website characteristics on a consumer’s urge to buy impulsively. Information Systems Research, 20, 1 (2009), 60–78.
  • Payne, J.W., and Bettman, J.R. Behavioral decision research: A constructive processing perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 43, 1 (1993), 87–131.
  • Podsakoff, P.M.; Mackenzie, S.B.; Lee, J.; and Podsakoff, N.P. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 5 (2003), 879–903.
  • Ringle, C.M.; Wende, S.; and Will, A. SmartPLS 2.0 M3 (beta). University of Hamburg, 2005.
  • Schreier, M. The value increment of mass-customized products: An empirical assessment. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 5, 4 (2006), 317–327.
  • Shadish, W.R.; Cook, T.D.; and Campbell, D.T. Experimental and Quasi-experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 2002.
  • Shin, J., and Ariely, D. Keeping doors open: The effect of unavailability on incentives to keep options viable. Management Science, 50, 5 (2004), 575–586.
  • Simonson, I. Determinants of customers’ responses to customized offers: Conceptual framework and research propositions. Journal of Marketing Research, 69, 1 (2005), 32–45.
  • Siwicki, B. Online sales of full-priced items jump in April. May 12, 2011, www.internetretailer.com/2011/05/12/online-sales-full-priced-items-jump-april-mybuys-finds/.
  • Slovic, P. The construction of preference. American Psychologist, 50, 5 (1995), 364–371.
  • Spool, J. Web Site Usability: A Designer’s Guide. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann, 1999.
  • Sutanto, J.; Palme, E.; Chuan-Hoo, T.; and Chee Wei, P. Addressing the personalization-privacy paradox: An empirical assessment from a field experiment on smartphone users. MIS Quarterly, 37, 4 (2013), 1141–1164.
  • Tam, K.Y., and Ho, S.Y. Web personalization as a persuasion strategy: An elaboration likelihood model perspective. Information Systems Research, 16, 3 (2005), 271–291.
  • Tam, K.Y., and Ho, S.Y. Understanding the impact of web personalization on user information processing and decision outcomes. MIS Quarterly, 30, 4 (2006), 865–890.
  • Tiwana, A., and Bush, A.A. Continuance in expertise-sharing networks: A social perspective. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 52, 1 (2005), 85–101.
  • Van der Heijden, A.H.C. Selective Attention in Vision. New York: Routledge, 1992.
  • Van der Heijden, H. User acceptance of hedonic information systems. MIS Quarterly, 28, 4 (2004), 695–704.
  • Veit, D.J.; Clemons, E.K.; Benlian, A.; Buxmann, P.; Hess, T.; Kundisch, D.; Leimeister, J.M.; Loos, P.; and Spann, M. Business models: An information systems research agenda. Business and Information Systems Engineering, 6, 1 (2014), 45–53.
  • Vessey, I., and Galletta, D. Cognitive fit: An empirical study of information acquisition. Information Systems Research, 2, 1 (1991), 63–84.
  • Voelckner, F. An empirical comparison of methods for measuring consumers’ willingness to pay. Marketing Letters, 17, 2 (2006), 137–149.
  • Wagner, T.; Benlian, A.; and Hess, T. Converting freemium customers from free to premium: The role of the perceived premium fit in the case of music as a service. Electronic Markets, 24, 4 (2014), 259–268.
  • Wang, W., and Benbasat, I. Interactive decision aids for consumer decision making in e-commerce: The influence of perceived strategy restrictiveness. MIS Quarterly, 33, 2 (2009), 293–320.
  • Wang, W., and Benbasat, I. A contingency approach to investigating the effects of user-system interaction modes of online decision aids. Information Systems Research, 24, 3 (2013), 861–876.
  • Wells, J.D.; Valacich, J.S.; and Hess, T.J. What signal are you sending? How website quality influences perceptions of product quality and purchase intentions. MIS Quarterly, 35, 2 (2011), 373–396.
  • Xu, J.; Benbasat, I.; and Cenfetelli, R.T. The nature and consequences of trade-off transparency in the context of recommendation agents. MIS Quarterly, 38, 2 (2014), 379–406.
  • Zhang, P. The affective response model: A theoretical framework of affective concepts and their relationships in the ICT context. MIS Quarterly, 37, 1 (2013), 247–274.
  • Zott, C., and Amit, R. Creating value through business model innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 53, 3 (2012), 41–49.
  • Zwass, V. Co-creation: Toward a taxonomy and an integrated research perspective. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 15, 1 (2010), 11–48.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.